arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Tutte polynomial is a well-studied invariant of graphs and matroids. We first extend the Tutte polynomial from graphs to hypergraphs, and more generally from matroids to polymatroids, as a two-variable polynomial. Our definition is related to previous works of Cameron and Fink and of Kálmán and Postnikov. We then define the universal Tutte polynomial $\T_n$, which is a polynomial of degree $n$ in $2+(2^n-1)$ variables that specializes to the Tutte polynomials of all polymatroids (hence all matroids) on a ground set with $n$ elements. The universal polynomial $\T_n$ admits three kinds of symmetries: translation invariance, $S_n$-invariance, and duality.

We generalize the Tutte polynomial of a matroid to a morphism of matroids via the K-theory of flag varieties. We introduce two different generalizations, and demonstrate that each has its own merits, where the trade-off is between the ease of combinatorics and geometry. One generalization recovers the Las Vergnas Tutte polynomial of a morphism of matroids, which admits a corank-nullity formula and a deletion-contraction recursion. The other generalization does not, but better reflects the geometry of flag varieties.

Employing two models, we show that various counting functions of a random variable defined by restriction or contraction of a ranked set with multiplicity (e.g., classical and arithmetic matroids) have expectations given by the corresponding multivariate Tutte polynomial. The first model is based on a generalization of a convolution formula of Kung (2010), extending from matroids to ranked sets with multiplicities. This model enables us to compute the expectations of many familiar polynomials, such as the chromatic, flow and Ehrhart polynomials, generalizing the classical results of Welsh (1996) on random graphs. The second model is designed to compute the expectations of invariants that are generally not evaluations of the polynomials mentioned above, such as the number of connected components of an intersection of hypersurfaces in an abelian Lie group arrangement, and the number of lattice points in a half-open zonotope. In particular, both models yield new probabilistic interpretations of the arithmetic Tutte polynomial and $G$-Tutte polynomial. A simple, but seems to be new convolution-like formula for the Ehrhart polynomials of lattice zonotopes will also be given.

We show that computing the Tutte polynomial of a linear matroid of dimension $k$ on $k^{O(1)}$ points over a field of $k^{O(1)}$ elements requires $k^{Ω(k)}$ time unless the \#ETH---a counting extension of the Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi [CCC 1999] due to Dell {\em et al.} [ACM TALG 2014]---is false. This holds also for linear matroids that admit a representation where every point is associated to a vector with at most two nonzero coordinates. We also show that the same is true for computing the Tutte polynomial of a binary matroid of dimension $k$ on $k^{O(1)}$ points with at most three nonzero coordinates in each point's vector. This is in sharp contrast to computing the Tutte polynomial of a $k$-vertex graph (that is, the Tutte polynomial of a {\em graphic} matroid of dimension $k$---which is representable in dimension $k$ over the binary field so that every vector has two nonzero coordinates), which is known to be computable in $2^k k^{O(1)}$ time [Björklund {\em et al.}, FOCS 2008]. Our lower-bound proofs proceed via (i) a connection due to Crapo and Rota [1970] between the number of tuples of codewords of full support and the Tutte polynomial of the matroid associated with the code; (ii) an earlier-established \#ETH-hardness of counting the solutions to a bipartite $(d,2)$-CSP on $n$ vertices in $d^{o(n)}$ time; and (iii) new embeddings of such CSP instances as questions about codewords of full support in a linear code. We complement these lower bounds with two algorithm designs. The first design computes the Tutte polynomial of a linear matroid of dimension~$k$ on $k^{O(1)}$ points in $k^{O(k)}$ operations. The second design generalizes the Björklund~{\em et al.} algorithm and runs in $q^{k+1}k^{O(1)}$ time for linear matroids of dimension $k$ defined over the $q$-element field by $k^{O(1)}$ points with at most two nonzero coordinates each.

A {\it tiered graph} $G=(V,E)$ with $m $ tiers is a simple graph with $V\subseteq \brk{n}$, where $\brk{n}=\{1,2,\cdots,n\}$, and with a surjective map $t$ from $V$ to $\brk{m}$ such that if $v$ is a vertex adjacent to $v'$ in $G$ with $v>v'$, then $t(v) >t(v')$. For any ordered partition $p=(p_1,p_2,\cdots,p_m)$ of $n$, let $\sett_p$ denote the set of tiered trees with vertex set $\brk{n}$ and with a map $t: \brk{n}\rightarrow \brk{m}$ such that $|t^{-1}(i)|=p_i$ for all $i=1,2,\ldots,m$. For any $T\in \sett_p$, let $K_T$ denote the complete tiered graph whose vertex set and tiering map are the same as those of $T$. If the edges of $K_T$ are ordered lexicographically by their endpoints, then the weight $w(T)$ of $T$ is the external activity of $T$ in $K_T$, i.e., the number of edges $e\in E(K_{T})\setminus E(T)$ such that $e$ is the least element in the unique cycle determined by $T\cup e$. Let $P_p(q)=\sum_{T\in \sett_{p}}q^{w(T)}$. Dugan, Glennon, Gunnells and Steingrímsson [J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A 164 (2019) pp. 24-49] asked for an elementary proof of the identity $P_p(q)=P_{π(p)}(q)$ for any permutation $π$ of $1,2,\cdots,m$, where $π(p)=p_{π(1)},p_{π(2)},\cdots,p_{π(m)})$. In this article, we will prove an extension of this identity by applying Tutte polynomials. Furthermore, we also provide a proof of the identity $P_{(1,p_1,p_2)}(q)=P_{(p_1+1,p_2+1)}(q)$ via Tutte polynomials.

This article computes the Tutte polynomial of the hyperplane arrangements associated to the complex reflection groups. The calculations are based on both formulas of De Concini and Procesi for Tutte polynomial and the normaliser of parabolic subgroups in complex reflection groups determined by Krishnasamy and Taylor.

This is a survey on the exact complexity of computing the Tutte polynomial. It is the longer 2017 version of Chapter 25 of the CRC Handbook on the Tutte polynomial and related topics, edited by J. Ellis-Monaghan and I. Moffatt, which is due to appear in the first quarter of 2020. In the version to be published in the Handbook the Sections 5 and 6 are shortened and made into a single section.

A graph polynomial $P$ is weakly distinguishing if for almost all finite graphs $G$ there is a finite graph $H$ that is not isomorphic to $G$ with $P(G)=P(H)$. It is weakly distinguishing on a graph property $\mathcal{C}$ if for almost all finite graphs $G\in\mathcal{C}$ there is $H \in \mathcal{C}$ that is not isomorphic to $G$ with $P(G)=P(H)$. We give sufficient conditions on a graph property $\mathcal{C}$ for the characteristic, clique, independence, matching, and domination and $ξ$ polynomials, as well as the Tutte polynomial and its specialisations, to be weakly distinguishing on $\mathcal{C}$. One such condition is to be addable and small in the sense of C. McDiarmid, A. Steger and D. Welsh (2005). Another one is to be of genus at most $k$.

For a quiver $Q$, we take $\mathcal{M}$ an associated toric Nakajima quiver variety and $Γ$ the underlying graph. In this article, we give a direct relation between a specialisation of the Tutte polynomial of $Γ$, the Kac polynomial of $Q$ and the Poincaré polynomial of $\mathcal{M}$. We do this by giving a cell decomposition of $\mathcal{M}$ indexed by spanning trees of $Γ$ and `geometrising' the deletion and contraction operators on graphs. These relations have been previously established by Sturmfels-Hausel and (Crawley-Boovey)-Van den Bergh, however the methods here are more hands-on.

In this work, we study matroids over a domain and several classical combinatorial and algebraic invariants related. We define their Grothendieck-Tutte polynomial $T_{\mathcal{M}}(x,y)$, extending the definition given by Fink and Moci in 2016, and we show that such polynomial has the classical deletion-contraction property. Moreover, we study the set of independencies for a realizable matroid over a domain, generalizing the definition of \emph{poset of torsions} $Gr(\mathcal{M})$ given by the second author in 2017. This is a union of identical simplicial posets as for (quasi-)arithmetic matroids. The new notions harmonize naturally through the face module $N_\mathcal{M}$ of the matroid over a domain. Whenever $Gr(\mathcal{M})$ is a finite poset, the Hilbert series $N_\mathcal{M}(t)$ of its face module is a specialization of the Tutte polynomial $T_{\mathcal{M}}(x,y)$. Further, for arrangements of codimension-one abelian subvarities of an elliptic curve admitting complex multiplication, we extend certain results of Bibby and we provide an algebraic interpretation of the elliptic Tutte polynomial.

Following Britz, Johnsen, Mayhew and Shiromoto, we consider demi\-ma\-troids as a(nother) natural generalization of matroids. As they have shown, demi\-ma\-troids are the appropriate combinatorial objects for studying Wei's duality. Our results here apport further evidence about the trueness of that observation. We define the Hamming polynomial of a demimatroid $M$, denoted by $W(x,y,t)$, as a generalization of the extended Hamming weight enumerator of a matroid. The polynomial $W(x,y,t)$ is a specialization of the Tutte polynomial of $M$, and actually is equivalent to it. Guided by work of Johnsen, Roksvold and Verdure for matroids, we prove that Betti numbers of a demimatroid and its elongations determine the Hamming polynomial. Our results may be applied to simplicial complexes since in a canonical way they can be viewed as demimatroids. Furthermore, following work of Brylawski and Gordon, we show how demimatroids may be generalized one step further, to combinatroids. A combinatroid, or Brylawski structure, is an integer valued function $ρ$, defined over the power set of a finite ground set, satisfying the only condition $ρ(\emptyset)=0$. Even in this extreme generality, we will show that many concepts and invariants in coding theory can be carried on directly to combinatroids, say, Tutte polynomial, characteristic polynomial, MacWilliams identity, extended Hamming polynomial, and the $r$-th generalized Hamming polynomial; this last one, at least conjecturelly, guided by the work of Jurrius and Pellikaan for linear codes. All this largely extends the notions of deletion, contraction, duality and codes to non-matroidal structures.

Unlike Whitney's definition of the corank-nullity generating function $T(G;x+1,y+1)$, Tutte's definition of his now eponymous polynomial $T(G;x,y)$ requires a total order on the edges of which the polynomial is a posteriori independent. Tutte presented his definition in terms of internal and external activities of maximal spanning forests. Although Tutte's original definition may appear somewhat ad hoc upon first inspection, subsequent work by various researchers has demonstrated that activity is a deep combinatorial concept. In this survey, we provide an introduction to activities for graphs and matroids. Our primary goal is to survey several notions of activity for graphs which admit expansions of the Tutte polynomial. Additionally, we describe some fundamental structural theorems, and outline connections to the topological notion of shellability as well as several topics in algebraic combinatorics.

Morphisms of matroids are combinatorial abstractions of linear maps and graph homomorphisms. We introduce the notion of basis for morphisms of matroids, and show that its generating function is strongly log-concave. As a consequence, we obtain a generalization of Mason's conjecture on the $f$-vectors of independent subsets of matroids to arbitrary morphisms of matroids. To establish this, we define multivariate Tutte polynomials of morphisms of matroids, and show that they are Lorentzian in the sense of [BH19] for sufficiently small positive parameters.

We associate two modules, the $G$-parking critical module and the toppling critical module, to an undirected connected graph $G$. The $G$-parking critical module and the toppling critical module are canonical modules (with suitable twists) of quotient rings of the well-studied $G$-parking function ideal and the toppling ideal, respectively. For each critical module, we establish a Tutte-like short exact sequence relating the modules associated to $G$, an edge contraction $G/e$ and an edge deletion $G \setminus e$ ($e$ is a non-bridge). We obtain purely combinatorial consequences of Tutte short exact sequences. For instance, we reprove a theorem of Merino that the critical polynomial of a graph is an evaluation of its Tutte polynomial, and relate the vanishing of certain combinatorial invariants (the number of acyclic orientations on connected partition graphs satisfying a unique sink property) of $G/e$ to the equality of the corresponding invariants of $G$ and $G \setminus e$.

We introduce the ``trivariate Tutte polynomial" of a signed graph as an invariant of signed graphs up to vertex switching that contains among its evaluations the number of proper colorings and the number of nowhere-zero flows. In this, it parallels the Tutte polynomial of a graph, which contains the chromatic polynomial and flow polynomial as specializations. The number of nowhere-zero tensions (for signed graphs they are not simply related to proper colorings as they are for graphs) is given in terms of evaluations of the trivariate Tutte polynomial at two distinct points. Interestingly, the bivariate dichromatic polynomial of a biased graph, shown by Zaslavsky to share many similar properties with the Tutte polynomial of a graph, does not in general yield the number of nowhere-zero flows of a signed graph. Therefore the ``dichromate" for signed graphs (our trivariate Tutte polynomial) differs from the dichromatic polynomial (the rank-size generating function). The trivariate Tutte polynomial of a signed graph can be extended to an invariant of ordered pairs of matroids on a common ground set -- for a signed graph, the cycle matroid of its underlying graph and its frame matroid form the relevant pair of matroids. This invariant is the canonically defined Tutte polynomial of matroid pairs on a common ground set in the sense of a recent paper of Krajewski, Moffatt and Tanasa, and was first studied by Welsh and Kayibi as a four-variable linking polynomial of a matroid pair on a common ground set.

We study the class of Lorentzian polynomials. The class contains homogeneous stable polynomials as well as volume polynomials of convex bodies and projective varieties. We prove that the Hessian of a nonzero Lorentzian polynomial has exactly one positive eigenvalue at any point on the positive orthant. This property can be seen as an analog of Hodge--Riemann relations for Lorentzian polynomials. Lorentzian polynomials are intimately connected to matroid theory and negative dependence properties. We show that matroids, and more generally M-convex sets, are characterized by the Lorentzian property, and develop a theory around Lorentzian polynomials. In particular, we provide a large class of linear operators that preserve the Lorentzian property and prove that Lorentzian measures enjoy several negative dependence properties. We also prove that the class of tropicalized Lorentzian polynomials coincides with the class of M-convex functions in the sense of discrete convex analysis. The tropical connection is used to produce Lorentzian polynomials from M-convex functions. We give two applications of the general theory. First, we prove that the homogenized multivariate Tutte polynomial of a matroid is Lorentzian whenever the parameter q satisfies $0 < q \le 1$. Consequences are proofs of the strongest Mason's conjecture from 1972 and negative dependence properties of the random cluster model model in statistical physics. Second, we prove that the multivariate characteristic polynomial of an M-matrix is Lorentzian. This refines a result of Holtz who proved that the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of an M-matrix form an ultra log-concave sequence.

We establish a relation between the trace evaluation in SO(3) topological quantum field theory and evaluations of a topological Tutte polynomial. As an application, a generalization of the Tutte golden identity is proved for graphs on the torus.

The Tutte polynomial is originally a bivariate polynomial enumerating the colorings of a graph and of its dual graph. But it reveals more of the internal structure of the graph like its number of forests, of spanning subgraphs, and of acyclic orientations. In 2007, Ardila extended the notion of Tutte polynomial to the hyperplane arrangements, and computed the Tutte polynomials of the classical root systems for a certain prime power of the first variable. In this article, we compute Tutte polynomials of ideal arrangements. Those arrangements were introduced in 2006 by Sommers and Tymoczko, and are defined for ideals of root systems. For the ideals of the classical root systems, we bring a slight improvement of the finite field method showing that it can applied on any finite field whose cardinality is not a minor of the matrix associated to a hyperplane arrangement. Computing the minor set associated to an ideal of a classical root system permits us particularly to deduce the Tutte polynomials of the classical root systems. For the ideals of the exceptional root systems of type $G_2$, $F_4$, and $E_6$, we use the formula of Crapo.

We prove that the Hessians of nonzero partial derivatives of the (homogenous) multivariate Tutte polynomial of any matroid have exactly one positive eigenvalue on the positive orthant when $0<q\leq 1$. Consequences are proofs of the strongest conjecture of Mason and negative dependence properties for $q$-state Potts model partition functions.

Matroids are ubiquitous in modern combinatorics. As discovered by Gelfand, Goresky, MacPherson and Serganova there is a beautiful connection between matroid theory and the geometry of Grassmannians: realizable matroids correspond to torus orbits in Grassmannians. Further, as observed by Fink and Speyer general matroids correspond to classes in the $K$-theory of Grassmannians. This yields in particular a geometric description of the Tutte polynomial. In this review we describe all these constructions in detail, and moreover we generalise some of them to polymatroids. More precisely, we study the class of flag matroids and their relations to flag varieties. In this way, we obtain an analogue of the Tutte polynomial for flag matroids.