arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is $F$-saturated if $G$ contains no copy of $F$ but $G+e$ contains a copy of $F$ for every missing edge $e$ of $G$. The saturation number $\sat(n,F)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $F$-saturated graph. Motivated by a problem posed by Faudree, Ferrara, Gould, and Jacobson concerning $K_p\cup K_q\cup K_{q+1}$, we determine the saturation number and the unique extremal graph for $K_p\cup K_q\cup K_r$ whenever $2\le p\le q<r<p+q$ and $n$ is sufficiently large. Together with the previously known results for $r\ge p+q$ and for $r=q$, this completes the determination of the saturation number and the extremal graphs for unions of three cliques, for all sufficiently large $n$.

We study automorphism groups in five extremal families of polyhedral graphs. For every $n\ge14$, we prove that every minimum-order $3$-polytopal graph containing a vertex of each degree $3,4,\ldots,n$ is asymmetric. The proof uses an exact planar defect decomposition, a complete description of the high-degree tail, and a saturation theorem for the subgraph induced by the uniquely high-degree vertices. Duality gives the corresponding asymmetry result for minimum-face polyhedra containing faces of every size $3,4,\ldots,n$. For the three polyhedral graphs whose complements are also polyhedral, we determine the ordinary and extended automorphism groups and identify the extended group \[ \mathsf{Aut}^{\pm}(G_{13})\cong (C_2\times C_2)\rtimes C_4. \] Next, we classify automorphism groups of radius-one polyhedra. In the unique-dominating-vertex case they are cyclic or dihedral, and in the triangulated case the possibilities are \[ 1,\qquad C_2,\qquad C_3,\qquad C_2\times C_2,\qquad S_3. \] For polyhedra that are unigraphic among the class of self-dual, we show that their automorphism group is either $1$ or $C_2$. Finally, we consider polyhedra that are products of graphs, for each of the four standard graph products, and we classify them according to their automorphism group.

Let $A(n,d,w)$ denote the maximum size of a binary constant-weight code of length $n$, minimum distance $d$, and weight $w$. We construct explicit codes proving $A(23,6,10)\ge 2979$ and $A(24,6,10)\ge 4214$. These improve the best surviving explicit codes of sizes 2969 and 4174 and surpass the corresponding 1990 bounds 2970 and 4200 of Brouwer, Shearer, Sloane and Smith, whose code listings were lost. We also obtain $A(23,6,11)\ge 3539$ and $A(24,6,8)\ge 1855$. All four bounds are now listed in Brouwer's online table. The constructions use a coordinate decomposition in which one half is fixed to a known code and the complementary half is selected from its full cross-compatible pool using CHILS for maximum-weight independent set. For the 2969-word $A(23,6,10)$ incumbent, exact computations with two solver families prove insertion maximality and exclude every improving exchange deleting at most three codewords. We also analyze codes invariant under prime-order permutations: several cycle types are excluded exactly, the $5+1^{18}$ type has upper bound 499, and reproducible heuristic saturation evidence is reported for the remaining types, with $13+1^{10}$ left open. Code files, an independent validator, model descriptions, and computational logs are released.

For graphs $F$ and $H$, a spanning subgraph $G$ of $F$ is weakly $H$-saturated in $F$ if the edges in $E(F)\setminus E(G)$ can be added one at a time, each addition creating a new copy of $H$. Recently, Tancer and Tyomkyn proved that, given an $n$-vertex graph $F$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,K_3)=n-1$ is NP-hard. In this paper, we study the decision version of the weak saturation problem and show that, for every fixed integer $r\ge 3$, given a graph $F$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,H)\le k$ is NP-complete when $H\in\{K_r,K_{r,r}\}$. Our approach uses new graph-theoretic and topological ideas and techniques, yielding new constructions that build on the construction of Tancer and Tyomkyn. In particular, our proofs further reveal a connection between weak saturation and the flag-no-square property, a fundamental property in topology that is of independent interest.

A graph $G$ is said to be $F$-semi-saturated if the addition of any nonedge $e \not \in E(G)$ would create a new copy of $F$ in $G+e$. The semi-saturation number $ssat(n,F)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $F$-semi-saturated graph of order $n$. In this paper we investigate the semi-saturation number of $K_r$ on $n$ vertices with maximal degree at most $Δ$, denoted by $ssat^Δ(n,K_r)$. This investigation was suggested by Erd\H os, Rényi and Sós, who in 1966 considered the graph of diameter 2 with degree restrictions, equivalently $ssat^Δ(n,K_3)$. The following are some of our results. For arbitrary $r \geq 4$, we show that the limit $ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} ssat^{cn}(n,K_r)/n$ exists for all $0 < c \leq 1$, except for some sparse values of $c$ contained in a countable and rational sequence $c_i \rightarrow 0$. Moreover, we establish the asymptotic behaviour of this limit for $\frac{r}{r+2} < c <1$ and determine the exact value of $ssat^Δ(n,K_r)$ for some specific $Δ$. As an application, we determine the relation between the saturation number of the join graph $K_r \vee F$ and that of $F$ for a large class of pairs $(r,F)$.

A graph $G$ is $\mathcal F$-saturated if $G$ contains no member of $\mathcal F$, but the addition of any non-edge creates a copy of a member of $\mathcal F$. For $m\ge 1$, let $(m+1)K_3$ denote the vertex-disjoint union of $(m+1)$ triangles. In this paper, we study $(m+1)K_3$-saturated graphs. We construct a family of $(m+1)K_3$-saturated graphs which gives the uniform upper bound $\operatorname{sat}((m+1)K_3,n)=O(n^{3/2})$ for all $m\ge 1$ and $n\ge 3m+3$. For general $(m+1)K_p$-saturated graphs, Faudree et al. determined $\operatorname{sat}((m+1)K_p, n)$ for sufficiently large $n$. In the case of $p=3$, we lower Faudree's threshold from $n \ge 12m + 3$ to $n\ge 9m+5$ and prove that $\operatorname{sat}((m+1)K_3,n)=n+6m-1.$ We also provide two structural restrictions on the components obtained after deleting all vertices of degree $|V(G)|-1$ from an $(m+1)K_3$-saturated graph.

For which graphs $H$ does there exist a graph $G$ with at least one edge and no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$, such that deleting any edge of $G$ creates an induced copy of $H$? We call such a graph "$H$-deletion-saturated". This version of the well-studied notion of "$H$-induced-saturated" graphs -- where both adding and deleting any edge creates an induced copy of $H$ -- appears more tractable. For example, while it remains wide open whether $H$-induced-saturated graphs exist for every even cycle $H$, we proved recently that deletion-saturated graphs exist for all even cycles. In fact, apart from complete graphs, no graph $H$ is known for which $H$-deletion-saturated graphs do not exist. We conjecture that $H$-deletion-saturated graphs exist for every non-complete graph $H$, and prove this conjecture for several types of graphs, including: complete bipartite graphs with parts of unequal size, triangle-free graphs with one cycle, graphs with two leaves at distance at most three, and line graphs of trees. In fact, in all cases, we prove the conjecture for substantially more general families. We also verify our conjecture for every graph $H$ on at most six vertices.

Let $H$ be a graph. A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if $G$ is $H$-free, but adding any edge between two non-adjacent vertices of $G$ yields an $H$-copy as a subgraph. The saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n, H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $H$-saturated graph on $n$ vertices. The saturation number for the join of a vertex and a graph $F$, denoted by $K_1\vee F$, has attracted considerable attention. Cameron and Puleo [Discrete Math. 345 (2022), 112867] proved that $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)\le n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ for $n > |V(F)|$. A natural question is when the above equality holds. Most existing results impose conditions on $F$ and assume that $F$ has no isolated vertices. Let $K_p^-$ be the graph obtained by deleting one edge from the complete graph $K_p$. In this paper, we investigate the saturation number of $K_1\vee F$ when $F$ contains isolated vertices, and determine the exact value of $\mathrm{sat}(n, K_1\vee F)$ when $F=K^-_{3}\cup sK_1(s\ge 1)$ or $F=K^-_{p-1}\cup K_1(p\ge 5)$. In our results, $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)= n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ holds when $F=K^-_{3}\cup sK_1$ for any $s\ge 1$, but fails when $F=K^-_{p-1}\cup K_1$ for $p\ge 5$.

A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if $G$ contains no $H$-copy as a subgraph, but adding any edge between two non-adjacent vertices in $G$ creates a copy of $H$. The saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $H$-saturated graph. Saturation number for the join of a vertex and a graph $F$, denoted by $K_1\vee F$, has received considerable attention. Cameron and Puleo [Discrete Math. 345 (2022), 112867] showed that $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)\le n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ for all $n > |V(F)|$. A natural question is to ask when the above equality holds. Existing results for $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)$ always constrain that a non-empty graph $F$ contains no isolated vertex. In this paper, we investigate the saturation number of $K_1\vee F$ when a non-empty graph $F$ contains an isolated vertex. We first determine the saturation number for $K_1\vee F$ when $F=K_{p-1}\cup K_1$. When $p=3$, we extend the result to any number of isolated vertices, and determine the saturation number for $K_1\vee F$ when $F=K_{2}\cup qK_1$, or $F=2K_{2}\cup qK_1$ for any $q\ge 1$. Moreover, all minimum saturated graphs are fully characterized. In our results, $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)= n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ holds when $F=K_2\cup qK_1$, or $F=2K_2\cup qK_1$ for any $q\ge 1$; but fails when $F=K_{p-1}\cup K_1$ for $p\ge 4$.

For a graph $G$ put $h_r(G)=\max{χ(H):H\subseteq G,\operatorname{girth}(H)\ge r}.$ Erdős and Hajnal asked whether $h_r(G)\to\infty$ as $χ(G)\to\infty$, for every fixed $r\ge4$. We prove this in every fixed polynomial edge-density regime: for all $r\ge4$, $k\ge2$, $P,C>0$, there is $M=M_{r,k}(P,C)$ such that $χ(G)\ge M,\ e(G)\le Cχ(G)^P\Longrightarrow h_r(G)\ge k.$ Quantitatively, after replacing $P$ by $P\vee2$ and $C$ by $C\vee2$, $M_{r,k}(P,C)\le \exp!\left(O_{r,k}\bigl((P+2+\log(C\vee2))^2\bigr)\right),$ and consequently the same conclusion holds throughout the quasi-polynomial range $e(G)\le \exp\bigl(C_0(\logχ(G))^a\bigr),\ 1 < a < 3/2,$ for all sufficiently large $χ(G)$. In each fixed polynomial-density regime we also obtain $f_{P,C}(k,r)\le k^{O_{r,P,C}(1)}.$ The proof combines a chromatic-defect random extraction lemma, compact and near-quadratic sparse-core bases, and a peeling/thinning bootstrap increasing the admissible edge exponent by $1/(r-1)$. We also prove structural saturation results for possible counterexamples, including Moore-strength exact-cycle packings and quadratic saturation in projected colour-pair space. Finally, writing $h_r^{\mathrm f}(G)=\max{χ_{\mathrm f}(H):H\subseteq G,\operatorname{girth}(H)\ge r},$ we develop a fractional random-extraction framework based on Mohar-Wu preservation. We prove sufficient cheap-cycle-killing criteria and verify them for several structured families, including clique-organised families, line graphs of incidence graphs of equal-order generalized quadrangles and generalized hexagons, and the Bohman-Keevash tracking-time triangle-free-process graph. We also isolate a density-free obstruction that any proof using this fractional surgery route must overcome.

The saturation number $μ^*(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a maximal matching, and $H(G)$ is its harmonic index. TxGraffiti conjectured in 2023 that $μ^*(G) \le H(G)$ for every nontrivial connected graph $G$, and Bıyıkoğlu refuted this by showing that the ratio $μ^*(G)/H(G)$ can be made arbitrarily large. Restricting to trees bounds the ratio sharply. Every nontrivial tree $T$ satisfies $μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, with the constant $3/2$ best possible. A complementary bound $H(G) < 4μ^*(G)$ holds for every graph with an edge, so on a nontrivial tree the saturation number is pinned to $\frac{1}{4} H(T) < μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, both constants best possible. The friendship graph $F_4$ is a smallest counterexample to the conjecture, on nine vertices, and the smallest tree counterexample is the subdivided star on eleven vertices. For each positive integer $m$ a family of graphs with $m$ hubs has ratio approaching $m+1$, while the conjecture holds whenever all vertices have equal degree. Both invariants arise in applications, the harmonic index as a molecular descriptor and the saturation number as a measure of adsorption inefficiency, and the bounds estimate the latter, which is NP-hard to compute, by the former, which is computable in linear time.

For a clique $K_r$, a graph is $K_r$-saturated if it contains no copy of $K_r$ and the addition of any edge from its complement creates a $K_r$. A classical result of Erdős-Hajnal-Moon and Zykov shows that the number of edges of an $n$-vertex $K_r$-saturated graph is at least $(r-2)n-\binom{r-1}{2}$. In this paper, we focus on the number of edges of the $K_r$-saturated graphs with a fixed matching number. Let $G$ be an $n$-vertex $K_r$-saturated graph with matching number $ν(G) = s$. For sufficiently large $n$, we prove that the number of edges \begin{equation*} e(G)\geq \left\{\begin{array}{cl}{(r-1)n-\frac{r}{2}(r-1)-1,}&{\quad\mathrm{if}~s=r-1;}\\{(r-1)n + (s-r)^2 - \frac{1}{2}(r+2)(r-3) - 5,}&{\quad\mathrm{if}~s>r-1.}\\\end{array}\right. \end{equation*} Moreover, we completely characterize the graphs attaining the equality.

For a full-rank integral lattice $\mathcal{L}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, Regev and Stephens-Davidowitz proved that \[N_{=k}(\mathcal{L}):=|\{y\in\mathcal{L}:\lVert y\rVert^2=k\}|\le 2\binom{n+2k-2}{2k-1}.\] We classify the equality cases. For $n\ge2$, equality holds if and only if either $k=1$ and $\mathcal{L}\cong\mathbb{Z}^n$, or $n=8$, $k=2$, and $\mathcal{L}\cong E_8$. For $n=1$, equality holds exactly when $\mathcal{L}$ represents $k$. The proof shows that equality is rigid. Saturation of the shell bound forces the normalized norm-$k$ shell to be an antipodal tight spherical $(4k-1)$-design. The associated Delsarte--Goethals--Seidel annihilator polynomial gives an arithmetic root condition, which isolates $E_8$ at $k=2$, rules out $k=3$, and combines with the Bannai--Damerell/Bannai theorem and an elementary circle argument to exclude all remaining cases in dimension at least $2$.

For a given graph $F$, a graph $G$ is said to be $F$-saturated if $G$ contains no copy of $F$ but for any edge $uv\notin E(G)$, $G+uv$ contains a copy of $F$. The saturation number $sat(n,F)$ is defined as the minimum number of edges among all $n$-vertex $F$-saturated graphs. The virus graph $K^s_t$, where $s\geq0$ and $t\geq \max\{3,s\}$, is a graph of order $s+t$ constructed by attaching $s$ distinct leaves to $s$ different vertices of a complete graph $K_t$. Hua and Peng [Discrete Math. 349 (2026) 114674] determined $sat(n,K^2_3)$ and characterized its corresponding extremal graphs. In this paper, we determine $sat(n,K^3_3)$ and $sat(n,K^2_t)$ with $t\geq 4$, together with the structural descriptions of the related extremal saturated graphs.

For a permutation $u\in S_n$, let $N\ast u\in S_{Nn}$ be the permutation with scaled Lehmer code. For given $u,v,w\in S_n$ and integer $N$, the stretched Schubert coefficients are defined as $f_{u,v,w}(N):=c_{N*u,N*v}^{N*w}$. Our main result is that the function $f_{u,v,w}(N)$ is eventually quasi-polynomial. This proves Kirillov's conjecture (2004), that the generating function for the sequence $\{f_{u,v,w}(N)\}$ is rational. For the proof, we use combinatorics of pipe dreams to show that Schubert coefficients are given as an alternating sum of the numbers of integer points in certain polytopes. These polytopes behave nicely under stretching, and we use Ehrhart theory to obtain the result. As a consequence of the proof, we also present new counterexamples to the saturation conjecture for Schubert coefficients, and give computational applications.

Given a finite poset $\mathcal P$, how small can a family $\mathcal F$ of subsets of $[n]$ be such that $\mathcal F$ does not contain an induced copy of $\mathcal P$, but $\mathcal F\cup\{X\}$ contains such a copy for all $X\in\mathcal P([n])\setminus\mathcal F$? This is known as the induced saturation number of $\mathcal P$, denoted by $\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal P)$. The main conjecture in the area is that the induced saturation number for any poset is either bounded, or linear. In this paper we establish linearity for the induced saturation number of the 4-point poset $\mathcal N$. Previously, it was known that $2\sqrt n\leq\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal N)\leq 2n$. We show that $\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal N)\geq\frac{n+6}{4}$. A crucial role in the proof is played by a structural feature of $\mathcal N$-saturated families, namely that if the family contains two antichains, one completely above the other, then it must also contain a `middle' point -- greater than one antichain and less than the other.

Solutions to the Markov equation appear in many mathematical contexts. We aim to build on the understanding of them by proving a recent conjecture about Markov polynomials; solutions to a generalised version of the Markov equation. The proof we provide is a constructive argument based on the Markov snake graph, a combinatorial object related to Markov numbers, deepening the connection between the Markov equation and combinatorics.

Set $[n]=\{1, 2, \ldots , n\}$. The hypergrid $[t]^n$ is the collection of functions $f: \ [n]\rightarrow [t]$. We equip it with the natural partial order by letting $f\leq g$ whenever $f(x)\leq g(x)$ holds for all $x\in [n]$. Given a poset $P$ which can be embedded as an induced subposet of $[t]^n$, the induced poset saturation function $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)$ denotes the minimum size of a subset of $[t]^n$ that is both induced $P$-free and induced $P$-saturated. We show that for all $t\geq 2$, $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)$ satisfies a dichotomy: for every poset $P$, either there exists a constant $C_P$ such that $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)=C_P$ for all $n$ sufficiently large, or $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)=Ω(\sqrt{n})$. We also show chains fall in the former part of the dichotomy, while posets with the unique twin cover property fall in the latter part. These contributions generalize a number of results obtained by various authors in the hypercube ($t=2$) setting; the transition to the hypergrid setting provides novel challenges, however, and requires some new ideas.

The immanants of combinatorial matrices have many significant properties, including m-positivity and Schur positivity. While the immanants of Jacobi-Trudi matrices are known to be both m-positive and Schur positive, those of Giambelli matrices have only been proven to be m-positive, with Schur positivity remaining a conjecture. These positivity properties rely heavily on lattice path interpretations. In this paper, we study the Newton polytopes of immanants for these two classes of matrices. Using the lattice path method, we verify the saturation property for the Newton polytopes of Jacobi-Trudi matrices in special cases. For Giambelli matrices, we prove that this property holds for all immanants. To achieve this, we obtain the explicit coefficients of the largest monomial (in the dominance order) in the monomial expansion of the immanants of Giambelli matrices.

Given an $r$-uniform hypergraph $H$ and a positive integer $n$, the weak saturation number $\mathrm{wsat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph $F$ on $n$ vertices such that the missing edges in $F$ can be added, one at a time, so that each added edge creates a copy of $H$. For the case of graphs ($r = 2$), asymptotically optimal general lower bounds for these numbers in terms of the minimum vertex degree of $H$ are known. In this work, we generalize these bounds to the case of hypergraphs and establish their asymptotic optimality. To prove this, we introduce a lower bound method based on polymatroids. This method generalizes a linear algebraic method but, unlike the original version, makes it possible to derive lower bounds with non-integer asymptotic coefficients.