arXiv++ Combinatorics

A majority coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring of $G$ in which no vertex has more than half of its neighbors colored with its own color. The least number of colors required for a majority coloring of $G$ is the majority chromatic number $μ(G)$. The majority coloring game, introduced by Bosek et al. (2019), is a two-player Maker-Breaker-type game where the players alternately color vertices while maintaining the majority condition at each vertex; the least number of colors required for the first player to have a winning strategy on $G$ is the majority game chromatic number $μ_g(G)$. In contrast with the static case, Bosek et al. show that $μ_g(G)$ is unbounded in general, while $μ_g(G)\le col_g(G)$, where $col_g(G)$ is the game coloring number of $G$. It is known (cf. Faigle et al. (1993)) that, for any acyclic graph $G$, $col_g(G) \leq 4$, so $μ_g(G) \leq 4$ as well. We improve this bound by showing that $μ_g(G) \leq 3$ for any acyclic graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $4$. We also show that $μ_g(G) = 2$ if $G$ is a nonempty path, star, or complete graph, or a disjoint union of such graphs. These improve the results of Bosek et al. We also initiate the study of the computational complexity of the pre-coloring extension problem for the static and game versions of majority coloring. We show that the Majority $k$-precoloring Extension problem is NP-complete for each $k \geq 2$. When $k = 2$, it remains NP-complete on the class of bipartite graphs where maximum degrees of each part are $5$ and $6$, and when $k = 3$ it remains NP-complete on the class of $12$-regular planar graphs. We show that the game version is PSPACE-complete, even when the number of colors $k=χ(G)$, and even when $k=2$ and $G$ is a bipartite graph in which one part has maximum degree equal to $9$. The results on the game versions also hold for the variation where Bob starts the game.

We prove that deciding whether a graph has lettericity at most k is NP-complete, even for four-colorable comparability graphs. Our reduction maps a bipartite graph G to the graph obtained from its incidence graph by inflating each vertex by a clique or an independent set of three vertices. The lettericity of this graph is determined by the numbers of vertices and edges of G and the greatest number of edge-disjoint paths on four vertices in G. Teypaz and Rapine showed that deciding whether the edges of a bipartite graph can be partitioned into paths on four vertices is NP-complete.

A $k$-bend path is a non-self-intersecting polyline that lies on a grid and consists of at most $k+1$ axis-parallel line segments. A $B_k$-CPG graph is a graph whose vertices can be represented by pairwise interiorly disjoint $k$-bend paths on a grid such that two vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding grid paths touch at a grid point. We prove that recognizing planar $B_0$-CPG graphs of maximum degree 8 is NP-complete, and that recognizing planar $B_1$-CPG graphs of maximum degree 11 is NP-complete. These results settle two of the three planar recognition problems left open by Champseix, Galby, Munaro, and Ries.

A reduced word of the longest permutation $w_0\in S_m$, taken up to commutations, encodes a wiring diagram of $m$ pseudolines, and a braid move $σ_iσ_{i+1}σ_i\leftrightarrowσ_{i+1}σ_iσ_{i+1}$ flips one of its triangles. We prove that deciding whether two wiring diagrams are within a given braid-move distance is NP-complete. Equivalently, deciding flip distance is NP-complete in the higher Bruhat order $B(m,2)$, for triangle flips of marked arrangements of pseudolines, and for rhombic tilings of a $2m$-gon; this answers an open question on flip graphs of pseudoline arrangements (SODA 2024). The reduction is from Vertex Cover: for every graph $G$ we construct two wiring diagrams at braid-move distance $|D|+2\,\mathrm{VC}(G)$, where $\mathrm{VC}(G)$ is the vertex cover number of $G$ and the Hamming distance $|D|$ is the number of triples of wires whose triangles are oriented differently. The construction glues copies of a seven-wire gadget whose braid-move distance exceeds its Hamming distance by $2$; flipping either of two disjoint triangles in both diagrams removes the excess. Adding a line at infinity transfers the construction to rank-$3$ uniform oriented matroids, where two oriented matroids are adjacent in the mutation graph if their chirotopes differ in one basis; so deciding mutation distance is NP-complete in rank $3$. An iterate of Rambau's expansion of signotopes amplifies the excess and gives NP-hardness in every fixed rank $r\ge 4$. By duality we obtain the corresponding results for every fixed corank at least $3$. The same instances show that flip distance in the higher Bruhat orders $B(n,k)$ is NP-complete for every fixed $k\ge 2$.

A strong odd $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper $k$-coloring such that every color appearing in the neighborhood of a non-isolated vertex appears an odd number of times. The minimum $k$ for which $G$ admits a strong odd $k$-coloring is the \emph{strong odd chromatic number}, denoted by $χ_{\text{so}}(G)$, of $G$. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, \textsc{strong odd $k$-colorability} problem asks whether $G$ admits a strong odd $k$-coloring. It is known that STRONG ODD $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete in general graphs. In this paper, we prove that the problem is NP-complete on perfect elimination bipartite graphs for $k\geq3$, which is a subclass of bipartite graphs. Furthermore, we show that $χ_{\text{so}}(G)$ is inapproximable within a factor of $O(n^{\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon})$ for every $\varepsilon>0$. On the positive side, we obtain a linear time algorithm to compute an optimal strong odd coloring for block graphs. From a parameterized perspective, we present an FPT algorithm for STRONG ODD $k$-COLORABILITY when parameterized by treewidth. Moreover, we show that the problem cannot be solved in time $(k-\varepsilon)^{\texttt{tw}}n^{O(1)}$ for every $k\geq3$ and $\varepsilon>0$ when parameterized by treewidth under SETH. Furthermore, we show that STRONG ODD $k$-COLORABILITY does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by feedback vertex set. Lastly, we prove that STRONG ODD $k$-COLORABILITY is W[1]-hard when parameterized by clique-width.

A majority coloring of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is a coloring of $V(G)$ such that, for each vertex $v$, the number of neighbors of $v$ with the same color as $v$ is at most $deg(v)/2$. A strong majority coloring is a coloring of $V(G)$ such that, for each vertex $v$, every monochromatic subset of $N(v)$ has size at most $deg(v)/2$. The (strong) majority coloring game is a two-player Maker-Breaker-type game, in which two players Alice and Bob color the vertices of a graph $G$ alternately, maintaining the (strong) majority condition. The least number of colors such that Alice has a winning strategy in such a game is called the (strong) majority game chromatic number of the graph $G$, denoted $μ_g(G)$ (or $\mathrm{Maj}_g(G)$ for the strong version). For the majority coloring game, we prove that $μ_g(G) \le 3$ under the following cases: $G$ is a $2$-caterpillar, $G$ is a rooted tree with all leaves at depth $k \le 4$, and $G$ is a subdivision of some graph. The latter resolves a problem posed by Bosek--Grytczuk--Jakóbczak in 2019, who also asked whether $μ_g(T) \le 3$ for every tree $T$. For the latter question, we discuss various difficulties that arise when natural strategies are attempted by Alice to win the majority coloring game on trees. We include a comparison with the marking game and relaxed coloring game on trees, and with the majority coloring game on locally finite acyclic graphs $G$ with $δ(G) > 1$. For the strong majority coloring game, we compute $\mathrm{Maj}_g(C_n)$ exactly for each cycle $C_n$, $n \ge 3$. We also initiate the study of the computational complexity of the strong majority coloring game; specifically, we prove that the decision version of the Strong Majority Game Chromatic Number problem is PSPACE-complete. We also show that the Strong Majority 2-Coloring problem is NP-complete on Eulerian graphs.

A mixed graph $M=(V,E\cup A)$ is acyclic if its directed part $(V,A)$ is an acyclic digraph. In this note we study the so-called orientation completion problem for the class of acyclic mixed graphs. That is, given an acyclic mixed graph $M$ and a property ${\cal P}$; can we orient the edges of $M$ so that the resulting digraph is acyclic and has property ${\cal P}$. We prove that one can decide in polynomial time whether $M$ can be completed to an acyclic digraph with an out-branching from a prescibed vertex $s$, while it is NP-complete to decide whether $M$ has an acyclic orientation which has both an out-branching and an in-branching (a bipolar orientation). We show that it is NP-complete to decide whether $M$ can be oriented so that it contains a directed path between two prescribed vertices. Finally we describe a polynomial algorithm for deciding whether an acyclic digraph $D$ has an out-branching $B^+_s$ such that the digraph $D-A(B^+_s)$ is connected (in the underlying sense). Based on this we pose as an open problem the complexity of deciding whether the edges of an acyclic mixed graph can be oriented so that the result is an acyclic digraph with a non-separating out-branching.

This paper explores variations of vertex-coloring problems defined on graph visibility properties. It introduces and studies the dual, outer, and total mutual-visibility chromatic numbers, which partition the vertex set of a graph into color classes that preserve specific mutual-visibility conditions called dual, outer or total. The work provides structural conditions under which these chromatic parameters are finite or infinite, and establishes that deciding whether a graph admits a dual, outer, or total mutual-visibility coloring using a given number of colors is NP-complete, even when restricted to two colors. Exact formulas and tight bounds for these chromatic parameters are established across several fundamental graph classes. For block graphs, complete characterizations are provided for the outer and dual mutual-visibility chromatic numbers based on structural invariants such as cut vertices and specific forbidden subgraph structures. On Hamming graphs, the dual and total mutual-visibility chromatic numbers are shown to equal the smaller dimension of the factors, while the outer mutual-visibility chromatic number is proven to equal the star arboricity of a corresponding complete bipartite graph. Finally, the paper examines strong grid graphs, determining exact values for their total, outer, and dual mutual-visibility chromatic numbers. These results demonstrate how the parameter behaviors range from finite constants to infinity depending on the grid dimensions.

For distinct integers $a$ and $b$, an $\{a,b\}$-edge-weighting assigns $a$ or $b$ to each edge and labels each vertex by the sum of its incident weights. Such a weighting is proper if adjacent vertices receive distinct labels. We prove that, for every fixed pair of distinct integers, deciding whether a proper weighting exists is NP-complete even for simple cubic planar graphs. On planar multigraphs with $m$ edges, we give an exact $2^{O(\sqrt m)}$-time algorithm and, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), exclude $2^{o(\sqrt m)}$-time algorithms even for simple cubic planar graphs. As a consequence, locally irregular $2$-edge-coloring is NP-complete on simple cubic planar graphs, admits a deterministic $2^{O(\sqrt n)}$-time algorithm on $n$-vertex graphs in this class, and admits no $2^{o(\sqrt n)}$-time algorithm under ETH. For maximizing the number of edges joining vertices with distinct labels, we give a deterministic efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) on planar multigraphs, a polynomial-time $1/2$-approximation on multigraphs, and APX-completeness even on simple cubic graphs. Extending a partial $\{a,b\}$-edge-weighting to a proper one is NP-complete for every fixed pair even on simple cubic planar bipartite graphs, while it is polynomial-time solvable on trees. The hardness persists even when the prescribed edges form disjoint paths of length $6$ and all edges of each path have the same prescribed weight.

For a graph (undirected or directed), a cycle-factor is a collection of vertex-disjoint cycles covering the entire vertex set. Cycle-factors subject to parity constraints arise naturally in the study of structural graph theory and algorithmic complexity. In this work, we study four variants of the problem of finding a cycle-factor subject to the following parity constraints: (1) all cycles are odd, (2) all cycles are even, (3) at least one cycle is odd, and (4) at least one cycle is even. We show that all the variants of the problem are NP-complete both in undirected and directed graphs, even if each vertex is incident to at most three edges. We also prove that the first two variants are NP-complete even for planar directed graphs.

We study nonpreemptive scheduling on a single machine with release dates, due dates, positive job weights, and a common processing time. The objective is to minimize total weighted tardiness. Although closely related equal-processing-time problems admit polynomial-time algorithms, the complexity of this problem has remained open in the literature since 2010. We prove that its decision version is strongly NP-complete, even when every job can meet its due date if processed immediately upon release. The reduction is from unweighted MAX-CUT and uses a quadratic number of jobs with polynomially bounded numerical data. Its main ingredient is a constructive normalization theorem that converts every sufficiently inexpensive feasible schedule into a binary choice for each graph vertex; after normalization, total weighted tardiness equals a constant minus a scaled cut value. We also give a deterministic polynomial-time phase-grid assignment algorithm for the shifted objective $Φ=F+p\sum_jw_j$, where $F$ is total weighted tardiness. The algorithm enumerates at most $N$ release-date residues modulo $p$, solves one minimum-cost assignment problem for each residue, and returns the best phase-grid schedule. It runs in $O(N^5)$ arithmetic operations and achieves the tight ratio $3/2-1/(2N)$ for this algorithm. Because the added term $p\sum_jw_j$ is independent of how the jobs are scheduled, the shifted and original objectives have exactly the same optimal schedules. However, the approximation guarantee applies to the shifted objective; for the original objective, the analysis provides an additive bound. Thus, the paper both resolves the long-standing complexity question and provides a complementary worst-case guarantee for the phase-grid assignment algorithm.

We study the computational complexity of fundamental algorithmic problems -- membership testing, separation, valid-inequality testing, and linear optimization -- over polytopes and cones arising from cooperative games (also known as pseudo-Boolean functions). A central obstacle in the study of such problems is that a general cooperative game on $n$ players requires $2^n$ values, so the input size is $2^n$ for a game with $n$ players, making these computational tasks theoretically trivial. Restricting to $k$-additive games reduces the input size to $O(n^k)$, making such games a natural target for meaningful questions about the existence of efficient algorithms. On the positive side, we give an explicit extended formulation of size $O(n^k)$ for the core of $k$-additive $k$-monotone games, allowing all four problems to be solved by a single polynomial-size linear program -- in particular, circumventing the ellipsoid method that is needed when building from earlier tractability results of Deng and Papadimitriou, or of Edmonds. For the cone of $k$-additive $(k{-}1)$-monotone games, we give a complete characterization of its extreme rays and derive the same $O(n^k)$ bound on extension complexity, yielding a geometry-based proof and generalization of a result of Billionnet and Minoux. On the negative side, we show that for $l \leq k-2$ the cone of $k$-additive $l$-monotone games is computationally intractable: membership testing is not in NP (unless NP\,=\,coNP), valid-inequality testing is NP-complete, and extension complexity is at least $1.5^n$. Our hardness results yield, as a special case, a result of Crama and of Gallo and Simone. Furthermore, our hardness results also explain the lack of any good characterization of the extreme rays of the cone of $k$-additive $(k{-}2)$-monotone games.

The edge complexity of a weighted graph is the smallest ratio of the Fourier $\ell^1$ and $\ell^2$ norms of its adjacency matrix over all vertex labelings. We study the difficulty of finding this minimum by relating it to a graph symmetry. Adding a universal vertex with sufficiently large incident weight produces an explicit Fourier $\ell^1$ lower bound. We show that equality holds exactly when the source graph has a fixed-point-free involutory automorphism. Two-sided estimates compare the excess above this bound with the squared Frobenius distance to the nearest weighted graph having such a symmetry. For sources of constant weighted degree, these estimates determine the exact leading term as the added weight tends to infinity. A stronger separation for simple source graphs proves that additive $\frac{1}{256N^{\frac{7}{2}}}$ approximation of weighted edge complexity is NP-hard, even on connected graphs of odd order $N$ with at most two distinct positive integer weights, each at most $N^2$. We also prove that recognizing a simple graph with a real Fourier labeling is NP-complete. A seven-vertex example shows that every minimizing labeling can have nonreal Fourier coefficients even when real Fourier labelings exist. An exact rational certificate for this example is included in the appendix.

The Cluster Deletion problem asks for a minimum-size edge set whose deletion turns a graph into a disjoint union of complete graphs. Equivalently, the Clique Partition problem asks for a partition of the vertex set into cliques that maximizes the number of edges within the parts. We give a simpler proof of a result of Gao, Hare, and Nastos (Discete Mathematics, 2013), that Cluster Deletion is polynomial-time solvable on cographs. In addition, we show that the natural linear programming formulation of Clique Partition is exact on cographs. We then show that Cluster Deletion is NP-complete on permutation graphs, which are a superclass of cographs. This answers an open question of Konstantinidis and Papadopoulos (Algorithmica, 2021). We also exhibit a permutation graph on nine vertices for which the linear programming formulation is not exact. Finally, for graphs with clique number at most $c$, we give a polynomial-time $2\binom{c}{2}/(\binom{c}{2}+1)$-approximation algorithm for Clique Partition. More generally, the algorithm runs in polynomial time on every graph class for which a maximum clique can be found in polynomial time. For each fixed $c\geq 3$, we also construct infinitely many examples attaining the stated approximation ratio. The same examples show that, for Cluster Deletion , the algorithm is a $2$-approximation and no better, for every fixed $c \geq 3$.

We prove that the integer-threshold decision problem for weak partition connectivity in hedgegraphs is NP-complete, answering an open question about its computational complexity. Hardness holds even for connected unweighted hedgegraphs in which every hedge consists of exactly two nonempty, vertex-disjoint hyperedges whose union is the entire vertex set. On the same class of instances, hedge connectivity has a simple exact formula. Using a binary matrix representation, we express fractional weak partition connectivity as $m-ρ(A)$, where $ρ(A)$ maximizes the ratio of the number of selected rows to one less than the number of distinct projected columns. This formula yields both the hardness reduction and deterministic algorithms: exact computation when some reference column gives row supports satisfying a linear intersection condition, including the case of minimum row-support number $s(A)\le2$, and a partition-output polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for both the integer and fractional objectives on all full-support split systems. Unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$, neither objective admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) on this class.

Single-machine asymmetric weighted earliness--tardiness (AWET) scheduling asks how to sequence jobs around a common synchronization date when early and late completion incur unrelated job-dependent penalties. At the boundary nonrestrictive date $d=\sum_jp_j$, a compact V-shaped schedule reduces the continuous-time problem to a quadratic choice of a nonempty early set. We establish four complementary results for this model. First, the positive-integer problem is strongly NP-complete by a unary-polynomial reduction from Restricted Exact Cover by 3-Sets. Second, unrestricted AWET admits a polynomial-time $(3+2\sqrt2+\varepsilon)$-approximation based on an anchored semidefinite relaxation and deterministic marginal thresholding. Third, when the earliness and tardiness ratio orders are strict reversals, the problem is weakly NP-complete but has an exact two-resource pseudopolynomial dynamic program. Fourth, for fixed total refinements whose ratio permutation is separable, an exact separating-tree recurrence and coordinated geometric trimming yield an FPTAS. The proofs use different manifestations of the same canonical objective: scale-separated prefix penalties, positive-semidefinite minimum-kernel covariance, a dominant completed load square, and a bounded four-coordinate decomposition interface. Together, the results show that the decisive issue is not merely whether the two ratio orders agree, but whether their interaction can be controlled by a global certificate or compressed into a bounded constructive interface.

We introduce and begin the study of sequence b-colorings, a natural generalization of the classical notion of b-colorings introduced by Irving and Manlove in 1999. In a sequence b-coloring, each color class is required to contain a prescribed minimum number of color-dominating vertices (CDVs). We establish several fundamental properties of the associated parameters, prove that every sequence is realizable, and show that the problem of deciding whether a particular graph realizes a particular sequence is NP-complete. We also characterize the sequences realized by cycles, obtain results on regular graphs with prescribed girth, and investigate colorings requiring one additional CDV, including a characterization of connected graphs with chromatic number $3$ for which no such coloring exists.

The directed clique number $\vecω(T)$ of a tournament $T$ is the minimum, over all orderings of the vertices of $T$, of the clique number of the graph whose edges are the arcs that point backward with respect to the ordering. In this paper, we prove that, for every integer $k \geq 3$, deciding whether $\vecω(T) \leq k$ is NP-complete. This answers a question of Nguyen, Scott, and Seymour, and contrasts with the classical undirected setting, where deciding whether $ω(G) \leq k$ is polynomial-time solvable for every fixed integer $k$. On the other hand, we give a polynomial-time algorithm distinguishing tournaments with $\vecω(T) \leq 2$ from those with $\vecω(T) > 100$. We also study the tournament analogue of the Gyárfás--Sumner conjecture. We construct new $\vecχ$-bounding tournaments and thereby prove a conjecture of Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes stating that every class of tournaments with bounded twin-width is $\vecχ$-bounded. We then exhibit new tournaments that are not $\vecχ$-bounding, disproving another conjecture of Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes, as well as two conjectures of Kim. Finally, we present infinite families of 3-$\vecω$-critical and 4-$\vecω$-critical tournaments.

We study graph coloring with color preferences, in which each vertex ranks the available colors. In addition to assigning different colors to adjacent vertices, we require the coloring to be stable: no group of vertices can cyclically exchange their assigned colors so that each strictly prefers its new color to its original one. We define the stable chromatic number $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the minimum integer $k$ such that every preference profile admits a stable $k$-coloring of $G$. We establish several upper and lower bounds. In particular, for any acyclic orientation of the edges of $G$, the largest number of vertices reachable from a vertex by directed paths, including the vertex itself, is an upper bound on $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$. This shows that $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ is well-defined. We also show that $O(t \log (1+n/t))$ colors suffice for an $n$-vertex graph $G$ of treewidth $t$, and complement this with a lower bound in terms of the Grundy number. Turning to the problem of finding a minimum stable coloring for a given profile, we show that stable $2$-colorability is polynomial-time solvable, whereas stable $k$-colorability is NP-complete for every fixed $k\ge 3$. Using the treewidth bound, we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by treewidth.

A finite connected graph is rarely a Cayley graph. We measure how far it is from being one: given $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, how few edges must be added, or added and deleted, before the result is a Cayley graph of an abelian group of order $n$ on the same vertex set? This defines two invariants, the completion number $γ^{+}$ (additions only) and the Cayley edit distance $γ_{\triangle}$ (both), each normalized by $m$. We show that deciding the edit version is NP-complete already for a fixed cyclic host, by a reduction from Hamiltonian Cycle in which the edit cost of a labeling is $n+m-2k$ when it realizes a longest path with $k$ edges; the optimal cost is $m-n+2pp(G)$, bounded in polynomial time by the matching number. We prove that irregularity alone forces $γ^{+}(G)\ge nΔ^{*}/(2m)-1$, where $Δ^{*}$ is the least $d\geΔ$ with $nd$ even, computable in linear time from the degree sequence; we characterize equality exactly. It is attained on the star, where $γ^{+}(K_{1,q})=(q-1)/2$ and the star maximizes $γ^{+}$, while $γ_{\triangle}$ stays bounded by an absolute constant. We determine paths and grids exactly, $γ^{+}(P_n)=γ^{+}(P_n\,\square\,P_n)=1/(n-1)$, and show $γ_{\triangle}(K_{1,q})\to 2$, not the $3/2$ suggested by the additive case. We report an exhaustive certified census of all $995$ connected graphs on at most seven vertices. The degree bound is attained on $89.4\%$ and the two invariants separate strictly on $84.7\%$, though both rates vary sharply with order: attainment $100\%,100\%,84.8\%,89.7\%$ and separation $0\%,61.9\%,73.2\%,87.7\%$ for $n=4,5,6,7$, dominated by the $853$ graphs on seven vertices. The star uniquely maximizes both. Edit count and the bi-Lipschitz distortion of the completed host are independent, moving oppositely on stars and paths.Data and certificates at doi:10.5281/zenodo.21852006.