arXiv++ Combinatorics

For any connected graph $G$, let $P(G,m)$ and $P_{DP}(G,m)$ denote the chromatic polynomial and DP color function of $G$, respectively. It is known that $P_{DP}(G,m)\le P(G,m)$ holds for every positive integer $m$. Let $DP_\approx$ (resp. $DP_<$) be the set of graphs $G$ for which there exists an integer $M$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ (resp. $P_{DP}(G,m)<P(G,m)$) holds for all integers $m \ge M$. Determining the sets $DP_\approx$ and $DP_<$ is a key problem on the study of the DP color function. For any edge set $E_0$ of $G$, let $\ell_G(E_0)$ be the length of a shortest cycle $C$ in $G$ such that $|E(C)\cap E_0|$ is odd whenever such a cycle exists, and $\ell_G(E_0)=\infty$ otherwise. Write $\ell_G(E_0)$ as $\ell_G(e)$ if $E_0=\{e\}$. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ has a spanning tree $T$ such that $\ell_G(e)$ is odd for each $e\in E(G)\setminus E(T)$, the edges in $E(G)\setminus E(T)$ can be labeled as $e_1,e_2,\cdots, e_q$ with $\ell_G(e_i)\le \ell_G(e_{i+1})$ for all $1\le i\le q-1$ and each edge $e_i$ is contained in a cycle $C_i$ of length $\ell_G(e_i)$ with $E(C_i)\subseteq E(T)\cup \{e_j: 1\le j\le i\}$, then $G$ is a graph in $DP_{\approx}$. As a direct application of this conclusion, all plane near-triangulations and complete multipartite graphs with at least three partite sets belong to $DP_{\approx}$. We also show that if $E^*$ is an edge set of $G$ such that $\ell_{G}(E^*)$ is even and $E^*$ satisfies certain conditions, then $G$ belongs to $DP_<$. In particular, if $\ell_G(E^*)=4$, where $E^*$ is a set of edges between two disjoint vertex subsets of $G$, then $G$ belongs to $DP_<$. Both results extend known ones in [DP color functions versus chromatic polynomials, $Advances\ in\ Applied\ Mathematics$ 134 (2022), article 102301].

The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since the early 1990s, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a $k \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_\ell(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. In 2009, Thomassen asked whether there is a universal constant $α$ such that for any graph $G$, $τ(G) \leq χ_{\ell}(G) + α$, where $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is the list chromatic number of $G$. We show that the answer to this question is no by proving that there exists a constant $C$ such that $τ(K_{2,l}) - χ_{\ell}(K_{2,l}) \ge C\sqrt{l}$ for $l \ge 16$.

Chromatic symmetric functions are well-studied symmetric functions in algebraic combinatorics that generalize the chromatic polynomial and are related to Hessenberg varieties and diagonal harmonics. Motivated by the Stanley--Stembridge conjecture, we show that the allowable coloring weights for indifference graphs of Dyck paths are the lattice points of a permutahedron $\mathcal{P}_λ$, and we give a formula for the dominant weight $λ$. Furthermore, we conjecture that such chromatic symmetric functions are Lorentzian, a property introduced by Brändén and Huh as a bridge between discrete convex analysis and concavity properties in combinatorics, and we prove this conjecture for abelian Dyck paths. We extend our results on the Newton polytope to incomparability graphs of (3+1)-free posets, and we give a number of conjectures and results stemming from our work, including results on the complexity of computing the coefficients and relations with the $ζ$ map from diagonal harmonics.

We study the chromatic quasisymmetric class function of a linearized combinatorial Hopf monoid. Given a linearized combinatorial Hopf monoid $H$, and an $H$-structure $h$ on a set $N$, there are proper colorings of $h$, generalizing graph colorings and poset partitions. We show that the automorphism group of $h$ acts on the set of proper colorings. The chromatic quasisymmetric class function enumerates the fixed points of this action, weighting each coloring with a monomial. For the Hopf monoid of graphs this invariant generalizes Stanley's chromatic symmetric function and specializes to the orbital chromatic polynomial of Cameron and Kayibi. We also introduce the flag quasisymmetric class function of a balanced relative simplicial complex equipped with a group action. We show that, under certain conditions, the chromatic quasisymmetric class function of $h$ is the flag quasisymmetric class function of a balanced relative simplicial complex that we call the coloring complex of $h$. We use this result to deduce various inequalities for the associated orbital polynomial invariants. We apply these results to several examples related to enumerating graph colorings, poset partitions, generic functions on matroids or generalized permutohedra, and others.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Formulas for chromatic polynomials of clique-gluings of graphs, a fundamental graph operation, are well-known, but the effect of such gluings on the DP color function is not well understood. In this paper we study the DP color function of $K_p$-gluings of graphs. Recently, Becker et. al. asked whether $P_{DP}(G,m) \leq (\prod_{i=1}^n P_{DP}(G_i,m))/\left( \prod_{i=0}^{p-1} (m-i) \right)^{n-1}$ whenever $m \geq p$, where the expression on the right is the DP-coloring analogue of the corresponding chromatic polynomial formula for a $K_p$-gluing, $G$, of $G_1, \ldots, G_n$. Becker et. al. showed this inequality holds when $p=1$. In this paper we show this inequality holds for edge-gluings ($p=2$). On the other hand, we show it does not hold for triangle-gluings ($p=3$), which also answers a question of Dong and Yang (2021). Finally, we show a relaxed version, based on a class of $m$-fold covers that we conjecture would yield the fewest DP-colorings for a given graph, of the inequality holds when $p \geq 3$.

The bivariate chromatic polynomial $χ_G(x,y)$ of a graph $G = (V, E)$, introduced by Dohmen-Pönitz-Tittmann (2003), counts all $x$-colorings of $G$ such that adjacent vertices get different colors if they are $\le y$. We extend this notion to mixed graphs, which have both directed and undirected edges. Our main result is a decomposition formula which expresses $χ_G(x,y)$ as a sum of bivariate order polynomials (Beck-Farahmand-Karunaratne-Zuniga Ruiz 2020), and a combinatorial reciprocity theorem for $χ_G(x,y)$.

Recently, we have witnessed tremendous applications of algebraic intersection theory to branches of mathematics, that previously seemed very distant. In this article we review some of them. Our aim is to provide a unified approach to the results e.g. in the theory of chromatic polynomials (work of Adiprasito, Huh, Katz), maximum likelihood degree in algebraic statistics (Drton, Manivel, Monin, Sturmfels, Uhler, Wiśniewski), Euler characteristics of determinental varieties (Dimca, Papadima), characteristic numbers (Aluffi, Schubert, Vakil) and the degree of semidefinite programming (Bothmer, Nie, Ranestad, Sturmfels). Our main tools come from intersection theory on special varieties called the varieties of complete forms (De Concini, Procesi, Thaddeus) and the study of Segre classes (Laksov, Lascoux, Pragacz, Thorup).

We introduce the characteristic numbers and the chromatic polynomial of a tensor. Our approach generalizes and unifies the chromatic polynomial of a graph and of a matroid, characteristic numbers of quadrics in Schubert calculus, Betti numbers of complements of hyperplane arrangements and Euler characteristic of complements of determinantal hypersurfaces and the maximum likelihood degree for general linear concentration models in algebraic statistics.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Motivated by results related to list coloring Cartesian products of graphs, we initiate the study of the DP-chromatic number, $χ_{DP}$, of the same. We show that $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of the graph $H$. We focus on building tools for lower bound arguments for $χ_{DP}(G \square H)$ and use them to show the sharpness of the bound above and its various forms. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, is essential in the study of the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs, including the following question that extends the sharpness problem above and the classical result on gap between list chromatic number and chromatic number: given any graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, what is the smallest $t$ for which $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{k,t})= χ_{DP}(G) + k$?

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an extensively studied notion in combinatorics since its introduction by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of the chromatic polynomial have been introduced and studied for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, the list color function (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, the DP color function (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, the dual DP color function (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. A function $f$ is chromatic-adherent if for every graph $G$, $f(G,a) = P(G,a)$ for some $a \geq χ(G)$ implies that $f(G,m) = P(G,m)$ for all $m \geq a$. It is not known if the list color function and the DP color function are chromatic-adherent. We show that the DP color function is not chromatic-adherent by studying the DP color function of Generalized Theta graphs. The tools we develop along with the Rearrangement Inequality give a new method for determining the DP color function of all Theta graphs and the dual DP color function of all Generalized Theta graphs.

DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. A well-known tool for computing the chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is the deletion-contraction formula which relates $P(G,m)$ to the chromatic polynomials of two smaller graphs. The DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, is a DP-coloring analogue of the chromatic polynomial, and $P_{DP}(G,m)$ is the minimum number of DP-colorings of $G$ over all possible $m$-fold covers. In this paper we present a deletion-contraction relation for the DP color function. To make this possible, we extend the definition of the DP color function to multigraphs. We also introduce the dual DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P^*_{DP}(G,m)$, which counts the maximum number of DP-colorings of $G$ over certain $m$-fold covers. We show how the dual DP color function along with our deletion-contraction relation yields a new general lower bound on the DP color function of a graph.

In \cite{10.2140/agt.2005.5.1365}, Rong and Helme-Guizon defined a categorification for the chromatic polynomial $P_G(x)$ of graphs $G$, i.e. a homology theory $H^*(G)$ whose Euler characteristic equals $P_G(x)$. In this paper, we showed that the rational homoology $H^*(G;\mathbb{Q})$ is supported in two lines, and develop an analogy of Lee's theory for Khovanov homology. In particular, we develop a new homology theory $H_{Lee}(G)$, and showed that there is a spectral sequence whose $E_2$ -term is isomorphic to $H^*(G)$ converges to $H_{Lee}(G)$.

Let G be a combinatorial graph with vertices V and edges E. A proper coloring of G is an assignment of colors to the vertices such that no edge connects two vertices of the same color. These are the colorings considered in the famous Four Color Theorem. It turns out that the number of proper colorings of G using t colors is a polynomial in t, called the chromatic polynomial of G. This polynomial has many wonderful properties. It also has the surprising habit of appearing in contexts which, a priori, have nothing to do with graph coloring. We will survey three such instances involving acyclic orientations, hyperplane arrangements, and increasing forests. In addition, connections to symmetric functions and algebraic geometry will be mentioned.

For any graph $G$, the chromatic polynomial of $G$ is the function $P(G,m)$ which counts the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$ for each positive integer $m$. The DP color function $P_{DP}(G,m)$ of $G$, introduced by Kaul and Mudrock in 2019, is a generalization of $P(G,m)$ with $P_{DP}(G,m)\le P(G,m)$ for each positive integer $m$. Let $P_{DP}(G)\approx P(G)$ (resp. $P_{DP}(G)< P(G)$) denote the property that $P_{DP}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ (resp. $P_{DP}(G,m)<P(G,m)$) holds for sufficiently large integers $m$.It is an interesting problem of finding graphs $G$ for which $P_{DP}(G)\approx P(G)$ (resp. $P_{DP}(G,m)<P(G,m)$) holds. Kaul and Mudrock showed that if $G$ has an even girth, then $P_{DP}(G)<P(G)$ and Mudrock and Thomason recently proved that $P_{DP}(G)\approx P(G)$ holds for each graph $G$ which has a dominating vertex. We shall generalize their results in this article. For each edge $e$ in $G$, let $\ell(e)=\infty$ if $e$ is a bridge of $G$, and let $\ell(e)$ be the length of a shortest cycle in $G$ containing $e$ otherwise. We first show that if $\ell(e)$ is even for some edge $e$ in $G$, then $P_{DP}(G)<P(G)$ holds. However, the converse statement of this conclusion fails with infinitely many counterexamples. We then prove that $P_{DP}(G)\approx P(G)$ holds for every graph $G$ that contains a spanning tree $T$ such that for each $e\in E(G)\setminus E(T)$, $\ell(e)$ is odd and $e$ contained in a cycle $C$ of length $\ell (e)$ with the property that $\ell(e')<\ell(e)$ for each $e'\in E(C)\setminus (E(T)\cup \{e\})$. Some open problems are proposed in this article.

We prove that for any graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $Δ$, the zeros of its chromatic polynomial $χ_G(z)$ (in $\mathbb{C}$) lie outside the disk of radius $5.02 Δ$ centered at $0$. This improves on the previously best known bound of approximately $6.91Δ$. In the case of graphs of high girth we can improve this. We prove that for every $g$ there is a constant $K_g$ such that for any graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $Δ$ and girth at least $g$, the zeros of its chromatic polynomial $χ_G(z)$ lie outside the disk of radius $K_g Δ$ centered at $0$ where $K_g \to 1 + e \approx 3.72$ as $g \to \infty$. Finally, we give improved bounds on the Fisher zeros of the partition function of the Ising model.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Chromatic polynomials for joins and vertex-gluings of graphs are well understood, but the effect of these graph operations on the DP color function is not known. In this paper we make progress on understanding the DP color function of the join of a graph with a complete graph and vertex-gluings of certain graphs. We also develop tools to study the DP color function under these graph operations, and we study the threshold (smallest $m$) beyond which the DP color function of a graph constructed with these operations equals its chromatic polynomial.

Stanley introduced the chromatic symmetric function of a simple graph, which is a generalization of a chromatic polynomial. This is expressed in terms of the integer points of the complements of the corresponding graphic arrangement. Stanley proved a combinatorial reciprocity theorem for chromatic functions. This is considered as an Ehrhart-type reciprocity theorem for the graphic arrangement. We introduce the chromatic signed-symmetric function of a signed graph, an analogue of the chromatic symmetric function, by the integer points of the complements of the corresponding signed-graphic arrangement and prove a generalization of Stanley's reciprocity theorem. Stanley has conjectured that the chromatic symmetric function distinguishes trees. This conjecture is also generalized for signed trees. We verify the conjecture for certain classes of signed paths.

By coloring a signed graph by signed colors, one obtains the signed chromatic polynomial of the signed graph. For each signed graph we construct graded cohomology groups whose graded Euler characteristic yields the signed chromatic polynomial of the signed graph. We show that the cohomology groups satisfy a long exact sequence which corresponds to signed deletion-contraction rule. This work is motivated by Helme-Guizon and Rong's construction of the categorification for the chromatic polynomial of unsigned graphs.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It is known that, unlike the list color function $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph $G$ with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. Thus, two fundamental open questions regarding the DP color function are: (i) for which $G$ does there exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq N$, (ii) Given a graph $G$ does there always exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? In this paper we give exact formulas for the DP color function of a Theta graph based on the parity of its path lengths. This gives an explicit answer, including the formulas for the polynomials that are not the chromatic polynomial, to both the questions above for Theta graphs. We extend this result to Generalized Theta graphs by characterizing the exact parity condition that ensures the DP color function eventually equals the chromatic polynomial. To answer the second question for Generalized Theta graphs, we confirm it for the larger class of graphs with a feedback vertex set of size one.

The partition lattice and noncrossing partition lattice are well studied objects in combinatorics. Given a graph $G$ on vertex set $\{1,2,\dots, n\}$, its bond lattice, $L_G$, is the subposet of the partition lattice formed by restricting to the partitions whose blocks induce connected subgraphs of $G$. In this article, we introduce a natural noncrossing analogue of the bond lattice, the noncrossing bond poset, $NC_G$, obtained by restricting to the noncrossing partitions of $L_G$. Both the noncrossing partition lattice and the bond lattice have many nice combinatorial properties. We show that, for several families of graphs, the noncrossing bond poset also exhibits these properties. We present simple necessary and sufficient conditions on the graph to ensure the noncrossing bond poset is a lattice. Additionally, for several families of graphs, we give combinatorial descriptions of the Möbius function and characteristic polynomial of the noncrossing bond poset. These descriptions are in terms of a noncrossing analogue of non-broken circuit (NBC) sets of the graphs and can be thought of as a noncrossing version of Whitney's NBC theorem for the chromatic polynomial. We also consider the shellability and supersolvability of the noncrossing bond poset, providing sufficient conditions for both. We end with some open problems.