arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study list coloring of common independent sets of two matroids. We construct a graphic matroid $M_1$ and a partition matroid $M_2$ with common chromatic number two and common list chromatic number three, showing that the two parameters need not be equal. This resolves a question raised by Király, later stated as a conjecture by Aharoni, Berger, Guo, and Kotlar. We also show that if two strongly base-orderable matroids are each $2$-colorable, then their intersection is $2$-list-colorable.

It remains open whether every $K_t$-minor-free graph is $O(t)$-choosable. Postle proved that every $K_t$-minor-free graph has choice number $O(t(\log\log t)^6)$. At the end of an earlier version of a paper establishing an $O(t\log\log t)$ bound on the chromatic number of $K_t$-minor-free graphs, Delcourt and Postle remarked that their methods, combined with Postle's earlier techniques, yield an $O(t(\log\log t)^2)$ bound on the choice number. In this paper, we first prove that every $n$-vertex $K_t$-minor-free graph has choice number $O(t\log(2+n/t))$. Using this bound as a key ingredient, we follow the approach outlined by Delcourt and Postle to prove that every $K_t$-minor-free graph is $O(t\log\log t)$-choosable.

A famous folklore result in list coloring demonstrating that the gap between the list chromatic number and chromatic number of a graph can be arbitrarily large is: $χ_{\ell}(K_{l,t}) = 1+l$ if and only if $t \geq l^l$. DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a well-studied generalization of list coloring introduced in 2015. In 2018, Mudrock studied the DP analogue of the aforementioned folklore result. He proved that for $l \in\mathbb{N}$, if $μ(l)$ is the smallest integer $t$ such that $χ_{DP}(K_{l,t})=1+l$, then $\left\lceil l^l/l!\right\rceil \leq μ(l) \leq 1+l^l(\log(l!)+1)/l!$. Recently, Kaul, Mudrock, and Sharma studied a more general version of this problem by studying the smallest $t$ for which $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t}) = k + l$, where $G$ satisfies certain criticality conditions and $G \square K_{l,t}$ denotes the Cartesian product of $G$ and $K_{l,t}$. In this paper, we introduce a notion we call covering families that gives a new perspective on these DP-coloring questions. In particular, if $κ(l)$ denotes the minimum size of a covering family of $[l]^l$, we show that $μ(l)=κ(l)$. We use this equivalence to prove $μ(4)=12$ and to obtain new general lower bounds on $μ(l)$. We also prove a general upper bound on the minimum size of covering families which yields an improved general upper bound on $μ(l)$ and gives improvements on known bounds for related DP-coloring questions involving Cartesian products with complete bipartite graphs.

We exhibit a graph $G$ with $14$ vertices and list chromatic number equal to $3$ such that there is a $2$-list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that at most $9$ vertices of $G$ can be properly coloured from $L$. This disproves the Partial List Colouring Conjecture of Albertson, Grossman and Haas. This counterexample was discovered and fully verified by ChatGPT 6 Astra Ultra after some persistent prompting, but almost no mathematical input, from the author.

We prove that for every fixed integer $r\geq 2$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, every sufficiently large finite uncrowded $(r+1)$-uniform hypergraph of maximum degree $Δ$ has list chromatic number at most \[ (1+\varepsilon)\left(\frac{rΔ}{\logΔ}\right)^{1/r}. \] The proof is a semi-random list-coloring nibble carried out directly on the original hypergraph. We encode the remaining coloring problem by active edge-color constraints and control all residual sizes through a binomial degree bound. After the nibble reaches a sparse terminal state, the coloring is completed by a Rosenfeld-style counting argument.

The Alon--Tarsi number $AT(G)$ of a graph $G$, defined via the graph polynomial, is a strengthening of the list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. We study the Alon--Tarsi number of squares of planar graphs. The square of a graph $G$ is the graph obtained by joining every pair of vertices whose distance in $G$ is at most $2$. Recently, Kim and Luo (2026) proved that $χ_{\ell}(G^2)\le 6$ for every subcubic planar graph containing no $k$-cycles for $4\le k\le 8$. We strengthen this result by proving that $AT(G^2)\le 6$ for every such graph $G$.

List-coloring, introduced independently by Vizing and by Erdős, Rubin, and Taylor in the 1970s, generalizes ordinary vertex coloring by assigning to each vertex its own set of admissible colors. A graph is chromatic-choosable if its list chromatic number equals its chromatic number. The previous survey on list-coloring by D R Woodall (2001), emphasized defective choosability, the list-coloring conjectures, and different methods used for list-coloring. This survey reviews major developments on list-coloring and chromatic-choosability, with emphasis on graph classes for which equality is known, graph classes exhibiting a nontrivial gap, and the principal methods used to prove such results. The survey covers embedded graphs, perfect graphs, complete bipartite and multipartite graphs, claw-free graphs, line graphs, powers of graphs, graph products, and selected variants of list-coloring.

Chromatic choosability is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number, $χ(G)$, is equal to its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. A graph $G$ is said to be enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ for every $m \in \mathbb{N}$. Theta graphs and their generalizations have played an important role in graph coloring problems over the years; for example, they appear in the characterization of chromatic-choosable graphs with chromatic number 2. In this paper we characterize the enumeratively chromatic-choosable theta graphs. Our proof utilizes ideas from DP-coloring (a.k.a. correspondence coloring), providing yet another example of how the more general setting of DP-coloring can be leveraged to attack a problem in list coloring.

Borodin and Kostochka in 1977 conjectured that if a graph $G$ has maximum degree $Δ(G)\ge 9$ and its clique number satisfies $ω(G)\le Δ(G)-1$, then its chromatic number satisfies $χ(G) \le Δ(G)-1$. We prove this statement with respect to a stronger graph coloring parameter, the correspondence chromatic number $χ_{DP}$, provided the maximum degree is sufficiently large. More precisely, we prove that for every integer $Δ\ge 3\cdot 10^9$, a graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $Δ$ satisfies $χ_{DP}(G) \le \max(ω(G),Δ-1)$. This strengthens earlier results of Reed (1999) for usual chromatic number and of Choi, Kierstead and Rabern (2023) for list chromatic number.

The dichromatic number of a digraph $D$, denoted by $\vecχ(D)$, is the smallest number of colours required to colour the vertices of $D$ such that each colour class induces an acyclic digraph. A conjecture of Erdős and Neumann-Lara states that there exists a function $f(k)$ such that for every graph $G$ with $χ(G) \geq f(k)$ there is an orientation of $G$ such that the resulting digraph $D$ satisfies $\vecχ(D) \geq k$. We prove the list version of this conjecture: if $G$ has large list chromatic number then there is an orientation of $G$ such that the resulting digraph has large list dichromatic number. The main tool in our result is the following theorem, which is an extension of an analogous result of Alon for the chromatic number: every graph of minimum degree $d$ admits an orientation such that the resulting digraph has list dichromatic number of order at least $\ln d$.

Komjath studied the list chromatic number of infinite graphs and introduced the notion of restricted list chromatic number. For a graph $X=(V_X,E_X)$ and a cardinal $κ$, we say that $X$ is restricted list colorable for $κ$ if for every $L:V_X\to[κ]^κ$ there is a choice function $c$ of $L$ such that $c(v)\neq c(w)$ whenever ${v,w}\in E_X$. In this paper, we discuss a variation, stationary list colorability for $κ$, obtained by replacing $[κ]^κ$ with the set of all stationary subsets of $κ$. We compare the stationary list colorability with other coloring properties. Among other things, we prove that the stationary list colorability is essentially different from other coloring properties including the restricted list colorability. We also prove the consistency result showing that for some $κ<λ$, restricted and stationary list colorability at $κ$ do not imply the corresponding properties at $λ$.

Chromatic-choosablility is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number, $χ(G)$, is equal to its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019 in order to address a situation in list coloring where we still seek a proper list coloring, but each vertex may have a preferred color assigned to it, and for those vertices we wish to color as many of them with their preferred colors as possible. In flexible list coloring, the list flexibility number of $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell flex}(G)$, serves as the natural analogue of $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 2002, Ohba famously showed that for any graph $G$, there exists an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $χ(K_p \vee G) = χ_{\ell}(K_p \vee G)$ whenever $p \geq N$. Since $χ(G) \leq χ_{\ell}(G) \leq χ_{\ell flex}(G)$, it is natural to ask whether this result holds if $χ_{\ell}$ is replaced with $χ_{\ell flex}$. In this paper we not only show that this result doesn't hold in general if $χ_{\ell}$ is replaced with $χ_{\ell flex}$, but we also give a characterization of the graphs for which it does hold.

We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of a complete graph of order $n$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_{\ell}(K_n \square K_{a,b})$. At the 2024 Sparse Graphs Coalition's Workshop on algebraic, extremal, and structural methods and problems in graph colouring, Mudrock presented the following question: For each positive integer $a$, does $χ_{\ell}(K_n \square K_{a,b}) = n+a$ if and only if $b \geq (n+a-1)!^a/(a-1)!^a$? In this paper, we show the answer to this question is yes by studying $χ_{\ell}(H \square K_{a,b})$ when $H$ is strongly chromatic-choosable (a special form of vertex criticality) with the help of the list color function and analytic inequalities such as that of Karamata. Our result can be viewed as a generalization of the well-known result that $χ_{\ell}(K_{a,b}) = 1+a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a well-studied generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The following sharp bound on the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs $G$ and $H$ is known: $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $χ_{DP}(G)$ is the DP-chromatic number of $G$ and $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of $H$. We seek to understand when $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t})$ is far from its chromatic number: $χ(G \square K_{l,t}) = \max \{χ(G), 2 \}$ in the case that $G$ is a $k$-critical graph with $χ_{DP}(G)=k$. In particular, we have $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t}) \leq k + l$, and for fixed $l$ we wish to find the smallest $t$ for which this upper bound is achieved. This can be viewed as an extension of the classic result that the list chromatic number of $K_{l,t}$ is $l+1$ if and only if $t \geq l^l$. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, provides a concept and tool that is useful for making progress on this problem.

Chromatic-choosablility is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number is equal to its list chromatic number. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a positive integer $k$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. In this paper, we study enumerative chromatic-choosability. A graph $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \in \mathbb{N}$. We completely determine the graphs of chromatic number two that are enumeratively chromatic-choosable. We construct examples of graphs that are chromatic-choosable but fail to be enumeratively-chromatic choosable, and finally, we explore a conjecture as to whether for every graph $G$, there is a $p \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and $K_p$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable. The techniques we use to prove results are diverse and include probabilistic ideas and ideas from DP (or correspondence)-coloring.

Alon and Krivelevich conjectured that if $G$ is a bipartite graph of maximum degree $Δ$, then the choosability (or list chromatic number) of $G$ satisfies $χ_{\ell}(G) = O \left ( \log Δ\right )$. Currently, the best known upper bound for $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is $(1 + o(1)) \fracΔ{\log Δ}$, which also holds for the much larger class of triangle-free graphs. We prove that for $\varepsilon = 10^{-3}$, every bipartite graph $G$ of sufficiently large maximum degree $Δ$ satisfies $χ_{\ell}(G) < (\frac{4}{5} -\varepsilon) \fracΔ{\log Δ}$. This improved upper bound suggests that list coloring is fundamentally different for bipartite graphs than for triangle-free graphs and hence gives a step toward solving the conjecture of Alon and Krivelevich.

It is known that in matroids the difference between the chromatic number and the fractional chromatic number is smaller than 1, and that the list chromatic number is equal to the chromatic number. We investigate the gap within these pairs of parameters for hypergraphs that are the intersection of a given number k of matroids. We prove that in such hypergraphs the list chromatic number is at most k times the chromatic number and at most 2k-1 times the maximum chromatic number among the k matroids. We study the relationship between three polytopes associated with k-sets of matroids, and connect them to bounds on the fractional chromatic number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. This also connects to bounds on the matroidal matching and covering number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. The tools used are in part topological.

A famous theorem of Galvin states that the list chromatic number of the intersection of two partition matroids equals its chromatic number. Kiraly and Berczi et. al. conjectured that this equality holds for any two matroids. We prove this conjecture and a conjecture by Aharoni--Berger for any two generalized partition matroids.

The online list coloring game is a two-player graph-coloring game played on a graph $G$ as follows. On each turn, a Lister reveals a new color $c$ at some subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ of uncolored vertices, and then a Painter chooses an independent subset of $S$ to which to assign $c$. As the game is played, the revealed colors at each vertex $v \in V(G)$ form a color set $L(v)$, often called a list. The paintability of $G$ measures the minimum value $k$ for which Painter has a strategy to complete a coloring of $G$ in such a way that $|L(v)| \leq k$ for each vertex $v \in V(G)$. The paintability of a graph is an upper bound for its list chromatic number, or choosability. The online list coloring game is a special case of the DP-painting game, which is defined similarly using the setting of DP-coloring. In the DP-painting game, the Lister reveals correspondence covers of a graph $G$ rather than colors, and the Painter chooses independent subsets of these covers. The DP-painting game has a parameter known as DP-paintability which is analogous to paintability. In this paper, we consider upper bounds for the paintability and DP-paintability of a graph $G$ with large maximum degree $Δ$ and chromatic number at most some fixed value $r$. We prove that the paintability of $G$ is at most $\left(1 - \frac{1}{4r+1} \right ) Δ+ 2$ and that the DP-paintability of $G$ is at most $Δ- Ω( \sqrt{Δ\log Δ})$. We prove our first upper bound using Alon-Tarsi orientations, and we prove our second upper bound by considering the strict type-$3$ degeneracy parameter recently introduced by Zhou, Zhu, and Zhu.

We say that a graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is equal to its chromatic number $χ(G)$. Chromatic-choosability is a well-studied topic, and in fact, some of the most famous results and conjectures related to list coloring involve chromatic-choosability. In 2002 Ohba showed that for any graph $G$ there is an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and a complete graph on at least $N$ vertices is chromatic-choosable. The Ohba number of $G$ is the smallest such $N$. In 2014, Noel suggested studying the Ohba number, $τ_{0}(a,b)$, of complete bipartite graphs with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$. In this paper we improve a 2009 result of Allagan by showing that $τ_{0}(2,b) = \lfloor \sqrt{b} \rfloor - 1$ for all $b \geq 2$, and we show that for $a \geq 2$, $τ_{0}(a,b) = Ω( \sqrt{b} )$ as $b \rightarrow \infty$. We also initiate the study of some relaxed versions of the Ohba number of a graph which we call generalized Ohba numbers. We present some upper and lower bounds of generalized Ohba numbers of complete bipartite graphs while also posing some questions.