arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Double-Partition Coloring Problem (DPCP) is a recently introduced generalization of several coloring problems on graphs and hypergraphs, including the Partition Coloring Problem, the List Coloring Problem, and the Conflict-Free Coloring Problem (CFCP). In this work, we further investigate the structural and computational properties of the DPCP and develop exact and heuristic solution approaches. We derive structural results that allow the detection of infeasible instances and the reduction of their size. We propose one-step and two-step heuristics for obtaining high-quality solutions. These procedures are incorporated into an enhanced branch-and-price algorithm based on a set covering formulation of the DPCP. The algorithm further includes new strategies for solving the NP-hard pricing problem. Computational experiments show that the proposed branch-and-price algorithm and a compact integer programming formulation complement each other: while the compact formulation is generally more effective on sparse instances, branch-and-price performs particularly well on denser and larger instances. In particular, these are the first exact algorithms to be computationally evaluated on various CFCP instances.

We study list coloring of common independent sets of two matroids. We construct a graphic matroid $M_1$ and a partition matroid $M_2$ with common chromatic number two and common list chromatic number three, showing that the two parameters need not be equal. This resolves a question raised by Király, later stated as a conjecture by Aharoni, Berger, Guo, and Kotlar. We also show that if two strongly base-orderable matroids are each $2$-colorable, then their intersection is $2$-list-colorable.

A famous folklore result in list coloring demonstrating that the gap between the list chromatic number and chromatic number of a graph can be arbitrarily large is: $χ_{\ell}(K_{l,t}) = 1+l$ if and only if $t \geq l^l$. DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a well-studied generalization of list coloring introduced in 2015. In 2018, Mudrock studied the DP analogue of the aforementioned folklore result. He proved that for $l \in\mathbb{N}$, if $μ(l)$ is the smallest integer $t$ such that $χ_{DP}(K_{l,t})=1+l$, then $\left\lceil l^l/l!\right\rceil \leq μ(l) \leq 1+l^l(\log(l!)+1)/l!$. Recently, Kaul, Mudrock, and Sharma studied a more general version of this problem by studying the smallest $t$ for which $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t}) = k + l$, where $G$ satisfies certain criticality conditions and $G \square K_{l,t}$ denotes the Cartesian product of $G$ and $K_{l,t}$. In this paper, we introduce a notion we call covering families that gives a new perspective on these DP-coloring questions. In particular, if $κ(l)$ denotes the minimum size of a covering family of $[l]^l$, we show that $μ(l)=κ(l)$. We use this equivalence to prove $μ(4)=12$ and to obtain new general lower bounds on $μ(l)$. We also prove a general upper bound on the minimum size of covering families which yields an improved general upper bound on $μ(l)$ and gives improvements on known bounds for related DP-coloring questions involving Cartesian products with complete bipartite graphs.

The classic enumerative functions for counting colorings of a graph $G$, such as the chromatic polynomial $P(G,k)$, do so under the assumption that the given graph is labeled. In 1985, Hanlon defined and studied the chromatic polynomial for an unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$, $P(\mathcal{G}, k)$. Determining $P(\mathcal{G}, k)$ amounts to counting colorings under the action of automorphisms of $\mathcal{G}$. In this paper, we consider the problem of counting list colorings of unlabeled graphs. We extend Hanlon's definition to the list context and define the unlabeled list color function, $P_\ell(\mathcal{G}, k)$, of an unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$. In this context, we pursue a fundamental question whose analogues have driven much of the research on counting list colorings and its generalizations: For a given unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$, does $P_\ell(\mathcal{G}, k) = P(\mathcal{G}, k)$ when $k$ is large enough? We show the answer to this question is yes for almost all graphs, in particular, for a large class of unlabeled graphs that includes point-determining graphs (also known as twin-free graphs, irreducible graphs, and mating graphs).

Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu (2020) introduced the notion of fractional DP-coloring, which generalizes both fractional coloring and fractional list coloring. Among several foundational results, they proved that every $d$-degenerate bipartite graph $G$ satisfies $χ_f^{\mathrm{DP}} \le (1 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log d}$, and that this bound is optimal---a stark contrast to ordinary fractional coloring. In this paper, we extend this upper bound to all $d$-degenerate triangle-free graphs, proving that $χ_f^{\mathrm{DP}} \le (4 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log d}$. This generalizes a recent result of Martinsson and Steiner (2025) for ordinary fractional coloring. We derive this result as a corollary of a more general upper bound concerning locally sparse graph orderings. Specifically, a $d$-degenerate graph $G$ is left $k$-locally-sparse if it admits a degeneracy ordering in which, for every vertex $v$, the subgraph induced by its back-neighbors contains at most $k$ edges. We show that if a $d$-degenerate graph $G$ is left $\frac{d^2}{f}$-locally-sparse, then \[ χ_f^{\mathrm{DP}}(G) \le (8 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log f}. \] This immediately yields an identical upper bound on the ordinary fractional chromatic number $χ_f(G)$, improving upon the leading constants of previously known bounds. Additionally, we establish the asymptotic sharpness of this result up to the leading constant. For any $1 \ll f \le d^2$, we construct $d$-degenerate graphs that are left $\frac{d^2}{f}$-locally-sparse and satisfy $χ_f(G) \ge (1 - o(1))\frac{d}{\log f}$. Finally, as applications of our main theorem, we obtain improved upper bounds on the fractional DP-chromatic number of $d$-degenerate $K_{1,t,t}$-free graphs, as well as $K_{t,t,t}$-free graphs with maximum degree $Δ$. Notably, these bounds improve upon existing results even in the setting of ordinary fractional coloring.

For finite simple graphs $G,H$ on a common vertex set $V$, we say that $H$ is $G$-colorable if $H$ admits a proper list coloring with list assignment $L(v)=N_G(v)$ for all $v\in V$. This notion of coloring a graph using the neighborhood of another graph on the same vertex set, which we call \emph{graphic list coloring}, has connections to several classical topics, including systems of distinct representatives and graph factorizations. In this paper, we investigate when a necessary Hall-type condition, introduced by Hilton and Johnson in 1990, is also sufficient for $H$ to be $G$-colorable. We characterize all graphs $H$ that are $G$-colorable whenever the pair $(H,G)$ satisfies Hall's condition, answering a question raised by Johnson. We then consider the dual problem of characterizing graphs $G$ such that, whenever $(H,G)$ satisfies Hall's condition, $H$ is $G$-colorable. In this vein, we obtain complete results for several families of graphs, such as forests, complete multipartite graphs, and grid graphs.

A graph $G$ is $k$-choosable if it has a proper coloring for every $k$-list assignment. While every $C_3$-free planar graph is $4$-choosable, some of them are not $3$-choosable, as constructed by Voigt. Hu and Zhu conjectured that if $G$ is a $C_3$-free planar graph and $X \subseteq V(G)$ induces a bipartite subgraph, then $G$ has a proper $L$-coloring whenever $|L(x)| = 3$ for $x \in X$ and $|L(v)| = 4$ for $v \in V(G) \setminus X$. As evidence, they proved the conjecture when $X$ is an independent set. We provide further evidence by proving the conjecture when the induced subgraph $G[X]$ is an induced sparse matching. This is the first result supporting the conjecture in which the set $X$ receiving smaller lists may induce a subgraph with edges.

For a graph $G$, a proper coloring of $G$ is called proper conflict-free if for every non-isolated vertex $u$, there is at least one color appearing exactly once in $N_G(u)$. A graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)|\ge f(v)$ for each vertex $v$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring. Recently, Kashima, Škrekovski, and Xu proposed a conjecture on proper conflict-free list coloring. For a graph $G$, let $κ_G:V(G)\to \mathbb{N}$ be defined by \[ κ_G(v)= \begin{cases} 4, & \text{if } d_G(v)=2,\\[4pt] d_G(v)+1, & \text{if } d_G(v)\neq 2. \end{cases} \] They conjectured that every connected graph other than $C_5$ is proper conflict-free $κ_G$-choosable. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture in two classes of graphs with bounded average degree, thereby generalizing results of Kashima, Škrekovski, and Xu and of Wang and Zhang. We prove that every connected graph $G\neq C_5$ with either $\operatorname{mad}(G)<\frac{12}{5}$ or $Δ(G)\le3$ is proper conflict-free $κ_G$-choosable. To prove these results, we introduce a method based on systems of proper conflict-free representatives and develop a construction of auxiliary graphs that preserves the maximum average degree bound.

Let $λ=\{k_1,\ldots,k_q\}$ be a partition, and let $|λ|=k_1+\cdots+k_q$. A $|λ|$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$ is a $λ$-assignment if its color set can be partitioned into $q$ disjoint sets $X_1,\ldots,X_q$ such that $|L(v)\cap X_i|=k_i$ for every vertex $v$ and every $i\in[q]$. This notion, introduced by Zhu [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 2020], puts ordinary coloring and list coloring in the same framework. A theorem of Alon [Random Structures Algorithms, 2000] states that every graph with minimum degree $d$ has choice number at least $(1/2-o(1))\log_2d$. Saxton and Thomason [Invent. Math., 2015] later used the hypergraph container method to replace $1/2$ by the sharp constant $1$. It is natural to ask whether a similar phenomenon holds for every fixed partition $λ$. Minimum degree alone is not sufficient: balanced complete bipartite graphs have arbitrarily large minimum degree but are always $\{1,1\}$-choosable. We show that the appropriate replacement is the minimum $q$-codegree, defined for $|V(G)|\geq q$ by $δ_q(G)=\min\{|N_G(S)|:S\subseteq V(G),\,|S|=q\}$. More precisely, for every partition $λ$ there exists an integer $d$ such that every graph $G$ with $δ_q(G)\geq d$ is not $λ$-choosable. Let $f(λ)$ be the least such $d$. For every fixed $q$, we prove $f(λ)\leq2^{(2q+o(1))|λ|}$ as $|λ|\to\infty$, while $f(λ)\geq(q+1)^{-1}(1+1/q)^{|λ|}$ for every $λ$. For the partition $\{k,\ldots,k\}$ with $q$ equal parts, we determine the threshold asymptotically: $f(\{k,\ldots,k\})=ρ_q^{-(1+o(1))k}$ as $k\to\infty$, where $ρ_q$ is the unique $x\in(0,1)$ satisfying $x=(1-x)^q$. When $q=1$, our result implies $\operatorname{ch}(G)\geq(1-o(1))\log_2δ(G)$.

DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of $P(G,q)$, the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,q)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all $q$-fold covers of $G$. It follows that $P_{DP}(G,q) \leq P(G,q)$. It is known that there are graphs for which $P_{DP}(G,q) < P(G,q)$ for all sufficiently large $q$; in fact, all bipartite graphs containing a cycle have this property. A fundamental open question about DP color functions asks whether, for every graph $G$, there exist $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p$ such that $P_{DP}(G,q) = p(q)$ whenever $q \geq N$. In this paper we answer this question affirmatively for all bipartite graphs. Specifically, if $G$ is an $n$-vertex bipartite graph with $c$ components, then $P_{DP}(G,q) = (-1)^{n-c}q^c \;T_G(1-q,1)$ for all sufficiently large $q$, where $T_G(x,y)$ is the Tutte polynomial of $G$. The ideas we develop also yield an asymptotic formula for $P(G,q)-P_{DP}(G,q)$ whenever the girth of $G$ is even.

The square of a graph $G$ is the graph obtained from $G$ after adding an edge between any two vertices of distance $2$. A $k$-irregular graph is a graph with maximum degree $k$ such that vertices of degree $k$ are not adjacent. A \textit{list assignment} of a graph is a function $L$ that assigns to each vertex a list of permissible colors. The graph is said to be \textit{$L$-colorable} if there exists a proper coloring $f$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for every vertex $v$. A graph $G$ is called \textit{$k$-choosable} if it is $L$-colorable for every list assignment where each list has exactly $k$ colors. The \textit{list chromatic number} of $G$, denoted by $χ_l(G)$, is the smallest integer $k$ for which $G$ is $k$-choosable. Cranston and Kim \cite{ck} showed that $χ_l(G^2) \leq 8$ for all subcubic graphs except the Petersen Graph. Moreover, Cranston and Kim \cite{ck} conjectured that for graphs with maximum degree $k$ and maximum clique size $w (G^2)\leq k^2-1$, we have $χ_l(G^2) \leq k^2-1$. We prove that for a 4-irregular graph $G$, we have $χ_l(G^2) \leq 11$. Moreover, we provide an example to show that this bound is sharp.

We prove that for every fixed integer $r\geq 2$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, every sufficiently large finite uncrowded $(r+1)$-uniform hypergraph of maximum degree $Δ$ has list chromatic number at most \[ (1+\varepsilon)\left(\frac{rΔ}{\logΔ}\right)^{1/r}. \] The proof is a semi-random list-coloring nibble carried out directly on the original hypergraph. We encode the remaining coloring problem by active edge-color constraints and control all residual sizes through a binomial degree bound. After the nibble reaches a sparse terminal state, the coloring is completed by a Rosenfeld-style counting argument.

We show that list $3$-coloring a~$C_4$-free graph of diameter-$2$ can be done in polynomial-time. Our algorithm is based on a structural characterization showing that many such graphs are not~$3$-colorable. In particular, we show that~$C_4$-free graphs of diameter-$2$ without universal vertices, where the maximum degree is at least~$17$, are not~$3$-colorable.

For a graph $G$, a proper $k$-coloring of $G$ is \emph{equitable} if the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most one. The \textsc{Equitable $k$-Coloring} problem asks, for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$, whether $G$ admits an equitable $k$-coloring. Bodlaender and Fomin showed that it is polynomial-time solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth, while it remains $\NP$-hard on cographs, and thus on graphs of constant clique-width. Fellows et al. showed that the problem becomes $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard when parameterized by tree-width (and hence clique-width) plus the number of colors~$k$. We first show that, for every fixed $k$, counting equitable $k$-colorings is polynomial-time solvable on graph classes of bounded clique-width, given a clique-width expression. We then show that, under $\mathsf{SETH}$, the dependence on clique-width in this algorithm is essentially optimal. As a consequence, our results provide a fairly tight picture of the complexity of \textsc{Equitable $k$-Coloring} with respect to the combined parameter $k$+clique-width. Second, we refine our clique-width algorithm for the linear setting. We show that there exists an algorithm, given an integer $k\ge 1$ and an $n$-vertex graph $G$ together with a linear $w$-expression constructing $G$, computes the number of equitable $k$-colorings of $G$ in time $\max\{1,2^k-2\}^w\cdot n^{k+O(1)}$. Third, we consider a different structural restriction, namely the class of $P_t$-free graphs. A graph is called $P_t$-free if it does not contain the path on $t$ vertices as an induced subgraph. This is a different setting from bounded clique-width; in particular, already $P_5$-free graphs have unbounded clique-width. Nevertheless, we show that for every $P_t$-free graph $G$, the number of equitable list $3$-colorings of $G$ can be computed in subexponential time.

A proper $k$-coloring of vertices of an $n$-vertex graph is equitable if the size of every color class is $\lfloor n/k\rfloor$ or $\lceil n/k\rceil$. An extension of it to list coloring requires only that the size of every color class is at most $\lceil n/k\rceil$. Such colorings have interesting applications and have been actively studied recently. In this paper, we extend the notion of equitable coloring to the more general notion of equitable DP coloring and study properties of the new parameter.

Chromatic choosability is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number, $χ(G)$, is equal to its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. A graph $G$ is said to be enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ for every $m \in \mathbb{N}$. Theta graphs and their generalizations have played an important role in graph coloring problems over the years; for example, they appear in the characterization of chromatic-choosable graphs with chromatic number 2. In this paper we characterize the enumeratively chromatic-choosable theta graphs. Our proof utilizes ideas from DP-coloring (a.k.a. correspondence coloring), providing yet another example of how the more general setting of DP-coloring can be leveraged to attack a problem in list coloring.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, $χ_{_{DP}}(G)$, is the analogue of the chromatic number of $G$ in the DP context and is bounded above by the degeneracy of $G$ plus one. Over the last two years a plethora of authors have introduced variations on the notion of degeneracy and used these new ideas to give improved bounds on the DP-chromatic number of certain families of graphs. Fractional DP-coloring is a generalization of fractional list coloring introduced by Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu in 2019. In this paper we introduce two analogues of the degeneracy of a graph to the fractional context, each of which bound its fractional DP-chromatic number from above. We use these analogues to bound the fractional DP-chromatic number of a variety of graphs including unicyclic graphs, some complete bipartite graphs, and sparse graphs.

A strong edge coloring of a graph $G$ is an edge coloring $φ\,:\,E(G) \rightarrow \mathbb N$ such that each color class forms an induced matching in $G$. The strong chromatic index of $G$, written $χ'_s(G)$, is the minimum number of colors needed for a strong edge coloring of $G$. Erdős and Nešetřil conjectured in 1985 that if $G$ has maximum degree $d$, then $χ'_s(G) \leq \frac 54 d^2$. Mahdian showed in 2000 that if $G$ is $C_4$-free, then $χ'_s(G) \leq (2+o(1)) \frac{d^2}{\log d}$, and he conjectured that the same upper bound holds for $K_{t,t}$-free graphs. In this paper, we prove this conjecture and improve upon it to show the following: every $K_{t,t}$-free graph $G$ of maximum degree $d$ satisfies $χ'_s(G) \leq (1+o(1)) \frac{d^2}{\log d}$. We employ a variant of the Rödl nibble method to prove this result. The key new ingredient in our adaptation of the method is an application of the Kővári-Sós-Turán theorem to show that $H := L(G)^2$ satisfies certain structural properties. These properties, in conjunction with a variant of Talagrand's inequality to handle exceptional outcomes, allow us to concentrate the sizes of certain vertex sets through the nibble, even when these vertex sets have order smaller than the maximum codegree of $H$. We encapsulate these structural properties into a more general statement on list coloring that we believe to be of independent interest. In light of the conjectured computational threshold for coloring random graphs arising in average-case complexity theory, we suspect that our result is best possible using this approach.

Thomassen famously proved that every planar graph is 5-choosable. We explore variants of this result, focusing on finding disjoint correspondence colorings, in the more general class of $K_5$-minor-free graphs. Correspondence colorings generalize list colorings as follows. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $t$, a correspondence $t$-cover $\textbf{M}$ assigns to each $v\in V(G)$ a set of allowable colors $\{1_v,\ldots,t_v\}$ and to each edge $vw\in E(G)$ a matching between $\{1_v,\ldots,t_v\}$ and $\{1_w,\ldots,t_w\}$. An $\textbf{M}$-coloring $\varphi$ picks for each vertex $v$ a color $\varphi(v)$ (from the set $\{1_v,\ldots,t_v\}$) such that for each edge $vw\in E(G)$ the colors $\varphi(v),\varphi(w)$ are not matched to each other. Two $\textbf{M}$-colorings $\varphi_1,\varphi_2$ of $G$ are called disjoint if $\varphi_1(v)\ne\varphi_2(v)$ for all $v\in V(G)$. For every $K_5$-minor-free graph $G$ and every correspondence 6-cover $\textbf{M}$ of $G$, we construct 3 pairwise disjoint $\textbf{M}$-colorings $\varphi_1,\varphi_2,\varphi_3$. In contrast, we provide examples of $K_5$-minor-free graphs and correspondence 5-covers $\textbf{M}$ that do not admit 3 disjoint $\textbf{M}$-colorings.

Given a graph $G$ and a mapping $f:V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-list assignment of $G$ is a function that maps each $v \in V(G)$ to a set of at least $f(v)$ colors. For an $f$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, $φ(v) \in L(v)$ and some appears precisely once in the neighborhood of $v$. We say that $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for every $f$-list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$. If $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable and there is a constant $k$ such that $f(v)= d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, then we say $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable. In this paper, we consider graphs with a bounded maximum average degree. We show that every graph with the maximum average degree less than $\frac{10}{3}$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable, and that every graph with the maximum average degree less than $\frac{18}{7}$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable. As a result, every planar graph with girth at least $5$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable, and every planar graph with girth at least $9$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable.