arXiv++ Combinatorics

A set $A \subseteq {\mathbb{R}}^n$ is called an antichain (resp. antichain) if it does not contain two distinct elements ${\mathbf x}=(x_1,\ldots, x_n)$ and ${\mathbf y}=(y_1,\ldots, y_n)$ satisfying $x_i\le y_i$ (resp. $x_i < y_i$) for all $i\in \{1,\ldots,n\}$. We show that the Hausdorff dimension of a weak antichain $A$ in the $n$-dimensional unit cube $[0,1]^n$ is at most $n-1$ and that the $(n-1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure of $A$ is at most $n$, which are the best possible bounds. This result is derived as a corollary of the following {\it projection inequality}, which may be of independent interest: The $(n-1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure of a (weak) antichain $A\subseteq [0, 1]^n$ cannot exceed the sum of the $(n-1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measures of the $n$ orthogonal projections of $A$ onto the facets of the unit $n$-cube containing the origin. For the proof of this result we establish a discrete variant of the projection inequality applicable to weak antichains in ${\mathbb Z}^n$ and combine it with ideas from geometric measure theory.

We give a necessary and sufficient condition for a $P_4$-free graph to be a cograph. This allows us to obtain a simple proof of the fact that finite $P_4$-free graphs are finite cographs. We also prove that $N$-free chain complete posets and $N$-free posets with no infinite antichains are series-parallel. As a consequence, we obtain that every $N$-free poset with no infinite antichain has a chain and a partition into antichains so that each part intersects the chain. This answers a conjecture of Aharoni and Korman (Order \textbf{9} (1992) 245--253) in this case.

The hypergraph states are pure multipartite quantum states corresponding to a hypergraph. It is an equal superposition of the states belonging to the computational basis. Given any hypergraph, we can construct a hypergraph state determined by a Boolean function. In contrast, we can find a hypergraph, corresponding to a Boolean function. This investigation develops a number of combinatorial structures concerned with the hypergraph states. For instance, the elements of the computational basis generate a lattice. The chains and antichains in this lattice assist us to find the equation of the Boolean function explicitly as well as to find a hypergraph. In addition, we investigate the entanglement property of the hypergraph states in terms of their combinatorial structures. We demonstrate several classes of hypergraphs, such that every cut of equal length on the corresponding hypergraph states has an equal amount of entanglement.

For an integer $q\ge 2$, a graph $G$ is called $q$-Ramsey for a graph $H$ if every $q$-colouring of the edges of $G$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. If $G$ is $q$-Ramsey for $H$, yet no proper subgraph of $G$ has this property then $G$ is called $q$-Ramsey-minimal for $H$. Generalising a statement by Burr, Nešetřil and Rödl from 1977 we prove that, for $q\ge 3$, if $G$ is a graph that is not $q$-Ramsey for some graph $H$ then $G$ is contained as an induced subgraph in an infinite number of $q$-Ramsey-minimal graphs for $H$, as long as $H$ is $3$-connected or isomorphic to the triangle. For such $H$, the following are some consequences. (1) For $2\le r< q$, every $r$-Ramsey-minimal graph for $H$ is contained as an induced subgraph in an infinite number of $q$-Ramsey-minimal graphs for $H$. (2) For every $q\ge 3$, there are $q$-Ramsey-minimal graphs for $H$ of arbitrarily large maximum degree, genus, and chromatic number. (3) The collection $\{{\cal M}_q(H) : H \text{ is 3-connected or } K_3\}$ forms an antichain with respect to the subset relation, where ${\cal M}_q(H)$ denotes the set of all graphs that are $q$-Ramsey-minimal for $H$. We also address the question which pairs of graphs satisfy ${\cal M}_q(H_1)={\cal M}_q(H_2)$, in which case $H_1$ and $H_2$ are called $q$-equivalent. We show that two graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ are $q$-equivalent for even $q$ if they are $2$-equivalent, and that in general $q$-equivalence for some $q\ge 3$ does not necessarily imply $2$-equivalence. Finally we indicate that for connected graphs this implication may hold: Results by Nešetřil and Rödl and by Fox, Grinshpun, Liebenau, Person and Szabó imply that the complete graph is not $2$-equivalent to any other connected graph. We prove that this is the case for an arbitrary number of colours.

We address the following rainbow Ramsey problem: For posets $P,Q$ what is the smallest number $n$ such that any coloring of the elements of the Boolean lattice $B_n$ either admits a monochromatic copy of $P$ or a rainbow copy of $Q$. We consider both weak and strong (non-induced and induced) versions of this problem. We also investigate related problems on (partial) $k$-colorings of $B_n$ that do not admit rainbow antichains of size $k$.

A {\it clutter} (or {\it antichain} or {\it Sperner family}) $L$ is a pair $(V,E)$, where $V$ is a finite set and $E$ is a family of subsets of $V$ none of which is a subset of another. Normally, the elements of $V$ are called {\it vertices} of $L$, and the elements of $E$ are called {\it edges} of $L$. A subset $s_e$ of an edge $e$ of a clutter is {\it recognizing} for $e$, if $s_e$ is not a subset of another edge. The {\it hardness} of an edge $e$ of a clutter is the ratio of the size of $e\textrm{'s}$ smallest recognizing subset to the size of $e$. The hardness of a clutter is the maximum hardness of its edges. In this short note we prove a lower bound for the hardness of an arbitrary clutter. Our bound is asymptotically best-possible in a sense that there is an infinite sequence of clutters attaining our bound.

The $P$-partition generating function of a (naturally labeled) poset $P$ is a quasisymmetric function enumerating order-preserving maps from $P$ to $\mathbb{Z}^+$. Using the Hopf algebra of posets, we give necessary conditions for two posets to have the same generating function. In particular, we show that they must have the same number of antichains of each size, as well as the same shape (as defined by Greene). We also discuss which shapes guarantee uniqueness of the $P$-partition generating function and give a method of constructing pairs of non-isomorphic posets with the same generating function.

A coloured version of classic extremal problems dates back to Erdős and Rothschild, who in 1974 asked which $n$-vertex graph has the maximum number of 2-edge-colourings without monochromatic triangles. They conjectured that the answer is simply given by the largest triangle-free graph. Since then, this new class of coloured extremal problems has been extensively studied by various researchers. In this paper we pursue the Erdős--Rothschild versions of Sperner's Theorem, the classic result in extremal set theory on the size of the largest antichain in the Boolean lattice, and Erdős' extension to $k$-chain-free families. Given a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $[n]$, we define an $(r,k)$-colouring of $\mathcal{F}$ to be an $r$-colouring of the sets without any monochromatic $k$-chains $F_1 \subset F_2 \subset \dots \subset F_k$. We prove that for $n$ sufficiently large in terms of $k$, the largest $k$-chain-free families also maximise the number of $(2,k)$-colourings. We also show that the middle level, $\binom{[n]}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$, maximises the number of $(3,2)$-colourings, and give asymptotic results on the maximum possible number of $(r,k)$-colourings whenever $r(k-1)$ is divisible by three.

We investigate a trivariate polynomial associated with rooted trees. It generalises a bivariate polynomial for rooted trees that was recently introduced by Liu. We show that this polynomial satisfies a deletion-contraction recursion and can be expressed as a sum over maximal antichains. Several combinatorial quantities can be obtained as special values, in particular the number of antichains, maximal antichains and cutsets. We prove that two of the three possible bivariate specialisations characterise trees uniquely up to isomorphism. One of these has already been established by Liu, the other is new. For the third specialisation, we construct non-isomorphic trees with the same associated polynomial. We finally find that our polynomial can be generalised in a natural way to a family of posets that we call $\mathcal{V}$-posets. These posets are obtained recursively by either disjoint unions or adding a greatest/least element to existing $\mathcal{V}$-posets.

A family of sets is called $r$-\emph{cover free} if no set in the family is contained in the union of $r$ (or less) other sets in the family. A $1$-cover free family is simply an antichain with respect to set inclusion. Thus, Sperner's classical result determines the maximal cardinality of a $1$-cover free family of subsets of an $n$-element set. Estimating the maximal cardinality of an $r$-cover free family of subsets of an $n$-element set for $r>1$ was also studied. In this note we are interested in the following probabilistic variant of this problem. Let $S_0,S_1,\ldots, S_r$ be independent and identically distributed random subsets of an $n$-element set. Which distribution minimizes the probability that $S_0\subseteq {\bigcup_{i=1}^r S_i}$? A natural candidate is the uniform distribution on an $r$-cover-free family of maximal cardinality. We show that for $r=1$ such distribution is indeed best possible. In a complete contrast, we also show that this is far from being true for every $r>1$ and $n$ large enough.

We prove that there are arbitrarily large indecomposable ordered sets T with a 2-chain C such that the smallest indecomposable proper superset U of C in T is T itself. Subsequently, we characterize all such indecomposable ordered sets T and 2-chains C. We also prove the same type of result for 2-antichains.

We establish formulas for the number of all downsets (or equivalently, of all antichains) of a finite poset P. Then, using these numbers, we determine recursively and explicitly the number of all posets having a fixed set of minimal points and inducing the poset P on the non- minimal points. It turns out that these counting functions are closely related to a collection of downset numbers of certain subposets. Since any function of that kind is an exponential sum (with the number of minimal points as exponent), we call it the exponential function of the poset. Some linear equations, divisibility relations, upper and lower bounds, and asymptotical equalities for the counting functions are deduced. A list of all such exponential functions for posets with up to five points concludes the paper.

Birational rowmotion is an action on the space of assignments of rational functions to the elements of a finite partially-ordered set (poset). It is lifted from the well-studied rowmotion map on order ideals (equivariantly on antichains) of a poset $P$, which when iterated on special posets, has unexpectedly nice properties in terms of periodicity, cyclic sieving, and homomesy (statistics whose averages over each orbit are constant) [AST11, BW74, CF95, Pan09, PR13, RuSh12,RuWa15+,SW12, ThWi17, Yil17. In this context, rowmotion appears to be related to Auslander-Reiten translation on certain quivers, and birational rowmotion to $Y$-systems of type $A_m \times A_n$ described in Zamolodchikov periodicity. We give a formula in terms of families of non-intersecting lattice paths for iterated actions of the birational rowmotion map on a product of two chains. This allows us to give a much simpler direct proof of the key fact that the period of this map on a product of chains of lengths $r$ and $s$ is $r+s+2$ (first proved by D.~Grinberg and the second author), as well as the first proof of the birational analogue of homomesy along files for such posets.

Let $Λ^{\ast}$ be the free monoid of (finite) words over a not necessarily finite alphabet $Λ$, which is equipped with some (partial) order. This ordering lifts to $Λ^{\ast}$, where it extends the divisibility ordering of words. The MacNeille completion of $Λ^{\ast}$ constitutes a complete lattice ordered monoid and is realized by the system of "closed" lower sets in $Λ^*$ (ordered by inclusion) or its isomorphic copy formed of the "closed" upper sets (ordered by reverse inclusion). Under some additional hypothesis on $Λ$, one can easily identify the closed lower sets as the finitely generated ones, whereas it is more complicated to determine the closed upper sets. For a fairly large class of ordered sets $Λ$ (including complete lattices as well as antichains) one can generate the closure of any upper set of words by means of binary operations ( "syntactic rules") thus obtaining an efficient procedure to test closedness. Closed upper set of words are involved in an embedding theorem for valuated oriented graphs. In fact, generalized paths (so-called "zigzags") are encoded by words over an alphabet $Λ$. Then the valuated oriented graphs which are "isometrically" embeddable in a product of zigzags have the characteristic property that the words corresponding to the zigzags between any pair of vertices form a closed upper set in $Λ$.

We prove that the set of permutations sorted by a stack of depth $t \geq 3$ and an infinite stack in series has infinite basis, by constructing an infinite antichain. This answers an open question on identifying the point at which, in a sorting process with two stacks in series, the basis changes from finite to infinite.

The main aim of this paper is to bridge two directions of research generalizing asymptotic density zero sets. This enables to transfer results concerning one direction to the other one. Consider a function $g\colonω\to [0,\infty)$ such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}g(n)=\infty$ and $\frac{n}{g(n)}$ does not converge to $0$. Then the family $\mathcal{Z}_g=\{A\subseteqω:\ \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\text{card}(A\cap n)}{g(n)}=0\}$ is an ideal called simple density ideal (or ideal associated to upper density of weight $g$). We compare this class of ideals with Erdős-Ulam ideals. In particular, we show that there are $\sqsubseteq$-antichains of size $\mathfrak{c}$ among Erdős-Ulam ideals which are and are not simple density ideals. We characterize simple density ideals which are Erdős-Ulam as those containing the classical ideal of sets of asymptotic density zero. We also characterize Erdős-Ulam ideals which are simple density ideals. In the latter case we need to introduce two new notions. One of them, called increasing-invariance of an ideal $\mathcal{I}$, asserts that given $B\in\mathcal{I}$ and $C\subseteqω$ with $\text{card}(C\cap n)\leq\text{card}(B\cap n)$ for all $n$, we have $C\in\mathcal{I}$. Finally, we pose some open problems.

We investigate the ordinal invariants height, length, and width of well quasi orders (WQO), with particular emphasis on width, an invariant of interest for the larger class of orders with finite antichain condition (FAC). We show that the width in the class of FAC orders is completely determined by the width in the class of WQOs, in the sense that if we know how to calculate the width of any WQO then we have a procedure to calculate the width of any given FAC order. We show how the width of WQO orders obtained via some classical constructions can sometimes be computed in a compositional way. In particular, this allows proving that every ordinal can be obtained as the width of some WQO poset. One of the difficult questions is to give a complete formula for the width of Cartesian products of WQOs. Even the width of the product of two ordinals is only known through a complex recursive formula. Although we have not given a complete answer to this question we have advanced the state of knowledge by considering some more complex special cases and in particular by calculating the width of certain products containing three factors. In the course of writing the paper we have discovered that some of the relevant literature was written on cross-purposes and some of the notions re-discovered several times. Therefore we also use the occasion to give a unified presentation of the known results. ERRATUM:We incorrectly claimed in Lemma 4.4(1) the formula $o(P\cdot Q)=o(P)\cdot o(Q)$ for wpos $P$ and $Q$ and incorrectly attributed it to Abraham and Bonnet. We incorrectly claimed in 4.4(2) that the formula for $h(P\cdot Q)$ was due to Abraham and Bonnet.

Let $P(n)$ be the set of all posets with $n$ elements. Let $P^{(j)}(n)$, $1\leq j\leq 2^n,$ be the number of all posets with $n$ elements possessing exactly $j$ antichains. We have determined the numbers $P^{(j)}(7),$ $1\leq j\leq 128$, and using a result of M.~Erné [Erné, M., On the cardinalities of finite topologies and the number of antichains in partially ordered sets, Discrete Mathematics 35 (1981), 119-133.], we compute $|P(10)|$ without the aid of any computer program. We include the Hasse diagrams of all the non-isomorphic posets of $P(7)$. We also present formulas for the number of connected posets of certain forms, and use them to compute $|P(n)|$ with $1\le n\le 8$ by a different method.

Phylogenetic networks generalise phylogenetic trees and allow for the accurate representation of the evolutionary history of a set of present-day species whose past includes reticulate events such as hybridisation and lateral gene transfer. One way to obtain such a network is by starting with a (rooted) phylogenetic tree $T$, called a base tree, and adding arcs between arcs of $T$. The class of phylogenetic networks that can be obtained in this way is called tree-based networks and includes the prominent classes of tree-child and reticulation-visible networks. Initially defined for binary phylogenetic networks, tree-based networks naturally extend to arbitrary phylogenetic networks. In this paper, we generalise recent tree-based characterisations and associated proximity measures for binary phylogenetic networks to arbitrary phylogenetic networks. These characterisations are in terms of matchings in bipartite graphs, path partitions, and antichains. Some of the generalisations are straightforward to establish using the original approach, while others require a very different approach. Furthermore, for an arbitrary tree-based network $N$, we characterise the support trees of $N$, that is, the tree-based embeddings of $N$. We use this characterisation to give an explicit formula for the number of support trees of $N$ when $N$ is binary. This formula is written in terms of the components of a bipartite graph.

How large an antichain can we find inside a given downset in the lattice of subsets of [n]? Sperner's theorem asserts that the largest antichain in the whole lattice has size the binomial coefficient C(n, n/2); what happens for general downsets? Our main results are a Dilworth-type decomposition theorem for downsets, and a new proof of a result of Engel and Leck that determines the largest possible antichain size over all downsets of a given size. We also prove some related results, such as determining the maximum size of an antichain inside the downset that we conjecture minimizes this quantity among downsets of a given size.