arXiv++ Combinatorics

A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ is a locating-dominating set (LDS) if, for each pair of distinct vertices not in~$S$, their neighbourhoods in $S$ are distinct. Finding a minimum-cardinality LDS in finite graphs is a well-known NP-hard problem. On infinite graphs, this problem naturally generalises to finding an LDS of minimum density. While density bounds have been widely studied for specific infinite regular grids, no computational complexity results exist for infinite graphs. We prove that the minimum-density LDS problem in infinite $\mathbb{Z}$-periodic graphs with a finite period is NP-hard. This result bridges the gap between cardinality minimization on finite graphs and density minimization on infinite graphs via a rigorous periodic reduction. Furthermore, our approach can be adapted to establish NP-hardness for related structural problems on infinite periodic graphs.

For a matroid $M$, a join is a set $J\subseteq E(M)$ that meets every circuit $C$ in at most $|C|/2$ elements. Let $μ(M)$ denote the maximum size of a join. Motivated by Frank's min--max theorem for graphic matroids, we compare $μ(M)$ with an ear-decomposition parameter $η(M)=(r(M)+\varphi(M))/2$, where $\varphi(M)$ is the minimum number of even lobes in an ear decomposition of $M$. Frank's theorem implies $μ(M)=η(M)$ for connected graphic matroids. Here we study how far this equality extends beyond graphic matroids. We show that the exact equality does not hold in general: it already fails for cographic matroids, hence within the binary class. Furthermore, the class of matroids satisfying $μ(M)=η(M)$ is not minor-closed, thus there is little hope for a forbidden minor characterization. We also prove that computing a maximum join is NP-hard for cographic matroids, hard to approximate within a factor of $519/520$, and NP-hard for sparse paving matroids given by their list of bases. Despite these negative results, we show that the two parameters remain quantitatively comparable in several natural classes. We prove comparison bounds for binary, paving, cographic, and arbitrary connected matroids. In particular, using Seymour's decomposition theorem, we combine the equality for graphic matroids, the bound for cographic matroids, and a direct analysis of $R_{10}$ to obtain $η(M)\leq 6μ(M)-2$ for every regular matroid $M$.

Symmetric Numerical Three-Dimensional Matching (SN3DM) asks whether three disjoint labeled classes with identical weight multisets can be partitioned into class-transversal triples of one common target sum. Its theme is role recovery under marginal symmetry: identical numerical catalogues force the asymmetric source roles to be reconstructed from incidence structure alone. This tutorial develops three complementary hardness results for that symmetry restriction. Part I gives a unary-polynomial reduction from N3DM. Source roles become ports in one common occurrence set, a uniquely forced filler system reserves one main incidence per port, bipartite edge coloring restores the output-class labels, and a no-carry mixed-radix encoding packs four coordinates into positive integers. Hence SN3DM is strongly NP-complete. Part II studies Max-SN3DM, for which strong NP-hardness alone does not exclude a PTAS. Two numerical compilers lift Petrank's perfect-completeness gap for bounded 3DM to unary Max-N3DM, and a defect-stability lemma shows that a symmetric matching of size 13n - d yields a source matching of size at least n - 21d, where n is the multiset cardinality, and d is a symmetric defect. Hence, for some epsilon > 0, it is NP-hard to separate perfect instances from those of optimum at most (1- epsilon) times perfect, so no PTAS exists unless P = NP. Every maximal legal triple matching is a 3-approximation, placing the problem in APX. Part III supplies the approximation-preserving reduction Part II does not claim. An exact pair compiler and a one-live-port separation map degree-three Maximum 3DM to unary Max-SN3DM with OPT(Max-SN3DM) = Gamma + OPT(Max-3DM) for a fixed offset Gamma and one-for-one optimum-error transfer. The L-reduction has constants alpha = 764 and beta = 1, so Max-SN3DM is APX-complete. The two are incomparable; worked yes / no instances audit each construction.

The global and local $\mathcal{G}$-covering number $c_{\mathrm{g}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ and $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ encode how well the edges of a graph $H$ can be covered with graphs from a graph class $\mathcal{G}$: in the global setting, we minimize the number of graphs from $\mathcal{G}$ required, in the local setting how often a vertex is hit by the graphs of the cover. Within this work we consider for $\mathcal{G}$ the graph classes $\mathcal{B}$ of all bipartite and $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{c}}$ of all complete bipartite graphs. We give a tight lower bound on $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{B}}(H)$ in terms of the fractional chromatic number of $H$, thereby giving a local analogue of a result by Harary, Hsu and Miller. Answering a question by Fishburn and Hammer, we show that it is NP-hard to determine $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{c}}}(H)$. Further, we provide a finite and monotone graph class $\mathcal{G}$ such that $c_{\mathrm{g}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ can be computed in constant time for every graph $H$ while determining $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ is NP-hard. This yields a natural example to a question raised by Knauer and Ueckerdt.

Let $\mathcal F$ be a graph class that is closed under topological minors and 1-sums, has decidable membership, contains a triangle, and is not the class of all graphs. Recently, Lee, Liu, and Tsai [ICALP 2026] showed that the edge-decomposition problem into $k \geq 3$ elements of $\mathcal F$ is NP-hard. In particular, their general hardness reduction covers a long-standing problem on outerthickness (when $\mathcal F$ is the class of outerplanar graphs). On the other hand, it is well known that decomposing a graph into forests is polynomial-time solvable, as implied by work of Edmonds [J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. B. 1965]. In this paper, we take a first step toward determining the complexity of edge-decomposition problems into just two graphs (the case $k=2$). We consider the simplest possible graph class $\mathcal F$ satisfying the criteria above: the triangular forests, that is, graphs in which every 2-connected component is a triangle. We prove that determining whether a graph can be edge-decomposed into two triangular forests is NP-complete.

Inspired by the notion of tricolorability of knots, we introduce the concept of lean coloring for hypergraphs and the associated lean number of a hypergraph. Lean coloring often involves very few colors, yet still requires the methods of usual graph coloring, forcing the overall complexity to be NP-Hard. We provide two alternative formulations of the lean coloring problem that involve a type of coloring on abstract simplicial complexes and a partial coloring on bipartite graphs. We then provide bounds for the lean numbers of hypergraphs that are $k$-uniform, $k$-partite, wide-path connected, or $r$-complete. Python-like script is included to allow the implementation and study of a lean coloring algorithm. We conclude with some directions for future work and present the lean numbers of $130$ knots and links.

The dimension of a poset $P$ is the minimum positive integer $d$ such that $P$ is an induced subposet of $\mathbb{R}^d$ equipped with the product order. We give a constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithm for computing dimension in the class of posets with a planar (Hasse) diagram. While computing the dimension of a poset is NP-hard in general, the computational complexity of the problem for planar posets remains open. The algorithmic result is driven by a structural understanding of the canonical obstruction to small dimension: standard examples. A longstanding problem, originating in the early 1980s, asked whether every poset with a planar diagram has dimension bounded by a function of the maximum order of a standard example that it contains. In the first paper of the series, we have resolved the problem in a more general setting of posets with planar cover graphs by establishing a polynomial bound. We prove a stronger bound in the original setting, namely, for every poset $P$ with a planar diagram $\mathrm{dim}(P) \leq 96\mathrm{se}(P)+672$, where $\mathrm{dim}(P)$ denotes the dimension of $P$ and $\mathrm{se}(P)$ denotes the maximum order of a standard example contained in $P$.

Given a nonnegative matrix $X$, a factorization rank $r$ and a real parameter $p$, entrywise power matrix factorization (EPMF) looks for a low-rank matrix $X_r$ such that $X = |X_r|^{\circ p}$ (exact case) or $X \approx |X_r|^{\circ p}$ (approximate case), where $(\cdot)^{\circ p}$ denotes the component-wise exponent. EPMF includes the modulus model ($p=1$) and component-wise square factorization ($p=2$) as special cases, the latter being closely related to the square root rank. We analyze the computational complexity of the exact decision problem and the Frobenius-norm approximation problem, and establish a complete complexity landscape. In the exact case, we show that EPMF is equivalent to the combinatorial problem of flipping the signs of the entries of a given matrix $X$ to obtain a rank-$r$ matrix, which we refer to as the signing problem. We first show that the signing problem, and hence exact EPMF, is strongly NP-hard, improving a weak NP-hardness result for the square-root-rank of Fawzi et al. (Math. Prog., 2015). We then show that the signing problem can be solved in polynomial-time when $r$ is fixed. Moreover, when the rank $r$ is part of the input, we show that for generic matrices the algorithm is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) in the parameter $r$; in fact, the running time is linear in the input size $X$. In the approximate case using the Frobenius norm as an error measure, we show that EPMF is NP-hard, already when $r=2$, the smallest nontrivial case.

For graphs $F$ and $H$, a spanning subgraph $G$ of $F$ is weakly $H$-saturated in $F$ if the edges in $E(F)\setminus E(G)$ can be added one at a time, each addition creating a new copy of $H$. Recently, Tancer and Tyomkyn proved that, given an $n$-vertex graph $F$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,K_3)=n-1$ is NP-hard. In this paper, we study the decision version of the weak saturation problem and show that, for every fixed integer $r\ge 3$, given a graph $F$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,H)\le k$ is NP-complete when $H\in\{K_r,K_{r,r}\}$. Our approach uses new graph-theoretic and topological ideas and techniques, yielding new constructions that build on the construction of Tancer and Tyomkyn. In particular, our proofs further reveal a connection between weak saturation and the flag-no-square property, a fundamental property in topology that is of independent interest.

The geodesic treewidth of a graph $ G $ is the smallest $k$ for which there is a partition $\mathcal{P}$ into geodesics such that $G/\mathcal{P}$ has treewidth $k$, where $G/\mathcal{P}$ is obtained from $ G $ by contracting each part of $ \mathcal{P} $. Based on this notion, row treewidth was developed and is defined for a graph $ G $ as the smallest $ k $ such that $ G \subseteq H \boxtimes P $ for some graph $ H $ of treewidth $ k $ and a path $ P $. Equivalently, the row treewidth of a graph $ G $ is the smallest $ k $ for which there is a partition $ \mathcal{P} $ into disjoint unions of geodesics that are aligned with respect to some layering such that $ G/\mathcal{P} $ has treewidth $ k $. We separate the two notions by showing that bounded row treewidth does not imply bounded geodesic treewidth and by presenting a polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether a graph of treewidth 2 has geodesic treewidth 1, which is known to be NP-hard for row treewidth [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. More generally, we provide an algorithm to decide whether a given graph has geodesic treewidth at most $ d $ that is XP in the treewidth, whereas there is no such algorithm for row treewidth, unless P = NP [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. On the other hand, we show that computing the geodesic treewidth is NP-hard and that every graph with geodesic treewidth 1 has bounded row treewidth. Moreover, we improve the best known lower bound on the geodesic treewidth of planar graphs to 5.

We introduce the \emph{externally supported independence number} $α_{\rm es}(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the maximum cardinality of an independent set $B$ with an additional condition, that vertices from $N(B)$ are dominated by vertices in $V(G)-N[B]$. This parameter yields an improved upper bound on the isolation number $ι(G)$. We show that computing $α_{\rm es}(G)$ is NP-hard, while for trees we present a linear-time algorithm. We also establish several sharp bounds on $α_{\rm es}(G)$ for general graphs, with additional refined results for trees. In several cases, we completely describe the extreme graph classes attaining these bounds.

Given a hypergraph with edges of size at most 3, the 3-set cover problem asks to determine the minimum size of a family of edges which covers the vertex set. As the problem is NP-hard, it is natural to consider its fractional (linear programming) relaxation, which provides a lower bound on the value of the optimal solution. The ratio between the actual value and that of the fractional relaxation is called the integrality gap. A classic bound of Lovász implies that the integrality gap in this problem is at most 11/6. This has been improved to 5/3 by Fujito and Okumura. Here we prove that the integrality gap is at most 3/2, which is best possible. A corollary of this result is that the vertex set of any 3-uniform, regular hypergraph on n vertices can be covered by n/2 (or fewer) edges. This solves the k=3 case of a problem of de A. Moreira and Kohayakawa. As another application, we derive a certain variant of the Gale-Shapley stable marriage theorem for triples.

The saturation number $μ^*(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a maximal matching, and $H(G)$ is its harmonic index. TxGraffiti conjectured in 2023 that $μ^*(G) \le H(G)$ for every nontrivial connected graph $G$, and Bıyıkoğlu refuted this by showing that the ratio $μ^*(G)/H(G)$ can be made arbitrarily large. Restricting to trees bounds the ratio sharply. Every nontrivial tree $T$ satisfies $μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, with the constant $3/2$ best possible. A complementary bound $H(G) < 4μ^*(G)$ holds for every graph with an edge, so on a nontrivial tree the saturation number is pinned to $\frac{1}{4} H(T) < μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, both constants best possible. The friendship graph $F_4$ is a smallest counterexample to the conjecture, on nine vertices, and the smallest tree counterexample is the subdivided star on eleven vertices. For each positive integer $m$ a family of graphs with $m$ hubs has ratio approaching $m+1$, while the conjecture holds whenever all vertices have equal degree. Both invariants arise in applications, the harmonic index as a molecular descriptor and the saturation number as a measure of adsorption inefficiency, and the bounds estimate the latter, which is NP-hard to compute, by the former, which is computable in linear time.

Designing rapid transportation routes requires balancing efficiency and reachability. Shortest-path models ensure direct, cost-efficient routes but ignore coverage, while centrality-based approaches maximize accessibility but do not enforce operational constraints. We study the problem of selecting a shortest path that maximizes reachability, measured as the number of nodes within a fixed distance of the path. To do this, we introduce the $k$-Step-Central Shortest Path problem and analyse its structural properties. We show that optimal solutions on unweighted graphs can be found in polynomial time and propose an algorithm with a novel pruning rule. We also prove that the problem becomes NP-hard when edge weights are introduced. Additionally, we show that our algorithm can be used to solve the NP-hard problem of finding the closeness-central shortest path in a graph. We demonstrate the efficiency and scalability of our algorithm on synthetic and real-world networks with up to 2,000 nodes. Our results show that improving reachability can substitute for route expansion: increasing the reach of transit lines drastically increases their coverage with shorter routes. This suggests that investments in active transport infrastructure that improve reachability can be more effective than extending primary routes, providing a data-driven basis for allocating resources in network design.

The Graph Burning Problem (GBP) is a NP-Hard combinatorial optimization problem that models the propagation of influence or contagion in a network. The propagation is represented through the metaphor of a fire spreading through the vertices of a graph. A burning process takes place in a series of discrete time-steps. At each time step, the burning process is characterized by a propagation (where burned nodes spread the fire to their neighbors), and an ignition (where one additional unburned node is chosen to become burned). The minimum number of steps required to burn all vertices of a graph defines its burning number. Literature provides integer linear programming formulations to solve the problem, but with no surprise, such approaches struggle to converge as the graph size increases. Therefore, reducing the search space explored by these formulations becomes a key point to improve performances. In this work, we study the similarities of the Graph Burning Problem with the well-known Dominating Set Problem. We propose a new formulation based on this study and apply dominance rules and symmetry-breaking techniques to reduce the search space and consequently speed up resolution time. We also introduce a perturbation of the proposed objective function, as well as a pruning rule for the perturbed model in order to further accelerate its resolution.

We study maximum matching problems in temporal graphs whose underlying graph is a tree. We consider two temporal models. In a $Δ$-matching, selected time edges sharing an endpoint must have time ticks differing by at least $Δ$. In a $γ$-matching, the selected objects are blocks of $γ$ consecutive appearances of the same underlying edge. We also consider the related ordered static problem of $d$-distance matchings. We show that maximum $Δ$-matching remains NP-hard on temporal trees for every $Δ\geq 2$, even in the sparse case where each edge appears at most twice. Using a reduction between the temporal models, we obtain the analogous result for maximum $γ$-matching on temporal trees, even when each edge admits at most two $γ$-edges. We also show, via a reduction from $d$-distance matching, that maximum $γ$-matching is APX-hard even when the underlying graph is bipartite. Complementing these hardness results, we identify several tractable cases. We prove that maximum $Δ$-matching is polynomial-time solvable on temporal trees in which every edge appears exactly once, and that maximum $γ$-matching is polynomial-time solvable when each edge admits at most one $γ$-edge. We also give dynamic-programming algorithms under bounded local-use and local-sparsity assumptions, and derive polynomial-time solvability of maximum $d$-distance matching when the input bipartite graph is a tree. Finally, we prove that both maximum $Δ$-matching and maximum $γ$-matching admit polynomial-time approximation schemes on temporal trees.

The independence polynomial of a graph encapsulates all independent sets of differing sizes, a task classified as NP-hard in theoretical computer science. This article examines the independence polynomial of zero divisor graphs in commutative rings. We demonstrate that the independent sets, represented as a sequence of coefficients of the independence polynomial, exhibit unimodality and log-concavity. Therefore, for the independence polynomial of some zero divisor graphs, the unimodal conjecture is true. Additionally, the characteristics of the zeros of the independence polynomial are delineated, along with their corresponding annular regions on the plane.

We introduce a diffusion-based uncertainty model for robust optimization on directed graphs, in which perturbations of edge weights propagate along adjacent edges and satisfy conservation constraints at nodes. This topology-aware structure is natural in networked systems where uncertainty is induced by flows and local interactions, including transportation, logistics, communication, and energy networks. We analyze how such diffusive uncertainty reshapes the computational landscape of robust graph optimization. For convex network problems, such as minimum-cost flow and maximum flow, the resulting formulations remain convex and admit polynomial-time solution methods across all diffusion regimes considered. For combinatorial problems, the effect is more delicate. We focus on two canonical combinatorial graph problems, shortest path and the traveling salesman problem (TSP), which provide complementary benchmarks: shortest path is polynomial-time solvable in the nominal setting, whereas TSP is already NP-hard. We show that, for shortest path, propagation depth induces a sharp transition between tractable and intractable robust counterparts. For the traveling salesman problem, robustness often adds no computational complexity beyond ordinary TSP, because the structure of Hamiltonian cycles makes the fixed-tour adversarial problem collapse to explicit formulas. Together, these results show that topology-aware uncertainty can fundamentally change robust combinatorial optimization, with tractability governed by the interaction between propagation, budget geometry, and the structure of feasible solutions.

We introduce a physics-inspired continuous relaxation framework that yields substantially improved solutions for NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, including Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), binary sparse coding, and planted-solution Ising models. By parameterizing discrete binary variables as continuous wave-like states on the complex unit circle, we inherently smooth highly non-convex energy landscapes. We show that representing binary variables as complex phases reveals an implicit regularization mechanism that promotes convergence toward discrete states. Extracting this mechanism yields significant improvements even within standard real-valued optimization frameworks, using this regularizer explicitly. Empirically, this regularization yields vastly higher ground-state convergence rates than standard real-valued alternatives. Our models achieved zero error in large-scale 160x160 QUBO tasks under severe noise (sigma=0.25), and outperformed traditional algorithms (OMP and LASSO) in underdefined sparse coding with perfect recovery at sigma=0.15. The solver's robustness was further validated by recovering exact ground-state configurations in 8 out of 11 rigorously engineered planted-solution benchmarks.

An \emph{outer-string representation} of a graph $G$ is an intersection representation of $G$ where vertices are represented by curves (strings) inside the unit disk and each curve has exactly one endpoint on the boundary of the unit disk (the anchor of the curve). Additionally, if each two curves are allowed to cross at most once, we call this an \emph{outer-$1$-string representation} of $G$. If we impose a cyclic ordering on the vertices of $G$ and require the cyclic order of the anchors to respect this cyclic order, such a representation is called a \emph{constrained outer-string representation}. In this paper, we present two results about graphs admitting outer-string representations. Firstly, we show that for a bipartite graph $G$ (and, more generally, for any $\{C_3,C_5\}$-free graph $G$) with a given cyclic order of vertices, we can decide in polynomial time whether $G$ admits a constrained outer-string representation. Our algorithm follows from a characterization by a single forbidden configuration, similar to that of Biedl et al. [GD 2024] for chordal graphs. Secondly, we answer an open question from the same authors and show that determining whether a given graph admits an outer-1-string representation is NP-hard. More generally, we show that it is NP-hard to determine if a given graph $G$ admits an outer-$k$-string representation for any fixed $k\ge1$.