arXiv++ Combinatorics

It is well known that in q-matroids, axioms for independent spaces, bases, and spanning spaces differ from the classical case of matroids, since the straightforward q-analogue of the classical axioms does not give a q-matroid. For this reason, a fourth axiom has been proposed. In this paper we show how we can describe these spaces with only three axioms, providing two alternative ways to do that. As an application, we show direct cryptomorphisms between independent spaces and circuits and between independent spaces and bases.

Positroids are certain representable matroids originally studied by Postnikov in connection with the totally nonnegative Grassmannian and now used widely in algebraic combinatorics. The positroids give rise to determinantal equations defining positroid varieties as subvarieties of the Grassmannian variety. Rietsch, Knutson-Lam-Speyer, and Pawlowski studied geometric and cohomological properties of these varieties. In this paper, we continue the study of the geometric properties of positroid varieties by establishing several equivalent conditions characterizing smooth positroid varieties using a variation of pattern avoidance defined on decorated permutations, which are in bijection with positroids. This allows us to give two formulas for counting the number of smooth positroids along with two $q$-analogs. Furthermore, we give a combinatorial method for determining the dimension of the tangent space of a positroid variety at key points using an induced subgraph of the Johnson graph. We also give a Bruhat interval characterization of positroids.

The Tutte polynomial is a well-studied invariant of matroids. The polymatroid Tutte polynomial $\mathcal{J}_{P}(x,y)$, introduced by Bernardi et al., is an extension of the classical Tutte polynomial from matroids to polymatroids $P$. In this paper, we first prove that $\mathcal{J}_{P}(x,t)$ and $\mathcal{J}_{P}(t,y)$ are interpolating for any fixed real number $t\geq 1$, and then we study the coefficients of high-order terms in $\mathcal{J}_{P}(x,1)$ and $\mathcal{J}_{P}(1,y)$. These results generalize results on interior and exterior polynomials of hypergraphs.

The class of 2-regular matroids is a natural generalisation of regular and near-regular matroids. We prove an excluded-minor characterisation for the class of 2-regular matroids. The class of 3-regular matroids coincides with the class of matroids representable over the Hydra-5 partial field, and the 3-connected matroids in the class with a $U_{2,5}$- or $U_{3,5}$-minor are precisely those with six inequivalent representations over GF(5). We also prove that an excluded minor for this class has at most 15 elements.

We extend the fundamentals for tropical convexity beyond the tropically positive orthant expanding the theory developed by Loho and Végh (ITCS 2020). We study two notions of convexity for signed tropical numbers called 'TO-convexity' (formerly 'signed tropical convexity') and the novel notion 'TC-convexity'. We derive several separation results for TO-convexity and TC-convexity. A key ingredient is a thorough understanding of TC-hemispaces - those TC-convex sets whose complement is also TC-convex. Furthermore, we use new insights in the interplay between convexity over Puiseux series and its signed valuation. Remarkably, TC-convexity can be seen as a natural convexity notion for representing oriented matroids as it arises from a generalization of the composition operation of vectors in an oriented matroid. We make this explicit by giving representations of linear spaces over the real tropical hyperfield in terms of TC-convexity.

Positroids are families of matroids introduced by Postnikov in the study of non-negative Grassmannians. In particular, positroids enumerate a CW decomposition of the totally non-negative Grassmannian. Furthermore, Postnikov has identified several families of combinatorial objects in bijections with positroids. We will provide yet another characterization of positroids for Gr$_{\geq 0}(2,n)$, the Grassmannians of lines, in terms of certain graphs. We use this characterization to compute the dimension and the boundary of positroid cells. This also leads to a combinatorial description of the intersection of positroid cells, that is easily computable. Our techniques rely on determining different ways to enlarge a given collection of subsets of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$ to represent the dependent sets of a positroid, that is the dependencies among the columns of a matrix with non-negative maximal minors. Furthermore, we provide an algorithm to compute all the maximal positroids contained in a set.

Let $M$ be an excluded minor for the class of $\mathbb{P}$-representable matroids for some partial field $\mathbb{P}$, let $N$ be a $3$-connected strong $\mathbb{P}$-stabilizer that is non-binary, and suppose $M$ has a pair of elements $\{a,b\}$ such that $M\backslash a,b$ is $3$-connected with an $N$-minor. Suppose also that $|E(M)| \geq |E(N)|+11$ and $M \backslash a,b$ is not $N$-fragile. In the prequel to this paper, we proved that $M \backslash a,b$ is at most five elements away from an $N$-fragile minor. An element $e$ in a matroid $M'$ is $N$-essential if neither $M'/e$ nor $M' \backslash e$ has an $N$-minor. In this paper, we prove that, under mild assumptions, $M \backslash a,b$ is one element away from a minor having at least $r(M)-2$ elements that are $N$-essential.

We show that there exist $k$-colorable matroids that are not $(b,c)$-decomposable when $b$ and $c$ are constants. A matroid is $(b,c)$-decomposable, if its ground set of elements can be partitioned into sets $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_l$ with the following two properties. Each set $X_i$ has size at most $ck$. Moreover, for all sets $Y$ such that $|Y \cap X_i| \leq 1$ it is the case that $Y$ is $b$-colorable. A $(b,c)$-decomposition is a strict generalization of a partition decomposition and, thus, our result refutes a conjecture from arXiv:1911.10485v2 .

One of the most important questions in matroid optimization is to find disjoint common bases of two matroids. The significance of the problem is well-illustrated by the long list of conjectures that can be formulated as special cases. Bérczi and Schwarcz showed that the problem is hard in general, therefore identifying the borderline between tractable and intractable instances is of interest. In the present paper, we study the special case when one of the matroids is a partition matroid while the other one is a graphic matroid. This setting is equivalent to the problem of packing rainbow spanning trees, an extension of the problem of packing arborescences in directed graphs which was answered by Edmonds' seminal result on disjoint arborescences. We complement his result by showing that it is NP-complete to decide whether an edge-colored graph contains two disjoint rainbow spanning trees. Our complexity result holds even for the very special case when the graph is the union of two spanning trees and each color class contains exactly two edges. As a corollary, we give a negative answer to a question on the decomposition of oriented $k$-partition-connected digraphs.

Recently, it was proved by Bérczi and Schwarcz that the problem of factorizing a matroid into rainbow bases with respect to a given partition of its ground set is algorithmically intractable. On the other hand, many special cases were left open. We first show that the problem remains hard if the matroid is graphic, answering a question of Bérczi and Schwarcz. As another special case, we consider the problem of deciding whether a given digraph can be factorized into subgraphs which are spanning trees in the underlying sense and respect upper bounds on the indegree of every vertex. We prove that this problem is also hard. This answers a question of Frank. In the second part of the article, we deal with the relaxed problem of covering the ground set of a matroid by rainbow bases. Among other results, we show that there is a linear function $f$ such that every matroid that can be factorized into $k$ bases for some $k \geq 3$ can be covered by $f(k)$ rainbow bases if every partition class contains at most 2 elements.

Seymour proved that the chromatic numbers and the list chromatic numbers of loop-free finite matroids are the same. In this paper we prove the same statement for infinite, loop-free finitary matroids.

Let $M$ be an arbitrary matroid with circuits $\mathcal{C}(M)$. We propose a definition of a derived matroid $δM$ that has as its ground set $\mathcal{C}(M)$. Unlike previous attempts of such a definition, our definition applies to arbitrary matroids, and is completely combinatorial. We prove that the rank of $δM$ is bounded from above by $|M|-r(M)$, that it is connected if and only if $M$ is connected. We compute examples including the derived matroids of uniform matroids, the Vámos matroid and the graphical matroid $M(K_4)$. We formulate conjectures relating our construction to previous definitions of derived matroids.

Given integers $1 \le k_1 < \cdots < k_l \le n-1$, let $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}$ denote the type $A$ partial flag variety consisting of all chains of subspaces $(V_{k_1}\subset\cdots\subset V_{k_l})$ inside $\mathbb{R}^n$, where each $V_k$ has dimension $k$. Lusztig (1994, 1998) introduced the totally positive part $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{>0}$ as the subset of partial flags which can be represented by a totally positive $n\times n$ matrix, and defined the totally nonnegative part $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{\ge 0}$ as the closure of $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{>0}$. On the other hand, following Postnikov (2007), we define $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{Δ>0}$ and $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{Δ\ge 0}$ as the subsets of $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}$ where all Plücker coordinates are positive and nonnegative, respectively. It follows from the definitions that Lusztig's total positivity implies Plücker positivity, and it is natural to ask when these two notions of positivity agree. Rietsch (2009) proved that they agree in the case of the Grassmannian $\text{Fl}_{k;n}$, and Chevalier (2011) showed that the two notions are distinct for $\text{Fl}_{1,3;4}$. We show that in general, the two notions agree if and only if $k_1, \dots, k_l$ are consecutive integers. We give an elementary proof of this result (including for the case of Grassmannians) based on classical results in linear algebra and the theory of total positivity. We also show that the cell decomposition of $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{\ge 0}$ coincides with its matroid decomposition if and only if $k_1,\dots,k_l$ are consecutive integers, which was previously only known for complete flag varieties, Grassmannians, and $\text{Fl}_{1,3;4}$. Finally, we determine which notions of positivity are compatible with a natural action of the cyclic group of order $n$ that rotates the index set.

We show in several important cases that the $A$-hypergeometric system attached to a Feynman diagram in Lee--Pomeransky form, obtained by viewing the momenta and the nonzero masses as indeterminates, has a normal underlying semigroup. This continues a quest initiated by Klausen, and studied by Helmer and Tellander. In the process we identify several relevant matroids related to the situation and explore their relationships.

To every toric ideal one can associate an oriented matroid structure, consisting of a graph and another toric ideal, called bouquet ideal. The connected components of this graph are called bouquets. Bouquets are of three types; free, mixed and non mixed. We prove that the cardinality of the following sets - the set of indispensable elements, minimal Markov bases, the Universal Markov basis and the Universal Gröbner basis of a toric ideal - depends only on the type of the bouquets and the bouquet ideal. These results enable us to introduce the strongly robustness simplicial complex and show that it determines the strongly robustness property. For codimension 2 toric ideals, we study the strongly robustness simplicial complex and prove that robustness implies strongly robustness.

This article studies two notions of generalized matroid representations motivated by algorithmic information theory and cryptographic secret sharing. The first (entropic representability) involves discrete random variables, while the second (almost-multilinear representability) deals with approximate subspace arrangements. In both cases, we prove that determining whether an input matroid has such a representation is undecidable. Consequently, the conditional independence implication problem is also undecidable, providing an independent answer to a question posed by Geiger and Pearl, recently resolved by Cheuk Ting Li. These problems are also closely related to characterizing achievable rates in network coding and constructing secret sharing schemes. For example, another corollary of our work is that deciding whether an access structure admits an ideal secret sharing scheme is undecidable. Our approach reduces undecidable problems from group theory to matroid representation problems. Specifically, we reduce the uniform word problem for finite groups to entropic representability and the word problem for sofic groups to almost-multilinear representability. A key part of this reduction involves modifying group presentations into forms where linear representations are generic in an appropriate sense when restricted to the generating set.

The median function is a location/consensus function that maps any profile $π$ (a finite multiset of vertices) to the set of vertices that minimize the distance sum to vertices from $π$. The median function satisfies several simple axioms: Anonymity (A), Betweeness (B), and Consistency (C). McMorris, Mulder, Novick and Powers (2015) defined the ABC-problem for consensus functions on graphs as the problem of characterizing the graphs (called, ABC-graphs) for which the unique consensus function satisfying the axioms (A), (B), and (C) is the median function. In this paper, we show that modular graphs with $G^2$-connected medians (in particular, bipartite Helly graphs) are ABC-graphs. On the other hand, the addition of some simple local axioms satisfied by the median function in all graphs (axioms (T), and (T$_2$)) enables us to show that all graphs with connected median (comprising Helly graphs, median graphs, basis graphs of matroids and even $Δ$-matroids) are ABCT-graphs and that benzenoid graphs are ABCT$_2$-graphs. McMorris et al (2015) proved that the graphs satisfying the pairing property (called the intersecting-interval property in their paper) are ABC-graphs. We prove that graphs with the pairing property constitute a proper subclass of bipartite Helly graphs and we discuss the complexity status of the recognition problem of such graphs.

We consider the class of {\em separable} $k$-hypergraphs, which can be viewed as uniform analogs of threshold Boolean functions, and the class of {\em equatable} $k$-hypergraphs. We show that every $k$-hypergraph is either separable or equatable but not both. We raise several questions asking which classes of equatable (and separable) hypergraphs enjoy certain appealing characterizing properties, which can be viewed as uniform analogs of the $2$-summable and $2$-monotone Boolean function properties. In particular, we introduce the property of {\em exchangeability}, and show that all these questioned characterizations hold for graphs, multipartite $k$-hypergraphs for all $k$, paving $k$-matroids and binary $k$-matroids for all $k$, and $3$-matroids, which are all equatable if and only if they are exchangeable. We also discuss the complexity of deciding if a hypergraph is separable, and in particular, show that it requires exponential time for paving matroids presented by independence oracles, and can be done in polynomial time for binary matroids presented by such oracles.

A signed graph has edge signs. A gain graph has oriented edge gains drawn from a group. We define the combination of the two for the abelian case, in which each oriented edge of a signed graph has a gain from an abelian group, concentrating on the case of the additive group of a field. We develop the elementary graph properties, the associated matroid, and the vector and hyperplanar representations.

Robertson and Seymour constructed for every graph $G$ a tree-decomposition that efficiently distinguishes all the tangles in $G$. While all previous constructions of these decompositions are either iterative in nature or not canonical, we give an explicit one-step construction that is canonical. The key ingredient is an axiomatisation of 'local properties' of tangles. Generalisations to locally finite graphs and matroids are also discussed.