arXiv++ Combinatorics

A walk $u_0u_1 \ldots u_{k-1}u_k$ of a graph $G$ is a \textit{weakly toll walk} if $u_0u_k \not\in E(G)$, $u_0u_i \in E(G)$ implies $u_i = u_1$, and $u_ju_k\in E(G)$ implies $u_j=u_{k-1}$. The {\em weakly toll interval} of a set $S \subseteq V(G)$, denoted by $I(S)$, is formed by $S$ and the vertices belonging to some weakly toll walk between two vertices of $S$. Set $S$ is {\it weakly toll convex} if $I(S) = S$. The {\em weakly toll convex hull} of $S$, denote by $H(S)$, is the minimum weakly toll convex set containing $S$. The {\em weakly toll interval number} of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that $I(S) = V(G)$; and the {\em weakly toll hull number} of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that $H(S) = V(G)$. In this work, we show how to compute the weakly toll interval and the weakly toll hull numbers of a graph in polynomial time. In contrast, we show that determining the weakly toll convexity number of a graph $G$ (the size of a maximum weakly toll convex set distinct from $V(G)$) is \NP-hard.

Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a set of points in the plane, and $\mathcal{S}$ a strictly convex set of points. In this note, we show that if $\mathcal{P}$ contains many translates of $\mathcal{S}$, then these translates must come from a generalized arithmetic progression of low dimension. We also discuss an application to the unit distance conjecture.

We initiate the study of convex geometry over ordered hyperfields. We define convex sets and halfspaces over ordered hyperfields, presenting structure theorems over hyperfields arising as quotients of fields. We prove hyperfield analogues of Helly, Radon and Carathéodory theorems. We also show that arbitrary convex sets can be separated via hemispaces. Comparing with classical convexity, we begin classifying hyperfields for which halfspace separation holds. In the process, we demonstrate many properties of ordered hyperfields, including a classification of stringent ordered hyperfields.

Given a set $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$, define the \emph{Helly number of $S$}, denoted by $H(S)$, as the smallest positive integer $N$, if it exists, for which the following statement is true: for any finite family $\mathcal{F}$ of convex sets in~$\mathbb{R}^2$ such that the intersection of any $N$ or fewer members of~$\mathcal{F}$ contains at least one point of $S$, there is a point of $S$ common to all members of $\mathcal{F}$. We prove that the Helly numbers of \emph{exponential lattices} $\{α^n \colon n \in \mathbb{N}_0\}^2$ are finite for every $α>1$ and we determine their exact values in some instances. In particular, we obtain $H(\{2^n \colon n \in \mathbb{N}_0\}^2)=5$, solving a problem posed by Dillon (2021). For real numbers $α, β> 1$, we also fully characterize exponential lattices $L(α,β) = \{α^n \colon n \in \mathbb{N}_0\} \times \{β^n \colon n \in \mathbb{N}_0\}$ with finite Helly numbers by showing that $H(L(α,β))$ is finite if and only if $\log_α(β)$ is rational.

For an even set of points in the plane, choose a max-sum matching, that is, a perfect matching maximizing the sum of Euclidean distances of its edges. For each edge of the max-sum matching, consider the ellipse with foci at the edge's endpoints and eccentricity $\sqrt 3 / 2$. Using an optimization approach, we prove that the convex sets bounded by these ellipses intersect, answering a Tverberg-type question of Andy Fingerhut from 1995.

We prove an infinite $(p,q)$-theorem for piercing fat compact convex sets in $\RR^d$ with $k$-flats. Additionally, we develop a new framework through which infinite $(p,q)$-theorems concerning compact sets and $k$-flats can be extended to their 'colorful' variants. Further, we show that the existence of an infinite $(p,q)$-theorem does not necessarily imply the existence of the corresponding finite $(p,q)$-theorem.

Integrally convex functions constitute a fundamental function class in discrete convex analysis, including M-convex functions, L-convex functions, and many others. This paper aims at a rather comprehensive survey of recent results on integrally convex functions with some new technical results. Topics covered in this paper include characterizations of integral convex sets and functions, operations on integral convex sets and functions, optimality criteria for minimization with a proximity-scaling algorithm, integral biconjugacy, and the discrete Fenchel duality. While the theory of M-convex and L-convex functions has been built upon fundamental results on matroids and submodular functions, developing the theory of integrally convex functions requires more general and basic tools such as the Fourier-Motzkin elimination.

The collapsibility number of simplicial complexes was introduced by Wegner in order to understand the intersection patterns of convex sets. This number also plays an important role in a variety of Helly type results. We show that the non-cover complex of a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ is $|V(\mathcal{H)}|- γ_i(\mathcal{H})-1$-collapsible, where $γ_i(\mathcal{H})$ is the generalization of independence domination number of a graph to hypergraph. This extends the result of Choi, Kim and Park from graphs to hypergraphs. Moreover, the upper bound in terms of strong independence domination number given by Kim and Kim for the Leray number of the non-cover complex of a hypergraph can be obtained as a special case of our result. In general, there can be a large gap between the collapsibility number of a complex and its well-known upper bounds. In this article, we construct a sequence of upper bounds $\mathcal{M}_k(X)$ for the collapsibility number of a simplicial complex $X$, which lie in this gap. We also show that the bound given by $\mathcal{M}_k$ is tight if the underlying complex is $k$-vertex decomposable.

The classical Ham Sandwich theorem states that any $d$ point sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be simultaneously bisected by a single affine hyperplane. A generalization of Dolnikov asserts that any $d$ families of pairwise intersecting compact, convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ admit a common hyperplane transversal. We extend Dolnikov's theorem by showing that families of compact convex sets satisfying more general non-disjointness conditions admit common transversals by multiple hyperplanes. In particular, these generalize all known optimal results to the long-standing Grünbaum--Hadwiger--Ramos measure equipartition problem in the case of two hyperplanes. Our proof proceeds by establishing topological Radon-type intersection theorems and then applying Gale duality in the linear setting. For a single hyperplane, this gives a new proof of Dolnikov's original result via Sarkaria's non-embedding criterion for simplicial complexes.

In this paper, we consider the problem of making skeptical inferences for the multi-label ranking problem. We assume that our uncertainty is described by a convex set of probabilities (i.e. a credal set), defined over the set of labels. Instead of learning a singleton prediction (or, a completed ranking over the labels), we thus seek for skeptical inferences in terms of set-valued predictions consisting of completed rankings.

In this paper we propose Hit and Run (HAR) sampling from a tropically convex set. The key ingredient of HAR sampling from a tropically convex set is sampling uniformly from a tropical line segment over the tropical projective torus, which runs linearly in its computational time complexity. We show that this HAR sampling method samples uniformly from a tropical polytope which is the smallest tropical convex set of finitely many vertices. Finally, we apply this novel method to any given distribution using Metropolis-Hasting filtering over a tropical polytope.

We prove that for any collection F of $n \ge 2$ pairwise disjoint compact convex sets in the plane there is a pair of sets A and B in F such that any line that separates A from B separates either A or B from a subcollection of F with at least n/18 sets.

Let $K$ be a convex body (a compact convex set) in $\mathbb{R}^d$, that contains a copy of another body $S$ in every possible orientation. Is it always possible to continuously move any one copy of $S$ into another, inside $K$? As a stronger question, is it always possible to continuously select, for each orientation, one copy of $S$ in that orientation? These questions were asked by Croft. We show that, in two dimensions, the stronger question always has an affirmative answer. We also show that in three dimensions the answer is negative, even for the case when $S$ is a line segment -- but that in any dimension the first question has a positive answer when $S$ is a line segment. And we prove that, surprisingly, the answer to the first question is negative in dimension four for general $S$.

A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is \emph{monophonic convex} if $S$ contains all the vertices belonging to any induced path connecting two vertices of $S$. The cardinality of a maximum proper monophonic convex set of $G$ is called the \emph{monophonic convexity number} of $G$. The \emph{monophonic interval} of a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ is the set $S$ together with every vertex belonging to any induced path connecting two vertices of $S$. The cardinality of a minimum set $S \subseteq V(G)$ whose monophonic interval is $V(G)$ is called the \emph{monophonic number} of $G$. The \emph{monophonic convex hull} of a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ is the smallest monophonic convex set containing $S$ in $G$. The cardinality of a minimum set $S \subseteq V(G)$ whose monophonic convex hull is $V(G)$ is called the \emph{monophonic hull number} of $G$. The \emph{complementary prism} $\GG$ of $G$ is obtained from the disjoint union of $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between them. In this work, we determine the monophonic convexity number, the monophonic number, and the monophonic hull number of the complementary prisms of all graphs.

We construct a convex set $A$ with cardinality $2n$ and with the property that an element of the difference set $A-A$ can be represented in $n$ different ways. We also show that this construction is optimal by proving that for any convex set $A$, the maximum possible number of representations an element of $A-A$ can have is $\lfloor |A|/2 \rfloor $.

We introduce a novel definition of orientation on the triples of a family of pairwise intersecting planar convex sets and study its properties. In particular, we compare it to other systems of orientations on triples that satisfy a so-called interiority condition: $\circlearrowleft(ABD)=~\circlearrowleft(BCD)=~\circlearrowleft(CAD)=1$ imply $\circlearrowleft(ABC)=1$ for any $A,B,C,D$. We call such an orientation a P3O (partial 3-order), a natural generalization of a poset, that has several interesting special cases. For example, the order type of a planar point set (that can have collinear triples) is a P3O; we denote a P3O realizable by points as p-P3O. If we do not allow $\circlearrowleft(ABC)=0$, we obtain a T3O (total 3-order). Contrary to linear orders, a T3O can have a rich structure. A T3O realizable by points, a p-T3O, is the order type of a point set in general position. Despite these similarities to order types, P3O and p-T3O that can arise from the orientation of pairwise intersecting convex sets, denoted by C-P3O and C-T3O, turn out to be quite different from order types: there is no containment relation among the family of all C-P3O's and the family of all p-P3O's, or among the families of C-T3O's and p-T3O's. Finally, we study properties of these orientations if we also require that the family of underlying convex sets satisfies the (4,3) property.

We study systems of orientations on triples that satisfy the following so-called interiority condition: $\circlearrowleft(ABD)=~\circlearrowleft(BCD)=~\circlearrowleft(CAD)=1$ implies $\circlearrowleft(ABC)=1$ for any $A,B,C,D$. We call such an orientation a P3O (partial 3-order), a natural generalization of a poset, that has several interesting special cases. For example, the order type of a planar point set (that can have collinear triples) is a P3O; we denote a P3O realizable by points as p-P3O. If we do not allow $\circlearrowleft(ABC)=0$, we obtain a T3O (total 3-order). Contrary to linear orders, a T3O can have a rich structure. A T3O realizable by points, a p-T3O, is the order type of a point set in general position. In our paper "Orientation of convex sets" we defined a 3-order on pairwise intersecting convex sets; such a P3O is called a C-P3O. In this paper we extend this 3-order to pairwise intersecting good covers; such a P3O is called a GC-P3O. If we do not allow $\circlearrowleft(ABC)=0$, we obtain a C-T3O and a GC-T3O, respectively. The main result of this paper is that there is a p-T3O that is not a GC-T3O, implying also that it is not a C-T3O -- this latter problem was left open in our earlier paper. Our proof involves several combinatorial and geometric observations that can be of independent interest. Along the way, we define several further special families of GC-T3O's.

An abstract simplicial complex is said to be $d$-representable if it records the intersection pattern of a collection of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In this paper, we show that $d$-representability of a simplicial complex is equivalent to the existence of a map with certain properties, from a closely related simplicial complex into $\mathbb{R}^d$. This equivalence suggests a framework for proving (and disproving) $d$-representability of simplicial complexes using topological methods such as applications of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, which we begin to explore.

We consider the number of crossings in a graph which is embedded randomly on a convex set of points. We give an estimate to the normal distribution in Kolmogorov distance which implies a convergence rate of order $n^{-1/2}$ for various families of graphs, including random chord diagrams or full cycles.

Hadwiger's transversal theorem gives necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a line transversal to a family of pairwise disjoint convex sets in the plane. These conditions were subsequently generalized to hyperplane transversals to general families of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ by Goodman, Pollack, and Wenger. Here we show a colorful genealization of their theorem which confirms a conjecture of Arocha, Bracho, and Montejano. The proof is topological and uses the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.