arXiv++ Combinatorics

The number of Nash equilibria of the mixed extension of a generic finite game in normal form is finite and odd. This raises the question how large the number can be, depending on the number of players and the numbers of their pure strategies. Here we present a lower bound for the maximal possible number in the case of m-player games where each player has two pure strategies. It is surprisingly close to a known upper bound.

We propose a bounded degree SOS+SONC hierarchy for constrained polynomial optimization, termed B-SOS+SONC. Starting from Lasserre's bounded-degree SOS framework, we enlarge the certificate cone from SOS to the recently introduced SOS+SONC cone, thereby combining the algebraic strength of semidefinite relaxations with the sparse structure captured by circuit polynomials. We show that, for each fixed certificate degree, the resulting hierarchy is complete, that is, its optimal values are monotone and converge to the global optimum. Moreover, we derive an explicit SDP-REP reformulation, so that each relaxation can be solved within a tractable convex optimization framework over semidefinite and relative entropy cones. Beyond the optimization hierarchy itself, we investigate structural properties of the SONC cone and introduce the notions of first-order and second-order SONC-convexity. This leads to a new sufficient condition for first-level exactness of the B-SOS+SONC hierarchy. Numerical experiments illustrate that the proposed hierarchy often yields tighter lower bounds than the B-SOS relaxation while remaining tractable.

We study the computational complexity of fundamental algorithmic problems -- membership testing, separation, valid-inequality testing, and linear optimization -- over polytopes and cones arising from cooperative games (also known as pseudo-Boolean functions). A central obstacle in the study of such problems is that a general cooperative game on $n$ players requires $2^n$ values, so the input size is $2^n$ for a game with $n$ players, making these computational tasks theoretically trivial. Restricting to $k$-additive games reduces the input size to $O(n^k)$, making such games a natural target for meaningful questions about the existence of efficient algorithms. On the positive side, we give an explicit extended formulation of size $O(n^k)$ for the core of $k$-additive $k$-monotone games, allowing all four problems to be solved by a single polynomial-size linear program -- in particular, circumventing the ellipsoid method that is needed when building from earlier tractability results of Deng and Papadimitriou, or of Edmonds. For the cone of $k$-additive $(k{-}1)$-monotone games, we give a complete characterization of its extreme rays and derive the same $O(n^k)$ bound on extension complexity, yielding a geometry-based proof and generalization of a result of Billionnet and Minoux. On the negative side, we show that for $l \leq k-2$ the cone of $k$-additive $l$-monotone games is computationally intractable: membership testing is not in NP (unless NP\,=\,coNP), valid-inequality testing is NP-complete, and extension complexity is at least $1.5^n$. Our hardness results yield, as a special case, a result of Crama and of Gallo and Simone. Furthermore, our hardness results also explain the lack of any good characterization of the extreme rays of the cone of $k$-additive $(k{-}2)$-monotone games.

We prove two main algorithmic results in spectral discrepancy. First, we give a deterministic polynomial-time rounding theorem for rational positive semidefinite matrices of arbitrary rank. The algorithm starts from any rational fractional signing and assigns one sign per original matrix. Its discrepancy is less than $3.37\,\|\sum_i \mathrm{Tr}(A_i)A_i\|^{1/2}$. This yields Kadison--Singer half-partitions with error below $1.69\sqrt{\varepsilon}$, as well as deterministic graph signings that control signed adjacency and signed degrees simultaneously. The proof builds on the spectral-potential method of Ezeunala and Jiang (2026) and introduces a new way to choose rounding directions. We prove polynomial bit complexity for the rounding procedure. Second, we give a Las Vegas algorithm for the Bilu--Linial signing problem on an arbitrary prescribed graph. If $G$ has $n$ vertices and maximum degree $Δ\ge3$, the algorithm terminates almost surely. It uses fewer than $100n^3$ insertion attempts in expectation and returns a signing with $\|A_s\|<2\sqrt{2(Δ-1)}$. For bipartite graphs its one-sided form gives the sharp universal bound $\|A_s\|<2\sqrt{Δ-1}$. The algorithm builds the signing by inserting vertices and recursively deleting and restoring neighbors after rejected insertions. In the analysis, the $\sqrt2$ gap to the Bilu--Linial conjecture comes from a factor of two in the bound for vertex deletions in the two-sided case. On a $d$-regular bipartite Ramanujan base the same signing produces a Ramanujan $2$-lift of that prescribed base.

The permanent and mixed discriminant of positive matrices are classic problems for which we do not expect an efficient algorithm for exact computation. Thus much work has been done to understand how well we can bound and approximately compute these quantities. One line of research in this area begins with the results of the first author, where van der Waerden lower bounds of $\frac{n!}{n^n}$ are proven for doubly stochastic inputs for both problems, using a simple proof via stable polynomials. Along with the bound itself, the same techniques are used to show that the permanent and mixed discriminant are uniquely minimized at a certain natural symmetric input. In this paper, we generalize those results in two ways. First, we extend the unique minimization results beyond doubly stochastic inputs to other marginals which are near doubly stochastic. This yields the first such unique minimization results for the mixed discriminant beyond the doubly stochastic case. We also discuss why one cannot hope similar results to hold in general for all marginals. Second, we extend the unique minimization result for real stable polynomials to strongly log-concave (aka Lorentzian) polynomials in the doubly stochastic case. This captures an analogous previous result on unique minimization for the mixed volume. Finally, we discuss various open problems related to these results.

The Kemeny rule aggregates multiple strict rankings into a single strict ranking that minimizes the sum of its distances from the input rankings. The resulting optimization problem, called the Kemeny problem (\texttt{KP}), is a special case of the linear ordering problem (\texttt{LOP}). The Kemeny rule satisfies several desirable properties in social choice theory, including the extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{XCC}). Ando et al. strengthened this result by introducing the strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{SCC}) and showing that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOP} instance. Yoo and Escobedo extended the Kemeny rule to rankings with ties and showed that the resulting rule satisfies the non-strict extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NXCC}). This criterion gives a condition under which one candidate must be ranked strictly above another in every optimal solution. In this paper, we introduce the non-strict strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NSCC}), a counterpart of the \texttt{SCC} for rankings with ties, and show that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary instance of the linear ordering problem with ties (\texttt{LOPT}). We also establish a complementary structural property that gives conditions under which two candidates must be tied in every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOPT} instance.

Efficient resource use in packing and assembly-line applications requires decisions that jointly account for capacity and precedence constraints. The strongly NP-hard bin packing problem with generalized precedence constraints (BPP-GP) models such decisions by minimizing the number of ordered, capacitated bins required to pack weighted items, even when precedence requirements span multiple bins. Existing exact algorithms primarily focus on classical special cases, whereas general BPP-GP has been addressed only via compact integer models and heuristics, with no efficient open-source exact solver. We present PrecPack, a unified exact solver that extends branch-bound-and-remember (BBR) to arbitrary nonnegative precedence weights and naturally specializes to the classical cases. Generalized states capture restrictions that remain active across future bins, which are addressed through branching, dominance, and conflict-aware lower bounds. Root column generation uses fixed-point arithmetic to compute numerically valid dual bounds for pruning or to prove optimality. To support reuse and verification, we provide common programming and command-line interfaces, independent assignment checking, explicit termination statuses, and reproducible batch execution; the core procedures require no commercial software. In same-machine, single-threaded comparisons on classic assembly-line benchmarks, more instances are proven optimal, and average computing times are substantially reduced relative to leading source-available BBR implementations. Further comparisons with published benchmark results for bin packing with precedence constraints and BPP-GP also show that more instances were proved optimal and that reported average gaps were smaller on most benchmark sets. PrecPack is released under the MIT License at https://github.com/Sunkanghong-Wang/PrecPack.

The incidence matrix of a graph is totally unimodular if and only if the graph is bipartite, i.e., it contains no odd cycles. We extend the characterization of total unimodularity to hypergraphs whose hyperedges of size at least four form a laminar family. Such hypergraphs have been used to model problems with fairness constraints that ensure balanced representation, among other applications. Our main result shows that total unimodularity for laminar hypergraphs is equivalent to forbidding odd cycles and structures that we call avocados and tree houses. As a corollary, we resolve a special case of a conjecture on almost totally unimodular matrices, originally posed by Padberg and later modified by Cornuéjols and Zuluaga. We discuss applications of laminar hypergraphs and connect our results to integer programming with bounded subdeterminants.

Single-machine asymmetric weighted earliness--tardiness (AWET) scheduling asks how to sequence jobs around a common synchronization date when early and late completion incur unrelated job-dependent penalties. At the boundary nonrestrictive date $d=\sum_jp_j$, a compact V-shaped schedule reduces the continuous-time problem to a quadratic choice of a nonempty early set. We establish four complementary results for this model. First, the positive-integer problem is strongly NP-complete by a unary-polynomial reduction from Restricted Exact Cover by 3-Sets. Second, unrestricted AWET admits a polynomial-time $(3+2\sqrt2+\varepsilon)$-approximation based on an anchored semidefinite relaxation and deterministic marginal thresholding. Third, when the earliness and tardiness ratio orders are strict reversals, the problem is weakly NP-complete but has an exact two-resource pseudopolynomial dynamic program. Fourth, for fixed total refinements whose ratio permutation is separable, an exact separating-tree recurrence and coordinated geometric trimming yield an FPTAS. The proofs use different manifestations of the same canonical objective: scale-separated prefix penalties, positive-semidefinite minimum-kernel covariance, a dominant completed load square, and a bounded four-coordinate decomposition interface. Together, the results show that the decisive issue is not merely whether the two ratio orders agree, but whether their interaction can be controlled by a global certificate or compressed into a bounded constructive interface.

We develop a geometric framework for distance-based formation control that separates the evolution of inter-agent distances from its realization by compatible node motions, reducing the stability problem to the edge space. We show that local exponential convergence of the edge dynamics implies local exponential convergence of the formation, and that stability is certified by spectral properties of a linear edge operator. We introduce a hierarchy of generic spectral properties --- weak admissibility, admissibility, and strong admissibility --- that provide necessary conditions for local exponential stability. Specializing to directed sensing, we obtain a necessary and sufficient spectral condition for local stability at an arbitrary target, together with a quadratic sufficient certificate. These conditions reveal that stability depends jointly on the graph orientation and target geometry, and show that persistence is neither necessary nor sufficient for local convergence. We show that every generically rigid graph admits an admissible orientation and, for acyclic orientations, we give an exact combinatorial characterization of admissibility. Finally, the quadratic certificate leads to a semidefinite program for synthesizing stabilizing edge gains.

An influential 1989 result of Naddef shows that the diameters of $0/1$-polytopes are at most their dimension. This was extended shortly after by Kleinschmidt and Onn to any lattice polytope in $[0,k]^{d}$, where they showed a bound of at most $dk$. Naddef's argument easily extends to the monotone setting motivated by the simplex method, where one requires paths to increase with respect to a linear objective function. However, the Kleinschmidt-Onn argument does not. In fact, no argument in the 30 years since has managed to fill that gap. Prior to this work, it remained open whether the monotone diameter is bounded by a polynomial in $d$ and $k$ with no lower bounds suggesting any separation between the worst-case diameter and worst-case monotone diameter. Linear upper bounds hold for $k=1$ and $k=2$. However, we exhibit a sharp threshold for this question at $k = 3$ by constructing for each $d \geq 1$ a lattice polytope in $[0,3]^{6d}$ with monotone diameter at least $2^{d}-1$. In particular, the polynomial bound does not hold. Furthermore, we show that Naddef's result does not extend to the unbounded setting by exhibiting a family of unbounded polyhedra with $0/1$-vertices and diameter exponential in their dimension.

Greedy algorithms efficiently approximate combinatorial optimization problems, but their guarantees weaken when feasibility couples combinatorial structure with global physical constraints. We study monotone nondecreasing supermodular minimization over the bases of a graphic greedoid under physics-induced constraints. We model physics-informed selection using a look-ahead oracle that identifies candidates extendable to a feasible basis, yielding the Conditioned Sequential Greedy Algorithm. We derive a closed-form approximation bound, which we call the price of feasibility, based on the variability of oracle-restricted candidate sets and a probabilistic correction for unobserved elements. As a case study, we show that FORWARD, an algorithm for multi-source radial network reconfiguration, instantiates this framework. Numerical results demonstrate the tightness of the bound and quantify the feasibility-optimality trade-off.

Fourier-Motzkin elimination computes an inequality description of the projection of a polyhedron onto a subset of its coordinates by eliminating one variable at a time. It is used in several areas of optimisation and computer science, and it is a standard way of obtaining the entropic constraints of a causal structure, where the marginalisation over the latent variables produces such a projection. Its limitation is the growth of the intermediate systems of inequalities, which can be doubly exponential in the number of eliminated variables even though the projection itself grows only as a single exponential. In practice the computational overload of the method therefore depends on two choices: how the redundant inequalities are removed after each step, and the order in which the variables are eliminated. We consider both. We first show, by an explicit example, that Imbert's redundancy test cannot be interleaved with redundancy removal by linear programming. We show that the two methods, however, can be combined soundly if the derivation records used by Imbert's test are re-initialised after every step at which linear programming is used. We then propose a rule for choosing the elimination order of the variables that gives a significant computational advantage, however, at the cost of increased resource usage. We demonstrate this advantage on some random polytopes, where the rule reduces the running time by factors of between 6 and 25 compared with the same elimination under a fixed order. For entropic descriptions of causal structures, with more than 250 inequalities and more than 100 variables to eliminate, our rule keeps the number of inequalities handled at each step one to two orders of magnitude lower than a fixed order.

We study several $k$-fold generalizations of the Lovász theta function associated with the maximum $k$-colorable induced subgraph problem. The first is the Narasimhan--Manber parameter $\vartheta_k$. We prove that, for graphs whose adjacency matrix belongs to a homogeneous partially coherent algebra, this parameter is recovered by the theta number of the Cartesian product with the complete graph on $k$ vertices. This class includes distance-regular and $1$-walk-regular graphs, and thus our result generalizes a theorem by Sinjorgo and Sotirov (2022) for graphs that are vertex- and edge-transitive. We introduce a new parameter $\varphi_k$ obtained from orthonormal representations of graphs and show the inequality $\varphi_k \leq \vartheta_k$. For both parameters, we study the smallest $k$ for which the parameter is equal to the number of vertices; these saturation parameters yield lower bounds on the chromatic number. We determine which vertex-weighted versions of these parameters are gauges, and discuss a natural definition for the $k$-fold theta body of a graph. We conclude with open questions comparing $\vartheta_k$, $\varphi_k$, $\vartheta(G\square K_k)$, and related convexifications.

The Job Sequencing and Tool Switching Problem (SSP) is a well-known combinatorial optimization problem arising in the context of flexible manufacturing. Since the seminal work of Tang and Denardo (1988), the SSP has received significant attention in the literature, leading to the development of numerous exact and heuristic approaches. Despite these efforts, several benchmark instances proposed decades ago and containing only 20 jobs have remained unsolved to proven optimality. In this work, we propose an exact algorithm for the SSP, namely the Combinatorial Branch-and-Bound (C-B\&B) algorithm, which combines two distinct branch-and-bound algorithms, each introducing novel features compared with the existing literature. The former relies on a new branching scheme designed to reduce the size of the implicit enumeration tree, together with a collection of new bounding functions. The latter builds on the branching scheme introduced by Laporte et al. (2004) and strengthens it with a new bounding function and two dominance rules. Within C-B\&B, these exact algorithms are complemented by a preprocessing phase that incorporates a new branch-and-bound-based heuristic capable of rapidly generating a high-quality initial incumbent solution. Extensive computational experiments show that C-B\&B represents a strong breakthrough over previously published approaches, proving optimality for more instances with significantly less computational effort and closing several benchmark instances that have remained open for decades.

We develop a few calculus rules to compute or lower bound the facial distance of a polytope. We illustrate our calculus rules on various popular polytopes. In particular, we provide a provide a lower bound on the facial distance of the Birkhoff polytope.

We classify the facial exposedness of completely positive cones over symmetric cones in terms of the rank of the associated Euclidean Jordan algebras. The completely positive cones are facially exposed when the rank is at most $2$, but are not facially exposed when the rank is at least $5$. Facial exposedness is not completely determined by the rank when the rank is $3$ or $4$, but we provide a characterization in each case. The resulting classification of facial exposedness in fact agrees with the corresponding classification of spectrahedrality for completely positive cones.

For n points in the unit square, the Heilbronn triangle problem asks for the largest possible minimum triangle area. We develop a variational stress theory for this max-min problem. At every positive-area local optimum, normalized Karush-Kuhn-Tucker multipliers assemble into a skew matrix B satisfying Bz = 2ib, where b is the outward square reaction. This equilibrium has the isotropic affine moment sum_i p_i b_i^T = Delta I_2; the identity also holds for every tight subfamily carrying weights inherited from the same multiplier, with Delta scaled by its multiplier mass. It follows that every positive stress component meets all four sides and that there are at most two such components. To handle nonunique multipliers, we introduce the intersection of the stress kernels over the whole KKT face and a canonical hybrid operator incorporating all tight determinant and boundary derivatives. A strictly convex selector removes every decomposable invisible motion, leaving a rank-one-free residual with a sharp dimension bound; the literal maximal two-dimensional residual is excluded. Two-terminal substresses satisfy an exact interface-flux law, and a five-internal-vertex rank-four block has a Pfaffian cofactor carrier. Finally, an analytic reduction followed by exact symbolic enumeration excludes every one-external completion of a specified one-silent five-cycle residual, for all orientation words. These results isolate the remaining degeneracy but do not solve the problem for arbitrary n.

In 1971, Mason conjectured that the numbers of independent sets of fixed size in a matroid constitute an ultra log-concave sequence. In 2020, this conjecture was proven by Brändén and Huh and independently by Anari, Liu, Gharan and Vinzant. Recently, this result was extended to $M^\natural$-concave functions. In this note, we make the next step by proving it for $M_2^\natural$-concave functions. This shows the same property for the intersection of any pair of matroids (which itself may not be a matroid). Furthermore, we show that this can not be further extended to the intersections of three matroids by including a counterexample of partition matroids.

Discrete Convex Analysis (DCA) is a discrete analog of continuous convex analysis, originally proposed as a unified theoretical framework for efficiently solvable combinatorial optimization problems. Recently, DCA has proven to be a powerful tool across diverse fields, ranging from operations research to economics and pure mathematics. Motivated by the broad applicability of DCA, this paper establishes a unified theory of discrete convex analysis over discrete structures arising from classical root systems, extending the usual setting of the integer lattice, which essentially corresponds to type A. We adopt the vertex set of the Euclidean Coxeter complex as the primal discrete domain for L-convexity, and the root lattice as the dual discrete domain for M-convexity. Using the associated polyhedral structures, we formulate L- and M-convex functions together with notions of integrality determined by the root system. We show that local optimality guarantees global optimality for these functions. Furthermore, we establish that integral L-convex functions and integral M-convex functions correspond one-to-one via the discrete Fenchel--Legendre conjugate, thereby extending the conjugacy in the original DCA from type A to all classical root systems.