arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $λ_1(G) \geq \dots \geq λ_n(G)$ be the adjacency spectrum of a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices. The spectral distance $σ(G,H)$ between $n$-vertex graphs $G$ and $H$ is the Manhattan distance between their spectra, i.e. $σ(G,H) = \sum_{i=1}^n |λ_i(G) - λ_i(H)|$. Given a set $\mathcal{G}$ of pairwise non-isomorphic graphs of order $n$, the spectral diameter of $\mathcal{G}$ is defined as $\mathrm{sdiam}(\mathcal{G}) = \max\{\mathrm{secc}_{\mathcal{G}}(G) : G \in \mathcal{G}\}$, where $\mathrm{secc}_{\mathcal{G}}(G) = \max\{σ(G,H) : H \in \mathcal{G}\}$ is the spectral eccentricity of $G \in \mathcal{G}$. Among six conjectures on spectral distances posed by Z. Stanić in 2012, two conjectures related to the spectral diameter of certain graph classes remained open. One of them concerns the spectral diameter of the set $\mathcal{B}_n$ of all connected bipartite graphs of order $n$, while the other, of the set $\mathcal{T}_n$ of all trees of order $n$. More precisely, Stanić conjectured that $\mathrm{sdiam}(\mathcal{T}_n) = σ(P_n, K_{1,n-1})$, where $P_n$ is the path graph, while $K_{1,n-1}$ is the star, and that $\mathrm{sdiam}(\mathcal{B}_n) = \mathrm{secc}_{\mathcal{B}_n}(K_{\lceil n/2 \rceil, \lfloor n/2 \rfloor})$, where $K_{\lceil n/2 \rceil, \lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$ is the complete bipartite graph. In this paper, both of these conjectures are disproved.

Shift graphs, introduced by Erdős and Hajnal in 1964, form one of the simplest known non-recursive constructions of triangle-free graphs with arbitrarily large chromatic number. In this note, we identify a surprising property: for each integer $k \geq 1$, the smallest $k$-chromatic shift graph contains a \emph{unique} induced $k$-vertex-critical subgraph. We give an explicit description of this subgraph and prove its uniqueness. This provides a new family of vertex-critical triangle-free graphs of arbitrarily large chromatic number.

A dominating set $D$ of a graph $G$ is a \emph{fair dominating set} if every two vertices outside $D$ have the same number of neighbors in $D$, and the \emph{fair domination number} $\mathrm{fd}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of such a set. Caro, Hansberg and Henning, who introduced this parameter, proved that $\mathrm{fd}(G)<17n/19$ for every maximal outerplanar graph $G$ of order $n\geq3$, and asked whether this bound is asymptotically best possible. We show that it is not the case by proving $\mathrm{fd}(G)\leq(7n-3)/8<7n/8$ for every maximal outerplanar graph $G$ of order $n\geq3$, and we exhibit an infinite family of maximal outerplanar graphs with $\mathrm{fd}(G)/n\rightarrow7/9$, so that the best asymptotic constant lies between $7/9$ and $7/8$.

For a graph $G$ and a set $B\subseteq V(G)$, the spread $\mathrm{sp}(B)$ of $B$ is the difference between the largest and the smallest degree in $G$ of a vertex of $B$, and for an integer $k\geq0$ the parameter $\mathrm{sp}(G,k)$ is the largest cardinality of a set $B$ with $\mathrm{sp}(B)\leq k$. Caro, Lauri and Zarb derived a lower bound for $\mathrm{sp}(G,k)$ and, among several families of graphs, considered \[ \mathrm{MOP}(n,k)=\min \{\mathrm{sp}(G,k):G\text{ is a maximal outerplanar graph of order }n\} \] and determined $\mathrm{MOP}(n,k)$ up to an additive constant for every $k\not =2,$ leaving the case $k=2$ open, with the bounds $4n/9\leq \mathrm{MOP}(n,2)\leq (5n+19)/11$. We first prove a lower bound on $\mathrm{sp}(G,k)$ for an arbitrary graph $G$ in terms of its order $n$, its number of edges $m$ and its minimum degree $δ$. This lower bound contains the bounds of Caro, Lauri and Zarb and, for $k=0$, the bound $\mathrm{rep}(G)\geq \left\lceil n/(2d-2δ+1)\right\rceil $ of Caro and West, where $d=2m/n$. We determine when this lower bound is attained, exhibit explicit graphs attaining it, and show that it is exact for all graphs once $n\geq n_{0}(δ,k,d)$. We then apply the bound to maximal outerplanar graphs: adjusting the count to this class we prove \[ \mathrm{MOP}(n,2)\geq \left\lceil \frac{4n+10}{9}\right\rceil \qquad \text{for every }n\geq 14, \] with equality for $n\equiv 2\ (\mathrm{mod}\ 18)$, and $\mathrm{MOP}(n,2)=4n/9+O(1)$ for every $n$.

Let G be a cubic graph of order n. The induced cycles vertex number cind(G) is the largest size of a vertex set that induces a 2-regular subgraph of G. By gamma_1,2(G) we denote the (1,2)-domination number of G. Erves and Tepeh introduced the trilobite graphs T_n, which satisfy gamma_1,2(T_n) > cind(T_n). They stated two conjectures, the first of which says that every cubic graph G with cind(G) >= n/2 + 2 satisfies gamma_1,2(G) <= cind(G). The second says that a connected cubic graph G satisfies gamma_1,2(G) > cind(G) if and only if G is a trilobite. We show that both conjectures are false. A computer search finds counterexamples that are not trilobites already for n = 18, 20 and 22. We also construct an infinite family H(k) of order n = 20 + 4k. For every k >= 0 we prove that cind(H(k)) = n/2 + 2 and gamma_1,2(H(k)) = n/2 + 3. Hence both conjectures fail for infinitely many orders n.

The sigma-irregularity of a graph G = (V, E) is defined as the sum, over all edges uv in E, of (d(u) - d(v))^2, where d(u) denotes the degree of vertex u. A tree on n vertices with maximum degree Delta is called maximal if it attains the greatest possible sigma-irregularity among all such trees. The maximal trees are already known for chemical trees (Delta <= 4) and for Delta = 5. In this paper, we characterize the maximal trees for every Delta >= 6 when n >= Delta(Delta - 1) + 1. We introduce three families of trees, T'{n,Delta}, T''{n,Delta}, and T'''{n,Delta}. All trees within the same family have the same sigma-irregularity, and we derive an explicit formula for the value attained by each family. Comparing these formulas determines which family has the greatest sigma-irregularity for given n and Delta. We then prove that a tree is maximal if and only if it belongs to a family attaining this greatest value. In contrast to the case Delta <= 5, the two natural candidate families T'{n,Delta} and T''{n,Delta} are not sufficient, since for every Delta >= 7 and every n congruent to 3 modulo Delta, the trees in T'''{n,Delta} have strictly greater sigma-irregularity.

A geodesic is a shortest path which connects a pair of vertices of a graph G. In this paper we define the geodesic subpath number gpn(G) of a graph G as the number of geodesics in G. The number of subtrees and subpaths are already studied in literature, but they are both large quantities. Hence, the geodesic subpath number which is related to these quantities but smaller than both, seems worthy of investigation. We first consider extremal graphs with respect to the geodesic subpath number among all connected graphs on n vertices. This number is minimized by the so called geodetic graphs, i.e. graphs in which each pair of vertices is connected by precisely one geodesic. As for the graphs which maximize the geodesic subpath number, we provide an upper bound on gpn(G) in terms of n and we further consider several graph families which might have a large gpn(G). Yet, their value of gpn(G) still does not attain the established bound, so narrowing the gap remains as an open problem. We also consider the class of cactus graphs on n vertices and k cycles and among them characterize extremal graphs with respect to this new invariant.

Given a graph $G$ and a mapping $f:V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-list assignment of $G$ is a function that maps each $v \in V(G)$ to a set of at least $f(v)$ colors. For an $f$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, $φ(v) \in L(v)$ and some appears precisely once in the neighborhood of $v$. We say that $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for every $f$-list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$. If $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable and there is a constant $k$ such that $f(v)= d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, then we say $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable. In this paper, we consider graphs with a bounded maximum average degree. We show that every graph with the maximum average degree less than $\frac{10}{3}$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable, and that every graph with the maximum average degree less than $\frac{18}{7}$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable. As a result, every planar graph with girth at least $5$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable, and every planar graph with girth at least $9$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable.

An odd independent set $S$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is an independent set of vertices such that, for every vertex $v \in V \setminus S$, either $N(v) \cap S = \emptyset$ or $|N(v) \cap S| \equiv 1$ (mod 2), where $N(v)$ stands for the open neighborhood of $v$. The largest cardinality of odd independent sets of a graph $G$, denoted $α_{od}(G)$, is called the odd independence number of $G$. This new parameter is a natural companion to the recently introduced strong odd chromatic number. A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a strong odd coloring if, for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, each color used in the neighborhood of $v$ appears an odd number of times in $N(v)$. The minimum number of colors in a strong odd coloring of $G$ is denoted by $χ_{so}(G)$. A simple relation involving these two parameters and the order $|G|$ of $G$ is $α_{od}(G)\cdotχ_{so}(G) \geq |G|$, parallel to the same on chromatic number and independence number. In the present work, which is a companion to our first paper on the subject [The odd independence number of graphs, I: Foundations and classical classes], we focus on grid-like and chessboard-like graphs and compute or estimate their odd independence number and their strong odd chromatic number. Among the many results obtained, the following give the flavour of this paper: (1) $0.375 \leq \varrho_{od}(P_\infty \Box P_\infty) \leq 0.384615...$, where $\varrho_{od}(P_\infty \Box P_\infty)$ is the odd independence ratio. (2) $χ_{so}(G_d) = 3$ for all $d \geq 1$, where $G_d$ is the infinite $d$-dimensional grid. As a consequence, $\varrho_{od}(G_d) \geq 1/3$. (3) The $r$-King graph $G$ on $n^2$ vertices has $α_{od}(G) = \lceil n/(2r+1) \rceil^2$. Moreover, $χ_{so}(G) = (2r + 1)^2$ if $n \geq 2r + 1$, and $χ_{so}(G) = n^2$ if $n \leq 2r$. Many open problems are given for future research.

An odd independent set $S$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is an independent set of vertices such that, for every vertex $v \in V \setminus S$, either $N(v) \cap S = \emptyset$ or $|N(v) \cap S| \equiv 1$ (mod 2), where $N(v)$ stands for the open neighborhood of $v$. The largest cardinality of odd independent sets of a graph $G$, denoted $α_{od}(G)$, is called the odd independence number of $G$. This new parameter is a natural companion to the recently introduced strong odd chromatic number. A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a strong odd coloring if, for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, each color used in the neighborhood of $v$ appears an odd number of times in $N(v)$. The minimum number of colors in a strong odd coloring of $G$ is denoted by $χ_{so}(G)$. A simple relation involving these two parameters and the order $|G|$ of $G$ is $α_{od}(G)\cdot χ_{so}(G) \geq |G|$, parallel to the same on chromatic number and independence number. We develop several basic inequalities concerning $α_{od}(G)$, and use already existing results on strong odd coloring, to derive lower bounds for odd independence in many families of graphs. We prove that $α_{od}(G) = α(G^2)$ holds for all claw-free graphs $G$, and present many results, using various techniques, concerning the odd independence number of cycles, paths, Moore graphs, Kneser graphs, the complete subdivision $S(K_n)$ of $K_n$, the half graphs $H_{n,n}$, and $K_p \Box K_q$. Further, we consider the odd independence number of the hypercube $Q_d$ and also of the complements of triangle-free graphs. Many open problems for future research are stated.

A proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ is called a proper conflict-free coloring of $G$ if for every non-isolated vertex $v$ of $G$, there is a color $c$ such that $|φ^{-1}(c)\cap N_G(v)|=1$. As an analogy of degree-choosability of graphs, we introduced the notion of proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs. For a non-negative integer $k$, a graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable if for any list assignment $L$ of $G$ with $|L(v)|\geq d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free coloring $φ$ such that $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. In this note, we first remark if a graph $G$ is $d$-degenerate, then $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+d+1)$-choosable. Furthermore, when $d=1$, we can reduce the number of colors by showing that every tree is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+1)$-choosable. This motivates us to state a question.

A proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ is called a proper conflict-free coloring of $G$ if for every non-isolated vertex $v$ of $G$, there is a color $c$ such that $|φ^{-1}(c)\cap N_G(v)|=1$. As an analogy to degree-choosability of graphs, the authors recently, in a previous paper, introduced the notion of proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs. For a non-negative integer $k$, a graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable if for any list assignment $L$ of $G$ with $|L(v)|\geq d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free coloring $φ$ such that $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. In this paper, we show that every connected outerplanar graph other than the $5$-cycle is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable. This bound is tight in the sense that there are infinitely many connected outerplanar graphs that are not proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+1)$-choosable. We conclude the paper with two questions for further work.

Given a graph $G$ and a mapping $f:V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-list assignment of $G$ is a function that maps each $v \in V(G)$ to a set of at least $f(v)$ colors. For an $f$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that $φ(v) \in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$ and $v$ has a color that appears precisely once at its neighborhood for every non-isolated vertex $v\in V(G)$. We say that $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for any $f$-list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$. For a non-negative integer $k$, we say that $G$ is \emph{proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable} if $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable where $f$ is a mapping with $f(v)= d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. Motivated by degree-choosability of graphs, we investigate the proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs, especially for cases $k=1,2,3$. As the 5-cycle is not proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable and it is the only such graph we know, it is possible that every connected graph other than the 5-cycle is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable and thus every graph is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable. To support these, we show that every connected graph with maximum degree at most 3 distinct from the 5-cycle is proper conflict-free $(\text{degree}+2)$-choosable, and that $S(G)$ is proper conflict-free $(\text{degree}+2)$-choosable for every graph $G$, where $S(G)$ is a graph obtained from $G$ by subdividing each edge once. Furthermore, by adapting the technique of DP-colorings, we prove that every graph with maximum degree at most $4$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable.

The subpath number of a graph G is defined as the total number of subpaths in G, and it is closely related to the number of subtrees, a well-studied topic in graph theory. This paper is a continuation of our previous paper [5], where we investigated the subpath number and identified extremal graphs within the classes of trees, unicyclic graphs, bipartite graphs, and cycle chains. Here, we focus on the subpath number of cactus graphs and characterize all maximal and minimal cacti with n vertices and k cycles. We prove that maximal cacti are cycle chains in which all interior cycles are triangles, while the two end-cycles differ in length by at most one. In contrast, minimal cacti consist of k triangles, all sharing a common vertex, with the remaining vertices forming a tree attached to this joint vertex. By comparing extremal cacti with respect to the subpath number to those that are extremal for the subtree number and the Wiener index, we demonstrate that the subpath number does not correlate with either of these quantities, as their corresponding extremal graphs differ.

In this paper we count all the subpaths of a given graph G; including the subpaths of length zero, and we call this quantity the subpath number of G. The subpath number is related to the extensively studied number of subtrees, as it can be considered as counting subtrees with the additional requirement of maximum degree being two. We first give the explicit formula for the subpath number of trees and unicyclic graphs. We show that among connected graphs on the same number of vertices, the minimum of the subpath number is attained for any tree and the maximum for the complete graph. Further, we show that the complete bipartite graph with partite sets of almost equal size maximizes the subpath number among all bipartite graphs. The explicit formula for cycle chains, i.e. graphs in which two consecutive cycles share a single edge, is also given. This family of graphs includes the unbranched catacondensed benzenoids which implies a possible application of the result in chemistry. The paper is concluded with several directions for possible further research where several conjectures are provided.

The $σ_{t}$-irregularity (or sigma total index) is a graph invariant which is defined as $σ_{t}(G)=\sum_{\{u,v\}\subseteq V(G)}(d(u)-d(v))^{2},$ where $d(z)$ denotes the degree of $z$. This irregularity measure was proposed by R\' {e}ti [Appl. Math. Comput. 344-345 (2019) 107-115], and recently rediscovered by Dimitrov and Stevanović [Appl. Math. Comput. 441 (2023) 127709]. In this paper we remark that $σ_{t}(G)=n^{2}\cdot Var(G)$, where $Var(G)$ is the degree variance of the graph. Based on this observation, we characterize irregular graphs with maximum $σ_{t}$-irregularity. We show that among all connected graphs on $n$ vertices, the split graphs $S_{\lceil\frac{n}{4}\rceil, \lfloor\frac{3n}{4}\rfloor }$ and $S_{\lfloor\frac{n}{4}\rfloor, \lceil\frac{3n}{4}\rceil }$ have the maximum $σ_{t}$-irregularity, and among all complete bipartite graphs on $n$ vertices, either the complete bipartite graph $K_{\lfloor\frac{n}{4}(2-\sqrt{2})\rfloor, \lceil\frac{n}{4}(2+\sqrt{2})\rceil }$ or $K_{\lceil\frac{n}{4}(2-\sqrt{2})\rceil, \lfloor\frac{n}{4}(2+\sqrt{2})\rfloor }$ has the maximum sigma total index. Moreover, various upper and lower bounds for $σ_{t}$-irregularity are provided; in this direction we give a relation between the graph energy $\mathcal{E}(G)$ and sigma total index $σ_{t}(G)$ and give another proof of two results by Dimitrov and Stevanović. Applying Fiedler's characterization of the largest and the second smallest Laplacian eigenvalue of the graph, we also establish new relationships between $σ_{t}$ and $σ$. We conclude the paper with two conjectures.

The total $σ$-irregularity is given by $ σ_t(G) = \sum_{\{u,v\} \subseteq V(G)} \left(d_G(u) - d_G(v)\right)^2, $ where $d_G(z)$ indicates the degree of a vertex $z$ within the graph $G$. It is known that the graphs maximizing $σ_{t}$-irregularity are split graphs with only a few distinct degrees. Since one might typically expect that graphs with as many distinct degrees as possible achieve maximum irregularity measures, we modify this invariant to $ \IR(G)= \sum_{\{u,v\} \subseteq V(G)} |d_G(u)-d_G(v)|^{f(n)}, $ where $n=|V(G)|$ and $f(n)>0$. We study under what conditions the above modification obtains its maximum for antiregular graphs. We consider general graphs, trees, and chemical graphs, and accompany our results with a few problems and conjectures.

A set of vertices S is a resolving set of a graph G; if for every pair of vertices x and y in G, there exists a vertex s in S such that x and y differ in distance to s. A smallest resolving set of G is called a metric basis. The metric dimension dim(G) is the cardinality of a metric basis of G. The notion of a metric basis is applied to the problem of placing sensors in a network, where the problem of sensor faults can arise. The fault-tolerant metric dimension ftdim(G) is the cardinality of a smallest resolving set S such that S\{s} remains a resolving set of G for every s in S. A natural question is how much more sensors need to be used to achieve a fault-tolerant metric basis. It is known in literature that there exists an upper bound on ftdim(G) which is exponential in terms of dim(G); i.e. ftdim(G) <= dim(G)(1+2^(5dim(G)-1)). In this paper, we construct graphs G with ftdim(G) = dim(G)+2^(dim(G)-1) for any value of dim(G), so the exponential upper bound is necessary. We also extend these results to the k-metric dimension which is a generalization of the fault-tolerant metric dimension. First, we establish a similar exponential upper bound on dim(k+1)(G) in terms of dim(k)(G); and then we show that there exists a graph for which dim(k+1)(G) is indeed exponential. For a possible further work, we leave the gap between the bounds to be reduced.

A strong odd coloring of a simple graph $G$ is a proper coloring of the vertices of $G$ such that for every vertex $v$ and every color $c$, either $c$ is used an odd number of times in the open neighborhood $N_G(v)$ or no neighbor of $v$ is colored by $c$. The smallest integer $k$ for which $G$ admits a strong odd coloring with $k$ colors is the strong odd chromatic number, $χ_{soc}(G)$. These coloring notion and graph parameter were recently defined in [H. Kwon and B. Park, Strong odd coloring of sparse graphs, ArXiv:2401.11653v2]. We answer a question raised by the originators concerning the existence of a constant bound for the strong odd chromatic number of all planar graphs. We also consider strong odd colorings of trees, unicyclic graphs and graph products.