arXiv++ Combinatorics

Two (proper) colorings of a graph are adjacent if they differ on exactly one vertex. Jerrum proved that any $(d + 2)$-coloring of any d-degenerate graph can be transformed into any other via a sequence of adjacent colorings. A result of Bonamy et al. ensures that a shortest transformation can have a quadratic length even for $d = 1$. Bousquet and Perarnau proved that a linear transformation exists for between $(2d + 2)$-colorings. It is open to determine if this bound can be reduced. In this note, we prove that it can be reduced for graphs of treewidth 2, which are 2-degenerate. There exists a linear transformation between 5-colorings. It completes the picture for graphs of treewidth 2 since there exist graphs of treewidth 2 such a linear transformation between 4-colorings does not exist.

The problem of finding the minimum number of colors to color a graph properly without containing any bicolored copy of a fixed family of subgraphs has been widely studied. Most well-known examples are star coloring and acyclic coloring of graphs (Grünbaum, 1973) where bicolored copies of $P_4$ and cycles are not allowed, respectively. In this paper, we introduce a variation of these problems and study proper coloring of graphs not containing a bicolored path of a fixed length and provide general bounds for all graphs. A $P_k$-coloring of an undirected graph $G$ is a proper vertex coloring of $G$ such that there is no bicolored copy of $P_k$ in $G,$ and the minimum number of colors needed for a $P_k$-coloring of $G$ is called the $P_k$-chromatic number of $G,$ denoted by $s_k(G).$ We provide bounds on $s_k(G)$ for all graphs, in particular, proving that for any graph $G$ with maximum degree $d\geq 2,$ and $k\geq4,$ $s_k(G)=O(d^{\frac{k-1}{k-2}}).$ Moreover, we find the exact values for the $P_k$-chromatic number of the products of some cycles and paths for $k=5,6.$

One method to obtain a proper vertex coloring of graphs using a reasonable number of colors is to start from any arbitrary proper coloring and then repeat some local re-coloring techniques to reduce the number of color classes. The Grundy (First-Fit) coloring and color-dominating colorings of graphs are two well-known such techniques. The color-dominating colorings are also known and commonly referred as {\rm b}-colorings. But these two topics have been studied separately in graph theory. We introduce a new coloring procedure which combines the strategies of these two techniques and satisfies an additional property. We first prove that the vertices of every graph $G$ can be effectively colored using color classes say $C_1, \ldots, C_k$ such that $(i)$ for any two colors $i$ and $j$ with $1\leq i< j \leq k$, any vertex of color $j$ is adjacent to a vertex of color $i$, $(ii)$ there exists a set $\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\}$ of vertices of $G$ such that $u_j\in C_j$ for any $j\in \{1, \ldots, k\}$ and $u_k$ is adjacent to $u_j$ for each $1\leq j \leq k$ with $j\not= k$, and $(iii)$ for each $i$ and $j$ with $i\not= j$, the vertex $u_j$ has a neighbor in $C_i$. This provides a new vertex coloring heuristic which improves both Grundy and color-dominating colorings. Denote by $z(G)$ the maximum number of colors used in any proper vertex coloring satisfying the above properties. The $z(G)$ quantifies the worst-case behavior of the heuristic. We prove the existence of $\{G_n\}_{n\geq 1}$ such that $\min \{Γ(G_n), b(G_n)\} \rightarrow \infty$ but $z(G_n)\leq 3$ for each $n$. For each positive integer $t$ we construct a family of finitely many colored graphs ${\mathcal{D}}_t$ satisfying the property that if $z(G)\geq t$ for a graph $G$ then $G$ contains an element from ${\mathcal{D}}_t$ as a colored subgraph. This provides an algorithmic method for proving numeric upper bounds for $z(G)$.

There has been much research on the topic of finding a large rainbow matching (with no two edges having the same color) in a properly edge-colored graph, where a proper edge coloring is a coloring of the edge set such that no same-colored edges are incident. Recently, Gao, Ramadurai, Wanless, and Wormald proved that in every proper edge coloring of a graph with $q$ colors where each color appears at least $q+o(q)$ times, there is always a rainbow matching using every color. We strengthen this result by simultaneously relaxing two conditions: (i) we lift the condition on the number of colors and allow any finite number of colors and instead, put a weaker condition requiring the maximum degree of the graph to be at most $q$, and (ii) we also relax the proper coloring condition and require that the graph induced by each of the colors have bounded degree. This strengthening resolves a natural question inspired by the remarks made by Gao, Ramadurai, Wanless, and Wormald. As an application of this result, we show that for every proper edge coloring of a graph with $2q+o(q)$ colors where each color appears at least $q$ times, there is always a rainbow matching of size $q$. This can be seen as an asymptotic version of a conjecture of Barát, Gyárfás, and Sárközy restricted on simple graphs. We also provide a construction showing that having $q+1$ colors is not enough, disproving a conjecture of Aharoni and Berger. As a by-product of our techniques, we obtain a new asymptotic version of the Brualdi--Ryser--Stein Conjecture, which is one of the central open questions in combinatorics.

Suppose that $R$ (red) and $B$ (blue) are two graphs on the same vertex set of size $n$, and $H$ is some graph with a red-blue coloring of its edges. How large can $R$ and $B$ be if $R\cup B$ does not contain a copy of $H$? Call the largest such integer $\mathrm{mex}(n, H)$. This problem was introduced by Diwan and Mubayi, who conjectured that (except for a few specific exceptions) when $H$ is a complete graph on $k+1$ vertices with any coloring of its edges $\mathrm{mex}(n,H)=\mathrm{ex}(n, K_{k+1})$. This conjecture generalizes Turán's theorem. Diwan and Mubayi also asked for an analogue of Erdős-Stone-Simonovits theorem in this context. We prove the following asymptotic characterization of the extremal threshold in terms of the chromatic number $χ(H)$ and the \textit{reduced maximum matching number} $\mathcal{M}(H)$ of $H$. $$\mathrm{mex}(n, H)=\left(1- \frac{1}{2(χ(H)-1)} - Ω\left(\frac{\mathcal{M}(H)}{χ(H)^2}\right)\right)\frac{n^2}{2}.$$ $\mathcal{M}(H)$ is, among the set of proper $χ(H)$-colorings of $H$, the largest set of disjoint pairs of color classes where each pair is connected by edges of just a single color. The result is also proved for more than $2$ colors and is tight up to the implied constant factor. We also study $\mathrm{mex}(n, H)$ when $H$ is a cycle with a red-blue coloring of its edges, and we show that $\mathrm{mex}(n, H)\lesssim \frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{2}$, which is tight.

DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is a notion that has been extensively studied since the early 20th century. The chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is denoted $P(G,m)$, and it is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. In 2019, Kaul and Mudrock introduced an analogue of the chromatic polynomial for DP-coloring; specifically, the DP color function of graph $G$ is denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$. Two fundamental questions posed by Kaul and Mudrock are: (1) For any graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, is it the case that $P(G,m)-P_{DP}(G,m) = O(m^{n-3})$ as $m \rightarrow \infty$? and (2) For every graph $G$, does there exist $p,N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(K_p \vee G, m) = P(K_p \vee G, m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? We show that the answer to both these questions is yes. In fact, we show the answer to (2) is yes even if we require $p=1$.

We show that for any fixed integer $m \geq 1$, a graph of maximum degree $Δ$ has a coloring with $O(Δ^{(m+1)/m})$ colors in which every connected bicolored subgraph contains at most $m$ edges. This result unifies previously known upper bounds on the number of colors sufficient for certain types of graph colorings, including star colorings, for which $O(Δ^{3/2})$ colors suffice, and acyclic colorings, for which $O(Δ^{4/3})$ colors suffice. Our proof uses a probabilistic method of Alon, McDiarmid, and Reed. This result also gives previously unknown upper bounds, including the fact that a graph of maximum degree $Δ$ has a proper coloring with $O(Δ^{9/8})$ colors in which every bicolored subgraph is planar, as well as a proper coloring with $O(Δ^{13/12})$ colors in which every bicolored subgraph has treewidth at most $3$.

We consider the graph coloring game, a game in which two players take turns properly coloring the vertices of a graph, with one player attempting to complete a proper coloring, and the other player attempting to prevent a proper coloring. We show that if a graph $G$ has a proper coloring in which the game coloring number of each bicolored subgraph is bounded, then the game chromatic number of $G$ is bounded. As a corollary to this result, we show that for two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ with bounded game coloring number, the Cartesian product $G_1 \square G_2$ has bounded game chromatic number, answering a question of X. Zhu. We also obtain an upper bound on the game chromatic number of the strong product $G_1 \boxtimes G_2$ of two graphs.

The chromatic polynomial and its generalization, the chromatic symmetric function, are two important graph invariants. Celebrated theorems of Birkhoff, Whitney, and Stanley show how both objects can be expressed in three different ways: as sums over all spanning subgraphs, as sums over spanning subgraphs with no broken circuits, and in terms of acyclic orientations with compatible colorings. We establish all six of these expressions bijectively. In fact, we do this with only two bijections, as the proofs in the symmetric function setting are obtained using the same bijections as in the polynomial case and the bijection for broken circuits is just a restriction of the one for all spanning subgraphs.

We present a randomized algorithm which takes as input an undirected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with maximum degree $Δ$, and a number of colors $k \geq (8/3 + o_Δ(1))Δ$, and returns -- in expected time $\tilde{O}(nΔ^{2}\log{k})$ -- a proper $k$-coloring of $G$ distributed perfectly uniformly on the set of all proper $k$-colorings of $G$. Notably, our sampler breaks the barrier at $k = 3Δ$ encountered in recent work of Bhandari and Chakraborty [STOC 2020]. We also sketch how to modify our methods to relax the restriction on $k$ to $k \geq (8/3 - ε_0)Δ$ for an absolute constant $ε_0 > 0$. As in the work of Bhandari and Chakraborty, and the pioneering work of Huber [STOC 1998], our sampler is based on Coupling from the Past [Propp&Wilson, Random Struct. Algorithms, 1995] and the bounding chain method [Huber, STOC 1998; Häggström&Nelander, Scand. J. Statist., 1999]. Our innovations include a novel bounding chain routine inspired by Jerrum's analysis of the Glauber dynamics [Random Struct. Algorithms, 1995], as well as a preconditioning routine for bounding chains which uses the algorithmic Lovász Local Lemma [Moser&Tardos, J.ACM, 2010].

The Birkhoff graph $\mathcal{B}_n$ is the Cayley graph of the symmetric group $S_n$, where two permutations are adjacent if they differ by a single cycle. Our main result is a tighter upper bound on the independence number $α(\mathcal{B}_n)$ of $\mathcal{B}_n$, namely, we show that $α(\mathcal{B}_n) \le O(n!/1.97^n)$ improving on the previous known bound of $α(\mathcal{B}_n) \le O(n!/\sqrt{2}^{n})$ by [Kane-Lovett-Rao, FOCS 2017]. Our approach combines a higher-order version of their representation theoretic techniques with linear programming. With an explicit construction, we also improve their lower bound on $α(\mathcal{B}_n)$ by a factor of $n/2$. This construction is based on a proper coloring of $\mathcal{B}_n$, which also gives an upper bound on the chromatic number $χ(\mathcal{B}_n)$ of $\mathcal{B}_n$. Via known connections, the upper bound on $α(\mathcal{B}_n)$ implies alphabet size lower bounds for a family of maximally recoverable codes on grid-like topologies.

A graph where each vertex $v$ has a list $L(v)$ of available colors is $L$-colorable if there is a proper coloring such that the color of $v$ is in $L(v)$ for each $v$. A graph is $k$-choosable if every assignment $L$ of at least $k$ colors to each vertex guarantees an $L$-coloring. Given a list assignment $L$, an $L$-request for a vertex $v$ is a color $c\in L(v)$. In this paper, we look at a variant of the widely studied class of precoloring extension problems from [Z. Dvořák, S. Norin, and L. Postle: List coloring with requests. J. Graph Theory 2019], wherein one must satisfy "enough", as opposed to all, of the requested set of precolors. A graph $G$ is $\varepsilon$-flexible for list size $k$ if for any $k$-list assignment $L$, and any set $S$ of $L$-requests, there is an $L$-coloring of $G$ satisfying an $\varepsilon$-fraction of the requests in $S$. It is conjectured that planar graphs are $\varepsilon$-flexible for list size $5$, yet it is proved only for list size $6$ and for certain subclasses of planar graphs. We give a stronger version of the main tool used in the proofs of the aforementioned results. By doing so, we improve upon a result by Masařík and show that planar graphs without $K_4^-$ are $\varepsilon$-flexible for list size $5$. We also prove that planar graphs without $4$-cycles and $3$-cycle distance at least 2 are $\varepsilon$-flexible for list size $4$. Finally, we introduce a new (slightly weaker) form of $\varepsilon$-flexibility where each vertex has exactly one request. In that setting, we provide a stronger tool and we demonstrate its usefulness to further extend the class of graphs that are $\varepsilon$-flexible for list size $5$.

In any vertex coloring of a graph some edges have differently colored ends (\emph{good} edges) and some are monochromatic (\emph{bad} edges). In a proper coloring all edges are good. In a \emph{majority coloring} it is enough that for every vertex $v$, the number of bad edges incident to $v$ does not exceed the number of good edges incident to $v$. A well known result of Lovász \cite{Lovasz} asserts that every finite graph has a majority $2$-coloring. A similar statement for countably infinite graphs is a challenging open problem, known as the \emph{Unfriendly Partition Conjecture}. We consider a natural list variant of majority coloring. A graph is \emph{majority $k$-choosable} if it has a majority coloring from any lists of size $k$ assigned arbitrarily to the vertices. We prove that every countable graph is majority $4$-choosable. We also consider a natural analog of majority coloring for directed graphs. We prove that every countable digraph is also majority $4$-choosable. We pose list and directed analogs of the Unfriendly Partition Conjecture, stating that every countable graph is majority $2$-choosable and every countable digraph is majority $3$-choosable.

Dominator coloring of a graph is a proper (vertex) coloring with the property that every vertex is either alone in its color class or adjacent to all vertices of at least one color class. A dominated coloring of a graph is a proper coloring such that every color class is dominated with at least one vertex. The dominator chromatic number of corona products and of edge corona products is determined. Sharp lower and upper bounds are given for the dominated chromatic number of edge corona products. The dominator chromatic number of hierarchical products is bounded from above and the dominated chromatic number of hierarchical products with two factors determined. An application of dominated colorings in genetic networks is also proposed.

The reconfiguration graph $R_k(G)$ for the $k$-colorings of a graph $G$ has as vertex set the set of all possible proper $k$-colorings of $G$ and two colorings are adjacent if they differ in the color of exactly one vertex. A result of Bousquet and Perarnau (2016) regarding graphs of bounded degeneracy implies that if $G$ is a planar graph with $n$ vertices, then $R_{12}(G)$ has diameter at most $6n$. We improve on the number of colors, showing that $R_{10}(G)$ has diameter at most $8n$ for every planar graph $G$ with $n$ vertices.

Consider the following simple coloring algorithm for a graph on $n$ vertices. Each vertex chooses a color from $\{1, \dotsc, Δ(G) + 1\}$ uniformly at random. While there exists a conflicted vertex choose one such vertex uniformly at random and recolor it with a randomly chosen color. This algorithm was introduced by Bhartia et al. [MOBIHOC'16] for channel selection in WIFI-networks. We show that this algorithm always converges to a proper coloring in expected $O(n \log Δ)$ steps, which is optimal and proves a conjecture of Chakrabarty and Supinski [SOSA'20].

List k-Coloring (Li k-Col) is the decision problem asking if a given graph admits a proper coloring compatible with a given list assignment to its vertices with colors in {1,2,..,k}. The problem is known to be NP-hard even for k=3 within the class of 3-regular planar bipartite graphs and for k=4 within the class of chordal bipartite graphs. In 2015, Huang, Johnson and Paulusma asked for the complexity of Li 3-Col in the class of chordal bipartite graphs. In this paper we give a partial answer to this question by showing that Li k-Col is polynomial in the class of convex bipartite graphs. We show first that biconvex bipartite graphs admit a multichain ordering, extending the classes of graphs where a polynomial algorithm of Enright, Stewart and Tardos (2014) can be applied to the problem. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm to solve the Li k-Col in the calss of convex bipartite graphs. Finally we show how our algorithm can be modified to solve the more general Li H-Col problem on convex bipartite graphs.

Indicated coloring is a graph coloring game in which two players collectively color the vertices of a graph in the following way. In each round the first player (Ann) selects a vertex, and then the second player (Ben) colors it properly, using a fixed set of colors. The goal of Ann is to achieve a proper coloring of the whole graph, while Ben is trying to prevent the realization of this project. The smallest number of colors necessary for Ann to win the game on a graph $G$ (regardless of Ben's strategy) is called the indicated chromatic number of $G$, denoted by $χ_i(G)$. In this paper, we have shown that for any graphs $G$ and $H$, $G[H]$ is $k$-indicated colorable for all $k\geq\mathrm{col}(G)\mathrm{col}(H)$. Also, we have shown that for any graph $G$ and for some classes of graphs $H$ with $χ(H)=χ_i(H)=\ell$, $G[H]$ is $k$-indicated colorable if and only if $G[K_\ell]$ is $k$-indicated colorable. As a consequence of this result we have shown that for some particular families of graphs $G$ and $H$, $G[H]$ is $k$-indicated colorable for every $k\geq χ(G[H])$. This serves as a partial answer to one of the questions raised by A. Grzesik in \cite{and}. In addition, if $G$ is a Bipartite graph or a $\{P_5,K_3\}$-free graph (or) a $\{P_5,Paw\}$-free graph and if $H$ is from the same families of graphs, then we have shown that $χ_i(G[H])=χ(G[H])$.

A proper $q$-coloring of a graph is an assignment of one of $q$ colors to each vertex of the graph so that adjacent vertices are colored differently. Sample uniformly among all proper $q$-colorings of a large discrete cube in the integer lattice $\mathbb{Z}^d$. Does the random coloring obtained exhibit any large-scale structure? Does it have fast decay of correlations? We discuss these questions and the way their answers depend on the dimension $d$ and the number of colors $q$. The questions are motivated by statistical physics (anti-ferromagnetic materials, square ice), combinatorics (proper colorings, independent sets) and the study of random Lipschitz functions on a lattice. The discussion introduces a diverse set of tools, useful for this purpose and for other problems, including spatial mixing, entropy and coupling methods, Gibbs measures and their classification and refined contour analysis.

The locating-chromatic number of a graph $G$ is the smallest integer $n$, such that $G$ has a proper $n$-coloring $c$ and all vertices have different vectors of distances to the colors generated by $c$. We study the asymptotic value of the locating-chromatic number of a $k$-level $n$-ary tree. The locating-chromatic number of this tree acts very differently when $k$ goes to infinity and when $n$ goes to infinity. If we fix $k\geq2$, almost all $n$-ary Tree $T(n,k)$ satisfy $χ_L(T(n,k))=n+k-1$; so $\lim\limits_{n\to \infty} χ_L(T(n,k))-n=k-1$. But if we fix $n\geq 2$, then $χ_L(T(n,k))=o(k)$.