arXiv++ Combinatorics

We exhibit a new obstacle to the nascent algorithmic theory for classes excluding an induced minor. We indeed show that on the class of string graphs -- which avoids the 1-subdivision of, say, $K_5$ as an induced minor -- Induced 2-Disjoint Paths is NP-complete. So, while $k$-Disjoint Paths, for a fixed $k$, is polynomial-time solvable in general graphs, the absence of a graph as an induced minor does not make its induced variant tractable, even for $k=2$. This answers a question of Korhonen and Lokshtanov [SODA '24], and complements a polynomial-time algorithm for Induced $k$-Disjoint Paths in classes of bounded genus by Kobayashi and Kawarabayashi [SODA '09]. In addition to being string graphs, our produced hard instances are subgraphs of a constant power of bounded-degree planar graphs, hence have bounded twin-width and bounded maximum degree. We also leverage our new result to show that there is a fixed subcubic graph $H$ such that deciding if an input graph contains $H$ as an induced subdivision is NP-complete. Until now, all the graphs $H$ for which such a statement was known had a vertex of degree at least 4. This answers a question by Chudnovsky, Seymour, and the fourth author [JCTB '13], and by Le [JGT '19]. Finally we resolve another question of Korhonen and Lokshtanov by exhibiting a subcubic graph $H$ without two adjacent degree-3 vertices and such that deciding if an input $n$-vertex graph contains $H$ as an induced minor is NP-complete, and unless the Exponential-Time Hypothesis fails, requires time $2^{Ω(\sqrt n)}$. This complements an algorithm running in subexponential time $2^{O(n^{2/3} \log n)}$ by these authors [SODA '24] under the same technical condition.

The tree spanner problem for a graph $G$ is as follows: For a given integer $k$, is there a spanning tree $T$ of $G$ (called a tree $k$-spanner) such that the distance in $T$ between every pair of vertices is at most $k$ times their distance in $G$? The minimum $k$ that $G$ admits a tree $k$-spanner is denoted by $σ(G)$. It is well known in the literature that determining $σ(G)\leq 2$ is polynomially solvable, while determining $σ(G)\leq k$ for $k\geq 4$ is NP-complete. A long-standing open problem is to characterize graphs with $σ(G)=3$. This paper settles this open problem by proving that it is polynomially solvable.

In a graph $ G $, a subset of vertices $ S $ is called an efficient dominating set (EDS) if every vertex in the graph is uniquely dominated by exactly one vertex in $ S $. A graph is said to be efficiently dominatable if it contains an EDS. Additionally, a function $ f: V(G) \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, \dots, k\} $ is termed a $ k $-limited dominating broadcast if, for every vertex $ u \in V(G) $, there exists a vertex $ v $, with $ f(v) \geq 1$ such that $ d(u, v) \leq f(v) $. A vertex $u$ is said to be dominated by a vertex $v$. In this work, we unify these two concepts to explore the notion of efficient $k$-limited broadcast domination in graphs. A $ k $-limited dominating broadcast $f$ is called an efficient $k$-limited dominating broadcast ($k$-$ELDB$) if each vertex in the graph is dominated exactly once. The minimum value of $k$ for which the given graph $G$ has $k$-$ELDB$ is defined as $mcr(G)$. We prove determining $mcr(G)$ is NP-Complete for general graphs and explore the $mcr(G)$ values and other related parameters on standard graphs and their products.

Evolomino is a pencil-and-paper logic puzzle popularized by the Japanese publisher Nikoli (like Sudoku, Kakuro, Slitherlink, Masyu, and Fillomino). The puzzle's name reflects its core mechanic: the shapes of polyomino-like blocks that players must draw gradually "evolve" in the directions indicated by pre-drawn arrows. We prove, by reduction from 3-SAT, that the question of whether there exists at least one solution to an Evolomino puzzle satisfying the rules is NP-complete. Since our reduction is parsimonious, i.e., it preserves the number of distinct solutions, we also prove that counting the number of solutions to an Evolomino puzzle is #P-complete.

A split graph is a graph whose vertex set can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. The word-representability of split graphs was studied in a series of papers in the literature, and the class of word-representable split graphs was characterized through semi-transitive orientation. Nonetheless, the representation number of this class of graphs is still not known. In general, determining the representation number of a word-representable graph is an NP-complete problem. In this work, through an algorithmic procedure, we show that the representation number of the class of word-representable split graphs is at most three. Further, we characterize the class of word-representable split graphs as well as the class of split comparability graphs which have representation number exactly three.

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say that $A$ \emph{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1 \leq i < j \leq k$. In this article, we study a variation of the transitive partition, namely the \emph{total transitive partition}. The total transitivity $Tr_t(G)$ is defined as the maximum order of a vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ obtained by repeatedly removing a total dominating set from $G$ until no vertices remain. Thus, $V_1$ is a total dominating set of $G$, $V_2$ is a total dominating set of the graph $G_1 = G - V_1$, and, for $2 \leq i \leq k - 1$, $V_{i+1}$ is a total dominating set in the graph $G_i = G - \bigcup_{j=1}^i V_j$. A vertex partition of order $Tr_t(G)$ is called a $Tr_t$-partition. The \textsc{Maximum Total Transitivity Problem} is to find a total transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. First, we characterize split graphs with total transitivity equal to $1$ and $ω(G) - 1$. Moreover, for a split graph $G$ and $1 \leq p \leq ω(G) - 1$, we provide necessary conditions for $Tr_t(G) = p$. Furthermore, we show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for bipartite chain graphs. Finally, we design a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the \textsc{Maximum Total Transitivity Problem} in trees.

We show that it is NP-hard to distinguish graphs of linear mim-width at most 1211 from graphs of sim-width at least 1216. This implies that Mim-Width, Sim-Width, One-Sided Mim-Width, and their linear counterparts are all paraNP-complete, i.e., NP-complete to compute even when upper bounded by a constant.

The $H$-Induced Minor Containment problem ($H$-IMC) consists in deciding if a fixed graph $H$ is an induced minor of a graph $G$ given as input, that is, whether $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by deleting vertices and contracting edges. Equivalently, the problem asks if there exists an induced minor model of $H$ in $G$, that is, a collection of disjoint subsets of vertices of $G$, each inducing a connected subgraph, such that contracting each subgraph into a single vertex results in $H$. It is known that $H$-IMC is NP-complete for several graphs $H$, even when $H$ is a tree. In this work, we investigate which properties of $H$ guarantee the existence of an induced minor model whose structure can be leveraged to solve the problem in polynomial time. This allows us to identify four infinite families of graphs $H$ that enjoy such properties. Moreover, we show that if the input graph $G$ excludes long induced paths, then $H$-IMC is polynomial-time solvable for any fixed graph $H$. As a byproduct of our results, this implies that $H$-IMC is polynomial-time solvable for all graphs $H$ with at most $5$ vertices, except for three open cases.

Let $G$ be a graph and $S \subseteq V(G)$. In the cycle convexity, we say that $S$ is \textit{cycle convex} if for any $u\in V(G)\setminus S$, the induced subgraph of $S\cup\{u\}$ contains no cycle that includes $u$. The \textit{cycle convex hull} of $S$ is the smallest convex set containing $S$. The \textit{cycle hull number} of $G$, denoted by $hn_{cc}(G)$, is the cardinality of the smallest set $S$ such that the convex hull of $S$ is $V(G)$. The \textit{convexity number} of $G$, denoted by $C_{cc}(G)$, is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of $V(G)$. This paper studies cycle convexity in graph products. We show that the cycle hull number is always two for strong and lexicographic products. For the Cartesian, we establish tight bounds for this product and provide a closed formula when the factors are trees, generalizing an existing result for grid graphs. In addition, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, we prove that $hn_{cc}(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete even if $G$ is a bipartite Cartesian product graph, addressing an open question in the literature. Furthermore, we present exact formulas for the cycle convexity number in those three graph products. That leads to the NP-completeness of, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $C_{cc}(G) \geq k$, when $G$ is a Cartesian, strong or lexicographic product graph.

A tree is said to be even if for every pair of distinct leaves, the length of the unique path between them is even. In this paper we discuss the problem of determining whether an input graph has a spanning even tree. Hofmann and Walsh [Australas. J Comb. 35, 2006] proved that this problem can be solved in polynomial time on bipartite graphs. In contrast to this, we show that this problem is NP-complete even on planar graphs. We also give polynomial-time algorithms for several restricted classes of graphs, such as split graphs, cographs, cobipartite graphs, unit interval graphs, and block graphs.

The famous Ryser--Brualdi--Stein conjecture asserts that every $k \times k$ Latin square contains a partial transversal of size $k-1$. Since its appearance, the conjecture has attracted significant interest, leading to several proposed generalizations. One of the most notable of these, by Aharoni, Kotlar, and Ziv, conjectures that $k$ disjoint common bases of two matroids of rank $k$ have a common independent partial transversal of size $k-1$. Although simple counterexamples show that the size $k-1$ above cannot be improved to $k$ (i.e., a transversal instead of a partial transversal), it is remarkable that no such counterexample is known for the special case of spanning arborescences. This motivated the formulation of the Rainbow Arborescence Conjecture: any graph on $n$ vertices formed by the union of $n-1$ spanning arborescences contains an arborescence using exactly one arc from each. We prove several partial results on this conjecture. We show that the computational problem of testing the existence of such an arborescence with a fixed root is NP-complete, verify the conjecture in several special cases, and study relaxations of the problem. In particular, we establish the validity of the conjecture when the underlying undirected graph is a cycle; this also yields a new result on systems of distinct representatives for intervals on a cycle.

One of the questions in Rigidity Theory is whether a realization of the vertices of a graph in the plane is flexible, namely, if it allows a continuous deformation preserving the edge lengths. A flexible realization of a connected graph in the plane exists if and only if the graph has a NAC-coloring, which is a surjective edge coloring by two colors such that for each cycle, either all the edges have the same color, or there are at least two edges of each color. The question whether a graph has a NAC-coloring, and hence also the existence of a flexible realization, has been proven to be NP-complete. We show that this question is also NP-complete on graphs with maximum degree five and on graphs with the average degree at most $4+\varepsilon$ for every fixed $\varepsilon >0$. We also show that NAC-colorings can be counted in linear time for graphs with bounded treewidth. Since the only existing implementation of checking the existence of a NAC-coloring is rather naive, we propose new algorithms along with their implementation, which is significantly faster. We also focus on searching all NAC-colorings of a graph, since they provide useful information about its possible flexible realizations.

The Hidden Subset Sum Problem (HSSP) is a significant NP-complete problem in number theory and combinatorics, with applications in cryptography and AI privacy. For the $(n,k)$-complete HSSP, where a target multiset must be recovered from its all $k$-subset sums, existing algorithms face limitations due to high complexity or intractability. This paper proposes two deterministic algorithms: a brute-force approach, and a novel method leveraging symmetric polynomials and Vieta's formulas with $O\left(\sum_{u=1}^n p(u,\leq k)^3+\binom{n}{k}n\right)$ complexity, where $ p(u,\leq k)$ counts the number of partitions of a positive integer $u$ into at most $k$ parts. The latter constructs an $n$-th degree polynomial via Vieta's formulas, whose roots correspond to the hidden multiset elements. Additionally, the discussion about the homogeneous symmetric polynomial rings is of independent interest.

In this work, we extend the concept of Robinson spaces to asymmetric dissimilarities, enhancing their applicability in representing and analyzing complex data. Within this generalized framework, we introduce two different problems that extend the classical seriation problem: an optimization problem and a decision problem. We establish that these problems are NP-hard and NP-complete, respectively. Despite this complexity results, we identify several non-trivial instances where these problems can be solved in polynomial time, providing valuable insights into their tractability.

Lazy burning is a recently introduced variation of burning where only one set of vertices is chosen to burn in the first round. In hypergraphs, lazy burning spreads when all but one vertex in a hyperedge is burned. The lazy burning number is the minimum number of initially burned vertices that eventually burns all vertices. We give several equivalent characterizations of lazy burning on hypergraphs using matchings and zero forcing, and then apply these to give new bounds and complexity results. We prove that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph $H$ equals its order minus the maximum cardinality of a certain matching on its incidence graph. Using this characterization, we give a formula for the lazy burning number of a dual hypergraph and give new bounds on the lazy burning number based on various hypergraph parameters. We show that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph may be characterized by a maximal subhypergraph that results from iteratively deleting vertices in singleton hyperedges. We prove that lazy burning on a hypergraph is equivalent to zero forcing on its incidence graph and show an equivalence between skew zero forcing on a graph and lazy burning on its neighborhood hypergraph. As a result, we show that finding an upper bound on the lazy burning number of a hypergraph is NP-complete, which resolves a conjecture from \cite{BJR}. By applying lazy burning, we show that computing an upper bound on the skew zero forcing number for bipartite graphs is NP-complete. We finish with open problems.

A set $D \subseteq V$ is a dominating set of a graph $G$ if every vertex in $V - D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. A dominating set $D$ is a paired-dominating set if the subgraph of $G$ induced by $D$ contains a perfect matching. In this paper, we prove that determining the minimum paired-dominating set in circle graphs is NP-complete. We further present an $O(n(\frac{n}{k^2-k})^{2k^2-2k})$-time algorithm for finding the minimum paired-dominating set in $k$-polygon graphs, a subclass of circle graphs. Additionally, we refine the existing algorithm of Elmallah and Stewart for computing the minimum dominating set in $k$-polygon graphs, reducing its time complexity from $O(n^{4k^2+3})$ to $O(n^{3k-5})$, and further extend it to find the minimum total dominating set.

Given a graph $G$ with vertex set $V(G)$, a mapping $h : V(G) \rightarrow \lbrace 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 \rbrace$ is called a quadruple Roman dominating function (4RDF) for $G$ if it holds the following. Every vertex $x$ such that $h(x)\in \{0,1,2, 3\}$ satisfies that $h(N[x]) = \sum_{v\in N[x]} h(v) \geq |\{y:y \in N(x) \; \text{and} \; h(y) \neq 0\}|+4$, where $N(x)$ and $N[x]$ stands for the open and closed neighborhood of $x$, respectively. The smallest possible weight $\sum_{x \in V(G)} h(x)$ among all possible 4RDFs $h$ for $G$ is the quadruple Roman domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{[4R]}(G)$. This work is focused on complexity aspects for the problem of computing the value of this parameter for several graph classes. Specifically, it is shown that the decision problem concerning $γ_{[4R]}(G)$ is NP-complete when restricted to star convex bipartite, comb convex bipartite, split and planar graphs. In contrast, it is also proved that such problem can be efficiently solved for threshold graphs where an exact solution is demonstrated, while for graphs having an efficient dominating set, tight upper and lower bounds in terms of the classical domination number are given. In addition, some approximation results to the problem are given. That is, we show that the problem cannot be approximated within $(1 - ε) \ln |V|$ for any $ε> 0$ unless $P=NP$. An approximation algorithm for it is proposed, and its APX-completeness proved, whether graphs of maximum degree four are considered. Finally, an integer linear programming formulation for our problem is presented.

We present a dichotomy theorem on the parameterized complexity of the 3-uniform hypergraphicality problem. Given $0<c_1\le c_2 < 1$, the parameterized 3-uniform Hypergraphic Degree Sequence problem, $3uni-HDS_{c_1,c_2}$, considers degree sequences $D$ of length $n$ such that all degrees are between $c_1 {n-1 \choose 2}$ and $c_2 {n-1\choose 2}$ and it asks if there is a 3-uniform hypergraph with degree sequence $D$. We prove that for any $0<c_2< 1$, there exists a unique, polynomial-time computable $c_1^*$ with the following properties. For any $ c_1\in (c_1^*,c_2]$, $3uni-HDS_{c_1,c_2}$ can be solved in linear time. In fact, for any $c_1\in (c_1^*,c_2]$ there exists an easy-to-compute $n_0$ such that any degree sequence $D$ of length $n\ge n_0$ and all degrees between $c_1 {n-1\choose 2}$ and $c_2 {n-1\choose 2}$ has a 3-uniform hypergraph realization if and only if the sum of the degrees can be divided by $3$. Further, $n_0$ grows polynomially with the inverse of $c_1-c_1^*$. On the other hand, we prove that for all $c_1<c_1^*$, $3uni-HDS_{c_1,c_2}$ is NP-complete. Finally, we briefly consider an extension of the hypergraphicality problem to arbitrary $t$-uniformity. We show that the interval where degree sequences (satisfying divisibility conditions) always have $t$-uniform hypergraph realizations must become increasingly narrow, with interval width tending to $0$ as $t \rightarrow \infty$.

We develop a unified framework for rotor-routing that extends the classical model to a broad class of multigraphs equipped with Generalized Rotor Mechanisms (GRM). This perspective places rotor-routing on the same footing as abelian sandpiles by interpreting both as conservative instances of Vector Addition Systems (VAS). Within this framework, routing becomes a linear transformation governed by arc mechanisms, while legality is enforced through non-negativity constraints. We introduce four routing models -- free routing, standard rotor-routing, cyclic GRM routing, and fully general GRM routing -- and study their reachability problems in both the linear and legal settings. Our results generalize previous characterizations for standard rotor-routing and extend them to the GRM setting. In particular, we show that legal reachability in GRM multigraphs is NP-complete, whereas the cyclic GRM routing model, which includes the classical rotor-router, admits a polynomial-time algorithm.

In reconfiguration, we are given two solutions to a graph problem, such as Vertex Cover or Dominating Set, with each solu tion represented by a placement of tokens on vertices of the graph. Our task is to reconfigure one into the other using small steps while ensuring the intermediate configurations of tokens are also valid solutions. The two commonly studied settings are Token Jumping and Token Sliding, which allows moving a single token to an arbitrary or an adjacent vertex, respectively. We introduce new rules that generalize Token Jumping, parameterized by the number of tokens allowed to move at once and by the maximum distance of each move. Our main contribution is identifying minimal rules that allow reconfiguring any possible given solution into any other for Independent Set, Vertex Cover, and Dominating Set. For each minimal rule, we also provide an efficient algorithm that finds a corresponding reconfiguration sequence. We further focus on the rule that allows each token to move to an adjacent vertex in a single step. This natural variant turns out to be the minimal rule that guarantees reconfigurability for Vertex Cover. We determine the computational complexity of deciding whether a (shortest) reconfiguration sequence exists under this rule for the three studied problems. While reachability for Vertex Cover is shown to be in P, finding a shortest sequence is shown to be NP-complete. For Independent Set and Dominating Set, even reachability is shown to be PSPACE-complete.