arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a 3-uniform hypergraph H, its 2-intersection graph G has for vertex set the hyperedges of H and ee' is an edge of G whenever e and e' have exactly two common vertices in H. Di Marco et al. prove that deciding wether a graph G is the 2-intersection graph of a 3-uniform hypergraph is NP-complete. The main problems we study concern the class of claw-free graphs. We show that the recognition problem remains NP-complete when G is claw-free graphs but becomes polynomial if in addition G is triangulated.

Given a graph $G=(V, E)$ and a list of available colors $L(v)$ for each vertex $v\in V$, where $L(v) \subseteq \{1, 2, \ldots, k\}$, List $k$-Coloring refers to the problem of assigning colors to the vertices of $G$ so that each vertex receives a color from its own list and no two neighboring vertices receive the same color. The decision version of the problem List $3$-Coloring is NP-complete even for bipartite graphs, and its complexity on comb-convex bipartite graphs has been an open problem. We give a polynomial-time algorithm to solve List $3$-Coloring for caterpillar-convex bipartite graphs, a superclass of comb-convex bipartite graphs. We also give a polynomial-time recognition algorithm for the class of caterpillar-convex bipartite graphs.

For a given digraph $D$ and distinct $u,v \in V(D)$, we denote by $λ_D(u,v)$ the local arc-connectivity from $u$ to $v$. Further, we define the total arc-connectivity $tac(D)$ of $D$ to be $\sum_{\{u,v\}\subseteq V(D)}λ_D(u,v)+λ_D(v,u)$. We show that, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, it is NP-complete to decide whether $G$ has an orientation $\vec{G}$ satisfying $tac(\vec{G})\geq k$. This answers a question of Pekec. On the positive side, we show that the corresponding maximization problem admits a $\frac{2}{3}$-approximation algorithm.

We study Steiner Forest on $H$-subgraph-free graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain some fixed graph $H$ as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. We are motivated by a recent framework that completely characterizes the complexity of many problems on $H$-subgraph-free graphs. However, in contrast to e.g. the related Steiner Tree problem, Steiner Forest falls outside this framework. Hence, the complexity of Steiner Forest on $H$-subgraph-free graphs remained tantalizingly open. In this paper, we make significant progress towards determining the complexity of Steiner Forest on $H$-subgraph-free graphs. Our main results are four novel polynomial-time algorithms for different excluded graphs $H$ that are central to further understand its complexity. Along the way, we study the complexity of Steiner Forest for graphs with a small $c$-deletion set, that is, a small set $S$ of vertices such that each component of $G-S$ has size at most $c$. Using this parameter, we give two noteworthy algorithms that we later employ as subroutines. First, we prove Steiner Forest is FPT parameterized by $|S|$ when $c=1$ (i.e. the vertex cover number). Second, we prove Steiner Forest is polynomial-time solvable for graphs with a 2-deletion set of size at most 2. The latter result is tight, as the problem is NP-complete for graphs with a 3-deletion set of size 2.

This work addresses the block-diagonal semidefinite program (SDP) relaxations for the clique number of the Paley graphs. The size of the maximal clique (clique number) of a graph is a classic NP-complete problem; a Paley graph is a deterministic graph where two vertices are connected if their difference is a quadratic residue (square) in a finite field with the number of elements given by certain primes and prime powers. Improving the upper bound for the Paley graph clique number for prime powers that are non-squares is an open problem in combinatorics. Moreover, since quadratic residues exhibit pseudorandom properties, Paley graphs are related to the construction of deterministic restricted isometries, an open problem in compressed sensing. Recent work provides numerical evidence that the current upper bounds can be improved by the sum-of-squares (SOS) relaxations. In particular, the bounds given by the SOS relaxations of degree 4 (SOS-4) have been empirically observed to be growing at an order smaller than square root of the prime. However, computations of SOS-4 appear to be intractable with respect to large graphs. Gvozdenovic et al. introduced a more computationally efficient block-diagonal hierarchy of SDPs and computed the values of these SDPs of degrees 2 (L2) for the Paley graph clique numbers associated with primes p less or equal to 809, which bound from above the corresponding SOS-4 relaxations. We compute the values of the L2 relaxations for p's between 821 and 997. Our results provide some numerical evidence that these relaxations, and therefore also the SOS-4 relaxations, may be scaling at an order smaller than the square root of p. However, due to the size of the SDPs, we have not been able to compute L2 relaxations for p's greater than 997. Therefore, our scaling estimate is not conclusive and presents an interesting open problem for further study.

Deciding whether a graph can be edge-decomposed into a matching and a $k$-bounded linear forest was recently shown by Campbell, H{ö}rsch and Moore to be NP-complete for every $k \ge 9$, and solvable in polynomial time for $k=1,2$. In the first part of this paper, we close this gap by showing that this problem is in NP-complete for every $k \ge 3$. In the second part of the paper, we show that deciding whether a graph can be edge-decomposed into a matching and a $k$-bounded star forest is polynomially solvable for any $k \in \mathbb{N} \cup \{ \infty \}$, answering another question by Campbell, H{ö}rsch and Moore from the same paper.

Given a formal context, an ordinal factor is a subset of its incidence relation that forms a chain in the concept lattice, i.e., a part of the dataset that corresponds to a linear order. To visualize the data in a formal context, Ganter and Glodeanu proposed a biplot based on two ordinal factors. For the biplot to be useful, it is important that these factors comprise as much data points as possible, i.e., that they cover a large part of the incidence relation. In this work, we investigate such ordinal two-factorizations. First, we investigate for formal contexts that omit ordinal two-factorizations the disjointness of the two factors. Then, we show that deciding on the existence of two-factorizations of a given size is an NP-complete problem which makes computing maximal factorizations computationally expensive. Finally, we provide the algorithm Ord2Factor that allows us to compute large ordinal two-factorizations.

The (Perfect) Matching Cut problem is to decide if a graph $G$ has a (perfect) matching cut, i.e., a (perfect) matching that is also an edge cut of $G$. Both Matching Cut and Perfect Matching Cut are known to be NP-complete. A perfect matching cut is also a matching cut with maximum number of edges. To increase our understanding of the relationship between the two problems, we perform a complexity study for the Maximum Matching Cut problem, which is to determine a largest matching cut in a graph. Our results yield full dichotomies of Maximum Matching Cut for graphs of bounded diameter, bounded radius and $H$-free graphs. A disconnected perfect matching of a graph $G$ is a perfect matching that contains a matching cut of $G$. We also show how our new techniques can be used for finding a disconnected perfect matching with a largest matching cut for special graph classes. In this way we can prove that the decision problem Disconnected Perfect Matching is polynomial-time solvable for $(P_6+sP_2)$-free graphs for every $s\geq 0$, extending a known result for $P_5$-free graphs (Bouquet and Picouleau, 2020).

The {\it inversion} of a set $X$ of vertices in a digraph $D$ consists of reversing the direction of all arcs of $D\langle X\rangle$. We study $sinv'_k(D)$ (resp. $sinv_k(D)$) which is the minimum number of inversions needed to transform $D$ into a $k$-arc-strong (resp. $k$-strong) digraph and $sinv'_k(n) = \max\{sinv'_k(D) \mid D~\mbox{is a $2k$-edge-connected digraph of order $n$}\}$. We show : $(i): \frac{1}{2} \log (n - k+1) \leq sinv'_k(n) \leq \log n + 4k -3$ ; $(ii):$ for any fixed positive integers $k$ and $t$, deciding whether a given oriented graph $D$ with $sinv'_k(D)<+\infty$ satisfies $sinv'_k(D) \leq t$ is NP-complete; $(iii):$ for any fixed positive integers $k$ and $t$, deciding whether a given oriented graph $D$ with $sinv_k(D)<+\infty$ satisfies $sinv_k(D) \leq t$ is NP-complete; $(iv):$ if $T$ is a tournament of order at least $2k+1$, then $sinv'_k(T) \leq sinv_k(T) \leq 2k$, and $sinv'_k(T) \leq \frac{4}{3}k+o(k)$; $(v):\frac{1}{2}\log(2k+1) \leq sinv'_k(T) \leq sinv_k(T)$ for some tournament $T$ of order $2k+1$; $(vi):$ if $T$ is a tournament of order at least $19k-2$ (resp. $11k-2$), then $sinv'_k(T) \leq sinv_k(T) \leq 1$ (resp. $sinv_k(T) \leq 3$); $(vii):$ for every $ε>0$, there exists $C$ such that $sinv'_k(T) \leq sinv_k(T) \leq C$ for every tournament $T$ on at least $2k+1 + εk$ vertices.

This investigation is firstly focused into showing that two metric parameters represent the same object in graph theory. That is, we prove that the multiset resolving sets and the ID-colorings of graphs are the same thing. We also consider some computational and combinatorial problems of the multiset dimension, or equivalently, the ID-number of graphs. We prove that the decision problem concerning finding the multiset dimension of graphs is NP-complete. We consider the multiset dimension of king grids and prove that it is bounded above by 4. We also give a characterization of the strong product graphs with one factor being a complete graph, and whose multiset dimension is not infinite.

Interval graphs and proper interval graphs are well known graph classes, for which several generalizations have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we study the (proper) thinness, and several variations, for the classes of cographs, crowns graphs and grid graphs. We provide the exact values for several variants of thinness (proper, independent, complete, precedence, and combinations of them) for the crown graphs $CR_n$. For cographs, we prove that the precedence thinness can be determined in polynomial time. We also improve known bounds for the thinness of $n \times n$ grids $GR_n$ and $m \times n$ grids $GR_{m,n}$, proving that $\left \lceil \frac{n-1}{3} \right \rceil \leq \mbox{thin}(GR_n) \leq \left \lceil \frac{n+1}{2} \right \rceil$. Regarding the precedence thinness, we prove that $\mbox{prec-thin}(GR_{n,2}) = \left \lceil \frac{n+1}{2} \right \rceil$ and that $\left \lceil \frac{n-1}{3} \right \rceil \left \lceil\frac{n-1}{2} \right \rceil + 1 \leq \mbox{prec-thin}(GR_n) \leq \left \lceil\frac{n-1}{2} \right \rceil^2+1$. As applications, we show that the $k$-coloring problem is NP-complete for precedence $2$-thin graphs and for proper $2$-thin graphs, when $k$ is part of the input. On the positive side, it is polynomially solvable for precedence proper $2$-thin graphs, given the order and partition.

Given a graph $G$, a subset $S$ of vertices of $G$ is an efficient dominating set ($EDS$) if $|N[v] \cap S|=1,$ for all $v\in V(G)$. A graph $G$ is efficiently dominatable if it possesses an $EDS$. The efficient domination number of G is denoted by F(G) and is defined to be $\max \left\{\sum_{v \in S}(1 + \operatorname{deg} v):\right.$ $\left.S \subseteq V(G)\right.$ and $\left.|N[x] \cap S| \leq 1, \forall~ x \in V(G)\right\}$. In general, not every graph is efficiently dominatable. Further, the class of efficiently dominatable graphs has not been completely characterized and the problem of determining whether or not a graph is efficiently dominatable is NP-Complete. Hence, interest is shown to study the efficient domination property for graphs under restricted conditions or special classes of graphs. In this paper, we study the notion of efficient domination in some Lattice graphs, namely, rectangular grid graphs ($P_m \Box P_n$), triangular grid graphs, and hexagonal grid graphs.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with no isolated vertices. A vertex $v$ totally dominate a vertex $w$ ($w \ne v$), if $v$ is adjacent to $w$. A set $D \subseteq V$ called a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex $v\in V$ is totally dominated by some vertex in $D$. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. A total dominator coloring of graph $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$, so that each vertex totally dominates some color class. The total dominator chromatic number $χ_{td}(G)$ of $G$ is the least number of colors required for a total dominator coloring of $G$. The Total Dominator Coloring problem is to find a total dominator coloring of $G$ using the minimum number of colors. It is known that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for general graphs. We show that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite, planar and split graphs. We further study the Total Dominator Coloring problem for various graph classes, including trees, cographs and chain graphs. First, we characterize the trees having $χ_{td}(T)=γ_t(T)+1$, which completes the characterization of trees achieving all possible values of $χ_{td}(T)$. Also, we show that for a cograph $G$, $χ_{td}(G)$ can be computed in linear-time. Moreover, we show that $2 \le χ_{td}(G) \le 4$ for a chain graph $G$ and give characterization of chain graphs for every possible value of $χ_{td}(G)$ in linear-time.

Given a graph G and an integer k, the objective of the $Π$-Contraction problem is to check whether there exists at most k edges in G such that contracting them in G results in a graph satisfying the property $Π$. We investigate the problem where $Π$ is `H-free' (without any induced copies of H). It is trivial that H-free Contraction is polynomial-time solvable if H is a complete graph of at most two vertices. We prove that, in all other cases, the problem is NP-complete. We then investigate the fixed-parameter tractability of these problems. We prove that whenever H is a tree, except for seven trees, H-free Contraction is W[2]-hard. This result along with the known results leaves behind three unknown cases among trees.

For a simple graph $G=(V,E)$ without any isolated vertex, a cosecure dominating set $D$ of $G$ satisfies the following two properties (i) $S$ is a dominating set of $G$, (ii) for every vertex $v \in S$ there exists a vertex $u \in V \setminus S$ such that $uv \in E$ and $(S \setminus \{v\}) \cup \{u\}$ is a dominating set of $G$. The minimum cardinality of a cosecure dominating set of $G$ is called cosecure domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{cs}(G)$. The Minimum Cosecure Domination problem is to find a cosecure dominating set of a graph $G$ of cardinality $γ_{cs}(G)$. The decision version of the problem is known to be NP-complete for bipartite, planar, and split graphs. Also, it is known that the Minimum Cosecure Domination problem is efficiently solvable for proper interval graphs and cographs. In this paper, we work on various important graph classes in an effort to reduce the complexity gap of the Minimum Cosecure Domination problem. We show that the decision version of the problem remains NP-complete for circle graphs, doubly chordal graphs, chordal bipartite graphs, star-convex bipartite graphs and comb-convex bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we give an efficient algorithm to compute the cosecure domination number of chain graphs, which is an important subclass of bipartite graphs. In addition, we show that the problem is linear-time solvable for bounded tree-width graphs. Further, we prove that the computational complexity of this problem varies from the domination problem.

A temporal (directed) graph is a graph whose edges are available only at specific times during its lifetime, $τ$. Paths are sequences of adjacent edges whose appearing times are either strictly increasing or non-strictly increasingly (i.e., non-decreasing) depending on the scenario. Then, the classical concept of connected components and also of unilateral connected components in static graphs and digraphs naturally extends to the temporal setting. In this paper, we answer to the following fundamental questions in temporal graphs. (i) What is the complexity of deciding the existence of a component of size $k$, parameterized by $τ$, by $k$, and by $k+τ$? We show that this question has a different answer depending on the considered definition of component and whether the temporal graph is directed or undirected. (ii) What is the minimum running time required to check whether a subset of vertices are pairwise reachable? A quadratic algorithm is known but, contrary to the static case, we show that a better running time is unlikely unless SETH fails. (iii) Is it possible to verify whether a subset of vertices is a component in polynomial time? We show that depending on the definition of temporal component this test is NP-complete.

A perfect matching cut is a perfect matching that is also a cutset, or equivalently a perfect matching containing an even number of edges on every cycle. The corresponding algorithmic problem, Perfect Matching Cut, is known to be NP-complete in subcubic bipartite graphs [Le & Telle, TCS '22] but its complexity was open in planar graphs and in cubic graphs. We settle both questions at once by showing that Perfect Matching Cut is NP-complete in 3-connected cubic bipartite planar graphs or Barnette graphs. Prior to our work, among problems whose input is solely an undirected graph, only Distance-2 4-Coloring was known NP-complete in Barnette graphs. Notably, Hamiltonian Cycle would only join this private club if Barnette's conjecture were refuted.

Let $G$ be a graph. A dominating set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a super dominating set if for every vertex $x\in V(G) \setminus D$ there exists $y\in D$ such that $N_G(y)\cap (V(G)\setminus D)) = \{x\}$. The cardinality of a smallest super dominating set of $G$ is the super domination number of $G$. An exact formula for the super domination number of a tree $T$ is obtained and demonstrated that a smallest super dominating set of $T$ can be computed in linear time. It is proved that it is NP-complete to decide whether the super domination number of a graph $G$ is at most a given integer if $G$ is a bipartite graph of girth at least $8$. The super domination number is determined for all $k$-subdivisions of graphs. Interestingly, in half of the cases the exact value can be efficiently computed from the obtained formulas, while in the other cases the computation is hard. While obtaining these formulas, II-matching numbers are introduced and proved that they are computationally hard to determine.

We investigate some graph parameters dealing with biindependent pairs $(A,B)$ in a bipartite graph $G=(V_1\cup V_2,E)$, i.e., pairs $(A,B)$ where $A\subseteq V_1$, $B\subseteq V_2$ and $A\cup B$ is independent. These parameters also allow to study bicliques in general graphs. When maximizing the cardinality $|A\cup B|$ one finds the stability number $α(G)$, well-known to be polynomial-time computable. When maximizing the product $|A|\cdot |B|$ one finds the parameter $g(G)$, shown to be NP-hard by Peeters (2003), and when maximizing the ratio $|A|\cdot |B|/|A\cup B|$ one finds $h(G)$, introduced by Vallentin (2020) for bounding product-free sets in finite groups. We show that $h(G)$ is an NP-hard parameter and, as a crucial ingredient, that it is NP-complete to decide whether a bipartite graph $G$ has a balanced maximum independent set. These hardness results motivate introducing semidefinite programming bounds for $g(G)$, $h(G)$, and $α_{\text{bal}}(G)$ (the maximum cardinality of a balanced independent set). We show that these bounds can be seen as natural variations of the Lovász $\vartheta$-number, a well-known semidefinite bound on $α(G)$. In addition we formulate closed-form eigenvalue bounds and we show relationships among them as well as with earlier spectral parameters by Hoffman, Haemers (2001) and Vallentin (2020).

An out-branching $B^+_u$ (in-branching $B^-_u$) in a digraph $D$ is a connected spanning subdigraph of $D$ in which every vertex except the vertex $u$, called the root, has in-degree (out-degree) one. A {\bf good $\mathbf{(u,v)}$-pair} in $D$ is a pair of branchings $B^+_u,B^-_v$ which have no arc in common. Thomassen proved that is NP-complete to decide if a digraph has any good pair. A digraph is {\bf semicomplete} if it has no pair of non adjacent vertices. A {\bf semicomplete composition} is any digraph $D$ which is obtained from a semicomplete digraph $S$ by substituting an arbitrary digraph $H_x$ for each vertex $x$ of $S$. Recently the authors of this paper gave a complete classification of semicomplete digraphs which have a good $(u,v)$-pair, where $u,v$ are prescribed vertices of $D$. They also gave a polynomial algorithm which for a given semicomplete digraph $D$ and vertices $u,v$ of $D$, either produces a good $(u,v)$-pair in $D$ or a certificate that $D$ has such pair. In this paper we show how to use the result for semicomplete digraphs to completely solve the problem of deciding whether a given semicomplete composition $D$, has a good $(u,v)$-pair for given vertices $u,v$ of $D$. Our solution implies that the problem is polynomially solvable for all semicomplete compositions. In particular our result implies that there is a polynomial algorithm for deciding whether a given quasi-transitive digraph $D$ has a good $(u,v)$-pair for given vertices $u,v$ of $D$. This confirms a conjecture of Bang-Jensen and Gutin from 1998.