arXiv++ Combinatorics

We relate star colouring of even-degree regular graphs to the notions of locally constrained graph homomorphisms to the oriented line graph $ \vec{L}(K_q) $ of the complete graph $ K_q $ and to its underlying undirected graph $ L^*(K_q) $. Our results have consequences for locally constrained graph homomorphisms and oriented line graphs in addition to star colouring. We show that $ L^*(H) $ is a 2-lift of the line graph $ L(H) $ for every graph $ H $. Dvořák, Mohar and Šámal (J. Graph Theory, 2013) proved that for every 3-regular graph $ G $, the line graph of $ G $ is 4-star colourable if and only if $ G $ admits a locally bijective homomorphism to the cube $ Q_3 $. We generalise this result as follows: for $ p\geq 2 $, a $ K_{1,p+1} $-free $ 2p $-regular graph $ G $ admits a $ (p+2) $-star colouring if and only if $ G $ admits a locally bijective homomorphism to $ L^*(K_{p+2}) $. As a result, if a $ K_{p+1} $-free $ 2p $-regular graph $ G $ with $ p\geq 2 $ is $ (p+2) $-star colourable, then $ -2 $ and $ p-2 $ are eigenvalues of $ G $. We also prove the following: (i) for $ p\geq 2 $, a $ 2p $-regular graph $ G $ admits a $ (p+2) $-star colouring if and only if $ G $ has an orientation that admits an out-neighbourhood bijective homomorphism to $ \vec{L}(K_{p+2}) $; (ii) the line graph of a 3-regular graph $ G $ is 4-star colourable if and only if $ G $ is bipartite and distance-two 4-colourable; and (iii) it is NP-complete to check whether a planar 4-regular 3-connected graph is 4-star colourable.

The problems of determining the permutation-representation number (prn) and the representation number of bipartite graphs are open in the literature. Moreover, the decision problem corresponding to the determination of the prn of a bipartite graph is NP-complete. However, these numbers were established for certain subclasses of bipartite graphs, e.g., for crown graphs. Further, it was conjectured that the crown graphs have the highest representation number among the bipartite graphs. In this work, first, we reconcile the relation between the prn of a comparability graph and the dimension of its induced poset and review the upper bounds on the prn of bipartite graphs. Then, we study the prn of bipartite graphs using the notion called neighborhood graphs. This approach substantiates the aforesaid conjecture and gives us theoretical evidence. In this connection, we devise a polynomial-time procedure to construct a word that represents a given bipartite graph permutationally. Accordingly, we provide a better upper bound for the prn of bipartite graphs. Further, we construct a class of bipartite graphs, viz., extended crown graphs, defined over posets and investigate its prn using the neighborhood graphs.

In the recently introduced framework of solution discovery via reconfiguration [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023], we are given an initial configuration of $k$ tokens on a graph and the question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution (for some problem) via a bounded number $b$ of small modification steps. In this work, we study solution discovery variants of polynomial-time solvable problems, namely Spanning Tree Discovery, Shortest Path Discovery, Matching Discovery, and Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery in the unrestricted token addition/removal model, the token jumping model, and the token sliding model. In the unrestricted token addition/removal model, we show that all four discovery variants remain in P. For the toking jumping model we also prove containment in P, except for Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery, for which we prove NP-completeness. Finally, in the token sliding model, almost all considered problems become NP-complete, the exception being Spanning Tree Discovery, which remains polynomial-time solvable. We then study the parameterized complexity of the NP-complete problems and provide a full classification of tractability with respect to the parameters solution size (number of tokens) $k$ and transformation budget (number of steps) $b$. Along the way, we observe strong connections between the solution discovery variants of our base problems and their (weighted) rainbow variants as well as their red-blue variants with cardinality constraints.

In the Minimum Clique Routing Problem on Cycles \textsc{MCRPC} we are given a cycle together with a set of demands (weighted origin-destination pairs) and the goal is to route all the pairs minimizing the maximum weighted clique of the intersection graph induced by the routing. The vertices of this graph are the demands with their corresponding weights and two demands are adjacent when their routes share at least one arc. In this work we are not only interested in the \textsc{MCRPC} but also in two natural subproblems. First, we consider the situation where the demands are disjoint, in the sense that every two demands do not share any of their corresponding ends. Second, we analyze the subproblem where the weights of the routes are all equal. We first show that the problem is NP-complete even in the subproblem of disjoint demands. For the case of arbitrary weights, we exhibit a simple combinatorial 2-approximation algorithm and a $\frac{3}{2}$-approximation algorithm based on rounding a solution of a relaxation of an integer linear programming formulation of our problem. Finally, we give a Fixed Parameter Tractable algorithm for the case of uniform weights, whose parameter is related to the maximum degree of the intersection graph induced by any routing.

The Longest Path Problem is a question of finding the maximum length between pairs of vertices of a graph. In the general case, the problem is NP-complete. However, there is a small collection of graph classes for which there exists an efficient solution. Current approaches involve either approximation or computational enumeration. For Tree-like classes of graphs, there are approximation and enumeration algorithms which solves the problem efficiently. Despite this, we propose a new method of approaching the longest path problem with exact algebraic solutions that give rise to polynomial-time algorithms. Our method provides algorithms that are proven correct by their underlying algebraic operations unlike existing purely algorithmic solutions to this problem. We introduce a `booleanize' mapping on the adjacency matrix of a graph which we prove identifies the solution for trees, uniform block graphs, block graphs, and directed acyclic graphs with exact conditions and associated polynomial-time algorithms. In addition, we display additional algorithms that can generate every possible longest path of acyclic graphs in efficient time, as well as for block graphs.

We consider the problem of classifying those graphs that arise as an undirected square of an oriented graph by generalising the notion of quasi-transitive directed graphs to mixed graphs. We fully classify those graphs of maximum degree three and those graphs of girth at least four that arise an undirected square of an oriented graph. In contrast to the recognition problem for graphs that admit a quasi-transitive orientation, we find it is NP-complete to decide if a graph admits a partial orientation as a quasi-transitive mixed graph. We prove the problem is Polynomial when restricted to inputs of maximum degree three, but remains NP-complete when restricted to inputs with maximum degree at least five. Our proof further implies that for fixed $k \geq 3$, it is NP-complete to decide if a graph arises as an undirected square of an orientation of a graph with $Δ= k$.

A graph $G$ contains a graph $H$ as a pivot-minor if $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by applying a sequence of vertex deletions and edge pivots. Pivot-minors play an important role in the study of rank-width. Pivot-minors have mainly been studied from a structural perspective. In this paper we perform the first systematic computational complexity study of pivot-minors. We first prove that the Pivot-Minor problem, which asks if a given graph $G$ contains a pivot-minor isomorphic to a given graph $H$, is NP-complete. If $H$ is not part of the input, we denote the problem by $H$-Pivot-Minor. We give a certifying polynomial-time algorithm for $H$-Pivot-Minor when (1) $H$ is an induced subgraph of $P_3+tP_1$ for some integer $t\geq 0$, (2) $H=K_{1,t}$ for some integer $t\geq 1$, or (3) $|V(H)|\leq 4$ except when $H \in \{K_4,C_3+ P_1\}$. Let ${\cal F}_H$ be the set of induced-subgraph-minimal graphs that contain a pivot-minor isomorphic to $H$. To prove the above statement, we either show that there is an integer $c_H$ such that all graphs in ${\cal F}_H$ have at most $c_H$ vertices, or we determine ${\cal F}_H$ precisely, for each of the above cases.

A sequence $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is called a dominating sequence of $G$ if $(i)$ each vertex $v$ of $S$ dominates a vertex of $G$ that was not dominated by any of the vertices preceding vertex $v$ in $S$, and $(ii)$ every vertex of $G$ is dominated by at least one vertex of $S$. The Grundy Domination problem is to find a longest dominating sequence for a given graph $G$. It has been known that the decision version of the Grundy Domination problem is NP-complete even when restricted to chordal graphs. In this paper, we prove that the decision version of the Grundy Domination problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and co-bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we present a linear-time algorithm that solves the Grundy Domination problem for chain graphs, which form a subclass of bipartite graphs.

This article deals with homomorphisms of oriented graphs with respect to push equivalence. Here homomorphisms refer to arc preserving vertex mappings, and push equivalence refers to the equivalence class of orientations of a graph $G$ those can be obtained from one another by reversing arcs of an edge cut. We study and prove some fundamental properties of pushable homomorphisms, and establish its connections to homomorphisms of signed graphs and graph coloring. To list a few highlights of this work: $\bullet$ We characterize orientations of a graph up to push equivalence and show that it is possible to decide whether they are equivalent or not in polynomial time. $\bullet$ We give a canonical definition of pushable homomorphism - this answers a natural open question. $\bullet$ We build a one-to-one correspondence between the equivalence classes of oriented and signed bipartite graphs. Thus, it is possible to translate a number of important results directly from the theory of signed graphs to oriented graphs. In particular, we show that pushable homomorphisms of bipartite graphs capture the entire theory of graph coloring as a subcase. $\bullet$ Given a graph $G$, we build a gadget oriented graph $\overrightarrow{G}^{(k)}$ which admits a pushable homomorphism to a directed odd cycle of length $(2k+1)$ if and only if $G$ admits a $(2k+1)$-coloring. We also show that it is NP-complete to determine whether an oriented (sparse) graph admits a pushable homomorphism to a directed odd cycle or not.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple undirected graph. The open neighbourhood of a vertex $v$ in $G$ is defined as $N_G(v)=\{u\in V~|~ uv\in E\}$; whereas the closed neighbourhood is defined as $N_G[v]= N_G(v)\cup \{v\}$. For an integer $k$, a subset $D\subseteq V$ is called a $k$-vertex-edge dominating set of $G$ if for every edge $uv\in E$, $|(N_G[u]\cup N_G[v]) \cap D|\geq k$. In $k$-vertex-edge domination problem, our goal is to find a $k$-vertex-edge dominating set of minimum cardinality of an input graph $G$. In this paper, we first prove that the decision version of $k$-vertex-edge domination problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs. On the positive side, we design a linear time algorithm for finding a minimum $k$-vertex-edge dominating set of tree. We also prove that there is a $O(\log(Δ(G)))$-approximation algorithm for this problem in general graph $G$, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. Then we show that for a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, this problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $(1-ε) \ln n$ for any $ε>0$ unless $NP\subseteq DTIME(|V|^{O(\log\log|V|)})$. Finally, we prove that it is APX-complete for graphs with bounded degree $k+3$.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph. For an edge $e=xy\in E$, the closed neighbourhood of $e$, denoted by $N_G[e]$ or $N_G[xy]$, is the set $N_G[x]\cup N_G[y]$. A vertex set $L\subseteq V$ is liar's vertex-edge dominating set of a graph $G=(V,E)$ if for every $e_i\in E$, $|N_G[e_i]\cap L|\geq 2$ and for every pair of distinct edges $e_i$ and $e_j$, $|(N_G[e_i]\cup N_G[e_j])\cap L|\geq 3$. This paper introduces the notion of liar's vertex-edge domination which arises naturally from some applications in communication networks. Given a graph $G$, the \textsc{Minimum Liar's Vertex-Edge Domination Problem} (\textsc{MinLVEDP}) asks to find a liar's vertex-edge dominating set of $G$ of minimum cardinality. In this paper, we study this problem from algorithmic point of view. We show that \textsc{MinLVEDP} can be solved in linear time for trees, whereas the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs, bipartite graphs, and $p$-claw free graphs for $p\geq 4$. We further study approximation algorithms for this problem. We propose two approximation algorithms for \textsc{MinLVEDP} in general graphs and $p$-claw free graphs. %We propose an $O(\ln Δ(G))$-approximation algorithm for \textsc{MinLVEDP} in general graphs, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of the input graph. Also, we design a constant factor approximation algorithm for $p$-claw free graphs. On the negative side, we show that the \textsc{MinLVEDP} cannot be approximated within $\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{8}-ε)\ln|V|$ for any $ε>0$, unless $NP\subseteq DTIME(|V|^{O(\log(\log|V|)})$. Finally, we prove that the \textsc{MinLVEDP} is APX-complete for bounded degree graphs and $p$-claw free graphs for $p\geq 6$.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. In this article, we study a variation of transitive partition, namely \emph{$2$-transitive partition}. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{$2$-dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least two vertices of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{$2$-transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ $2$-dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The \textsc{Maximum $2$-Transitivity Problem} is to find a $2$-transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. We show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for chordal and bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we design three linear-time algorithms for solving \textsc{Maximum $2$-Transitivity Problem} in trees, split and bipartite chain graphs.

A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{strongly dominates} $B$ if for every vertex $y\in B$, there exists a vertex $x\in A$, such that $xy\in E$ and $deg_G(x)\geq deg_G(y)$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{strong transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ strongly dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The \textsc{Maximum Strong Transitivity Problem} is to find a strong transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. In this article, we initiate the study of this variation of transitive partition from algorithmic point of view. We show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs. On the positive side, we prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for trees and split graphs.

The support of a flow $x$ in a network is the subdigraph induced by the arcs $uv$ for which $x(uv)>0$. We discuss a number of results on flows in networks where we put certain restrictions on structure of the support of the flow. Many of these problems are NP-hard because they generalize linkage problems for digraphs. For example deciding whether a network ${\cal N}=(D,s,t,c)$ has a maximum flow $x$ such that the maximum out-degree of the support $D_x$ of $x$ is at most 2 is NP-complete as it contains the 2-linkage problem as a very special case. Another problem which is NP-complete for the same reason is that of computing the maximum flow we can send from $s$ to $t$ along $p$ paths (called a maximum {\bf $p$-path-flow}) in ${\cal N}$. Baier et al. (2005) gave a polynomial time algorithm which finds a $p$-path-flow $x$ whose value is at least $\frac{2}{3}$ of the value of a optimum $p$-path-flow when $p\in \{2,3\}$, and at least $\frac{1}{2}$ when $p\geq 4$. When $p=2$, they show that this is best possible unless P=NP. We show for each $p\geq 2$ that the value of a maximum $p$-path-flow cannot be approximated by any ratio larger than $\frac{9}{11}$, unless P=NP. We also consider a variant of the problem where the $p$ paths must be disjoint. For this problem, we give an algorithm which gets within a factor $\frac{1}{H(p)}$ of the optimum solution, where $H(p)$ is the $p$'th harmonic number ($H(p) \sim \ln(p)$). We show that in the case where the network is acyclic, we can find such a maximum $p$-path-flow in polynomial time for every $p$. We determine the complexity of a number of related problems concerning the structure of flows. For the special case of acyclic digraphs, some of the results we obtain are in some sense best possible.

A clique transversal in a graph is a set of vertices intersecting all maximal cliques. The problem of determining the minimum size of a clique transversal has received considerable attention in the literature. In this paper, we initiate the study of the ''upper'' variant of this parameter, the upper clique transversal number, defined as the maximum size of a minimal clique transversal. We investigate this parameter from the algorithmic and complexity points of view, with a focus on various graph classes. We show that the corresponding decision problem is NP-complete in the classes of chordal graphs, chordal bipartite graphs, cubic planar bipartite graphs, and line graphs of bipartite graphs, but solvable in linear time in the classes of split graphs, proper interval graphs, and cographs, and in polynomial time for graphs of bounded cliquewidth. We conclude the paper with a number of open questions.

For $k\in \mathbb{N}$, a $k$-acyclic colouring of a graph $G$ is a function $f\colon V(G)\to \{0,1,\dots,k-1\}$ such that (i)~$f(u)\neq f(v)$ for every edge $uv$ of $G$, and (ii)~there is no cycle in $G$ bicoloured by $f$. For $k\in \mathbb{N}$, the problem $k$-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY takes a graph $G$ as input and asks whether $G$ admits a $k$-acyclic colouring. Ochem (EuroComb 2005) proved that 3-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for bipartite graphs of maximum degree~4. Mondal et al. (J. Discrete Algorithms, 2013) proved that 4-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for graphs of maximum degree five. We prove that for $k\geq 3$, $k$-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for bipartite graphs of maximum degree $k+1$, thereby generalising the NP-completeness result of Ochem, and adding bipartiteness to the NP-completeness result of Mondal et al. In contrast, $k$-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY is polynomial-time solvable for graphs of maximum degree at most $0.38\, k^{\,3/4}$. Hence, for $k\geq 3$, the least integer $d$ such that $k$-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY in graphs of maximum degree $d$ is NP-complete, denoted by $L_a^{(k)}$, satisfies $0.38\, k^{\,3/4}<L_a^{(k)}\leq k+1$. We prove that for $k\geq 4$, $k$-ACYCLIC COLOURABILITY in $d$-regular graphs is NP-complete if and only if $L_a^{(k)}\leq d\leq 2k-3$. We also show that it is coNP-hard to check whether an input graph $G$ admits a unique $k$-acyclic colouring up to colour swaps (resp. up to colour swaps and automorphisms).

We study how the complexity of the graph colouring problems star colouring and restricted star colouring vary with the maximum degree of the graph. Restricted star colouring (in short, rs colouring) is a variant of star colouring. For $k\in \mathbb{N}$, a $k$-colouring of a graph $G$ is a function $f\colon V(G)\to \mathbb{Z}_k$ such that $f(u)\neq f(v)$ for every edge $uv$ of $G$. A $k$-colouring of $G$ is called a $k$-star colouring of $G$ if there is no path $u,v,w,x$ in $G$ with $f(u)=f(w)$ and $f(v)=f(x)$. A $k$-colouring of $G$ is called a $k$-rs colouring of $G$ if there is no path $u,v,w$ in $G$ with $f(v)>f(u)=f(w)$. For $k\in \mathbb{N}$, the problem $k$-STAR COLOURABILITY takes a graph $G$ as input and asks whether $G$ admits a $k$-star colouring. The problem $k$-RS COLOURABILITY is defined similarly. Recently, Brause et al. (Electron. J. Comb., 2022) investigated the complexity of 3-star colouring with respect to the graph diameter. We study the complexity of $k$-star colouring and $k$-rs colouring with respect to the maximum degree for all $k\geq 3$. For $k\geq 3$, let us denote the least integer $d$ such that $k$-STAR COLOURABILITY (resp. $k$-RS COLOURABILITY) is NP-complete for graphs of maximum degree $d$ by $L_s^{(k)}$ (resp. $L_{rs}^{(k)}$). We prove that for $k=5$ and $k\geq 7$, $k$-STAR COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for graphs of maximum degree $k-1$. We also show that $4$-RS COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for planar 3-regular graphs of girth 5 and $k$-RS COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for triangle-free graphs of maximum degree $k-1$ for $k\geq 5$. Using these results, we prove the following: (i) for $k\geq 4$ and $d\leq k-1$, $k$-STAR COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for $d$-regular graphs if and only if $d\geq L_s^{(k)}$; and (ii) for $k\geq 4$, $k$-RS COLOURABILITY is NP-complete for $d$-regular graphs if and only if $L_{rs}^{(k)}\leq d\leq k-1$.

A Hamiltonian path (a Hamiltonian cycle) in a graph is a path (a cycle, respectively) that traverses all of its vertices. The problems of deciding their existence in an input graph are well-known to be NP-complete, in fact, they belong to the first problems shown to be computationally hard when the theory of NP-completeness was being developed. A lot of research has been devoted to the complexity of Hamiltonian path and Hamiltonian cycle problems for special graph classes, yet only a handful of positive results are known. The complexities of both of these problems have been open even for $4K_1$-free graphs, i.e., graphs of independence number at most $3$. We answer this question in the general setting of graphs of bounded independence number. We also consider a newly introduced problem called \emph{Hamiltonian-$\ell$-Linkage} which is related to the notions of a path cover and of a linkage in a graph. This problem asks if given $\ell$ pairs of vertices in an input graph can be connected by disjoint paths that altogether traverse all vertices of the graph. For $\ell=1$, Hamiltonian-1-Linkage asks for existence of a Hamiltonian path connecting a given pair of vertices. Our main result reads that for every pair of integers $k$ and $\ell$, the Hamiltonian-$\ell$-Linkage problem is polynomial time solvable for graphs of independence number not exceeding $k$.

For a fixed finite set of finite tournaments ${\mathcal F}$, the ${\mathcal F}$-free orientation problem asks whether a given finite undirected graph $G$ has an $\mathcal F$-free orientation, i.e., whether the edges of $G$ can be oriented so that the resulting digraph does not embed any of the tournaments from ${\mathcal F}$. We prove that for every ${\mathcal F}$, this problem is in P or NP-complete. Our proof reduces the classification task to a complete complexity classification of the orientation completion problem for ${\mathcal F}$, which is the variant of the problem above where the input is a directed graph instead of an undirected graph, introduced by Bang-Jensen, Huang, and Zhu (2017). Our proof uses results from the theory of constraint satisfaction, and a result of Agarwal and Kompatscher (2018) about infinite permutation groups and transformation monoids.

The idea of enumeration algorithms with polynomial delay is to polynomially bound the running time between any two subsequent solutions output by the enumeration algorithm. While it is open for more than four decades if all minimal dominating sets of a graph can be enumerated in output-polynomial time, it has recently been proven that pointwise-minimal Roman dominating functions can be enumerated even with polynomial delay. The idea of the enumeration algorithm was to use polynomial-time solvable extension problems. We use this as a motivation to prove that also two variants of Roman dominating functions studied in the literature, named perfect and unique response, can be enumerated with polynomial delay. This is interesting since Extension Perfect Roman Domination is W[1]-complete if parameterized by the weight of the given function and even W[2]-complete if parameterized by the number vertices assigned 0 in the pre-solution, as we prove. Otherwise, efficient solvability of extension problems and enumerability with polynomial delay tend to go hand-in-hand. We achieve our enumeration result by constructing a bijection to Roman dominating functions, where the corresponding extension problem is polynomimaltime solvable. Furthermore, we show that Unique Response Roman Domination is solvable in polynomial time on split graphs, while Perfect Roman Domination is NP-complete on this graph class, which proves that both variations, albeit coming with a very similar definition, do differ in some complexity aspects. This way, we also solve an open problem from the literature.