arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

lattice-free ↗ reference

14 papers tagged with this keyword
2026-05-11
Lattice-free Schubitopes
In this paper, we provide a simple criterion for the Schubitope $\mathcal{S}_{D}$ associated to a diagram $D$ to be lattice-free. We further show that $\mathcal{S}_{D}$ is lattice-free if and only if its Ehrhart polynomial is equal to the product of Ehrhart polynomials of the Schubert matroid polytopes corresponding to each column of $D$. As applications, we obtain that the Newton polytopes of the Schubert polynomial $\mathfrak{S}_w(x)$ and the Grothendieck polynomial $\mathfrak{G}_w(x)$ are lattice-free if and only if $w$ avoids the patterns 1423, 1432, 13254, and confirm several conjectures by Mészáros, Setiabrata, and St.Dizier on the support of Grothendieck polynomials for this class of permutations.
2021-11-16 v2
Lattice-free simplices with lattice width $2d - o(d)$
Published • View Publication • BIB
The Flatness theorem states that the maximum lattice width ${\rm Flt}(d)$ of a $d$-dimensional lattice-free convex set is finite. It is the key ingredient for Lenstra's algorithm for integer programming in fixed dimension, and much work has been done to obtain bounds on ${\rm Flt}(d)$. While most results have been concerned with upper bounds, only few techniques are known to obtain lower bounds. In fact, the previously best known lower bound ${\rm Flt}(d) \ge 1.138d$ arises from direct sums of a $3$-dimensional lattice-free simplex. In this work, we establish the lower bound ${\rm Flt}(d) \ge 2d - O(\sqrt{d})$, attained by a family of lattice-free simplices. Our construction is based on a differential equation that naturally appears in this context. Additionally, we provide the first local maximizers of the lattice width of $4$- and $5$-dimensional lattice-free convex bodies.
On lattice width of lattice-free polyhedra and height of Hilbert bases
Published • View Publication • BIB
We study the lattice width of lattice-free polyhedra given by $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x}\leq\mathbf{b}$ in terms of $Δ(\mathbf{A})$, the maximal $n\times n$ minor in absolute value of $\mathbf{A}\in\mathbb{Z}^{m\times n}$. Our main contribution is to link the lattice width of lattice-free polyhedra to the height of Hilbert bases and to the diameter of finite abelian groups. This leads to a bound on the lattice width of lattice-free pyramids which solely depends on $Δ(\mathbf{A})$ provided a conjecture regarding the height of Hilbert bases holds. Further, we exploit a combination of techniques to obtain novel bounds on the lattice width of simplices. A second part of the paper is devoted to a study of the above mentioned Hilbert basis conjecture. We give a complete characterization of the Hilbert basis if $Δ(\mathbf{A}) = 2$ which implies the conjecture in that case and prove its validity for simplicial cones.
Generalised Flatness Constants: A Framework Applied in Dimension $2$
Let $A \in \{ \mathbb{Z}, \mathbb{R} \}$ and $X \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ be a bounded set. Affine transformations given by an automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}^d$ and a translation in $A^d$ are called (affine) $A$-unimodular transformations. The image of $X$ under such a transformation is called an $A$-unimodular copy of $X$. It was shown in [Averkov, Hofscheier, Nill, 2019] that every convex body whose width is "big enough" contains an $A$-unimodular copy of $X$. The threshold when this happens is called the generalised flatness constant $\mathrm{Flt}_d^A(X)$. It resembles the classical flatness constant if $A=\mathbb{Z}$ and $X$ is a lattice point. In this work, we introduce a general framework for the explicit computation of these numerical constants. The approach relies on the study of $A$-$X$-free convex bodies generalising lattice-free (also known as hollow) convex bodies. We then focus on the case that $X=P$ is a full-dimensional polytope and show that inclusion-maximal $A$-$P$-free convex bodies are polytopes. The study of those inclusion-maximal polytopes provides us with the means to explicitly determine generalised flatness constants. We apply our approach to the case $X=Δ_2$ the standard simplex in $\mathbb{R}^2$ of normalised volume $1$ and compute $\mathrm{Flt}^{\mathbb{R}}_2(Δ_2)=2$ and $\mathrm{Flt}^{\mathbb{Z}}_2(Δ_2)=\frac{10}3$.
2018-07-17 v2
Difference between families of weakly and strongly maximal integral lattice-free polytopes
Published • View Publication • BIB
A $d$-dimensional closed convex set $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is said to be lattice-free if the interior of $K$ is disjoint with $\mathbb{Z}^d$. We consider the following two families of lattice-free polytopes: the family $\mathcal{L}^d$ of integral lattice-free polytopes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ that are not properly contained in another integral lattice-free polytope and its subfamily $\mathcal{M}^d$ consisting of integral lattice-free polytopes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ which are not properly contained in another lattice-free set. It is known that $\mathcal{M}^d = \mathcal{L}^d$ holds for $d \le 3$ and, for each $d \ge 4$, $\mathcal{M}^d$ is a proper subfamily of $\mathcal{L}^d$. We derive a super-exponential lower bound on the number of polytopes in $\mathcal{L}^d \setminus \mathcal{M}^d$ (with standard identification of integral polytopes up to affine unimodular transformations).
Notions of maximality for integral lattice-free polyhedra: the case of dimension three
Published • View Publication • BIB
Lattice-free sets (convex subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$ without interior integer points) and their applications for cutting-plane methods in mixed-integer optimization have been studied in recent literature. Notably, the family of all integral lattice-free polyhedra which are not properly contained in another integral lattice-free polyhedron has been of particular interest. We call these polyhedra $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximal. It is known that, for fixed $d$, the family $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximal integral lattice-free polyhedra is finite up to unimodular equivalence. In view of possible applications in cutting-plane theory, one would like to have a classification of this family. However, this turns out to be a challenging task already for small dimensions. In contrast, the subfamily of all integral lattice-free polyhedra which are not properly contained in any other lattice-free set, which we call $\mathbb{R}^d$-maximal lattice-free polyhedra, allow a rather simple geometric characterization. Hence, the question was raised for which dimensions the notions of $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximality and $\mathbb{R}^d$-maximality are equivalent. This was known to be the case for dimensions one and two. On the other hand, Nill and Ziegler (2011) showed that for dimension $d \ge 4$, there exist polyhedra which are $\mathbb{Z}^d$-maximal but not $\mathbb{R}^d$-maximal. In this article, we consider the remaining case $d = 3$ and prove that for integral polyhedra the notions of $\mathbb{R}^3$-maximality and $\mathbb{Z}^3$-maximality are equivalent. As a consequence, the classification of all $\mathbb{R}^3$-maximal integral polyhedra by Averkov, Wagner and Weismantel (2011) contains all $\mathbb{Z}^3$-maximal integral polyhedra.
2014-04-29 v2
Lifting properties of maximal lattice-free polyhedra
Published • View Publication • BIB
We study the uniqueness of minimal liftings of cut-generating functions obtained from maximal lattice-free polyhedra. We prove a basic invariance property of unique minimal liftings for general maximal lattice-free polyhedra. This generalizes a previous result by Basu, Cornuéjols and Köppe~\cite{bcm} for {\em simplicial} maximal lattice-free polytopes, thus completely settling this fundamental question about lifting for maximal lattice-free polyhedra. We further give a very general iterative construction to get maximal lattice-free polyhedra with the unique-lifting property in arbitrary dimensions. This single construction not only obtains all previously known polyhedra with the unique-lifting property, but goes further and vastly expands the known list of such polyhedra. Finally, we extend characterizations from~\cite{bcm} about lifting with respect to maximal lattice-free simplices to more general polytopes. These nontrivial generalizations rely on a number of results from discrete geometry, including the Venkov-Alexandrov-McMullen theorem on translative tilings and characterizations of zonotopes in terms of central symmetry of their faces.
2014-01-15 v2
On Lattice-Free Orbit Polytopes
Published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, 53 (2015), 144-172 • View Publication • BIB
Given a permutation group acting on coordinates of $\mathbb{R}^n$, we consider lattice-free polytopes that are the convex hull of an orbit of one integral vector. The vertices of such polytopes are called \emph{core points} and they play a key role in a recent approach to exploit symmetry in integer convex optimization problems. Here, naturally the question arises, for which groups the number of core points is finite up to translations by vectors fixed by the group. In this paper we consider transitive permutation groups and prove this type of finiteness for the $2$-homogeneous ones. We provide tools for practical computations of core points and obtain a complete list of representatives for all $2$-homogeneous groups up to degree twelve. For transitive groups that are not $2$-homogeneous we conjecture that there exist infinitely many core points up to translations by the all-ones-vector. We prove our conjecture for two large classes of groups: For imprimitive groups and groups that have an irrational invariant subspace.
2012-04-08
Improved theoretical guarantees regarding a class of two-row cutting planes
The corner polyhedron is described by minimal valid inequalities from maximal lattice-free convex sets. For the Relaxed Corner Polyhedron (RCP) with two free integer variables and any number of non-negative continuous variables, it is known that such facet defining inequalities arise from maximal lattice-free splits, triangles and quadrilaterals. We improve on the tightest known upper bound for the approximation of the RCP, purely by minimal valid inequalities from maximal lattice-free quadrilaterals, from 2 to 1.71. We generalize the tightest known lower bound of 1.125 for the approximation of the RCP, purely by minimal valid inequalities from maximal lattice-free triangles, to an infinite subclass of quadrilaterals.
2011-10-18 v3
On finitely generated closures in the theory of cutting planes
Published • View Publication • BIB
Let $P$ be a rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and let $\mathcal{L}$ be a class of $d$-dimensional maximal lattice-free rational polyhedra in $\mathbb{R}^d$. For $L \in \mathcal{L}$ by $R_L(P)$ we denote the convex hull of points belonging to $P$ but not to the interior of $L$. Andersen, Louveaux and Weismantel showed that if the so-called max-facet-width of all $L \in \mathcal{L}$ is bounded from above by a constant independent of $L$, then $\bigcap_{L\in \mathcal{L}} R_L(P)$ is a rational polyhedron. We give a short proof of a generalization of this result. We also give a characterization for the boundedness of the max-facet-width on $\mathcal{L}$. The presented results are motivated by applications in cutting-plane theory from mixed-integer optimization.
2011-10-05
A proof of Lovász's theorem on maximal lattice-free sets
Published • View Publication • BIB
Let $K$ be a maximal lattice-free set in $\mathbb{R}^d$, that is, $K$ is convex and closed subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$, the interior of $K$ does not cointain points of $\mathbb{Z}^d$ and $K$ is inclusion-maximal with respect to the above properties. A result of Lovász assert that if $K$ is $d$-dimensional, then $K$ is a polyhedron with at most $2^d$ facets, and the recession cone of $K$ is spanned by vectors from $\mathbb{Z}^d$. A first complete proof of mentioned Lovász's result has been published in a paper of Basu, Conforti, Cornuéjols and Zambelli (where the authors use Dirichlet's approximation as a tool). The aim of this note is to give another proof of this result. Our proof relies on Minkowki's first fundamental theorem from the gemetry of numbers. We remark that the result of Lovász is relevant in integer and mixed-integer optimization.
Maximal lattice-free polyhedra: finiteness and an explicit description in dimension three
Published • View Publication • BIB
A convex set with nonempty interior is maximal lattice-free if it is inclusion-maximal with respect to the property of not containing integer points in its interior. Maximal lattice-free convex sets are known to be polyhedra. The precision of a rational polyhedron $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is the smallest integer $s$ such that $sP$ is an integral polyhedron. In this paper we show that, up to affine mappings preserving $\mathbb{Z}^d$, the number of maximal lattice-free rational polyhedra of a given precision $s$ is finite. Furthermore, we present the complete list of all maximal lattice-free integral polyhedra in dimension three. Our results are motivated by recent research on cutting plane theory in mixed-integer linear optimization.
2009-04-14 v2
Maximal integral simplices with no interior integer points
In this paper, we consider integral maximal lattice-free simplices. Such simplices have integer vertices and contain integer points in the relative interior of each of their facets, but no integer point is allowed in the full interior. In dimension three, we show that any integral maximal lattice-free simplex is equivalent to one of seven simplices up to unimodular transformation. For higher dimensions, we demonstrate that the set of integral maximal lattice-free simplices with vertices lying on the coordinate axes is finite. This gives rise to a conjecture that the total number of integral maximal lattice-free simplices is finite for any dimension.
2004-03-31
Neighborhood complexes and generating functions for affine semigroups
Published in Discrete and Computational Geometry 35 (2006), 385 - 403 • View Publication • BIB
Given a_1,a_2,...,a_n in Z^d, we examine the set, G, of all non-negative integer combinations of these a_i. In particular, we examine the generating function f(z)=\sum_{b\in G} z^b. We prove that one can write this generating function as a rational function using the neighborhood complex (sometimes called the complex of maximal lattice-free bodies or the Scarf complex) on a particular lattice in Z^n. In the generic case, this follows from algebraic results of D. Bayer and B. Sturmfels. Here we prove it geometrically in all cases, and we examine a generalization involving the neighborhood complex on an arbitrary lattice.