arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper, we find the crossing number of the complete multipartite graphs $K_{1,1,1,1,n}$, $K_{1,2,2,n}$, $K_{1,1,1,2,n}$ and $K_{1,4,n}$.

In this paper, we consider the embedding of a complete $d$-uniform geometric hypergraph with $n$ vertices in general position in $\mathbb{R}^d$, where each hyperedge is represented as a $(d-1)$-simplex, and a pair of hyperedges is defined to cross if they are vertex-disjoint and contains a common point in the relative interior of the simplices corresponding to them. As a corollary of the Van Kampen-Flores Theorem, it can be seen that such a hypergraph contains $Ω(\frac{2^d}{\sqrt{d}})$ $n\choose 2d$ crossing pairs of hyperedges. Using Gale Transform and Ham Sandwich Theorem, we improve this lower bound to $Ω(\frac{2^d \log d}{\sqrt{d}})$ $n\choose 2d$.

The Harary-Hill Conjecture States that the number of crossings in any drawing of the complete graph $ K_n $ in the plane is at least $Z(n):=\frac{1}{4}\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor \frac{n-2}{2}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor \frac{n-3}{2}\right\rfloor$. In this paper, we settle the Harary-Hill conjecture for {\em shellable drawings}. We say that a drawing $D$ of $ K_n $ is {\em $ s $-shellable} if there exist a subset $ S = \{v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_ s\}$ of the vertices and a region $R$ of $D$ with the following property: For all $1 \leq i < j \leq s$, if $D_{ij}$ is the drawing obtained from $D$ by removing $v_1,v_2,\ldots v_{i-1},v_{j+1},\ldots,v_{s}$, then $v_i$ and $v_j$ are on the boundary of the region of $D_{ij}$ that contains $R$. For $ s\geq n/2 $, we prove that the number of crossings of any $ s $-shellable drawing of $ K_n $ is at least the long-conjectured value Z(n). Furthermore, we prove that all cylindrical, $ x $-bounded, monotone, and 2-page drawings of $ K_n $ are $ s $-shellable for some $ s\geq n/2 $ and thus they all have at least $ Z(n) $ crossings. The techniques developed provide a unified proof of the Harary-Hill conjecture for these classes of drawings.

We prove new lower bounds on the crossing number of a complete graphs assuming that it is drawn in such a way that it contains a Hamiltonian cycle with no crossings.

Since the crossing number of K_{12} is now known to be 150, it is well-known that simple counting arguments and Kleitman's parity theorem for the crossing number of K_{2n+1} combine with a specific drawing of K_{13} to show that the crossing number of K_{13} is one of the numbers in {217,219,221,223,225}. We show that the crossing number is not 217.

We prove crossing number inequalities for geometric graphs whose vertex sets are taken from a d-dimensional grid of volume N and give applications of these inequalities to counting the number of non-crossing geometric graphs that can be drawn on such grids. In particular, we show that any geometric graph with m >= 8N edges and with vertices on a 3D integer grid of volume N, has Ω((m^2/n)\log(m/n)) crossings. In d-dimensions, with d >= 4, this bound becomes Ω(m^2/n). We provide matching upper bounds for all d. Finally, for d >= 4 the upper bound implies that the maximum number of crossing-free geometric graphs with vertices on some d-dimensional grid of volume N is n^Θ(n). In 3 dimensions it remains open to improve the trivial bounds, namely, the 2^Ω(n) lower bound and the n^O(n) upper bound.

The {\it crossing number} of a graph $G$ is the least number of pairwise crossings of edges among all the drawings of $G$ in the plane. The pancake graph is an important topology for interconnecting processors in parallel computers. In this paper, we prove the exact value of the crossing number of pancake graph $P_4$ is six.

The crossing number of a graph G is the minimum number of pairwise intersections of edges in a drawing of G. Motivated by the recent work [Faria, L., Figueiredo, C.M.H. de, Sykora, O., Vrt'o, I.: An improved upper bound on the crossing number of the hypercube. J. Graph Theory 59, 145-161 (2008)], we give an upper bound of the crossing number of n-dimensional bubble-sort graph Bn.

The crossing number of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of pairwise intersections of edges among all drawings of $G$. In this paper, we study the crossing number of $K_{n,n}-nK_2$, $K_n\times P_2$, $K_n\times P_3$ and $K_n\times C_4$.

The crossing number of a graph is the least number of crossings of edges among all drawings of the graph in the plane. In this article, we prove that the crossing number of the generalized Petersen graph P(10, 3) is equal to 6.

The equidistribution of many crossing and nesting statistics exists in several combinatorial objects like matchings, set partitions, permutations, and embedded labelled graphs. The involutions switching nesting and crossing numbers for set partitions given by Krattenthaler, also by Chen, Deng, Du, Stanley, and Yan, and for permutations given by Burrill, Mishna, and Post involved passing through tableau-like objects. Recently, Chen and Guo for matchings, and Marberg for set partitions extended the result to coloured arc annotated diagrams. We prove that symmetric joint distribution continues to hold for arc-coloured permutations. As in Marberg's recent work, but through a different interpretation, we also conclude that the ordinary generating functions for all $j$-noncrossing, $k$-nonnesting, $r$-coloured permutations according to size $n$ are rational functions. We use the interpretation to automate the generation of these rational series for both noncrossing and nonnesting coloured set partitions and permutations.

A {\it good drawing} of a graph $G$ is a drawing where the edges are non-self-intersecting and each two edges have at most one point in common, which is either a common end vertex or a crossing. The {\it crossing number} of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of pairwise intersections of edges in a good drawing of $G$ in the plane. The {\it $n$-dimensional augmented cube} $AQ_n$, proposed by S.A. Choudum and V. Sunitha, is an important interconnection network with good topological properties and applications. In this paper, we obtain an upper bound on the crossing number of $AQ_n$ less than $26/324^{n}-(2n^2+7/2n-6)2^{n-2}$.

A "book" with k pages consists of a straight line (the "spine") and k half-planes (the "pages"), such that the boundary of each page is the spine. If a graph is drawn on a book with k pages in such a way that the vertices lie on the spine, and each edge is contained in a page, the result is a k-page book drawing (or simply a k-page drawing). The pagenumber of a graph G is the minimum k such that G admits a k-page embedding (that is, a k-page drawing with no edge crossings). The k-page crossing number nu_k(G) of G is the minimum number of crossings in a k-page drawing of G. We investigate the pagenumbers and k-page crossing numbers of complete bipartite graphs. We find the exact pagenumbers of several complete bipartite graphs, and use these pagenumbers to find the exact k-page crossing number of K_{k+1,n} for 3<=k<=6. We also prove the general asymptotic estimate lim_{k->oo} lim_{n->oo} nu_k(K_{k+1,n})/(2n^2/k^2)=1. Finally, we give general upper bounds for nu_k(K_{m,n}), and relate these bounds to the k-planar crossing numbers of K_{m,n} and K_n.

Zarankiewicz's Conjecture (ZC) states that the crossing number cr$(K_{m,n})$ equals $Z(m,n):=\floor{\frac{m}{2}} \floor{\frac{m-1}{2}} \floor{\frac{n}{2}} \floor{\frac{n-1}{2}}$. Since Kleitman's verification of ZC for $K_{5,n}$ (from which ZC for $K_{6,n}$ easily follows), very little progress has been made around ZC; the most notable exceptions involve computer-aided results. With the aim of gaining a more profound understanding of this notoriously difficult conjecture, we investigate the optimal (that is, crossing-minimal) drawings of $K_{5,n}$. The widely known natural drawings of $K_{m,n}$ (the so-called Zarankiewicz drawings) with $Z(m,n)$ crossings contain antipodal vertices, that is, pairs of degree-$m$ vertices such that their induced drawing of $K_{m,2}$ has no crossings. Antipodal vertices also play a major role in Kleitman's inductive proof that cr$(K_{5,n}) = Z(5,n)$. We explore in depth the role of antipodal vertices in optimal drawings of $K_{5,n}$, for $n$ even. We prove that if {$n \equiv 2$ (mod 4)}, then every optimal drawing of $K_{5,n}$ has antipodal vertices. We also exhibit a two-parameter family of optimal drawings $D_{r,s}$ of $K_{5,4(r+s)}$ (for $r,s\ge 0$), with no antipodal vertices, and show that if $n\equiv 0$ (mod 4), then every optimal drawing of $K_{5,n}$ without antipodal vertices is (vertex rotation) isomorphic to $D_{r,s}$ for some integers $r,s$. As a corollary, we show that if $n$ is even, then every optimal drawing of $K_{5,n}$ is the superimposition of Zarankiewicz drawings with a drawing isomorphic to $D_{r,s}$ for some nonnegative integers $r,s$.

For a subclass of matchings, set partitions, and permutations, we describe a direct bijection involving only arc annotated diagrams that not only interchanges maximum nesting and crossing numbers, but also all refinements of crossing and nesting numbers. Furthermore, we show that the bijection cannot be applied to a similar class of coloured arc annotated diagrams.

A "book with k pages" consists of a straight line (the "spine") and k half-planes (the "pages"), such that the boundary of each page is the spine. If a graph is drawn on a book with k pages in such a way that the vertices lie on the spine, and each edge is contained in a page, the result is a k-page book drawing (or simply a k-page drawing). The k-page crossing number nu_k(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of crossings in a k-page drawing of G. In this paper we investigate the k-page crossing numbers of complete graphs K_n. We use semidefinite programming techniques to give improved lower bounds on nu_k(K_n) for various values of k. We also use a maximum satisfiability reformulation to calculate the exact value of nu_k(K_n) for several values of k and n. Finally, we investigate the best construction known for drawing K_n in k pages, calculate the resulting number of crossings, and discuss this upper bound in the light of the new results reported in this paper.

Around 1958, Hill described how to draw the complete graph $K_n$ with [Z(n) :=1/4\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-2}{2}% \rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor] crossings, and conjectured that the crossing number $\crg (K_{n})$ of $K_n$ is exactly Z(n). This is also known as Guy's conjecture as he later popularized it. Towards the end of the century, substantially different drawings of $K_{n}$ with Z(n) crossings were found. These drawings are \emph{2-page book drawings}, that is, drawings where all the vertices are on a line $\ell$ (the spine) and each edge is fully contained in one of the two half-planes (pages) defined by $\ell$. The \emph{2-page crossing number} of $K_{n} $, denoted by $ν_{2}(K_{n})$, is the minimum number of crossings determined by a 2-page book drawing of $K_{n}% $. Since $\crg(K_{n}) \leν_{2}(K_{n})$ and $ν_{2}(K_{n}) \le Z(n)$, a natural step towards Hill's Conjecture is the %(formally) weaker conjecture $ν_{2}(K_{n}) = Z(n)$, popularized by Vrt'o. %As far as we know, this natural %conjecture was first raised by Imrich Vrt'o in 2007. %Prior to this paper, results known for $ν_2(K_n)$ were basically %the same as for $\crg (K_n)$. Here In this paper we develop a novel and innovative technique to investigate crossings in drawings of $K_{n}$, and use it to prove that $ν_{2}(K_{n}) = Z(n) $. To this end, we extend the inherent geometric definition of $k$-edges for finite sets of points in the plane to topological drawings of $K_{n}$. We also introduce the concept of ${\leq}{\leq}k$-edges as a useful generalization of ${\leq}k$-edges and extend a powerful theorem that expresses the number of crossings in a rectilinear drawing of $K_{n}$ in terms of its number of $(\le k)$-edges to the topological setting.

We show that, if P\not=NP, there is a constant c > 1 such that there is no c-approximation algorithm for the crossing number, even when restricted to 3-regular graphs.

A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an edge. We show the surprising fact that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing number of near-planar graphs. A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing where every edge is crossed by at most one other edge. We show that it is NP-hard to decide whether a given near-planar graph is 1-planar. The main idea in both reductions is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar graphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the disk. This leads to the concept of anchored embedding, which is of independent interest. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of NP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic graphs. This resolves a question of Hliněný.

Richter and Thomassen proved that every graph has an edge $e$ such that the crossing number $\ucr(G-e)$ of $G-e$ is at least $(2/5)\ucr(G) - O(1)$. Fox and Cs. Tóth proved that dense graphs have large sets of edges (proportional in the total number of edges) whose removal leaves a graph with crossing number proportional to the crossing number of the original graph; this result was later strenghtened by Černý, Kynčl and G. Tóth. These results make our understanding of the {decay} of crossing numbers in dense graphs essentially complete. In this paper we prove a similar result for large sparse graphs in which the number of edges is not artificially inflated by operations such as edge subdivisions. We also discuss the connection between the decay of crossing numbers and expected crossing numbers, a concept recently introduced by Mohar and Tamon.