bipartite graph
2575 papers tagged with this keyword
Bipartite graphs with uniquely restricted maximum matchings and their corresponding greedoids
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum size. S is a local maximum stable set if it is a maximum stable set of the subgraph of G spanned by the union of S and N(S), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S. A matching M is uniquely restricted if its saturated vertices induce a subgraph which has a unique perfect matching, namely M itself. One theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter Jr., working as a useful sufficient local optimality condition for the weighted maximum stable set problem, ensures that any local maximum stable set of G can be enlarged to a maximum stable set of G. In one of our previous papers it is proven that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. In this paper we obtain a generalization of this assertion claiming that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a bipartite graph G is a greedoid if and only if all maximum matchings of G are uniquely restricted.
Computing and Sampling Restricted Vertex Degree Subgraphs and Hamiltonian Cycles
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a bipartite graph embedded in a plane (or $n$-holed torus). Two subgraphs of $G$ differ by a {\it $Z$-transformation} if their symmetric difference consists of the boundary edges of a single face---and if each subgraph contains an alternating set of the edges of that face. For a given $φ: V \mapsto \mathbb Z^+$, $S_φ$ is the set of subgraphs of $G$ in which each $v\in V$ has degree $φ(v)$. Two elements of $S_φ$ are said to be adjacent if they differ by a $Z$-transformation. We determine the connected components of $S_φ$ and assign a {\it height function} to each of its elements.
If $φ$ is identically two, and $G$ is a grid graph, $S_φ$ contains the partitions of the vertices of $G$ into cycles. We prove that we can always apply a series of $Z$-transformations to decrease the total number of cycles provided there is enough ``slack'' in the corresponding height function. This allows us to determine in polynomial time the minimal number of cycles into which $G$ can be partitioned provided $G$ has a limited number of non-square faces. In particular, we determine the Hamiltonicity of polyomino graphs in $O(|V|^2)$ steps. The algorithm extends to $n$-holed-torus-embedded graphs that have grid-like properties. We also provide Markov chains for sampling and approximately counting the Hamiltonian cycles of $G$.
The Intersection of All Maximum Stable Sets of a Tree and its Pendant Vertices
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A stable set in a graph G is a set of mutually non-adjacent vertices, alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set of G, and core(G) is the intersection of all its maximum stable sets. In this paper we demonstrate that in a tree T, of order n greater than 1, any stable set of size greater or equal to n/2 contains at least one pendant vertex. Hence, we deduce that any maximum stable set in a tree contains at least one pendant vertex. Our main finding is the theorem claiming that if T does not own a perfect matching, then at least two pendant vertices an even distance apart belong to core(T). While it is proved by Levit and Mandrescu that if G is a connected bipartite graph of order at least 2, then the size of core(G) is different from 1, our new statement reveals an additional structure of the intersection of all maximum stable sets of a tree. The above assertions give refining of one result of Hammer, Hansen and Simeone, stating that if a graph G is of order less than 2*alpha(G), then core(G) is non-empty, and also of a result of Jamison, Gunter, Hartnel and Rall, and Zito, saying that for a tree T of order at least two, the size of core(G) is different from 1.
On $α^{++}$-Stable Graphs
The stability number of a graph G, denoted by alpha(G), is the cardinality of a stable set of maximum size in G. A graph is well-covered if every maximal stable set has the same size. G is a Koenig-Egervary graph if its order equals alpha(G) + mu(G), where mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching in G. In this paper we characterize $α^{++}$-stable graphs, namely, the graphs whose stability numbers are invariant to adding any two edges from their complements. We show that a König-Egerváry graph is $α^{++}$-stable if and only if it has a perfect matching consisting of pendant edges and no four vertices of the graph span a cycle. As a corollary it gives necessary and sufficient conditions for $α^{++}$-stability of bipartite graphs and trees. For instance, we prove that a bipartite graph is $α^{++}$-stable if and only if it is well-covered and C4-free.
On $α$-Critical Edges in König-Egerváry Graphs
The stability number of a graph G, denoted by alpha(G), is the cardinality of a stable set of maximum size in G. If alpha(G-e) > alpha(G), then e is an alpha-critical edge, and if mu(G-e) < mu(G), then e is a mu-critical edge, where mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching in G. G is a Koenig-Egervary graph if alpha(G) + mu(G) equals its order. Beineke, Harary and Plummer have shown that the set of alpha-critical edges of a bipartite graph is a matching. In this paper we generalize this statement to Koenig-Egervary graphs. We also prove that in a Koenig-Egervary graph alpha-critical edges are also mu-critical, and that they coincide in bipartite graphs. We obtain that for any tree its stability number equals the sum of the cardinality of the set of its alpha-critical vertices and the size of the set of its alpha-critical edges. Eventually, we characterize the Koenig-Egervary graphs enjoying this property.
A characterisation of Pfaffian near bipartite graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
In 1967 Kasteleyn introduced a powerful method for enumerating the 1-factors of planar graphs. In fact his method can be extended to graphs which permit an orientation under which every alternating circuit is clockwise odd. Graphs with this property are called {\it Pfaffian}. Little characterised Pfaffian bipartite graphs in terms of forbidden subgraphs in 1975. We extend his characterisation to near bipartite graphs.
A tree version of Konig's theorem
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Konig's theorem states that the covering number and the matching number of a bipartite graph are equal. We prove a generalisation of this result, in which each point in one side of the graph is replaced by a subtree of a given tree. The proof uses a recent extension of Hall's theorem to families of hypergraphs, by the first author and P. Haxell.
Matrices and $α$-Stable Bipartite Graphs
A square (0,1)-matrix X of order n > 0 is called fully indecomposable if there exists no integer k with 0 < k < n, such that X has a k by n-k zero submatrix. A stable set of a graph G is a subset of pairwise nonadjacent vertices. The stability number of G, denoted by $α(G)$, is the cardinality of a maximum stable set in G. A graph is called $α$-stable if its stability number remains the same upon both the deletion and the addition of any edge. We show that a connected bipartite graph has exactly two maximum stable sets that partition its vertex set if and only if its reduced adjacency matrix is fully indecomposable. We also describe a decomposition structure of $α$-stable bipartite graphs in terms of their reduced adjacency matrices. On the base of these findings we obtain both new proofs for a number of well-known theorems on the structure of matrices due to Brualdi, Marcus and Minc, Dulmage and Mendelsohn, and some generalizations of these statements. Several new results on $α$-stable bipartite graphs and their corresponding reduced adjacency matrices are presented, as well. Two kinds of matrix product are also considered (namely, Boolean product and Kronecker product), and their corresponding graph operations. As a consequence, we obtain a strengthening of one Lewin's theorem claiming that the product of two fully indecomposable matrices is a fully indecomposable matrix.
Combinatorial Properties of the Family of Maximum Stable Sets of a Graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The stability number alpha(G) of a graph G is the cardinality of a maximum stable set in G, xi(G) denotes the size of core(G), where core(G) is the intersection of all maximum stable sets of G. In this paper we prove that for a graph G without isolated vertices, the following assertions are true: (i) if xi(G)< 2, then G is quasi-regularizable; (ii) if G is of order n and alpha(G) > (n+k-1)/2, for some k > 0, then xi(G) > k, and xi(G) > k+1, whenever n+k-1 is even. The last finding is a strengthening of a result of Hammer, Hansen, and Simeone, which states that alpha(G) > n/2 implies xi(G) > 0. G is a Koenig-Egervary graph if n equals the sum of its stability number and the cardinality of a maximum matching. For Koenig-Egervary graphs, we prove that alpha(G) > n/2 holds if and only if xi(G) is greater than the size of the neighborhood of core(G). Moreover, for bipartite graphs without isolated vertices, alpha(G) > n/2 is equivalent to xi(G) > 1. We also show that Hall's marriage Theorem is valid for Koenig-Egervary graphs, and it is sufficient to check Hall's condition only for one specific stable set, namely, for core(G).
On $α^{+}$-Stable Koenig-Egervary Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The stability number of a graph G, is the cardinality of a stable set of maximum size in G. If the stability number of G remains the same upon the addition of any edge, then G is called $α^{+}$-stable. G is a König-Egervary graph if its order equals the sum of its stability number and the cardinality of a maximum matching. In this paper we characterize $α^{+}$-stable König-Egervary graphs, generalizing some previously known results on bipartite graphs and trees. Namely, we prove that a König-Egervary graph is $α^{+}$-stable if and only if either the set of vertices belonging to no maximum stable set is empty, or the cardinality of this set equals one, and G has a perfect matching. Using this characterization we obtain several new findings on general König-Egervary graphs, for example, the equality between the cardinalities of the set of vertices belonging to all maximum stable sets and the set of vertices belonging to no maximum stable set of G is a necessary and sufficient condition for a König-Egervary graph G to have a perfect matching.
On the Structure of $α$-Stable Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The stability number of a graph G is the cardinality of a stability system of G (that is of a stable set of maximum size of G). A graph is alpha-stable if its stability number remains the same upon both the deletion and the addition of any edge. Trying to generalize some stable trees properties, we show that there does not exist any alpha-stable chordal graph, and we prove that: if G is a connected bipartite graph, then the following assertions are equivalent: G is alpha-stable; G can be written as a vertex disjoint union of connected bipartite graphs, each of them having exactly two stability systems covering its vertex set; G has perfect matchings and no edge belongs to all its perfect matchings; from each vertex of G are issuing at least two edges contained in some perfect matchings of G; any vertex of G lies on a cycle, whose edges are alternately in and not in some perfect matching; no vertex belongs to all stability systems of G, and no edge belongs to all its perfect matchings.
Permanents, Pfaffian orientations, and even directed circuits
Published in Ann. of Math. (2) 150 (1999), no. 3, 929-975
• View Publication
• BIB
Given a 0-1 square matrix A, when can some of the 1's be changed to -1's in such a way that the permanent of A equals the determinant of the modified matrix? When does a real square matrix have the property that every real matrix with the same sign pattern (that is, the corresponding entries either have the same sign or are both zero) is nonsingular? When is a hypergraph with n vertices and n hyperedges minimally nonbipartite? When does a bipartite graph have a "Pfaffian orientation"? Given a digraph, does it have no directed circuit of even length? Given a digraph, does it have a subdivision with no even directed circuit?
It is known that all of the above problems are equivalent. We prove a structural characterization of the feasible instances, which implies a polynomial-time algorithm to solve all of the above problems. The structural characterization says, roughly speaking, that a bipartite graph has a Pfaffian orientation if and only if it can be obtained by piecing together (in a specified way) planar bipartite graphs and one sporadic nonplanar bipartite graph.
Geometric Thickness of Complete Graphs
Published in J. Graph Algorithms & Applications 4(3):5-17, 2000
• View Publication
• BIB
We define the geometric thickness of a graph to be the smallest number of layers such that we can draw the graph in the plane with straight-line edges and assign each edge to a layer so that no two edges on the same layer cross. The geometric thickness lies between two previously studied quantities, the (graph-theoretical) thickness and the book thickness. We investigate the geometric thickness of the family of complete graphs, K_n. We show that the geometric thickness of K_n lies between ceiling((n/5.646) + 0.342) and ceiling(n/4), and we give exact values of the geometric thickness of K_n for n <= 12 and n in {15,16}. We also consider the geometric thickness of the family of complete bipartite graphs. In particular, we show that, unlike the case of complete graphs, there are complete bipartite graphs with arbitrarily large numbers of vertices for which the geometric thickness coincides with the standard graph-theoretical thickness.
Towards a characterisation of Pfaffian graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A bipartite graph G is known to be Pfaffian if and only if it does not contain an even subdivision H of $K_{3,3}$ such that $G - VH$ contains a 1-factor. However a general characterisation of Pfaffian graphs in terms of forbidden subgraphs is currently not known. In this paper we describe a possible approach to the derivation of such a characterisation. We also extend the characterisation for bipartite graphs to a slightly more general class of graphs.
An exploration of the permanent-determinant method
Published in Electron. J. Combin. 5 (1998), #R46
• View Publication
• BIB
The permanent-determinant method and its generalization, the Hafnian-Pfaffian method, are methods to enumerate perfect matchings of plane graphs that was discovered by P. W. Kasteleyn. We present several new techniques and arguments related to the permanent-determinant with consequences in enumerative combinatorics. Here are some of the results that follow from these techniques:
1. If a bipartite graph on the sphere with 4n vertices is invariant under the antipodal map, the number of matchings is the square of the number of matchings of the quotient graph.
2. The number of matchings of the edge graph of a graph with vertices of degree at most 3 is a power of 2.
3. The three Carlitz matrices whose determinants count a x b x c plane partitions all have the same cokernel.
4. Two symmetry classes of plane partitions can be enumerated with almost no calculation.