arXiv++ Combinatorics

Efficient resource use in packing and assembly-line applications requires decisions that jointly account for capacity and precedence constraints. The strongly NP-hard bin packing problem with generalized precedence constraints (BPP-GP) models such decisions by minimizing the number of ordered, capacitated bins required to pack weighted items, even when precedence requirements span multiple bins. Existing exact algorithms primarily focus on classical special cases, whereas general BPP-GP has been addressed only via compact integer models and heuristics, with no efficient open-source exact solver. We present PrecPack, a unified exact solver that extends branch-bound-and-remember (BBR) to arbitrary nonnegative precedence weights and naturally specializes to the classical cases. Generalized states capture restrictions that remain active across future bins, which are addressed through branching, dominance, and conflict-aware lower bounds. Root column generation uses fixed-point arithmetic to compute numerically valid dual bounds for pruning or to prove optimality. To support reuse and verification, we provide common programming and command-line interfaces, independent assignment checking, explicit termination statuses, and reproducible batch execution; the core procedures require no commercial software. In same-machine, single-threaded comparisons on classic assembly-line benchmarks, more instances are proven optimal, and average computing times are substantially reduced relative to leading source-available BBR implementations. Further comparisons with published benchmark results for bin packing with precedence constraints and BPP-GP also show that more instances were proved optimal and that reported average gaps were smaller on most benchmark sets. PrecPack is released under the MIT License at https://github.com/Sunkanghong-Wang/PrecPack.

We introduce and study a novel generalization of the classical Bin Packing Problem (BPP), called the Bin Packing Problem with Setups (BPPS). In this problem, which has many practical applications in production planning and logistics, the items are partitioned into classes and, whenever an item from a given class is packed into a bin, a setup weight and cost are incurred. We present a natural Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation for the BPPS and analyze the structural properties of its Linear Programming relaxation. We show that the lower bound provided by the relaxation can be arbitrarily poor in the worst case. We introduce the Minimum Classes Inequalities (MCIs), which strengthen the relaxation and restore a worst-case performance guarantee of 1/2, matching that of the classical BPP. In addition, we derive the Minimum Bins Inequality (MBI) to further reinforce the relaxation, together with an upper bound on the number of bins in any optimal BPPS solution, which leads to a significant reduction in the number of variables and constraints of the ILP formulation. Finally, we establish a comprehensive benchmark of 480 BPPS instances and conduct extensive computational experiments. The results show that the integration of MCIs, the MBI, and the upper bound on the number of bins substantially improves the performance of the ILP formulation in terms of solution time and number of instances solved to optimality.

In the (1-dimensional) bin packing problem, we are asked to pack all the given items into bins, each of capacity one, so that the number of non-empty bins is minimized. Zhu~[Chaos, Solitons \& Fractals 2016] proposed an approximation algorithm $MM$ that sorts the item sequence in a non-increasing order by size at the beginning, and then repeatedly packs, into the current single open bin, first as many of the largest items in the remaining sequence as possible and then as many of the smallest items in the remaining sequence as possible. In this paper we prove that the asymptotic approximation ratio of $MM$ is at most 1.5. Next, focusing on the fact that $MM$ is at the intersection of two algorithm classes, max-min algorithms and 1-bounded space algorithms, we comprehensively analyze the theoretical performance bounds of each subclass derived from the two classes. Our results include a lower bound of 1.25 for the intersection of the two classes. Furthermore, we extend the theoretical analysis over algorithm classes to the cardinality constrained bin packing problem.

In this paper, we reduce the maximum weighted matching problem to the largest cardinality matching in {\bf CONGEST}. The paper presents two technical contributions. The first of them is a simple $poly(\log n, \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, t, \ln w_t)$-round {\bf CONGEST} algorithm for reducing the maximum weighted matching problem to the largest cardinality matching problem. This is achieved under the assumption that all vertices know all edge-weights $\{w_1,....,w_t\}$ (in particular, they know $t$, the number of different edge-weights), though a particular vertex may not know the weight of a particular edge. Our second ingredient is a simple rounding algorithm (similar to approximation algorithms for the bin packing problem) allowing to reduce general instances of the maximum weighted matching problem to ones satisfying the assumptions of the first ingredient, in which $t\leq poly'(\log n, \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. We end the paper with a brief discussion of implementing our algorithms in {\bf CONGEST}. Our main conclusion is that we just need constant rounds for the reduction.

The problem considered is the splittable bin packing with cardinality constraint. It is a variant of the bin packing problem where items are allowed to be split into parts but the number of parts in each bin is at most a given upper bound. Two versions of the splittable bin packing with cardinality constraint have been studied in the literature. Among these variants we consider the dual one where the objective is to minimize the maximum bin size while packing (may be fractional) the items to a given set of bins. We exhibit an EPTAS for the dual problem when the cardinality upper bound is part of the input. This result answers an open question raised by Epstein, Levin, and van Stee.

In the $d$-dimensional hypercube bin packing problem, a given list of $d$-dimensional hypercubes must be packed into the smallest number of hypercube bins. Epstein and van Stee [SIAM J. Comput. 35 (2005)] showed that the asymptotic performance ratio $ρ$ of the online bounded space variant is $Ω(\log d)$ and $O(d/\log d)$, and conjectured that it is $Θ(\log d)$. We show that $ρ$ is in fact $Θ(d/\log d)$, using probabilistic arguments.

We consider a known variant of bin packing called {\it cardinality constrained bin packing}, also called {\it bin packing with cardinality constraints} (BPCC). In this problem, there is a parameter k\geq 2, and items of rational sizes in [0,1] are to be packed into bins, such that no bin has more than k items or total size larger than 1. The goal is to minimize the number of bins. A recently introduced concept, called the price of clustering, deals with inputs that are presented in a way that they are split into clusters. Thus, an item has two attributes which are its size and its cluster. The goal is to measure the relation between an optimal solution that cannot combine items of different clusters into bins, and an optimal solution that can combine items of different clusters arbitrarily. Usually the number of clusters may be large, while clusters are relatively small, though not trivially small. Such problems are related to greedy bin packing algorithms, and to batched bin packing, which is similar to the price of clustering, but there is a constant number of large clusters. We analyze the price of clustering for BPCC, including the parametric case with bounded item sizes. We discuss several greedy algorithms for this problem that were not studied in the past, and comment on batched bin packing.

In the d-dimensional online bin packing problem, d-dimensional cubes of positive sizes no larger than 1 are presented one by one to be assigned to positions in d-dimensional unit cube bins. In this work, we provide improved upper bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratio for square and cube bin packing problems, where our bounds do not exceed 2.0885 and 2.5735 for square and cube packing, respectively. To achieve these results, we adapt and improve a previously designed harmonic-type algorithm, and apply a different method for defining weight functions. We detect deficiencies in the state-of-the-art results by providing counter-examples to the current best algorithms and the analysis, where the claimed bounds were 2.1187 for square packing and 2.6161 for cube packing.

We analyze a recently introduced concept, called the price of clustering, for variants of bin packing called open-end bin packing problems (OEBP). Input items have sizes, and they also belong to a certain number of types. The new concept deals with the comparison of optimal solutions for the cases where items of distinct types can and cannot be packed together, respectively. The problem is related to greedy bin packing algorithms and to batched bin packing, and we discuss some of those concepts as well. We analyze max-OEBP, where a packed bin is valid if by excluding its largest item, the total size of items is below 1. For this variant, we study the case of general item sizes, and the parametric case with bounded item sizes, which shows the effect of small items. Finally, we briefly discuss min-OEBP, where a bin is valid if the total size of its items excluding the smallest item is below 1, which is known to be an entirely different problem.

Let $\vec{w} = (w_1,\dots, w_n) \in \mathbb{R}^{n}$. We show that for any $n^{-2}\leε\le 1$, if \[\#\{\vecξ \in \{0,1\}^{n}: \langle \vecξ, \vec{w} \rangle = τ\} \ge 2^{-εn}\cdot 2^{n}\] for some $τ\in \mathbb{R}$, then \[\#\{\langle \vecξ, \vec{w} \rangle : \vecξ \in \{0,1\}^{n}\} \le 2^{O(\sqrtεn)}.\] This exponentially improves the $ε$ dependence in a recent result of Nederlof, Pawlewicz, Swennenhuis, and Węgrzycki and leads to a similar improvement in the parameterized (by the number of bins) runtime of bin packing.

We consider the Ordered Open End Bin Packing problem. Items of sizes in $(0,1]$ are presented one by one, to be assigned to bins in this order. An item can be assigned to any bin for which the current total size strictly below $1$. This means also that the bin can be overloaded by its last packed item. We improve lower and upper bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratio in the online case. Specifically, we design the first algorithm whose asymptotic competitive ratio is strictly below $2$ and it is close to the lower bound. This is in contrast to the best possible absolute approximation ratio, which is equal to $2$. We also study the offline problem where the sequence of items is known in advance, while items are still assigned to bins based on their order in the sequence. For this scenario we design an asymptotic polynomial time approximation scheme.

In this work, we consider online vector bin packing. It is known that no algorithm can have a competitive ratio of $o(d/\log^2 d)$ in the absolute sense, though upper bounds for this problem were always shown in the asymptotic sense. Since variants of bin packing are traditionally studied with respect to the asymptotic measure and since the two measures are different, we focus on the asymptotic measure and prove new lower bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratio. The existing lower bounds prior to this work were much smaller than $3$ even for very large dimensions. We significantly improve the best known lower bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratio (and as a byproduct, on the absolute competitive ratio) for online vector packing of vectors with $d \geq 3$ dimensions, for every such dimension $d$. To obtain these results, we use several different constructions, one of which is an adaptive construction showing a lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{d})$. Our main result is that the lower bound of $Ω(d/\log^2 d)$ on the competitive ratio holds also in the asymptotic sense. The last result requires a careful adaptation of constructions for online coloring rather than simple black-box reductions.

Configuration integer programs (IP) have been key in the design of algorithms for NP-hard high-multiplicity problems since the pioneering work of Gilmore and Gomory [Oper. Res., 1961]. Configuration IPs have a variable for each possible configuration, which describes a placement of items into a location, and whose value corresponds to the number of locations with that placement. In high multiplicity problems items come in types, and are represented succinctly by a vector of multiplicities; solving the configuration IP then amounts to deciding whether the input vector of multiplicities of items of each type can be decomposed into a given number of configurations. We make this implicit notion explicit by observing that the set of all input vectors decomposable into configurations forms a monoid, and solving the configuration IP is the Monoid Decomposition problem. Motivated by applications, we enrich this problem in two ways. First, sometimes each configuration additionally has an objective value, yielding an optimization problem of finding a "best" decomposition under the given objective. Second, there are often different types of configurations for different types of locations. The resulting problem is to optimize over decompositions of the input multiplicity vector into configurations of several types, and we call it Multitype Integer Monoid Optimization, or MIMO. We develop fast exact algorithms for various MIMO with few or many location types and with various objectives. Our algorithms build on a novel proximity theorem connecting the solutions of a certain configuration IP to those of its continuous relaxation. We then cast several fundamental scheduling and bin packing problems as MIMOs, and thereby obtain new or substantially faster algorithms for them. We complement our positive algorithmic results by hardness results.

The Two-dimensional Bin Packing Problem calls for packing a set of rectangular items into a minimal set of larger rectangular bins. Items must be packed with their edges parallel to the borders of the bins, cannot be rotated and cannot overlap among them. The problem is of interest because it models many real-world applications, including production, warehouse management and transportation. It is, unfortunately, very difficult, and instances with just 40 items are unsolved to proven optimality, despite many attempts, since the 1990s. In this paper, we solve the problem with a combinatorial Benders decomposition that is based on a simple model in which the two-dimensional items and bins are just represented by their areas, and infeasible packings are imposed by means of exponentially-many no-good cuts. The basic decomposition scheme is quite naive, but we enrich it with a number of preprocessing techniques, valid inequalities, lower bounding methods, and enhanced algorithms to produce the strongest possible cuts. The resulting algorithm behaved very well on the benchmark sets of instances, improving on average upon previous algorithms from the literature and solving for the first time a number of open instances.

Bin packing problem examines the minimum number of identical bins needed to pack a set of items of various weights. This problem arises in various areas of the artificial intelligence demanding derivation of the exact solutions in the shortest amount of time. Employing branch-and-bound and column generation techniques to derive the exact solutions to this problem, usually requires designation of problem-specific branching rules compatible with the nature of the polluted pricing sub-problem of column generation. In this work, we present a new approach to deal with the forbidden bins which handles two-dimensional knapsack problems. Furthermore, a set of diving criteria are introduced which emphasize the importance of the geometrical features of the bins. It is further shown that efficiency of the column generation technique could significantly get improved using an implicit sectional pricing scheme. The proposed algorithm outperforms the current state-of-the-art algorithms in number of the benchmark instances solved in less than one minute.

We continue the study of two recently introduced bin packing type problems, called bin packing with clustering, and online bin packing with delays. A bin packing input consists of items of sizes not larger than 1, and the goal is to partition or pack them into bins, where the total size of items of every valid bin cannot exceed 1. In bin packing with clustering, items also have colors associated with them. A globally optimal solution can combine items of different colors in bins, while a clustered solution can only pack monochromatic bins. The goal is to compare a globally optimal solution to an optimal clustered solution, under certain constraints on the coloring provided with the input. We show close bounds on the worst-case ratio between these two costs, called "the price of clustering", improving and simplifying previous results. Specifically, we show that the price of clustering does not exceed 1.93667, improving over the previous upper bound of 1.951, and that it is at least 1.93558, improving over the previous lower bound of 1.93344. In online bin packing with delays, items are presented over time. Items may wait to be packed, and an algorithm can create a new bin at any time, packing a subset of already existing unpacked items into it, under the condition that the bin is valid. A created bin cannot be used again in the future, and all items have to be packed into bins eventually. The objective is to minimize the number of used bins plus the sum of waiting costs of all items, called delays. We build on previous work and modify a simple phase-based algorithm. We combine the modification with a careful analysis to improve the previously known competitive ratio from 3.951 to below 3.1551.

We slightly improve the known lower bound on the asymptotic competitive ratio for online bin packing of rectangles. We present a complete proof for the new lower bound, whose value is above 1.91.

We improve the lower bound on the asymptotic competitive ratio of any online algorithm for bin packing to above 1.54278. We demonstrate for the first time the advantage of branching and the applicability of full adaptivity in the design of lower bounds for the classic online bin packing problem. We apply a new method for weight based analysis, which is usually applied only in proofs of upper bounds. The values of previous lower bounds were approximately 1.5401 and 1.5403.

We consider several previously studied online variants of bin packing and prove new and improved lower bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratios for them. For that, we use a method of fully adaptive constructions. In particular, we improve the lower bound for the asymptotic competitive ratio of online square packing significantly, raising it from roughly 1.68 to above 1.75.

We revisit the classic online bin packing problem. In this problem, items of positive sizes no larger than 1 are presented one by one to be packed into subsets called "bins" of total sizes no larger than 1, such that every item is assigned to a bin before the next item is presented. We use online partitioning of items into classes based on sizes, as in previous work, but we also apply a new method where items of one class can be packed into more than two types of bins, where a bin type is defined according to the number of such items grouped together. Additionally, we allow the smallest class of items to be packed in multiple kinds of bins, and not only into their own bins. We combine this with the approach of packing of sufficiently big items according to their exact sizes. Finally, we simplify the analysis of such algorithms, allowing the analysis to be based on the most standard weight functions. This simplified analysis allows us to study the algorithm which we defined based on all these ideas. This leads us to the design and analysis of the first algorithm of asymptotic competitive ratio strictly below 1.58, specifically, we break this barrier and provide an algorithm AH (Advanced Harmonic) whose asymptotic competitive ratio does not exceed 1.5783.