arXiv++ Combinatorics

Between April 1 and May 15, 2026, a group of 49 mathematicians compiled a dataset of research-level mathematics questions with known answers. Most of the work was done during the three-day workshop Benchmarks in Leipzig with 35 participants at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences in Leipzig, Germany. We present the resulting collection of 100~questions. We evaluated these questions in three stages: a single attempt by five state-of-the-art LLMs and their predecessors, followed by a 20-runs-per-model evaluation with three of these models, and finally a 3-run attempt with two heavy-thinking models. After Stage 1, 41 questions remained completely unsolved; after Stage 2, this count dropped to 16; and we concluded Stage 3 with only 2 unsolved questions. This demonstrates that the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs are becoming impressive. In September 2026, we added a fourth stage in which the next generation of models attempted all 100 questions once more, after which only 1 question remains unsolved.

The snake-in-the-box problem asks for a longest induced path in the hypercube graph $Q_n$. We find a length-191 snake in dimension $n=9$, the lowest dimension where the maximum is unknown, improving the previous record of 190 that had stood for 14 years. We also establish new lower bounds in dimensions 10-13. To find these records, we introduce snakepits, collections of disjoint snakes, to expand the search space and open new routes between snakes. This motivates our new Snakepit-in-the-Box benchmark, which seeks maximal edge counts when allowing multiple components. Finally, we introduce Beam Anchor, a search-supervised learned constructor algorithm that finds 100 inequivalent length-190 snakes in dimension 9.

This paper develops on algebraic grounds a polynomial time exact linear solution to the hard combinatorial problem of marginal inference in Markov random field (MRF) models under general assumptions. To prove our claim, we first implicitly remodel a MRF joint distribution as the unique solution of some linear identity assuming its clique potential functions (equivalently, its individual conditional distributions) to be specified. Then, by assuming an arbitrary point subset, we relax accordingly such a (global) linear identity for deriving a second linear identity, solely, acting on a polynomial time number of entries (e.g.; local marginals or Fourier frequencies) of a solution. Then, we show, only using linear algebraic techniques, that such an identity enables to capture all the entries necessary for the exact reconstruction of an MRF marginal distribution, thus, allowing to solve for the latter, exactly and in polynomial time, using a standard linear solver. Last, but not least, this paper probably solves, once and for all, the P = NP conjecture.

Since Isaac Newton first studied the Kissing Number Problem in 1694, determining the maximal number of non-overlapping spheres around a central sphere has remained a defining challenge in discrete geometry. As the local analogue of Hilbert's 18th problem, it has profound implications across geometry, number theory and information theory. Although lattices and codes have achieved significant progress, the field is confined to isolated extremal configurations, leaving underlying geometric principles obscured. Here we shift the object to the broader extremal configuration space, thereby opening a new path for the Kissing Number Problem. Accordingly, we recast this problem as a cooperative matrix-completion game, and train a reinforcement learning system, PackingStar, to solve it. One player fills cosine entries while the other corrects suboptimal ones, making explosive geometric complexity tractable. Working within extremal configuration spaces, PackingStar discovers new interpretable geometric structures that improve 15 strong bounds held for decades in kissing numbers and their generalizations, several of them provably optimal under natural inner products. These findings reveal the first explicit spherical-code realization of the Fischer group Fi22, extend the classical Euclidean representation of subgroup structure, and directly inspire subsequent breakthroughs by mathematicians. Overall, the work provides an early example of AI-driven progress on a Hilbert-calibre problem, showing how reinforcement learning advances mathematical discovery by unlocking more expressive objects.

Conway's 99-graph problem asks whether a strongly regular graph with parameters $\mathrm{srg}(99,14,1,2)$ exists. We develop two complementary lines of attack. Fixing one vertex, the conditions $λ=1$ and $μ=2$ force its neighbourhood to be a perfect matching and determine every edge between that neighbourhood and the remaining vertices. For $(99,14,1,2)$, the unresolved part is therefore a constrained $12$-regular graph on $84$ vertices. We encode this reduction in CP-SAT and validate it by recovering the unique $\mathrm{srg}(9,4,1,2)$. We also prove by exhaustive enumeration that no circulant graph on $\mathbb{Z}/99$ satisfies more than $68.0\%$ of the CAISc constraints, and we give a validated orbit formulation for prescribed automorphisms. We then study the partial-score search problem. Fourteen human-designed search configurations reached at most $69.43\%$. Separately, we supplied the scoring function to an evolutionary program-search system. It produced a degree-preserving $4$-vertex-switch tabu search whose best verified artifact scores $70.73\%$. The generated move differs from those used in our own searches and crosses a plateau that was stable under them. These results do not resolve the existence problem, but they reduce the exact search space and improve the best verified partial construction found in our experiments.

At a 2021 AIM workshop, Guo conjectured that the positive square energy s+ = E+_2 should inherit the familiar edge-addition monotonicity of the spectral radius, rho(G + uv) >= rho(G). That conjecture was subsequently shown to fail at p = 2. Tang, Liu, and Wang then introduced positive p-energy, proved nonmonotonicity for every 1 <= p < 3, and in version 3 of their preprint (26 March 2025) explicitly conjectured that monotonicity should hold for p >= 3. We disprove this conjectured high-exponent extension completely: for every real p > 2 there are infinitely many connected graphs G and nonedges uv such that E+_p(G + uv) < E+_p(G). Together with the Tang-Liu-Wang counterexamples below 3, this shows that no exponent p >= 1 restores the spectral-radius-style monotonicity: positive p-energy can decrease under the addition of an edge for every real p >= 1. The construction is a chain of clique blocks joined by regular bipartite graphs. An equitable quotient converges to Q = I + cA(P_k). For noninteger p, a binomial-series sign argument for a fractional power of I - cA(P_k) gives the required negative endpoint entry. At integer exponents, choosing c across the first spectral threshold leaves exactly one negative eigenvalue, and path locality forces the positive spectral contribution to have negative sign. We also give a fully rational 38-vertex certificate at p = 4 and determine the complete failure interval of a fixed 17-vertex counterexample at p = 3.

We present tensor network representations for discrete maximum entropy distributions under expectation constraints. To this end, we introduce Computation-Activation Networks (CompActNets), a tensor network architecture that subsumes exponential families. By leveraging the geometry of the convex polytope of realizable expectation vectors, we represent any maximum entropy distribution in the same architecture. We exploit the fact that proper faces of this polytope correspond to the boundary closure of exponential families, which restricts the distribution's support. We then derive explicit representations for the support within the CompActNet architecture. The proposed framework suggests tensor network ranks as complexity measures for faces. Finally, a case study on Boolean statistics links the geometry of 0/1-polytopes directly to propositional formulas.

We report on our ongoing project to develop a computational pipeline, AutoGraphForge, for an automated graph-theoretic conjecturing-refuting-formalizing-proving system. Conjecture generation is counterexample-guided and runs in rounds: a Graffiti3 generator proposes conjectures over a small, evolving snapshot table $T$ (initially a few hundred graphs with their computed invariants) that grows only by counterexamples to its own conjectures. A novelty filter of $559$ classical and folklore relations, closed under transitive composition and linear identity substitution, decides via a linear program whether a candidate is already implied by known results. Surviving candidates are tested against a dataset of about $348,000$ graphs, unioning the complete House of Graphs invariant export, the exhaustive census of all connected graphs on at most nine vertices, several extremal families (strongly regular, minimal Ramsey, Cayley, cages, barbells, lollipops, spiders), and random models. Counterexample-search algorithms then attack the remainder. Run for several rounds on an HPC cluster, the loop yields $6,522$ conjectures that survived the refutation dataset, the novelty filter and every active-search run -- among them nontrivial relations between the annihilation number and the edge-cover number for bipartite and regular graphs, which we prove by hand. A subsequent formalization and proving stage deterministically translates each surviving conjecture into a Lean 4 statement skeleton; every candidate proof is kernel-verified against a pinned mathlib4 and our custom invariant preamble. This stage integrates two neural provers -- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (served with vLLM) and the Lean-specialised OProver-32B -- behind the independent kernel check. It is implemented end-to-end and passes initial sanity checks, with the full pipeline currently running on the cluster.

Let $r\geq3$ be fixed, and let $\mathbf{G}_n$ be the set of all simple graphs with vertex set $[n]=\{1,\ldots,n\}$. We consider an exponential random graph model which gives higher probability to $G \in \mathbf{G}_n$ than to $H \in \mathbf{G}_n$ if $G$ has fewer $r$-cliques than $H$. But all graphs in $\mathbf{G}_n$ have positive probability. The degree to which graphs with fewer $r$-cliques are given higher probability is determined by a positive weight $w$. We prove that, asymptotically almost surely as $n \to \infty$, a random graph from $\mathbf{G}_n$ has a vertex partition into $r-1$ parts of roughly equal size, the density of edges between the parts is close to $1/2$, and for every $\varepsilon > 0$ the density of edges within any part is less than $\varepsilon$. The asymptotic structural properties are independent of the weight $w$ as long as it is positive. We also extend the result to the context of several clique sizes, each one with its own weight.

This paper presents new theoretical results on generalizing the Jaccard distance for lattices and real valuations. We demonstrate that when the valuation is strictly positive, monotone, and modular, the Jaccard distance satisfies the triangle inequality on arbitrary lattices, effectively generalizing earlier results that depended heavily on distributivity. Moving to relatively complemented distributive lattices (which safely drop the requirement for the global bounds found in Boolean algebras), we prove the triangle inequality holds as long as the valuation is positive, monotone, supermodular, and $\log$-submodular. Additionally, we adapt the symmetric-difference Jaccard formulation for submodular valuations to sectionally complemented distributive lattices. Shifting to necessary conditions, we prove that supermodularity is a strict requirement for the standard generalized Jaccard distance to operate as a valid metric. Finally, we map the practical value of relaxing these structural constraints to computational fields like quantum information theory, formal concept analysis, and machine learning, closing with a brief look at open mathematical problems.

AI systems are increasingly capable of contributing to mathematical research. In research practice, frontier-model reasoning is a limited resource, and expert mathematical review is even more sharply constrained. Allocating these scarce resources well is therefore central to making AI-assisted mathematical discovery efficient. In most current AI-for-math workflows, human effort is concentrated at the beginning and end, in selecting suitable research problems and later reviewing the resulting artifacts. These two stages are becoming bottlenecks for research-level mathematics. We address them by proposing a new human-AI discovery paradigm. The human input is no longer a single problem selected in advance, but a research direction in which the experts have interest and expertise. The system then searches a broad literature corpus for candidate problems in that direction. Inspired by search and recommender systems, we build Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR), a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering. In a combinatorics pilot, the pipeline starts from 5,245 combinatorics papers, recovers 6,453 candidate conjectures or open problems, and filters them to 4,717 apparently well-posed and still-open conjectures. Subsequent reasoning and automated triage stages surface 598 potential resolutions and select 77 items for author-team review. Among them, we identify many interesting discoveries, including results on conjectures and questions of Davies--Jenssen--Perkins--Roberts, Erdős--Straus, Ikenmeyer--Pak--Panova, and Lund--Saraf--Wolf. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this new mode of human-AI collaboration for mathematical discovery.

There are several methods for searching for graphs with prescribed properties, such as SAT solvers and specialized generators. These methods return the result as raw data: an adjacency matrix or a string encoding. The raw data certifies that the graph exists, but it does not reveal any structural properties of the graph. We ask whether one can automatically discover a short algebraic description if only this raw data is provided. We look for a description such as a Cayley graph $\mathrm{Cay}(Γ, S)$ or a lexicographic product $C_5[K_3]$. We address this question with a neurosymbolic approach. We propose an agent that runs on a general-purpose large language model with no fine-tuning or per-target training. The model interleaves reasoning with calls to the computer algebra system SageMath: it analyzes the target graph, proposes and tests candidate constructions, and revises them until the output matches the target. The agent communicates with SageMath through a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, which we release as a general-purpose bridge. Whether a construction matches the target is checked by a single exact isomorphism test, and therefore rests on the symbolic side and not on the model. We test the approach on a benchmark of 100 highly symmetric graphs, namely two-orbit graphs on up to 25 vertices; the benchmark was fixed in advance. Our agent could find verified algebraic constructions for all of them, without falling back to raw encodings. A strong template-enumeration baseline reaches only about $20\%$, and a catalog lookup could not identify any of these graphs. However, construction quality declines when symmetry is removed. As a concrete application, we identify the smallest known counterexample to the Bernhart-Kainen dispersability conjecture, a $16$-vertex graph that enumeration found as raw data. For this graph, our agent found an explicit algebraic construction.

The Zarankiewicz number Z(m,n,s,t) is the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph with parts of orders m and n containing no copy of Ks,t. We give one combined, certificate-based computer-assisted proof for two finite slices and a corrected neighboring frontier: Z(12,n,3,3) = 6n (18 <= n <= 22), Z(13,22,3,3) = 137, Z(13, 18, 3, 3) = 116, Z(14, 18, 3, 3) = 124, Z(15,18,3,3) = 132, Z(14, 17, 3, 3) = 118, Z(15, 17, 3, 3) = 126, 132 <= Z(16,17,3,3) <= 133. The load-bearing new upper bounds are the exact 12 x 18 and 13 x 18 certificate packages. Their orbit certificates exclude every hypothetical matrix at the next edge count. Deletion lemmas and explicit witnesses close four neighboring cells, while the 16 x 17 entry is deliberately reported as an interval because only its 132-edge lower witness and the published 133 upper bound are certified here. Separately, the 13 x 22 proof excludes 138 ones by reducing to 83 degree profiles, rationally separating 77 of them, and eliminating the remaining six by marked-row congruences, leave enumeration, modular Gram tests, and exact Farkas certificates. All accepted claims are replayed by standard-library Python and exact integer/rational arithmetic; floating-point optimization is used only to discover certificates.

Let \(\cthreshold(n)\) be the largest integer \(q\) such that every loopless digraph on \(n\) vertices with at most \(q\) arcs is isomorphic to a spanning subdigraph of a self-complementary digraph of order \(n\). We prove that \(\cthreshold(6)=7\). The upper bound is witnessed by \[ \bK{3}\dunion (x\longrightarrow y\longrightarrow z), \] and follows from a direct argument with a self-complementing permutation. We also determine the complete eight-arc obstruction layer: it consists of five isomorphism classes, or three after converse digraphs are identified. All five are arc-minimal. Each nevertheless packs with an isomorphic copy of itself, so ordinary packing is strictly weaker than same-order self-complementary completion already at this first failure layer.

Razborov's flag algebra method is a powerful tool for proving asymptotic inequalities in extremal graph theory, often reducing the task to finding a finite certificate by semidefinite programming. We present a machine-checked formalization of the method for finite simple graphs, together with a certificate-to-proof compiler that turns externally generated certificate data into algebraic proofs checked by Lean. The formalization covers the foundations of the method: partially labeled graphs, their densities in large graphs, the quotient algebra of density expressions, graph-limit semantics through positive homomorphisms, and the downward operators used to average out labels. The compiler treats the external semidefinite programming output as candidate data rather than trusted input: Lean independently computes the required density and multiplication facts, verifies positive semidefiniteness exactly over $\mathbb{Q}$, and carries out the algebraic normalization steps of flag-algebra proofs. Our case studies yield formal proofs of seven Turán-type upper bounds, including Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, a $C_4$-density bound for triangle-free graphs, and edge-density bounds for $K_4$-free, $K_5$-free, and $C_5$-free graphs. Independently of the compiler, we formalize the matching constructions that complete the exact Turán densities of Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, and prove two inequalities of Goodman. Our constrained semantics also prompted a meta-theoretic comparison of two ways of imposing graph constraints: building a hereditary constraint into the flag algebra from the start, or testing inequalities afterward on constrained graph limits with labels chosen at random. We state the resulting root-plantability criterion characterizing when the two approaches agree; a forthcoming paper will present the complete account.

In Problem~6 of his 1988 paper on differential posets, Stanley asked for the least possible cardinality of a fixed rank of an $r$-differential poset and suggested that the minimum should be attained by $Y^r$, the $r$-fold Cartesian power of Young's lattice. We disprove the resulting universal coefficientwise lower bound. For every $r\geq 3$, we construct an infinite $r$-differential poset $P^{(r)}$ satisfying \[ \card{P^{(r)}_4} =\card{(Y^r)_4}-\left\lfloor\frac r3\right\rfloor. \] For $r=3$, the construction replaces thirteen rank-four lower-cover blocks of $Y^3$ by twelve blocks with the same point and pair incidence multiplicities, producing the initial rank sequence $1,3,9,22,50$ instead of $1,3,9,22,51$. A reflection extension then yields an infinite differential poset. The construction does not address the cases $r=1$ and $r=2$.

Let $t(N)$ be the largest $t$ for which there exist distinct sets $A_1,\dots,A_t \subseteq \{1,\dots,N\}$ such that $A_i \cap A_j$ is a nonempty arithmetic progression for all $i \neq j$ (Erdos Problem #272). Simonovits and Sos proved $t(N)=O(N^2)$ and conjectured $\binom{N}{2}+1$ is best possible; Szabo disproved this by a construction giving $t(N) \geq \binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor$, proved the asymptotics $t(N)=N^2/2+O(N^{5/3}(\log N)^3)$, and asked whether $t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+O(N)$ and whether some element lies in all sets of any extremal family (the kernel question). We determine $t(N)$ exactly for all $3 \leq N \leq 12$ by exhaustive computation: in this entire range Szabo's lower bound is exact, and we conjecture that $t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor$ for every $N$. Towards the matching upper bound we prove, for every $N$, that Szabo's bound is the exact maximum over all families with a common element (starred families). The proof combines a self-contained ``defect-one'' counting inequality for staircase regions with a new structural theorem: every non-progression member of such a family contains a bad pair that no other member can share. Consequently the sharpened conjecture reduces to a single remaining statement, namely Szabo's kernel conjecture that some element lies in all sets of an extremal family, and we prove first structural constraints on putative non-starred extremal families.

The Shannon capacity $Θ(G)$ of a graph $G$ quantifies the maximum rate at which information can be transmitted with zero error over a noisy channel. It is lower bounded by $α(G^d)^{1/d}$ for any $d$, where $α(G^d)$ is the independence number of the $d$-th strong power of $G$. We construct independent sets of size $134753$ in $C_7^{10}$, $21909$ in $C_{11}^{6}$, and $62530$ in $C_{13}^{6}$, improving the best known lower bounds for the Shannon capacity of these graphs to $Θ(C_7)\geq 134753^{1/10}>3.258020$, $Θ(C_{11})\geq 21909^{1/6}>5.289773$, and $Θ(C_{13})\geq 62530^{1/6}>6.300109$. We also improve the best known lower bounds on the independence numbers of several individual strong powers of odd cycles that do not improve the Shannon capacity lower bound. The constructions were discovered through iterative interactions with a Large Language Model (LLM), illustrating the potential of LLMs for finding explicit combinatorial constructions.

For every loopless matroid $M$ and every Feichtner--Yuzvinsky building set $\mathcal{G}$ containing the top flat, we construct an integral tangent class $T_{M,\mathcal{G}}^{\mathbb{Z}}\in K_{\mathbb{Z}}(M,\mathcal{G})$; in the realizable case it specializes to the class of the tangent bundle of the corresponding wonderful compactification, it recovers the Hilbert series of the Chow ring through Hirzebruch--Riemann--Roch, and it satisfies the expected Chern-alpha lower bounds. This reproduces the tangent class and its key properties studied by the first author in arXiv:2606.22650. The main body of this paper was produced autonomously, without human mathematical guidance, by Danus, an AI mathematical reasoning agent. Danus solved the problem before arXiv:2606.22650 was publicly available, demonstrating the potential of AI agents in mathematical research. We reproduce its output faithfully, adding only editorial comments; the experiment is documented in Appendix B.

We study certain extremal problems in combinatorial geometry that ask about configurations of points in an $n \times n$ grid that satisfy strict, global geometric constraints. Classical exact solvers suffer from combinatorial explosion for these types of problems, and standard reinforcement learning and transformer-based models struggle with the sparse reward "validity cliff" and quadratic token-consumption limits. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose a Geometry-Aware Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) framework. Our approach strictly enforces geometric constraints through incremental updates to the feasible action space. For constraints about collections of collinear points, like those that occur in the classic No-Three-in-Line problem (Max-N3IL), this mechanism reduces the constraint checking complexity from $O(n^3)$ to $O(n^2)$. To improve search efficiency, we exploit geometric symmetries in two ways: canonical pruning during node expansion to reduce the branching factor, and symmetric batch transitions to accelerate the discovery of promising configurations. We perform extensive experiments and establish new best-known computational results on five out of six of the problems that we considered. Notably, for Max-N3IL we find configurations of size roughly $1.8 n$ for grids of size $82 \le n \le 119$. For the Smallest Complete Set problem, we find configurations of size roughly $0.95 n$, providing new upper bounds within the tested grids. This work establishes Geometry-Aware MCTS as a highly adaptable framework for discovering novel configurations in combinatorial geometry.