arXiv++ Combinatorics

At a 2021 AIM workshop, Guo conjectured that the positive square energy s+ = E+_2 should inherit the familiar edge-addition monotonicity of the spectral radius, rho(G + uv) >= rho(G). That conjecture was subsequently shown to fail at p = 2. Tang, Liu, and Wang then introduced positive p-energy, proved nonmonotonicity for every 1 <= p < 3, and in version 3 of their preprint (26 March 2025) explicitly conjectured that monotonicity should hold for p >= 3. We disprove this conjectured high-exponent extension completely: for every real p > 2 there are infinitely many connected graphs G and nonedges uv such that E+_p(G + uv) < E+_p(G). Together with the Tang-Liu-Wang counterexamples below 3, this shows that no exponent p >= 1 restores the spectral-radius-style monotonicity: positive p-energy can decrease under the addition of an edge for every real p >= 1. The construction is a chain of clique blocks joined by regular bipartite graphs. An equitable quotient converges to Q = I + cA(P_k). For noninteger p, a binomial-series sign argument for a fractional power of I - cA(P_k) gives the required negative endpoint entry. At integer exponents, choosing c across the first spectral threshold leaves exactly one negative eigenvalue, and path locality forces the positive spectral contribution to have negative sign. We also give a fully rational 38-vertex certificate at p = 4 and determine the complete failure interval of a fixed 17-vertex counterexample at p = 3.

Baste, Furst, Henning, Mohr, and Rautenbach conjectured that every finite regular graph of positive degree satisfies \(γ(G) \leq γ_e(G)\), where \(γ\) is the domination number and \(γ_e\) is the edge domination number, equivalently the minimum cardinality of a maximal matching. We show that the conjecture is false already for cubic graphs. The counterexample is a previously public 50-vertex cubic graph that had been used to refute the stronger independent-domination inequality \(i(G) \leq γ_e(G)\). For this graph we prove \(γ(G) = 16 > 15 = γ_e(G)\). The equality \(γ_e(G) = 15\) has a short counting proof, and a dominating set of order 16 is displayed explicitly. For the lower bound \(γ(G) \geq 16\), we give a self-contained exact reduction: after fixing which of the 20 clause vertices lie in a putative dominating set, the remaining problem is a finite set-cover problem on the 30 literal vertices. We enumerate all \(2^{20} = 1,048,576\) clause subsets, derive two explicit lower bounds, and solve exactly the 5,931 residual cases by a recurrence stated in the paper. The complete case counts and minima are displayed, and a short standard-library Python implementation is included in an appendix. A separate 893,049-node proof-tree certificate and a direct graph search provide independent verification. Thus the regular-graph conjecture is disproved. Combined with Gupta's recent theorem that every cubic graph on at most 48 vertices satisfies the conjectured inequality, the example is order-minimal among cubic counterexamples.

The Zarankiewicz number Z(m,n,s,t) is the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph with parts of orders m and n containing no copy of Ks,t. We give one combined, certificate-based computer-assisted proof for two finite slices and a corrected neighboring frontier: Z(12,n,3,3) = 6n (18 <= n <= 22), Z(13,22,3,3) = 137, Z(13, 18, 3, 3) = 116, Z(14, 18, 3, 3) = 124, Z(15,18,3,3) = 132, Z(14, 17, 3, 3) = 118, Z(15, 17, 3, 3) = 126, 132 <= Z(16,17,3,3) <= 133. The load-bearing new upper bounds are the exact 12 x 18 and 13 x 18 certificate packages. Their orbit certificates exclude every hypothetical matrix at the next edge count. Deletion lemmas and explicit witnesses close four neighboring cells, while the 16 x 17 entry is deliberately reported as an interval because only its 132-edge lower witness and the published 133 upper bound are certified here. Separately, the 13 x 22 proof excludes 138 ones by reducing to 83 degree profiles, rationally separating 77 of them, and eliminating the remaining six by marked-row congruences, leave enumeration, modular Gram tests, and exact Farkas certificates. All accepted claims are replayed by standard-library Python and exact integer/rational arithmetic; floating-point optimization is used only to discover certificates.