arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Zijian Ren

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
An asymptotically tight bound on oriented diameter
Let $f(d)$ be the smallest integer such that every finite connected bridgeless simple graph of diameter $d$ admits a strong orientation of diameter at most $f(d)$. Chvátal and Thomassen (1978) proved $\lceil d^2/2\rceil+d\le f(d)\le2d^2+2d$. In this paper, we prove that $\lceil d^2/2\rceil+d\le f(d)\le\lceil d^2/2\rceil+d+18$ for every $d\ge2$, which shows that $f(d)=\lceil d^2/2\rceil+d+O(1)$ and determines both the quadratic and linear terms up to a bounded additive error. The key method of our proof is to construct a central subgraph $H$ that admits a strong orientation of diameter $O(d)$ and is within distance $\lfloor d/2\rfloor$ of every vertex outside it. We obtain the sharp linear coefficient by jointly estimating outside paths and their connecting paths in $H$ at the actual attachment vertices, rebuilding $H$ when necessary.
2026-10-03
The asymptotic maximum oriented diameter of graphs
The oriented diameter of a connected bridgeless graph is the minimum diameter of a strong orientation. Let $f(d)$ be the maximum oriented diameter among all such graphs of diameter $d$. In 1978, Chvátal and Thomassen proved $f(d)\le2d^2+2d$ and constructed graphs showing that any quadratic upper bound on $f(d)$ must have leading coefficient at least $1/2$. We prove that $f(d)\le \tfrac12d^2+7d$ for every integer $d\ge1$. This matches the leading coefficient of their lower bound and establishes $f(d)=\tfrac12d^2+O(d)$, determining the optimal quadratic coefficient. Our proof gives a polynomial-time algorithm that constructs a strong orientation satisfying the stated bound.
2026-09-24
An improved upper bound for oriented diameter of graphs with diameter $4$
Let $f(d)$ denote the smallest integer such that every bridgeless graph of diameter $d$ admits a strong orientation with diameter at most $f(d)$. It is known that $f(2)=6$ and $f(3)=9$. For $d=4$, the classical bounds of Chvátal and Thomassen [JCTB, 1978] imply $12\le f(4)\le40$, and subsequent work reduced the upper bound to 21. Very recently, Lin, Wang and You further established the substantially stronger bound $f(4)\le18$. Pushing this bound below $18$ turns out to be considerably more difficult, since the remaining extremal configurations cannot be handled by existing techniques based on $R-S$ orientations and related local constructions. In this paper, we prove that $f(4)\le16$. Our approach is entirely different from previous ones. Instead of constructing a strong orientation directly, we develop a sequential orientation framework together with auxiliary distance functions and a potential-function analysis. This enables us to control directed distances globally while avoiding the intricate case analysis required by earlier methods. We believe that the framework introduced here may be useful for studying oriented diameter problems of larger diameter.