arXiv++ Combinatorics

Covers in hypergraphs are frequently studied to capture various forms of dependence between hyperedges. For example, even covers--which check if each vertex appears in an even number of hyperedges--have found much success recently in the study of locally decodable codes. Inspired by a recently-emerging line of work on the non-redundancy of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), we introduce and study two novel families of covers of hypergraphs which are stricter than even covers: \emph{Abelian} covers and Catalan covers. Abelian covers are similar to even covers, except that arithmetic is now done over the integers rather than modulo 2, allowing us to capture dependences over arbitrary Abelian groups. Catalan covers capture the behavior of non-Abelian groups by only allowing local cancellations in a sequence of hyperedges. We prove three main results about Abelian and Catalan covers. First, using tools from lattice theory, we show that any $r$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices and $n \log(r)$ hyperedges has an Abelian cover. Second, using tools from algebraic topology, we show that in any $3$-uniform hypergraph, Abelian covers and Catalan covers are equivalent; thereby showing that Catalan covers emerge after $O(n)$ hyperedges in $3$-uniform hypergraphs. Finally, using the theory of nilpotent groups, we show that there exists a $4$-uniform hypergraph which has an Abelian cover but not a Catalan cover. Collectively, these results exactly characterize the reach that Abelian covers have in deducing dependences in hypergraphs. As our primary application, we show that any arity-$3$ CSP with an infinite-domain Mal'tsev extension has linear non-redundancy. This implies near optimal streaming, sparsification, and kernelization algorithms for this family of CSPs. Previously, such a result was only known for the much simpler case of arity-$2$ CSPs.

For a constraint satisfaction problem defined by a relation $R$, its non-redundancy $\text{NRD}(R,n)$ is the size of largest instance (as a function of the number $n$ of variables) for which no constraint is implied by the rest. Its chain length $\text{CL}(R,n)$ is the largest such instance where the constraints can be ordered so that no constraint is implied by the preceding ones. Clearly $\text{CL}(R,n) \ge \text{NRD}(R,n)$ but so far no asymptotic separation was known between these quantities. We exhibit an explicit arity $4$ relation for which $\text{CL}(R,n) \ge ω(\text{NRD}(R,n))$.

In coding theory, list recoverability is a fundamental concept which robustly captures how ``spread-out'' codewords are in a code. More formally, given a code $C \subseteq Σ^n$ and input lists $S_1, \dots, S_n \subseteq Σ$ of size at most $\ell$, list recoverability requires that there are at most $L$ codewords $c \in C$ such that $c_i \in S_i$ for at least $(1-ρ)n$ choices of $i \in [n]$. List recovery is an important question which has found applications in many areas, including complexity theory, property testing, compressed sensing, streaming algorithms, and cryptography. As our first main result, we establish a tight ``generalized singleton bound''. Formally, we show that for constant $\ell, L,ρ$ and sufficiently large alphabets $Σ$, if we define $R^*=\frac{L+1-\ell}{L}-\frac{L+1}{L}ρ$, it is possible for a $(ρ,\ell,L)$ list-recoverable code to have rate $R^*-ε$ but impossible to have rate $R^*+ε$. One direction of our result already directly generalizes and improves a weaker impossibility result due to Goldberg, Shangguan, and Tamo. For our second main result, we prove that there is a fundamental shortcoming in existing methods that aim to construct explicit, optimal list-recoverable codes. Indeed, recent work has constructed explicit codes achieving list-decoding capacity (along with other related properties) using a framework introduced in the work of Alon--Edmonds--Luby (AEL). We give a meta-analysis of such constructions by presenting an ``AEL framework'' which captures all such recent constructions in the literature. Within this framework, we show that no AEL-based code can break a recently-identified list-recovery barrier for additive and linear codes.

The chain length of a set family $\mathcal{S} \subseteq 2^{[m]}$ is the largest ascending sequence of sets in containment order in the union-closure of $\mathcal S$. In this work, we provide a significantly simpler and more optimal characterization of the sparsifiability of set systems in terms of their chain length, improving on the work of Brakensiek and Guruswami [STOC 2025]. Our proof relies on a generalization of Karger's [SODA 1993] famous contraction algorithm and its recent linear algebraic extensions [Khanna-Putterman-Sudan SODA 2024], and our resulting bounds show that, just as VC dimension characterizes the \emph{additive sparsifiability} of a set system, chain length governs the \emph{multiplicative sparsifiability}. As a corollary, we obtain improved bounds for weighted CSP sparsification.

Given a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) predicate $P \subseteq D^r$, the non-redundancy (NRD) of $P$ is maximum-sized instance on $n$ variables such that for every clause of the instance, there is an assignment which satisfies all but that clause. The study of NRD for various CSPs is an active area of research which combines ideas from extremal combinatorics, logic, lattice theory, and other techniques. Complete classifications are known in the cases $r=2$ and $(|D|=2, r=3)$. In this paper, we give a near-complete classification of the case $(|D|=2, r=4)$. Of the 400 distinct non-trivial Boolean predicates of arity 4, we implement an algorithmic procedure which perfectly classifies 397 of them. Of the remaining three, we solve two by reducing to extremal combinatorics problems -- leaving the last one as an open question. Along the way, we identify the first Boolean predicate whose non-redundancy asymptotics are non-polynomial.

A classic result in graph theory, due to Batson, Spielman, and Srivastava (STOC 2009) shows that every graph admits a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$ cut (or spectral) sparsifier which preserves only $O(n / \varepsilon^2)$ reweighted edges. However, when applying this result to \emph{Cayley graphs}, the resulting sparsifier is no longer necessarily a Cayley graph -- it can be an arbitrary subset of edges. Thus, a recent line of inquiry, and one which has only seen minor progress, asks: for any group $G$, do all Cayley graphs over the group $G$ admit sparsifiers which preserve only $\mathrm{polylog}(|G|)/\varepsilon^2$ many re-weighted generators? As our primary contribution, we answer this question in the affirmative, presenting a proof of the existence of such Cayley graph spectral sparsifiers, along with an efficient algorithm for finding them. Our algorithm even extends to \emph{directed} Cayley graphs, if we instead ask only for cut sparsification instead of spectral sparsification. We additionally study the sparsification of linear equations over non-abelian groups. In contrast to the abelian case, we show that for non-abelian valued equations, super-polynomially many linear equations must be preserved in order to approximately preserve the number of satisfied equations for any input. Together with our Cayley graph sparsification result, this provides a formal separation between Cayley graph sparsification and sparsifying linear equations.