arXiv++ Combinatorics

We determine the full Sprague-Grundy sequence and its least period for a class of three-move subtraction games whose sequences are periodic from the start. Write the move set as $S=\{a,b,c\}$, with $0<a<b<c$ and $\gcd(a,b,c)=1$. The case $a=1$ is known and is summarized separately. For $a\ge2$ and $c\ne a+b$, we give three explicit sufficient tests for pure periodicity, associated with the candidate periods $a+b$, $c+a$, and $c+b$. For fixed $a,b$, the tests depend only on $c\bmod(a+b)$ and are computed from the losing positions of the two-move game $\{a,b\}$. Whenever a test succeeds, we give the losing positions in closed form, reconstruct the remaining values, and prove that the least period is the smallest candidate whose test succeeds. The construction shows how the added move $c$ modifies the two-move pattern to form a repeating block. We also give a uniform formulation of the known additive case $c=a+b$. For $a\ge2$, we conjecture that the tests cover every purely periodic non-additive game. In this range, when $c\ge2(a+b)$, we prove necessity for purely periodic games with least period at most $a+b$.

We find some significant special cases of subtraction games with infinite subtraction sets, whose outcome sequences are periodic, but whose SG value sequences are bounded and aperiodic.

We investigate {\sc Full Support (FS)}, a {\sc Partizan Subtraction} game in which the players can remove any number of pebbles from the heap up to certain bounds that are typically different for Left and Right. The player with the richer move set always wins for all but finitely many heap sizes. We confirm this advantage by finding the general canonical form and the atomic weights of this game. To restore fairness (and peace), we introduce {\sc Truncated Support (TS)}, which essentially trims the larger subtraction set from below. If the truncation is shallow, the unfairness persists above a certain heap size, and one player continues ruling. If the truncation is deep, another player starts ruling. Interestingly, there is one more balanced truncation level in the middle, for which a non-trivial periodicity emerges, and where it has infinitely many $\mathcal P$ and $\mathcal N$-positions. We also explore the atomic weights for the lightly trimmed scenarios.

We model Herman Kahn's escalation ladder as an impartial combinatorial game. Reindexing each rung by its distance to the nuclear threshold turns the ladder into a subtraction game, the most tractable class in combinatorial game theory, and the doctrinal fact that no side wishes to fire first selects the misere convention. We prove that single-ladder stability is governed by a congruence (Theorem 4.1) and derive a ladder-design corollary that makes the burden of first escalation a function of ladder length and escalation granularity (Corollary 4.2). For simultaneous theaters we show, under normal play, that joint stability is the Nim-sum of the theater-wise escalation distances (Theorem 5.2), a condition that is neither additive nor dominated by the most dangerous theater. We then show the Nim-sum reduction fails under misere play, introduce the misere quotient as its replacement, and prove by exhaustive backward induction that for two-step escalation the quotient is the order-six monoid with generators a, b satisfying a^2=1 and b^3=b, with loss set {a,b^2} (Theorem 6.3). To our knowledge, impartial combinatorial game theory has not previously been applied to nuclear escalation ladders; the existing game-theoretic literature on escalation is classical and payoff-based.

We determine the full nim-value structure of additive subtraction games in the {\em primitive quadratic} regime. The problem appears in Winning Ways by Berlekamp et al. in 1982; it includes a closed formula, involving Beatty-type {\em bracket expressions} on rational moduli, for determining the P-positions, but to the best of our knowledge, a complete proof of this claim has not yet appeared in the literature; Miklós and Post (2024) established outcome-periodicity, but without reference to that closed formula. The primitive quadratic case captures the source of the quadratic complexity of the problem, a claim supported by recent research in the dual setting of sink subtraction with Bhagat et al. This study focuses on a number theoretic solution involving the classical closed formula, and we establish that each nim-value sequence resides on a linear shift of the classical P-positions.

Subtraction games are a classical topic in Combinatorial Game Theory. A result of Golomb~(1966) shows that every subtraction game with a finite move set has an eventually periodic nim-sequence, but the known proof yields only an exponential upper bound on the period length. Flammenkamp (1997) conjectures a striking classification for three-move subtraction games: non-additive rulesets exhibit linear period lengths of the form ``the sum of two moves'', where the choice of which two moves displays fractal-like behavior, while additive sets $S=\{a,b,a+b\}$ have purely periodic outcomes with linear or quadratic period lengths. Despite early attention in \emph{Winning Ways} (1982), the general additive case remains open. We introduce and analyze a dual winning convention, which we call {\sc sink subtraction}. Unlike the standard wall convention, where moves to negative positions are forbidden, the sink convention declares a player the winner upon moving to a non-positive position. We show that {\sc additive sink subtraction} admits a complete solution: the nim-sequence is purely periodic with an explicit linear or quadratic period formula, and we conjecture a duality between additive sink subtraction and classical wall subtraction. Keywords: Additive Subtraction Game, Nimber, Periodicity, Sink Convention.

Subtraction games have a rich literature as normal-play combinatorial games (e.g., Berlekamp, Conway, and Guy, 1982). Recently, the theory has been extended to zero-sum scoring play (Cohensius et al. 2019). Here, we take the approach of cumulative self-interest games, as introduced in a recent framework preprint by Larsson, Meir, and Zick. By adapting standard Pure Subgame Perfect Equilibria (PSPE) from classical game theory, players must declare and commit to acting either ``friendly'' or ``antagonistic'' in case of indifference. Whenever the subtraction set has size two, we establish a tie-breaking rule monotonicity: a friendly player can never benefit by a deterministic deviation to antagonistic play. This type of terminology is new to both ``economic'' and ``combinatorial'' games, but it becomes essential in the self-interest cumulative setting. The main result is an immediate consequence of the tie-breaking rule's monotonicity; in the case of two-action subtraction sets, two antagonistic players are never better off than two friendly players, i.e., their PSPE utilities are never greater. For larger subtraction sets, we conjecture that the main result continues to hold, while tie-breaking monotonicity may fail, and we provide empirical evidence in support of both statements.

In this article, we study the behavior of a broad family of real sequences derived from randomized one-pile subtraction games. For any subtraction set $S$, we allow any valid number of chips $s\in S$ to be removed at equal probability at any given position and we study the sequences $(a_n^S)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ representing the probability of winning the game from a position with $n$ chips. We characterize these sequences in terms of linear recurrence relations and examine their behavior as $n\rightarrow\infty$ for all finite $S$. We fully solve the cases for subtraction sets of fewer than 3 elements and partially complete the general case for arbitrary $S$.

In this survey we revisit {\sc finite subtraction}, one-heap subtraction games on finite rulesets. The main purpose is to give a general overview of the development, and specifically to draw attention to Flammenkamp's thesis (1997), where he, contrary to other studies, experimentally observes exponential eventual period length of the outcomes, for a carefully selected subclass of games. In addition, we contribute an appendix on {\sc finite excluded subtraction} by Suetsugu.

Arc-Kayles is a game where two players alternate removing two adjacent vertices until no move is left, the winner being the player who played the last move. Introduced in 1978, its computational complexity is still open. More recently, subtraction games, where the players cannot disconnect the graph while removing vertices, were introduced. In particular, Arc-Kayles admits a non-disconnecting variant that is a subtraction game. We study the computational complexity of subtraction games on graphs, proving that they are PSPACE-complete even on very structured graph classes (split, bipartite of any even girth). We give a quadratic kernel for Non-Disconnecting Arc-Kayles when parameterized by the feedback edge number, as well as polynomial-time algorithms for clique trees and a subclass of threshold graphs. We also show that a sufficient condition for a second player-win on Arc-Kayles is equivalent to the graph isomorphism problem.

Given a finite set of positive integers, $A$, and starting with a heap of $n$ chips, Alice and Bob alternate turns and on each turn a player chooses $x\in A$ with $x$ smaller or equal than the current number of chips and subtract $x$ chips from the heap. The game terminates when the current number of chips becomes smaller than $\min\{A\}$ and no moves are possible. The player who makes the last move is the winner. We can define $w^A(n)$ to be $1$ if Alice has a winning strategy with a starting heap of $n$ chips and $0$ if Bob has a winning strategy. By the Pigeonhole Principle, $w^A(n)$ becomes periodic, and it is easy to see that the period length is at most an exponential function of $\max\{A\}$. The typical period length is a linear function of $\max\{A\}$, and it is a long time open question if exponential period length is possible. We consider a slight modification of this game by introducing an initial seed $S$ that tells for the few initial numbers of chips whether the current or the opposite player is the winner. In this paper we show that the initial seed cannot change the period length of $w^A(n)$ if the size of $A$ is $1$ or $2$, but it can change the period length with $|A| \geq 3$. Further, we exhibit a class of sets $A$ of size $3$ and corresponding initial seeds such that the period length becomes a superpolynomial function of $\max\{A\}$.

This paper concerns two-player alternating play combinatorial games (Conway 1976) in the normal-play convention, i.e. last move wins. Specifically, we study impartial vector subtraction games on tuples of nonnegative integers (Golomb 1966), with finite subtraction sets. In case of two move rulesets we find a complete solution, via a certain $\mathcal{P}$-to-$\mathcal{P}$ principle (where $\mathcal{P}$ means that the previous player wins). Namely $x \in \mathcal{P}$ if and only if $x +a +b \in \mathcal{P}$, where $a$ and $b$ are the two move options. Flammenkamp 1997 observed that, already in one dimension, rulesets with three moves can be hard to analyze, and still today his related conjecture remains open. Here, we solve instances of rulesets with three moves in two dimensions, and conjecture that they all have regular outcomes. Through several computer visualizations of outcomes of multi-move two-dimensional rulesets, we observe that they tend to partition the game board into periodic mosaics on very few regions/segments, which can depend on the number of moves in a ruleset. For example, we have found a five-move ruleset with an outcome segmentation into six semi-infinite slices. In this spirit, we develop a coloring automaton that generalizes the $\mathcal{P}$-to-$\mathcal{P}$ principle. Given an initial set of colored positions, it quickly paints the $\mathcal{P}$-positions in segments of the game board. Moreover, we prove that two-dimensional rulesets have row/column eventually periodic outcomes. We pose open problems on the generic hardness of two-dimensional rulesets; several regularity conjectures are provided, but we also conjecture that not all rulesets have regular outcomes.

We find conditions under which the P-positions of three subtraction games arise as pairs of complementary Beatty sequences. The first game is due to Fraenkel and the second is an extension of the first game to non-monotone settings. We show that the P-positions of the second game can be inferred from the recurrence of Fraenkel's paper if a certain inequality is satisfied. This inequality is shown to be necessary if the P-positions are known to be pairs of complementary Beatty sequences, and the family of irrationals for which this inequality holds is explicitly given. We highlight several games in the literature that have P-positions as pairs of complementary Beatty sequences with slope in this family. The third game we present is novel, and we show that the P-positions can be inferred from the same recurrence in any setting. It is shown that any pair of complementary Beatty sequences arises as the P-positions of some game in this family. We also provide background on some inverse problems which have appeared in the field over the last several years, in particular the Duchêne-Rigo conjecture. This paper presents a solution to the Fraenkel problem posed at the 2011 BIRS workshop, a modification of the Duchêne-Rigo conjecture.

Partizan subtraction games are combinatorial games where two players, say Left and Right, alternately remove a number n of tokens from a heap of tokens, with $n \in S_L$ (resp. $n \in S_R$) when it is Left's (resp. Right's) turn. The first player unable to move loses. These games were introduced by Fraenkel and Kotzig in 1987, where they introduced the notion of dominance, i.e. an asymptotic behavior of the outcome sequence where Left always wins if the heap is sufficiently large. In the current paper, we investigate the other kinds of behaviors for the outcome sequence. In addition to dominance, three other disjoint behaviors are defined, namely weak dominance, fairness and ultimate impartiality. We consider the problem of computing this behavior with respect to $S_L$ and $S_R$, which is connected to the well-known Frobenius coin problem. General results are given, together with arithmetic and geometric characterizations when the sets $S_L$ and $S_R$ have size at most 2.

We study algorithmic complexity of solving subtraction games in a~fixed dimension with a finite difference set. We prove that there exists a game in this class such that any algorithm solving the game runs in exponential time. Also we prove an existence of a game in this class such that solving the game is PSPACE-hard. The results are based on the construction introduced by Larsson and Wästlund. It relates subtraction games and cellular automata.

For impartial games $Γ$ and $Γ'$, the Sprague-Grundy function of the disjunctive sum $Γ+ Γ'$ is equal to the Nim-sum of their Sprague-Grundy functions. In this paper, we introduce $p$-calm subtraction games, and show that for $p$-calm subtraction games $Γ$ and $Γ'$, the Sprague-Grundy function of a $p$-saturation of $Γ+ Γ'$ is equal to the $p$-Nim-sum of the Sprague-Grundy functions of their $p$-saturations. Here a $p$-Nim-sum is the result of addition without carrying in base $p$ and a $p$-saturation of $Γ$ is an impartial game obtained from $Γ$ by adding some moves. It will turn out that Nim and Welter's game are $p$-calm. Further, using the $p$-calmness of Welter's game, we generalize a relation between Welter's game and representations of symmetric groups to disjunctive sums of Welter's games and representations of generalized symmetric groups; this result is described combinatorially in terms of Young diagrams.

In this paper, we study a combination (called the generalized cyclic Nimhoff) of the cyclic Nimhoff and subtraction games. We give the $\mathcal{G}$-value of the game when all the $\mathcal{G}$-value sequence of subtraction games have a common $h$-stair structure.

The present paper deals with connected subtraction games in graphs, which are generalization of takeaway games. In a connected subtraction game, two players alternate removing a connected sub-graph from a given connected game-graph, provided the resulting graph is connected, and provided the number of vertices of the removed subgraph belongs to a prescribed set of integers. We derive general periodicity results on such games, as well as specific results when played on subdivided stars.

A comply/constrain game or a game with a Muller twist is a game where the next player is allowed to place constraints on opponent's next move. We develop a closed form formula for the Grundy value of the single-pile subtraction game where the next player may determine whether the previous player has to select a move from the set of some first k natural numbers or its complement. We also investigate the periodicity of Grundy values when the set of legal moves is from a set of finite arithmetic sequences.

We study zero-sum games, a variant of the classical combinatorial Subtraction games (studied for example in the monumental work "Winning Ways", by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy), called Cumulative Subtraction (CS). Two players alternate in moving, and get points for taking pebbles out of a joint pile. We prove that the outcome in optimal play (game value) of a CS with a finite number of possible actions is eventually periodic, with period $2s$, where $s$ is the size of the largest available action. This settles a conjecture by Stewart in his Ph.D. thesis (2011). Specifically, we find a quadratic bound, in the size of $s$, on when the outcome function must have become periodic. In case of two possible actions, we give an explicit description of optimal play. We generalize the periodicity result to games with a so-called reward function, where at each stage of game, the change of `score' does not necessarily equal the number of pebbles you collect.