arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $G$ be a connected graph and $\cal X \subseteq V(G)$. By definition, two vertices $u$ and $v$ are $\cal X$-visible in $G$ if there exists a shortest $u,v$-path with all internal vertices being outside of the set $\cal X$. The largest size of $\cal X$ such that any two vertices of $G$ (resp. any two vertices from $\cal X$) are $\cal X$-visible is the total mutual-visibility number (resp. the mutual-visibility number) of $G$. In this paper, we determine the total mutual-visibility number of Kneser graphs, bipartite Kneser graphs, and Johnson graphs. The formulas proved for Kneser, and bipartite Kneser graphs are related to the size of transversal-critical uniform hypergraphs, while the total mutual-visibility number of Johnson graphs is equal to a hypergraph Turán number. Exact values or estimations for the mutual-visibility number over these graph classes are also established.

A monitoring edge-geodetic set, or simply an MEG-set, of a graph $G$ is a vertex subset $M \subseteq V(G)$ such that given any edge $e$ of $G$, $e$ lies on every shortest $u$-$v$ path of $G$, for some $u,v \in M$. The monitoring edge-geodetic number of $G$, denoted by $meg(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of such an MEG-set. This notion provides a graph theoretic model of the network monitoring problem. In this article, we compare $meg(G)$ with some other graph theoretic parameters stemming from the network monitoring problem and provide examples of graphs having prescribed values for each of these parameters. We also characterize graphs $G$ that have $V(G)$ as their minimum MEG-set, which settles an open problem due to Foucaud \textit{et al.} (CALDAM 2023), and prove that some classes of graphs fall within this characterization. We also provide a general upper bound for $meg(G)$ for sparse graphs in terms of their girth, and later refine the upper bound using the chromatic number of $G$. We examine the change in $meg(G)$ with respect to two fundamental graph operations: clique-sum and subdivisions. In both cases, we provide a lower and an upper bound of the possible amount of changes and provide (almost) tight examples.

The general position problem in graphs is to find the maximum number of vertices that can be selected such that no three vertices lie on a common shortest path. The mutual-visibility problem in graphs is to find the maximum number of vertices that can be selected such that every pair of vertices in the collection has a shortest path between them with no vertex from the collection as an internal vertex. In this paper, the general position problem and the mutual-visibility problem is investigated in double graphs and in Mycielskian graphs. Sharp general bounds are proved, in particular involving the total mutual-visibility number and the outer mutual-visibility number of base graphs. Several exact values are also determined, in particular the mutual-visibility number of the double graphs and of the Mycielskian of cycles.

Let $X$ be a vertex subset of a graph $G$. Then $u, v\in V(G)$ are $X$-positionable if $V(P)\cap X \subseteq \{u,v\}$ holds for any shortest $u,v$-path $P$. If each two vertices from $X$ are $X$-positionable, then $X$ is a general position set. The general position number of $G$ is the cardinality of a largest general position set of $G$ and has been already well investigated. In this paper a variety of general position problems is introduced based on which natural pairs of vertices are required to be $X$-positionable. This yields the total (resp.\ dual, outer) general position number. It is proved that the total general position sets coincide with sets of simplicial vertices, and that the outer general position sets coincide with sets of mutually maximally distant vertices. It is shown that a general position set is a dual general position set if and only if its complement is convex. Several sufficient conditions are presented that guarantee that a given graph has no dual general position set. The total general position number, the outer general position number, and the dual general position number of arbitrary Cartesian products are determined.

A graph $H$ is said to be an induced minor of a graph $G$ if $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by a sequence of vertex deletions and edge contractions. Equivalently, $H$ is an induced minor of $G$ if there exists an induced minor model of $H$ in $G$, that is, a collection of pairwise disjoint subsets of vertices of $G$ labeled by the vertices of $H$, each inducing a connected subgraph in $G$, such that two vertices of $H$ are adjacent if and only if there is an edge in $G$ between the corresponding subsets. In this paper, we investigate structural properties of induced minor models, including bounds on treewidth and chromatic number of the subgraphs induced by minimal induced minor models. It is known that for some graphs $H$, testing whether a given graph $G$ contains $H$ as an induced minor is an NP-complete problem. Nevertheless, as algorithmic applications of our structural results, we make use of recent developments regarding tree-independence number to show that if $H$ is the $4$-wheel, the $5$-vertex complete graph minus an edge, or a complete bipartite graph $K_{2,q}$, then there is a polynomial-time algorithm to find in a given graph $G$ an induced minor model of $H$ in $G$, if there is one. We also develop an alternative polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing graphs that do not contain $K_{2,3}$ as an induced minor, which revolves around the idea of detecting the induced subgraphs whose presence is forced when the input graph contains $K_{2,3}$ as an induced minor, using the so-called shortest path detector. It turns out that all these induced subgraphs are Truemper configurations.

A subset $M$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a mutual-visibility set if any two vertices $u$ and $v$ in $M$ ``see'' each other in $G$, that is, there exists a shortest $u,v$-path in $G$ that contains no elements of $M$ as internal vertices. The mutual-visibility number $μ(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the largest size of a mutual-visibility set in $G$. Let $n\in\mathbb{N}$ and $Q_{n}$ be an $n$-dimensional hypercube. Cicerone, Fonso, Di Stefano, Navarra, and Piselli showed that $2^{n}/\sqrt{n}\leqμ(Q_{n})\leq2^{n-1}$. In this paper, we prove that $μ(Q_{n})>0.186\cdot2^n$ and thus establish that $μ(Q_{n})=Θ(2^{n})$. We also consider the chromatic mutual-visibility number, $χ_μ(G)$, that is the smallest number of colors used on vertices of $G$, such that every color class is a mutual-visibility set. Klavžar, Kuziak, Valenzuela-Tripodoro, and Yero asked whether it is true that $χ_μ(Q_{n})=O(1)$. We answer their question in the negative by showing that $ω(1)=χ_μ(Q_{n})=O(\log\log{n})$. Finally, we study the so-called total mutual-visibility number of graphs and give asymptotically tight bounds on this parameter for hypercubes.

Given a metric space $(X,d_X)$, a $(β,s,Δ)$-sparse cover is a collection of clusters $\mathcal{C}\subseteq P(X)$ with diameter at most $Δ$, such that for every point $x\in X$, the ball $B_X(x,\fracΔβ)$ is fully contained in some cluster $C\in \mathcal{C}$, and $x$ belongs to at most $s$ clusters in $\mathcal{C}$. Our main contribution is to show that the shortest path metric of every $K_r$-minor free graphs admits $(O(r),O(r^2),Δ)$-sparse cover, and for every $ε>0$, $(4+ε,O(\frac1ε)^r,Δ)$-sparse cover (for arbitrary $Δ>0$). We then use this sparse cover to show that every $K_r$-minor free graph embeds into $\ell_\infty^{\tilde{O}(\frac1ε)^{r+1}\cdot\log n}$ with distortion $3+ε$ (resp. into $\ell_\infty^{\tilde{O}(r^2)\cdot\log n}$ with distortion $O(r)$). Further, among other applications, this sparse cover immediately implies an algorithm for the oblivious buy-at-bulk problem in fixed minor free graphs with the tight approximation factor $O(\log n)$ (previously nothing beyond general graphs was known).

A subset of vertices of a graph $G$ is a general position set if no triple of vertices from the set lie on a common shortest path in $G$. In this paper we introduce the general position polynomial as $\sum_{i \geq 0} a_i x^i$, where $a_i$ is the number of distinct general position sets of $G$ with cardinality $i$. The polynomial is considered for several well-known classes of graphs and graph operations. It is shown that the polynomial is not unimodal in general, not even on trees. On the other hand, several classes of graphs, including Kneser graphs $K(n,2)$, with unimodal general position polynomials are presented.

The mutual-visibility problem in a graph $G$ asks for the cardinality of a largest set of vertices $S\subseteq V(G)$ so that for any two vertices $x,y\in S$ there is a shortest $x,y$-path $P$ so that all internal vertices of $P$ are not in $S$. This is also said as $x,y$ are visible with respect to $S$, or $S$-visible for short. Variations of this problem are known, based on the extension of the visibility property of vertices that are in and/or outside $S$. Such variations are called total, outer and dual mutual-visibility problems. This work is focused on studying the corresponding four visibility parameters in graphs of diameter two, throughout showing bounds and/or closed formulae for these parameters. The mutual-visibility problem in the Cartesian product of two complete graphs is equivalent to (an instance of) the celebrated Zarankievicz's problem. Here we study the dual and outer mutual-visibility problem for the Cartesian product of two complete graphs and all the mutual-visibility problems for the direct product of such graphs as well. We also study all the mutual-visibility problems for the line graphs of complete and complete bipartite graphs. As a consequence of this study, we present several relationships between the mentioned problems and some instances of the classical Turán problem. Moreover, we study the visibility problems for cographs and several non-trivial diameter-two graphs of minimum size.

In a digraph, a quasi-kernel is a subset of vertices that is independent and such that the shortest path from every vertex to this subset is of length at most two. The ``small quasi-kernel conjecture,'' proposed by Erdős and Székely in 1976, postulates that every sink-free digraph has a quasi-kernel whose size is within a fraction of the total number of vertices. The conjecture is even more precise with a $1/2$ ratio, but even with larger ratio, this property is known to hold only for few classes of graphs. The focus here is on small quasi-kernels in split graphs. This family of graphs has played a special role in the study of the conjecture since it was used to disprove a strengthening that postulated the existence of two disjoint quasi-kernels. The paper proves that every sink-free split digraph $D$ has a quasi-kernel of size at most $\frac{2}{3}|V(D)|$, and even of size at most two when the graph is an orientation of a complete split graph. It is also shown that computing a quasi-kernel of minimal size in a split digraph is W[2]-hard.

A set of vertices $X$ of a graph $G$ is a strong edge geodetic set if to any pair of vertices from $X$ we can assign one (or zero) shortest path between them such that every edge of $G$ is contained in at least one on these paths. The cardinality of a smallest strong edge geodetic set of $G$ is the strong edge geodetic number ${\rm sg_e}(G)$ of $G$. In this paper, the strong edge geodetic number of complete multipartite graphs is determined. Graphs $G$ with ${\rm sg_e}(G) = n(G)$ are characterized and ${\rm sg_e}$ is determined for Cartesian products $P_n\,\square\, K_m$. The latter result in particular corrects an error from the literature.

In the recently introduced framework of solution discovery via reconfiguration [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023], we are given an initial configuration of $k$ tokens on a graph and the question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution (for some problem) via a bounded number $b$ of small modification steps. In this work, we study solution discovery variants of polynomial-time solvable problems, namely Spanning Tree Discovery, Shortest Path Discovery, Matching Discovery, and Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery in the unrestricted token addition/removal model, the token jumping model, and the token sliding model. In the unrestricted token addition/removal model, we show that all four discovery variants remain in P. For the toking jumping model we also prove containment in P, except for Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery, for which we prove NP-completeness. Finally, in the token sliding model, almost all considered problems become NP-complete, the exception being Spanning Tree Discovery, which remains polynomial-time solvable. We then study the parameterized complexity of the NP-complete problems and provide a full classification of tractability with respect to the parameters solution size (number of tokens) $k$ and transformation budget (number of steps) $b$. Along the way, we observe strong connections between the solution discovery variants of our base problems and their (weighted) rainbow variants as well as their red-blue variants with cardinality constraints.

It is proved that the number of shortest paths between two vertices of distance $t$ in a graph with degrees bounded by $Δ$ is at most $2 \cdot (\fracΔ{2})^t$. This improves upon the naïve $Δ(Δ-1) ^{t-1}$ bound.

Let $G$ be a connected graph on $n$ vertices and $d_{ij}$ be the length of the shortest path between vertices $i$ and $j$ in $G$. We set $d_{ii}=0$ for every vertex $i$ in $G$. The squared distance matrix $Δ(G)$ of $G$ is the $n\times n$ matrix with $(i,j)^{th}$ entry equal to $0$ if $i = j$ and equal to $d_{ij}^2$ if $i \neq j$. For a given complete $t$-partite graph $K_{n_1,n_2,\cdots,n_t}$ on $n=\sum_{i=1}^t n_i$ vertices, under some condition we find the inverse $Δ(K_{n_1,n_2,\cdots,n_t})^{-1}$ as a rank-one perturbation of a symmetric Laplacian-like matrix $\mathcal{L}$ with $\textup{rank} (\mathcal{L})=n-1$. We also investigate the inertia of $\mathcal{L}$.

Base polytopes of polymatroids, also known as generalized permutohedra, are polytopes whose edges are parallel to a vector of the form $\mathbf{e}_i - \mathbf{e}_j$. We consider the following computational problem: Given two vertices of a generalized permutohedron $P$, find a shortest path between them on the skeleton of $P$. This captures many known flip distance problems, such as computing the minimum number of exchanges between two spanning trees of a graph, the rotation distance between binary search trees, the flip distance between acyclic orientations of a graph, or rectangulations of a square. We prove that this problem is $NP$-hard, even when restricted to very simple polymatroids in $\mathbb{R}^n$ defined by $O(n)$ inequalities. Assuming $P\not= NP$, this rules out the existence of an efficient simplex pivoting rule that performs a minimum number of nondegenerate pivoting steps to an optimal solution of a linear program, even when the latter defines a polymatroid. We also prove that the shortest path problem is inapproximable when the polymatroid is specified via an evaluation oracle for a corresponding submodular function, strengthening a recent result by Ito et al. (ICALP'23). More precisely, we prove the $APX$-hardness of the shortest path problem when the polymatroid is a hypergraphic polytope, whose vertices are in bijection with acyclic orientations of a given hypergraph. The shortest path problem then amounts to computing the flip distance between two acyclic orientations of a hypergraph. On the positive side, we provide a polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the problem of computing the flip distance between two acyclic orientations of a hypergraph, where the approximation factor is the maximum codegree of the hypergraph. Our result implies an exact polynomial-time algorithm for the flip distance between two acyclic orientations of any linear hypergraph.

For a given graph $G$, the mutual-visibility problem asks for the largest set of vertices $M \subseteq V(G)$ with the property that for any pair of vertices $u,v \in M$ there exists a shortest $u,v$-path of $G$ that does not pass through any other vertex in $M$. The mutual-visibility problem for Cartesian products of a cycle and a path, as well as for Cartesian products of two cycles, is considered. Optimal solutions are provided for the majority of Cartesian products of a cycle and a path, while for the other family of graphs, the problem is completely solved.

Given a graph $G$ rooted at a vertex $r$ and weight functions, $γ, τ: E(G) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, the generalized cable-trench problem (CTP) is to find a single spanning tree that simultaneously minimizes the sum of the total edge cost with respect to $τ$ and the single-source shortest paths cost with respect to $γ$. Although this problem is provably $NP$-complete in the general case, we examine certain tractable instances involving various graph constructions of trees and cycles, along with quantities associated to edges and vertices that arise out of these constructions. We show that given a graph in which all cycles are edge disjoint, there exists a fast method to determine a cable-trench solution. Further, we examine properties of graphs which contribute to the general intractability of the CTP and present some open questions in this direction.

The restoration lemma is a classic result by Afek, Bremler-Barr, Kaplan, Cohen, and Merritt [PODC '01], which relates the structure of shortest paths in a graph $G$ before and after some edges in the graph fail. Their work shows that, after one edge failure, any replacement shortest path avoiding this failing edge can be partitioned into two pre-failure shortest paths. More generally, this implies an additive tradeoff between fault tolerance and subpath count: for any $f, k$, we can partition any $f$-edge-failure replacement shortest path into $k+1$ subpaths which are each an $(f-k)$-edge-failure replacement shortest path. This generalized result has found applications in routing, graph algorithms, fault tolerant network design, and more. Our main result improves this to a multiplicative tradeoff between fault tolerance and subpath count. We show that for all $f, k$, any $f$-edge-failure replacement path can be partitioned into $O(k)$ subpaths that are each an $(f/k)$-edge-failure replacement path. We also show an asymptotically matching lower bound. In particular, our results imply that the original restoration lemma is exactly tight in the case $k=1$, but can be significantly improved for larger $k$. We also show an extension of this result to weighted input graphs, and we give efficient algorithms that compute path decompositions satisfying our improved restoration lemmas.

We provide novel lower bounds on the Betti numbers of Vietoris-Rips complexes of hypercube graphs of all dimensions, and at all scales. In more detail, let $Q_n$ be the vertex set of $2^n$ vertices in the $n$-dimensional hypercube graph, equipped with the shortest path metric. Let $VR(Q_n;r)$ be its Vietoris--Rips complex at scale parameter $r \ge 0$, which has $Q_n$ as its vertex set, and all subsets of diameter at most $r$ as its simplices. For integers $r<r'$ the inclusion $VR(Q_n;r)\hookrightarrow VR(Q_n;r')$ is nullhomotopic, meaning no persistent homology bars have length longer than one, and we therefore focus attention on the individual spaces $VR(Q_n;r)$. We provide lower bounds on the ranks of homology groups of $VR(Q_n;r)$. For example, using cross-polytopal generators, we prove that the rank of $H_{2^r-1}(VR(Q_n;r))$ is at least $2^{n-(r+1)}\binom{n}{r+1}$. We also prove a version of \emph{homology propagation}: if $q\ge 1$ and if $p$ is the smallest integer for which $rank H_q(VR(Q_p;r))\neq 0$, then $rank H_q(VR(Q_n;r)) \ge \sum_{i=p}^n 2^{i-p} \binom{i-1}{p-1} \cdot rank H_q(VR(Q_p;r))$ for all $n \ge p$. When $r\le 3$, this result and variants thereof provide tight lower bounds on the rank of $H_q(VR(Q_n;r))$ for all $n$, and for each $r \ge 4$ we produce novel lower bounds on the ranks of homology groups. Furthermore, we show that for each $r\ge 2$, the homology groups of $VR(Q_n;r)$ for $n \ge 2r+1$ contain propagated homology not induced by the initial cross-polytopal generators.

Let $G$ be a graph and $X\subseteq V(G)$. Then, vertices $x$ and $y$ of $G$ are $X$-visible if there exists a shortest $u,v$-path where no internal vertices belong to $X$. The set $X$ is a mutual-visibility set of $G$ if every two vertices of $X$ are $X$-visible, while $X$ is a total mutual-visibility set if any two vertices from $V(G)$ are $X$-visible. The cardinality of a largest mutual-visibility set (resp. total mutual-visibility set) is the mutual-visibility number (resp. total mutual-visibility number) $μ(G)$ (resp. $μ_t(G)$) of $G$. It is known that computing $μ(G)$ is an NP-complete problem, as well as $μ_t(G)$. In this paper, we study the (total) mutual-visibility in hypercube-like networks (namely, hypercubes, cube-connected cycles, and butterflies). Concerning computing $μ(G)$, we provide approximation algorithms for both hypercubes and cube-connected cycles, while we give an exact formula for butterflies. Concerning computing $μ_t(G)$ (in the literature, already studied in hypercubes), we provide exact formulae for both cube-connected cycles and butterflies.