arXiv++ Combinatorics

We extend the study of the occupancy fraction of the hard-core model in two novel directions. One direction gives a tight lower bound in terms of individual vertex degrees, extending work of Sah, Sawhney, Stoner and Zhao which bounds the partition function. The other bounds the variance of the size of an independent set drawn from the model, which is strictly stronger than bounding the occupancy fraction. In the setting of triangle-free graphs, we make progress on a recent conjecture of Buys, van den Heuvel and Kang on extensions of Shearer's classic bounds on the independence number to the occupancy fraction of the hard-core model. Sufficiently strong lower bounds on both the expectation and the variance in triangle-free graphs have the potential to improve the known bounds on the off-diagonal Ramsey number $R(3,t)$, and to shed light on the algorithmic barrier one observes for independent sets in sparse random graphs.

A tuple $(G_1,\dots,G_n)$ of graphs on the same vertex set of size $n$ is said to be Hamilton-universal if for every map $χ: [n]\to[n]$ there exists a Hamilton cycle whose $i$-th edge comes from $G_{χ(i)}$. Bowtell, Morris, Pehova and Staden proved an analog of Dirac's theorem in this setting, namely that if $δ(G_i)\geq (1/2+o(1))n$ then $(G_1,\dots,G_n)$ is Hamilton-universal. Combining McDiarmid's coupling and a colorful version of the Friedman-Pippenger tree embedding technique, we establish a similar result in the setting of sparse random graphs, showing that there exists $C$ such that if the $G_i$ are independent random graphs sampled from $G(n,p)$, where $p\geq C\log n/n$, then $(G_1,\dots,G_n)$ is Hamilton-universal with high probability.

We perform a detailed statistical study of the distribution of topological and spectral indices on random graphs $G=(V,E)$ in a wide range of connectivity regimes. First, we consider degree-based topological indices (TIs), and focus on two classes of them: $X_Σ(G) = \sum_{uv \in E} f(d_u,d_v)$ and $X_Π(G) = \prod_{uv \in E} g(d_u,d_v)$, where $uv$ denotes the edge of $G$ connecting the vertices $u$ and $v$, $d_u$ is the degree of the vertex $u$, and $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are functions of the vertex degrees. Specifically, we apply $X_Σ(G)$ and $X_Π(G)$ on Erdös-Rényi graphs and random geometric graphs along the full transition from almost isolated vertices to mostly connected graphs. While we verify that $P(X_Σ(G))$ converges to a standard normal distribution, we show that $P( X_Π(G))$ converges to a log-normal distribution. In addition we also analyze Revan-degree-based indices and spectral indices (those defined from the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the graph adjacency matrix). Indeed, for Revan-degree indices, we obtain results equivalent to those for standard degree-based TIs. Instead, for spectral indices, we report two distinct patterns: the distribution of indices defined only from eigenvalues approaches a normal distribution, while the distribution of those indices involving both eigenvalues and eigenvectors approaches a log-normal distribution.

In 2013, Bollobás, Mitsche, and Pralat at gave upper and lower bounds for the likely metric dimension of random Erdős-Rényi graphs $G(n,p)$ for a large range of expected degrees $d=pn$. However, their results only apply when $d \ge \log^5 n$, leaving open sparser random graphs with $d < \log^5 n$. Here we provide upper and lower bounds on the likely metric dimension of $G(n,p)$ from just above the connectivity transition, i.e., where $d=pn=c \log n$ for some $c > 1$, up to $d=\log^5 n$. Our lower bound technique is based on an entropic argument which is more general than the use of Suen's inequality by Bollobás, Mitsche, and Pralat, whereas our upper bound is similar to theirs.

We study the asymptotic diameter of the preferential attachment model $\operatorname{PA}\!_n^{(m,δ)}$ with parameters $m \ge 2$ and $δ> 0$. Building on the recent work \cite{VZ25}, we prove that the diameter of $G_n \sim \operatorname{PA}\!_n^{(m,δ)}$ is $(1+o(1))\log_νn$ with high probability, where $ν$ is the exponential growth rate of the local weak limit of $G_n$. Our result confirms the conjecture in \cite{VZ25} and closes the remaining gap in understanding the asymptotic diameter of preferential attachment graphs with general parameters $m \ge 1$ and $δ>-m$. Our proof follows a general recipe that relates the diameter of a random graph to its typical distance, which we expect to have applicability in a broader range of models.

A random graph order is a partial order obtained from a random graph on $[n]$ by taking the transitive closure of the adjacency relation. The dimension of the random graph orders from random bipartite graphs $B(n,n,p)$ and from $G(n,p)$ were previously studied when $p=Ω(\log n/n)$ and when $p$ is not too close to 1. There is a conjectured phase transition in the sparse range at $p=1/n$. In this paper, we investigate this conjectured phase transition and estimate the dimension of the partial orders arising from $B(n,n,p)$ and $G(n,p)$ when $p=O(1/n)$. For the random bipartite order, we additionally estimate its dimension in the co-sparse regime, thereby closing all previously open ranges of $p$. Finally, we establish a general upper bound on the dimension of partial orders based on their decompositions into suborders, a result that is of independent interest.

Modularity is a parameter indicating the presence of community structure in the graph. Nowadays it lies at the core of widely used clustering algorithms. We study the modularity of the most classical random graph, binomial $G(n,p)$. In 2020 McDiarmid and Skerman proved, taking advantage of the spectral graph theory and a specific subgraph construction by Coja-Oghlan from 2007, that there exists a constant $b$ such that with high probability the modularity of $G(n,p)$ is at most $b/\sqrt{np}$. The obtained constant $b$ is very big and not easily computable. We improve upon this result showing that a constant under $3$ may be derived here. Interesting is the fact that it might be obtained by basic probabilistic tools. We also address the lower bound on the modularity of $G(n,p)$ and improve the results of McDiarmid and Skerman from 2020 using estimates of bisections of random graphs derived by Dembo, Montanari, and Sen in 2017.

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is geometrically embeddable into a normed space $X$ when there is a mapping $ζ: V\to X$ such that $\|ζ(v)-ζ(w)\|_X\leqslant 1$ if and only if $\{v,w\}\in E$, for all distinct $v,w\in V$. Our result is the following universal threshold for the embeddability of trees. Let $Δ\geqslant 3$, and let $N$ be sufficiently large in terms of $Δ$. Every $N$--vertex tree of maximal degree at most $Δ$ is embeddable into any normed space of dimension at least $64\,\frac{\log N}{\log\log N}$, and complete trees are non-embeddable into any normed space of dimension less than $\frac{1}{2}\,\frac{\log N}{\log\log N}$. In striking contrast, spectral expanders and random graphs are known to be non-embeddable in sublogarithmic dimension. Our result is based on a randomized embedding whose analysis utilizes the recent breakthroughs on Bourgain's slicing problem.

For many standard models of random structure, first-order logic sentences exhibit a convergence phenomenon on random inputs. The most well-known example is for random graphs with constant edge probability, where the probabilities of first-order sentences converge to 0 or 1. In other cases, such as certain ``sparse random graph'' models, the probabilities of sentences converge, although not necessarily to 0 or 1. In this work we deal with extensions of first-order logic with aggregate operators, variations of averaging. These logics will consist of real-valued terms, and we allow arbitrary Lipschitz functions to be used as ``connectives''. We show that some of the well-known convergence laws extend to this setting.

This work focuses on showing some arguments addressed to dismantle the extended idea about that social networks completely lacks of privacy properties. We consider the so-called active attacks to the privacy of social networks and the counterpart $(k,\ell)$-anonymity measure, which is used to quantify the privacy satisfied by a social network against active attacks. To this end, we make use of the graph theoretical concept of $k$-metric antidimensional graphs for which the case $k=1$ represents those graphs achieving the worst scenario in privacy whilst considering the $(k,\ell)$-anonymity measure. As a product of our investigation, we present a large number of computational results stating that social networks might not be as insecure as one often thinks. In particular, we develop a large number of experiments on random graphs which show that the number of $1$-metric antidimensional graphs is indeed ridiculously small with respect to the total number of graphs that can be considered. Moreover, we search on several real networks in order to check if they are $1$-metric antidimensional, and obtain that none of them are such. Along the way, we show some theoretical studies on the mathematical properties of the $k$-metric antidimensional graphs for any suitable $k\ge 1$. In addition, we also describe some operations on graphs that are $1$-metric antidimensional so that they get embedded into another larger graphs that are not such, in order to obscure their privacy properties against active attacks.

We study the algorithmic problem of finding a large independent set in the Erd{ö}s-Rényi random graph $G(n,p)$. For constant $p$ and $b=1/(1-p)$, the largest independent set has size $2\log_b n$, while a simple greedy algorithm - revealing vertices sequentially and making decisions based only on previously seen vertices - finds an independent set of size $\log_b n$. In his seminal 1976 paper, Karp challenged to either improve this guarantee or establish its hardness. Decades later, this problem remains open - one of the most prominent algorithmic problems in the theory of random graphs. In this paper, we establish that a broad class of online algorithms fails to find an independent set of size $(1+ε)\log_b n$ whp. This class includes Karp's algorithm as a special case, and extends it by allowing the algorithm to query exceptional edges, not yet "seen" by the algorithm. Our lower bound holds for $p\in [d/n,1-n^{-1/d}]$. In the dense regime (constant $p$), we also prove that our result is asymptotically tight with respect to the number of exceptional edges queried, by designing an online algorithm which beats the half-optimality threshold when the number of exceptional edges slightly exceeds our bound. Our result provides evidence for the algorithmic hardness of Karp's problem, by supporting the conjectured optimality of the greedy algorithm and establishing it within the class of online algorithms. Our proof relies on a refined analysis of the geometric structure of large independent sets, establishing a variant of the Overlap Gap Property (OGP). While OGP has predominantly served as a barrier to stable algorithms, online algorithms are inherently unstable, necessitating new ideas. Our proof refines the OGP framework by incorporating several new ideas (including temporal interpolation paths and stopping-times) that we expect to be useful for other online models.

We propose a novel exact algorithm for generating connected Erdos-Renyi random graphs $G(n,p)$. The method couples the graph exploration process to an inhomogeneous Poisson random walk, which yields an exact sampler that runs in $O(n)$ time in the sparse regime $p=c/n$. We also show how the method extends to the $G(n,M)$ model via an additional acceptance-rejection step.

We study the distribution of the set of copies of some given graph $H$ in the random graph $G(n,p)$, focusing on the case when $H = K_r$. Our main results capture the 'leading term' in the difference between this distribution and the 'independent hypergraph model', where (in the case $H = K_r$) each copy is present independently with probability $π= p^{\binom{r}{2}}$. As a concrete application, we derive a new upper bound on the number of $K_r$-factors in $G(n,p)$ above the threshold for such factors to appear. We will prove our main results in a much more general setting, so that they also apply to random hypergraphs, and also (for example) to the case when $p$ is constant and $r = r(n) \sim 2\log_{1/p}(n)$.

Consider a `dense' Erdős--Rényi random graph model $G=G_{n,M}$ with $n$ vertices and $M$ edges, where we assume the edge density $M/\binom{n}{2}$ is bounded away from 0 and 1. Fix $k=k(n)$ with $k/n$ bounded away from 0 and~1, and let $S$ be a random subset of size $k$ of the vertices of $G$. We show that with probability $1-\exp(-n^{Ω(1)})$, $G$ satisfies both a central limit theorem and a local limit theorem for the empirical distribution of the edge count $e(G[S])$ of the subgraph of $G$ induced by $S$, where the distribution is over uniform random choices of the $k$-set $S$.

The problems of detecting and recovering planted structures/subgraphs in Erdős-Rényi random graphs, have received significant attention over the past three decades, leading to many exciting results and mathematical techniques. However, prior work has largely focused on specific ad hoc planted structures and inferential settings, while a general theory has remained elusive. In this paper, we bridge this gap by investigating the detection of an \emph{arbitrary} planted subgraph $Γ= Γ_n$ in an Erdős-Rényi random graph $\mathcal{G}(n, q_n)$, where the edge probability within $Γ$ is $p_n$. We examine both the statistical and computational aspects of this problem and establish the following results. In the dense regime, where the edge probabilities $p_n$ and $q_n$ are fixed, we tightly characterize the information-theoretic and computational thresholds for detecting $Γ$, and provide conditions under which a computational-statistical gap arises. Most notably, these thresholds depend on $Γ$ only through its number of edges, maximum degree, and maximum subgraph density. Our lower and upper bounds are general and apply to any value of $p_n$ and $q_n$ as functions of $n$. Accordingly, we also analyze the sparse regime where $q_n = Θ(n^{-α})$ and $p_n-q_n =Θ(q_n)$, with $α\in[0,2]$, as well as the critical regime where $p_n=1-o(1)$ and $q_n = Θ(n^{-α})$, both of which have been widely studied, for specific choices of $Γ$. For these regimes, we show that our bounds are tight for all planted subgraphs investigated in the literature thus far\textemdash{}and many more. Finally, we identify conditions under which detection undergoes sharp phase transition, where the boundaries at which algorithms succeed or fail shift abruptly as a function of $q_n$.

For $t \in \mathbb{N}$, we say that a colouring of $E(K_n)$ is $\textit{almost}$ $t$-$\textit{Gallai}$ if no two rainbow $t$-cliques share an edge. Motivated by a lemma of Berkowitz on bounding the modulus of the characteristic function of clique counts in random graphs, we study the maximum number $τ_t(n)$ of rainbow $t$-cliques in an almost $t$-Gallai colouring of $E(K_n)$. For every $t \ge 4$, we show that $n^{2-o(1)} \leq τ_t(n) = o(n^2)$. For $t=3$, surprisingly, the behaviour is substantially different. Our main result establishes that $$\left ( \frac{1}{2}-o(1) \right ) n\log n \le τ_3(n) = O\big (n^{\sqrt{2}}\log n \big ),$$ which gives the first non-trivial improvements over the simple lower and upper bounds. Our proof combines various applications of the probabilistic method and a generalisation of the edge-isoperimetric inequality for the hypercube.

There has been much interest in the distribution of the circumference, the length of the longest cycle, of a random graph $G(n,p)$ in the sparse regime, when $p = Θ\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$. Recently, the first author and Frieze established a scaling limit for the circumference in this regime, along the way establishing an alternative 'structural' approximation for this parameter. In this paper, we give a central limit theorem for the circumference in this regime using a novel argument based on the Efron-Stein inequality, which relies on a combinatorial analysis of the effect of resampling edges on this approximation.

We study the evolution of majority dynamics on Erdős-Rényi $G(n,p)$ random graphs. In this process, each vertex of a graph is assigned one of two initial states. Subsequently, on every day, each vertex simultaneously updates its state to the most common state in its neighbourhood. If the difference in the numbers of vertices in each state on day $0$ is larger than $ \max \left\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{p}} \exp\left[A\sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{p}\right)}\right] , Bp^{-3/2} n^{-1/2} \right\}$ for constants $A$ and $B$, we demonstrate that the state with the initial majority wins with overwhelmingly high probability. This extends work by Linh Tran and Van Vu (2023), who previously considered this phenomenon. We also study majority dynamics with a random initial assignment of vertex states. When each vertex is assigned to a state with equal probability, we show that unanimity occurs with high probability for every $p \geq λn^{-2/3}$, for some constant $λ$. This improves work by Fountoulakis, Kang and Makai (2020). Furthermore, we also consider a random initial assignment of vertex states where a vertex is slightly more likely to be in the first state than the second state. Previous work by Zehmakan (2018) and Tran and Vu (2023) provided conditions on how big this bias needs to be for the first colour to achieve unanimity with high probability. We strengthen these results by providing a weaker sufficient condition.

Fix a sequence of $d$-regular graphs $(G_d)_{d\in \mathbb{N}}$ and denote by $G_{d,p}$ the graph obtained from $G_d$ after edge-percolation with probability $p=c/d$, for a constant $c>0$. We prove a quantitative local convergence of $(G_{d,p})_{d\in \mathbb{N}}$. In combination with results of Bordenave, Lelarge and Salez, it implies that the rescaled matching number of $G_{d,p}$ is asymptotically equivalent to that of the binomial random graph $G(n,c/n)$.

Majority dynamics is a process on a simple, undirected graph $G$ with an initial Red/Blue color for every vertex of $G$. Each day, each vertex updates its color following the majority among its neighbors, using its previous color for tie-breaking. The dynamics achieves \textit{unanimity} if every vertex has the same color after finitely many days, and such color is said to \textit{win}. When $G$ is a $G(n,p)$ random graph, L. Tran and Vu (2019) found a codition in terms of $p$ and the initial difference $2Δ$ beteween the sizes of the Red and Blue camps, such that unanimity is achieved with probability arbitrarily close to 1. They showed that if $pΔ^2 \gg1 $, $pΔ\geq 100$, and $p\geq (1+\varepsilon) n^{-1}\log n$ for a positive constant $\varepsilon$, then unanimity occurs with probability $1 - o(1)$. If $p$ is not extremely small, namely $p > \log^{-1/16} n $, then Sah and Sawhney (2022) showed that the condition $pΔ^2 \gg 1$ is sufficient. If $n^{-1}\log^2 n \ll p \ll n^{-1/2}\log^{1/4} n$, we show that $p^{3/2}Δ\gg n^{-1/2}\log n$ is enough. Since this condition holds if $pΔ\geq 100$ for $p$ in this range, this is an improvement of Tran's and Vu's result. For the closely related problem of finding the optimal condition for $p$ to achieve unanimity when the initial coloring is chosen uniformly at random among all possible Red/Blue assignments, our result implies a new lower bound $p \gg n^{-2/3}\log^{2/3} n$, which improves upon the previous bound of $n^{-3/5}\log n$ by Chakraborti, Kim, Lee and T. Tran (2021).