arXiv++ Combinatorics

Measures of tree balance play an important role in different research areas such as mathematical phylogenetics or theoretical computer science. The balance of a tree is usually quantified in a single number, called a balance or imbalance index, and several such indices exist in the literature. Here, we focus on the stairs2 balance index for rooted binary trees, which was first introduced in the context of viral phylogenetics but has not been fully analyzed from a mathematical viewpoint yet. While it is known that the caterpillar tree uniquely minimizes the stairs2 index for all leaf numbers and the fully balanced tree uniquely maximizes the stairs2 index for leaf numbers that are powers of two, understanding the maximum value and maximal trees for arbitrary leaf numbers is an open problem in the literature. In this note, we fill this gap by showing that for all leaf numbers, there is a unique rooted binary tree maximizing the stairs2 index. Additionally, we obtain recursive and closed expressions for the maximum value of the stairs2 index of a rooted binary tree with $n$ leaves.

Horizontal gene transfer inference approaches are usually based on gene sequences: parametric methods search for patterns that deviate from a particular genomic signature, while phylogenetic methods use sequences to reconstruct the gene and species trees. However, it is well-known that sequences have difficulty identifying ancient transfers since mutations have enough time to erase all evidence of such events. In this work, we ask whether character-based methods can predict gene transfers. Their advantage over sequences is that homologous genes can have low DNA similarity, but still have retained enough important common motifs that allow them to have common character traits, for instance the same functional or expression profile. A phylogeny that has two separate clades that acquired the same character independently might indicate the presence of a transfer even in the absence of sequence similarity. We introduce perfect transfer networks, which are phylogenetic networks that can explain the character diversity of a set of taxa under the assumption that characters have unique births, and that once a character is gained it is rarely lost. Examples of such traits include transposable elements, biochemical markers and emergence of organelles, just to name a few. We study the differences between our model and two similar models: perfect phylogenetic networks and ancestral recombination networks. Our goals are to initiate a study on the structural and algorithmic properties of perfect transfer networks. We then show that in polynomial time, one can decide whether a given network is a valid explanation for a set of taxa, and show how, for a given tree, one can add transfer edges to it so that it explains a set of taxa. We finally provide lower and upper bounds on the number of transfers required to explain a set of taxa, in the worst case.

Genome rearrangements are events where large blocks of DNA exchange places during evolution. The analysis of these events is a promising tool for understanding evolutionary genomics, providing data for phylogenetic reconstruction based on genome rearrangement measures. Many pairwise rearrangement distances have been proposed, based on finding the minimum number of rearrangement events to transform one genome into the other, using some predefined operation. When more than two genomes are considered, we have the more challenging problem of rearrangement-based phylogeny reconstruction. Given a set of genomes and a distance notion, there are at least two natural ways to define the "target" genome. On the one hand, finding a genome that minimizes the sum of the distances from this to any other, called the median genome. Finding a genome that minimizes the maximum distance to any other, called the closest genome. Considering genomes as permutations, some distance metrics have been extensively studied. We investigate median and closest problems on permutations over the metrics: breakpoint, swap, block-interchange, short-block-move, and transposition. In biological matters some values are usually small, such as the solution value d or the number k of input permutations. For each of these metrics and parameters d or k, we analyze the closest and the median problems from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. We obtain the following results: NP-hardness for finding the median/closest permutation for some metrics, even for k = 3; Polynomial kernels for the problems of finding the median permutation of all studied metrics, considering the target distance d as parameter; NP-hardness result for finding the closest permutation by short-block-moves; FPT algorithms and infeasibility of polynomial kernels for finding the closest permutation for some metrics parameterized by the target distance d.

In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic trees are commonly inferred from a set of characters (partitions) of a collection of biological entities (e.g., species or individuals in a population). Such characters naturally arise from molecular sequences or morphological data. Interestingly, it has been known for some time that any binary phylogenetic tree can be (convexly) defined by a set of at most four characters, and that there are binary phylogenetic trees for which three characters are not enough. Thus, it is of interest to characterise those phylogenetic trees that are defined by a set of at most three characters. In this paper, we provide such a characterisation, in particular proving that a binary phylogenetic tree $T$ is defined by a set of at most three characters precisely if $T$ has no internal subtree isomorphic to a certain tree.

We consider extremal problems related to decks and multidecks of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. rooted phylogenetic tree shapes). Here, the deck (resp. multideck) of a tree $T$ refers to the set (resp. multiset) of leaf induced binary subtrees of $T$. On the one hand, we consider the reconstruction of trees from their (multi)decks. We give lower and upper bounds on the minimum (multi)deck size required to uniquely encode a rooted binary tree on $n$ leaves. On the other hand, we consider problems related to deck cardinalities. In particular, we characterize trees with minimum-size as well as maximum-size decks. Finally, we present some exhaustive computations for $k$-universal trees, i.e., rooted binary trees that contain all $k$-leaf rooted binary trees as induced subtrees.

Let $\mathbf{v}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{v}_m$ be points in a metric space with distance $d$, and let $w_1,\ldots,w_m$ be positive real weights. The weighted Fermat-Weber points are those points $\mathbf{x}$ which minimize $\sum w_i d(\mathbf{v}_i, \mathbf{x})$. We extend a result of Comăneci and Joswig, that the set of unweighted Fermat-Weber points agrees with the "central" covector cell of the tropical convex hull of $\mathbf{v}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{v}_m$, to the weighted setting. In particular, we show that for any fixed data points $\mathbf{v}_1, \ldots, \mathbf{v}_m$, and any covector cell of the tropical convex hull of the data, there is a choice of weights that makes that cell the Fermat-Weber set. We similarly extend the method of Comăneci and Joswig for computing consensus trees in phylogenetics.

We investigate the connections between clusters and least common ancestors (LCAs) in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). We focus on the class of DAGs having unique least common ancestors for certain subsets of their minimal elements since these are of interest, particularly as models of phylogenetic networks. Here, we use the close connection between the canonical k-ary transit function and the closure function on a set system to show that pre-k-ary clustering systems are exactly those that derive from a class of DAGs with unique LCAs. Moreover, we show that k-ary T-systems and k-weak hierarchies are associated with DAGs that satisfy stronger conditions on the existence of unique LCAs for sets of size at most k.

We provide a complete classification of normal phylogenetic varieties coming from tripods, and more generally, from trivalent trees. Let $G$ be an abelian group. We prove that the group-based phylogenetic variety $X_{G,\mathcal{T}}$, for any trivalent tree $\mathcal{T}$, is projectively normal if and only if $G\in \{\mathbb{Z}_2, \mathbb{Z}_3, \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2, \mathbb{Z}_4, \mathbb{Z}_5, \mathbb{Z}_7\}$.

Weighted First Order Model Counting (WFOMC) is fundamental to probabilistic inference in statistical relational learning models. As WFOMC is known to be intractable in general ($\#$P-complete), logical fragments that admit polynomial time WFOMC are of significant interest. Such fragments are called domain liftable. Recent works have shown that the two-variable fragment of first order logic extended with counting quantifiers ($\mathrm{C^2}$) is domain-liftable. However, many properties of real-world data, like acyclicity in citation networks and connectivity in social networks, cannot be modeled in $\mathrm{C^2}$, or first order logic in general. In this work, we expand the domain liftability of $\mathrm{C^2}$ with multiple such properties. We show that any $\mathrm{C^2}$ sentence remains domain liftable when one of its relations is restricted to represent a directed acyclic graph, a connected graph, a tree (resp. a directed tree) or a forest (resp. a directed forest). All our results rely on a novel and general methodology of "counting by splitting". Besides their application to probabilistic inference, our results provide a general framework for counting combinatorial structures. We expand a vast array of previous results in discrete mathematics literature on directed acyclic graphs, phylogenetic networks, etc.

A graph G is a k-leaf power, for an integer k >= 2, if there is a tree T with leaf set V(G) such that, for all vertices x, y in V(G), the edge xy exists in G if and only if the distance between x and y in T is at most k. Such a tree T is called a k-leaf root of G. The computational problem of constructing a k-leaf root for a given graph G and an integer k, if any, is motivated by the challenge from computational biology to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. For fixed k, Lafond [SODA 2022] recently solved this problem in polynomial time. In this paper, we propose to study optimal leaf roots of graphs G, that is, the k-leaf roots of G with minimum k value. Thus, all k'-leaf roots of G satisfy k <= k'. In terms of computational biology, seeking optimal leaf roots is more justified as they yield more probable phylogenetic trees. Lafond's result does not imply polynomial-time computability of optimal leaf roots, because, even for optimal k-leaf roots, k may (exponentially) depend on the size of G. This paper presents a linear-time construction of optimal leaf roots for chordal cographs (also known as trivially perfect graphs). Additionally, it highlights the importance of the parity of the parameter k and provides a deeper insight into the differences between optimal k-leaf roots of even versus odd k. Keywords: k-leaf power, k-leaf root, optimal k-leaf root, trivially perfect leaf power, chordal cograph

We provide an $Ω(n\log n) $ lower bound and an $O(n^2)$ upper bound for the smallest size of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. phylogenetic tree shapes), which are universal for rooted binary trees with $n$ leaves, i.e., contain all of them as induced binary subtrees. We explicitly compute the smallest universal trees for $n\leq 11$. We also provide an $Ω(n^2) $ lower bound and an $O(n^4)$ upper bound for the smallest size of tanglegrams, which are universal for size $n$ tanglegrams, i.e., which contain all of them as induced subtanglegrams. Some of our results generalize to rooted $d$-ary trees and to $d$-ary tanglegrams.

A network $N$ on a finite set $X$, $|X|\geq 2$, is a connected directed acyclic graph with leaf set $X$ in which every root in $N$ has outdegree at least 2 and no vertex in $N$ has indegree and outdegree equal to 1; $N$ is arboreal if the underlying unrooted, undirected graph of $N$ is a tree. Networks are of interest in evolutionary biology since they are used, for example, to represent the evolutionary history of a set $X$ of species whose ancestors have exchanged genes in the past. For $M$ some arbitrary set of symbols, $d:{X \choose 2} \to M \cup \{\odot\}$ is a symbolic arboreal map if there exists some arboreal network $N$ whose vertices with outdegree two or more are labelled by elements in $M$ and so that $d(\{x,y\})$, $\{x,y\} \in {X \choose 2}$, is equal to the label of the least common ancestor of $x$ and $y$ in $N$ if this exists and $\odot$ else. Important examples of symbolic arboreal maps include the symbolic ultrametrics, which arise in areas such as game theory, phylogenetics and cograph theory. In this paper we show that a map $d:{X \choose 2} \to M \cup \{\odot\}$ is a symbolic arboreal map if and only if $d$ satisfies certain 3- and 4-point conditions and the graph with vertex set $X$ and edge set consisting of those pairs $\{x,y\} \in {X \choose 2}$ with $d(\{x,y\}) \neq \odot$ is Ptolemaic. To do this, we introduce and prove a key theorem concerning the shared ancestry graph for a network $N$ on $X$, where this is the graph with vertex set $X$ and edge set consisting of those $\{x,y\} \in {X \choose 2}$ such that $x$ and $y$ share a common ancestor in $N$. In particular, we show that for any connected graph $G$ with vertex set $X$ and edge clique cover $K$ in which there are no two distinct sets in $K$ with one a subset of the other, there is some network with $|K|$ roots and leaf set $X$ whose shared ancestry graph is $G$.

Imbalance in the 3D structure of plants can be an important indicator of insufficient light or nutrient supply, as well as excessive wind, (formerly present) physical barriers, neighbor or storm damage. It can also be a simple means to detect certain illnesses, since some diseases like the apple proliferation disease, an infection with the barley yellow dwarf virus or plant canker can cause abnormal growth, like \enquote{witches' brooms} or burls, resulting in a deviating 3D plant architecture. However, quantifying imbalance of plant growth is not an easy task, and it requires a mathematically sound 3D model of plants to which imbalance indices can be applied. Current models of plants are often based on stacked cylinders or voxel matrices and do not allow for measuring the degree of 3D imbalance in the branching structure of the whole plant. On the other hand, various imbalance indices are readily available for so-called graph-theoretical trees and are frequently used in areas like phylogenetics and computer science. While only some basic ideas of these indices can be transferred to the 3D setting, graph-theoretical trees are a logical foundation for 3D plant models that allow for elegant and natural imbalance measures. In this manuscript, our aim is thus threefold: We first present a new graph-theoretical 3D model of plants and discuss desirable properties of imbalance measures in the 3D setting. We then introduce and analyze eight different 3D imbalance indices and their properties. Thirdly, we illustrate all our findings using a data set of 63 bush beans. Moreover, we implemented all our indices in the publicly available \textsf{R}-software package \textsf{treeDbalance} accompanying this manuscript.

Given a set $X$ of species, a phylogenetic tree is an unrooted binary tree whose leaves are bijectively labelled by $X$. Such trees can be used to show the way species evolve over time. One way of understanding how topologically different two phylogenetic trees are, is to construct a minimum-size agreement forest: a partition of $X$ into the smallest number of blocks, such that the blocks induce homeomorphic, non-overlapping subtrees in both trees. This comparison yields insight into commonalities and differences in the evolution of $X$ across the two trees. Computing a smallest agreement forest is NP-hard (Hein, Jiang, Wang and Zhang, Discrete Applied Mathematics 71(1-3), 1996). In this work we study the problem on caterpillars, which are path-like phylogenetic trees. We will demonstrate that, even if we restrict the input to this highly restricted subclass, the problem remains NP-hard and is in fact APX-hard. Furthermore we show that for caterpillars two standard reductions rules well known in the literature yield a tight kernel of size at most $7k$, compared to $15k$ for general trees (Kelk and Simone, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 33(3), 2019). Finally we demonstrate that we can determine if two caterpillars have an agreement forest with at most $k$ blocks in $O^*(2.49^k)$ time, compared to $O^*(3^k)$ for general trees (Chen, Fan and Sze, Theoretical Computater Science 562, 2015), where $O^*(.)$ suppresses polynomial factors.

Phylogenetic networks play an important role in evolutionary biology as, other than phylogenetic trees, they can be used to accommodate reticulate evolutionary events such as horizontal gene transfer and hybridization. Recent research has provided a lot of progress concerning the reconstruction of such networks from data as well as insight into their graph theoretical properties. However, methods and tools to quantify structural properties of networks or differences between them are still very limited. For example, for phylogenetic trees, it is common to use balance indices to draw conclusions concerning the underlying evolutionary model, and more than twenty such indices have been proposed and are used for different purposes. One of the most frequently used balance index for trees is the so-called total cophenetic index, which has several mathematically and biologically desirable properties. For networks, on the other hand, balance indices are to-date still scarce. In this contribution, we introduce the \textit{weighted} total cophenetic index as a generalization of the total cophenetic index for trees to make it applicable to general phylogenetic networks. As we shall see, this index can be determined efficiently and behaves in a mathematical sound way, i.e., it satisfies so-called locality and recursiveness conditions. In addition, we analyze its extremal properties and, in particular, we investigate its maxima and minima as well as the structure of networks that achieve these values within the space of so-called level-$1$ networks. We finally briefly compare this novel index to the two other network balance indices available so-far.

One strategy for reconstruction of phylogenetic networks is to solve the phylogenetic network problem, which involves inferring phylogenetic trees first and subsequently computing the smallest phylogenetic network that displays all the trees. This approach capitalizes on exceptional tools available for inferring phylogenetic trees from biomolecular sequences. Since the vast space of phylogenetic networks poses difficulties in obtaining comprehensive sampling, the researchers switch their attention to inferring tree-child networks from multiple phylogenetic trees, where in a tree-child network each non-leaf node must have at least one child that is an indegree-one node. Two results are obtained: (1) The tree-child network inference problem for multiple line trees remains NP-hard by a reduction from the shortest common supersequence problem for permutations and proving that the latter is NP-hard. (2) The tree-child networks with the least reticulate nodes that display all the line trees are the same as that display all the binary trees, whose hybridization number is $Θ(n^3)$ for $n (> 7)$ taxa.

The problem of comparing probability distributions is at the heart of many tasks in statistics and machine learning. Established comparison methods treat the standard setting that the distributions are supported in the same space. Recently, a new geometric solution has been proposed to address the more challenging problem of comparing measures in Euclidean spaces of differing dimensions. Here, we study the same problem of comparing probability distributions of different dimensions in the tropical setting, which is becoming increasingly relevant in applications involving complex data structures such as phylogenetic trees. Specifically, we construct a Wasserstein distance between measures on different tropical projective tori -- the focal metric spaces in both theory and applications of tropical geometry -- via tropical mappings between probability measures. We prove equivalence of the directionality of the maps, whether mapping from a low dimensional space to a high dimensional space or vice versa. As an important practical implication, our work provides a framework for comparing probability distributions on the spaces of phylogenetic trees with different leaf sets. We demonstrate the computational feasibility of our approach using existing optimisation techniques on both simulated and real data.

A geophylogeny is a phylogenetic tree (or dendrogram) where each leaf (e.g. biological taxon) has an associated geographic location (site). To clearly visualize a geophylogeny, the tree is typically represented as a crossing-free drawing next to a map. The correspondence between the taxa and the sites is either shown with matching labels on the map (internal labeling) or with leaders that connect each site to the corresponding leaf of the tree (external labeling). In both cases, a good order of the leaves is paramount for understanding the association between sites and taxa. We define several quality measures for internal labeling and give an efficient algorithm for optimizing them. In contrast, minimizing the number of leader crossings in an external labeling is NP-hard. On the positive side, we show that crossing-free instances can be solved in polynomial time and give a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm. Furthermore, optimal solutions can be found in a matter of seconds on realistic instances using integer linear programming. Finally, we provide several efficient heuristic algorithms and experimentally show them to be near optimal on real-world and synthetic instances.

Classification of gene trees is an important task both in the analysis of multi-locus phylogenetic data, and assessment of the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analyses used in Bayesian phylogenetic tree reconstruction. The logistic regression model is one of the most popular classification models in statistical learning, thanks to its computational speed and interpretability. However, it is not appropriate to directly apply the standard logistic regression model to a set of phylogenetic trees, as the space of phylogenetic trees is non-Euclidean and thus contradicts the standard assumptions on covariates. It is well-known in tropical geometry and phylogenetics that the space of phylogenetic trees is a tropical linear space in terms of the max-plus algebra. Therefore, in this paper, we propose an analogue approach of the logistic regression model in the setting of tropical geometry. Our proposed method outperforms classical logistic regression in terms of Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) in numerical examples, including with data generated by the multi-species coalescent model. Theoretical properties such as statistical consistency have been proved and generalization error rates have been derived. Finally, our classification algorithm is proposed as an MCMC convergence criterion for Mr Bayes. Unlike the convergence metric used by MrBayes which is only dependent on tree topologies, our method is sensitive to branch lengths and therefore provides a more robust metric for convergence. In a test case, it is illustrated that the tropical logistic regression can differentiate between two independently run MCMC chains, even when the standard metric cannot.

It was recently shown that a large class of phylogenetic networks, the `labellable' networks, is in bijection with the set of `expanding' covers of finite sets. In this paper, we show how several prominent classes of phylogenetic networks can be characterised purely in terms of properties of their associated covers. These classes include the tree-based, tree-child, orchard, tree-sibling, and normal networks.