arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a positive integer $k$, a $\{k\}$-Roman dominating function of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is a function $f\colon V \rightarrow \{0,1,\ldots,k\}$ satisfying $f (N(v)) \geq k$ for each vertex $v\in V$ with $f (v) = 0$. Every graph $G$ satisfies $γ_{\{Rk\}}(G) \leq kγ(G)$, where $γ_{\{Rk\}}(G)$ denotes the minimum weight of a $\{k\}$-Roman dominating function of $G$ and $γ(G)$ is the domination number of $G$. In this work we study graphs for which the equality is reached, called \emph{$\{k\}$-Roman graphs}. This extends the concept of $\{k\}$-Roman trees studied by Wang et al. in 2021 to general graphs. We prove that for every $k\geq 3$, the problem of recognizing $\{k\}$-Roman graphs is NP-hard, even when restricted to split graphs. We provide partial answers to the question of which split graphs are $\{2\}$-Roman: we characterize $\{2\}$-Roman split graphs that can be decomposed with respect to the split join operation into two smaller split graphs and classify the $\{k\}$-Roman property within two specific families of split graphs that are prime with respect to the split join operation: suns and their complements.

Computing the cardinality of a maximum induced acyclic vertex set in a digraph is NP-hard. Since finding an exact solution is computationally difficult, a fruitful approach is to establish high-quality lower bounds that are efficiently computable. We build on the Akbari--Ghodrati--Jabalameli--Saghafian (AGJS) bound for digraphs by adapting refinement techniques used by (a) Selkow and Harant--Mohr and (b) Angel--Campigotto--Laforest in their respective improvements of the Caro--Wei bound for undirected graphs. First, inspired by (a), we prove a neighborhood-based refinement of the AGJS bound that incorporates local degree data of each vertex. Second, inspired by (b), we compute the variance of the size of a feedback vertex set returned by a randomized algorithm. This result, combined with the Bhatia--Davis inequality, yields a tighter lower bound than the AGJS bound.

Our study contributes to the scheduling and combinatorial optimization literature with new heuristics discovered by leveraging the power of Large Language Models (LLMs). We focus on the single-machine total tardiness (SMTT) problem, which aims to minimize total tardiness by sequencing n jobs on a single processor without preemption, given processing times and due dates. We develop and benchmark two novel LLM-discovered heuristics, the EDD Challenger (EDDC) and MDD Challenger (MDDC), inspired by the well-known Earliest Due Date (EDD) and Modified Due Date (MDD) rules. In contrast to prior studies that employed simpler rule-based heuristics, we evaluate our LLM-discovered algorithms using rigorous criteria, including optimality gaps and solution time derived from a mixed-integer programming (MIP) formulation of SMTT. We compare their performance against state-of-the-art heuristics and exact methods across various job sizes (20, 100, 200, and 500 jobs). For instances with more than 100 jobs, exact methods such as MIP and dynamic programming become computationally intractable. Up to 500 jobs, EDDC improves upon the classic EDD rule and another widely used algorithm in the literature. MDDC consistently outperforms traditional heuristics and remains competitive with exact approaches, particularly on larger and more complex instances. This study shows that human-LLM collaboration can produce scalable, high-performing heuristics for NP-hard constrained combinatorial optimization, even under limited resources when effectively configured.

In this paper, we compute the injective norm - a.k.a. geometric entanglement - of standard basis states of CSS quantum error-correcting codes. The injective norm of a quantum state is a measure of genuine multipartite entanglement. Computing this measure is generically NP-hard. However, it has been computed exactly in condensed-matter theory - notably in the context of topological phases - for the Kitaev code and its extensions, in works by Orús and collaborators. We extend these results to all CSS codes and thereby obtain the injective norm for a nontrivial, infinite family of quantum states. In doing so, we uncover an interesting connection to matroid theory and Edmonds' intersection theorem.

Circuit augmentation schemes are a family of combinatorial algorithms for linear programming that generalize the simplex method. To solve the linear program, they construct a so-called monotone circuit walk: They start at an initial vertex of the feasible region and traverse a discrete sequence of points on the boundary, while moving along certain allowed directions (circuits) and improving the objective function at each step until reaching an optimum. Since the existence of short circuit walks has been conjectured (Circuit Diameter Conjecture), several works have investigated how well one can efficiently approximate shortest monotone circuit walks towards an optimum. A first result addressing this question was given by De Loera, Kafer, and Sanità [SIAM J. Opt., 2022], who showed that given as input an LP and the starting vertex, finding a $2$-approximation for this problem is NP-hard. Cardinal and the third author [Math. Prog. 2023] gave a stronger lower bound assuming the exponential time hypothesis, showing that even an approximation factor of $O(\frac{\log m}{\log \log m})$ is intractable for LPs defined by $m$ inequalities. Both of these results were based on reductions from highly degenerate polytopes in combinatorial optimization with high dimension. In this paper, we significantly strengthen the aforementioned hardness results by showing that for every fixed $\varepsilon>0$ approximating the problem on polygons with $m$ edges to within a factor of $O(m^{1-\varepsilon})$ is NP-hard. This result is essentially best-possible, as it cannot be improved beyond $o(m)$. In particular, this implies hardness for simple polytopes and in fixed dimension.

The boxicity of a graph $G$ is the minimum dimension $d$ that admits a representation of $G$ as the intersection graph of a family of axis-parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Computing boxicity is an NP-hard problem, and there are few known graph classes for which it can be computed in polynomial time. One such class is the class of block graphs. A block graph is a graph in which every maximal $2$-connected component is a clique. Since block graphs are known to have boxicity at most two, computing their boxicity amounts to the linear-time interval graph recognition problem. On the other hand, complements of block graphs have unbounded boxicity, yet we show that there is also a polynomial algorithm that computes the boxicity of complements of block graphs. An adaptation of our approach yields a polynomial algorithm for computing the threshold dimension of the complements of block graphs, which for general graphs is an NP-hard problem. Our method suggests a general technique that may show the tractability of similar problems on block-restricted graph classes.

Metric dimension is a graph parameter that has been applied to robot navigation and finding low-dimensional vector embeddings. Throttling entails minimizing the sum of two available resources when solving certain graph problems. In this paper, we introduce throttling for metric dimension, edge metric dimension, and mixed metric dimension. In the context of vector embeddings, metric dimension throttling finds a low-dimensional, low-magnitude embedding with integer coordinates. We show that computing the throttling number is NP-hard for all three variants. We give formulas for the throttling numbers of special families of graphs, and characterize graphs with extremal throttling numbers. We also prove that the minimum possible throttling number of a graph of order $n$ is $Θ\left(\frac{\log{n}}{\log{\log{n}}}\right)$, while the minimum possible throttling number of a tree of order $n$ is $Θ(n^{1/3})$ or $Θ(n^{1/2})$ depending on the variant of metric dimension.

There is a strong interest in finding challenging instances of NP-hard problems, from the perspective of showing quantum advantage. Due to the limits of near-term NISQ devices, it is moreover useful if these instances are small. In this work, we identify two graph families ($|V|<1000$) on which the Goemans-Williamson algorithm for approximating the Max-Cut achieves at most a 0.912-approximation. We further show that, in comparison, a recent quantum algorithm, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (depth $p=1$), is a 0.592-approximation on Karloff instances in the limit ($n \to \infty$), and is at best a $0.894$-approximation on a family of strongly-regular graphs. We further explore construction of challenging instances computationally by perturbing edge weights, which may be of independent interest, and include these in the CI-QuBe github repository.

Can AI based methods help us make advances in complexity theory? We provide evidence towards answering this in the affirmative, using AlphaEvolve (an LLM code mutation agent) to obtain new results in three settings: a) We improve a recent result of Kunisky and Yu to obtain near-optimal upper and (conditional) lower bounds on certification algorithms for MAX-CUT and MAX-Independent Set on random 3- and 4-regular graphs. Our improved lower bounds are obtained by constructing nearly extremal Ramanujan graphs on as many as $163$ vertices, and our upper bounds are obtained via analytical arguments. b) We obtain new inapproximability results for MAX-4-CUT and MAX-3-CUT, proving that it is NP-hard to approximate them within factors of $0.987$ and $0.9649$ respectively, using AlphaEvolve to discover new gadget reductions. Our MAX-4-CUT result improves upon the SOTA of $0.9883$, and our MAX-3-CUT result improves on the current best gadget-based inapproximability result of $0.9853$, but falls short of the SOTA of $16/17$ that relies on a custom PCP (rather than a reduction from ``standard'' Håstad-style PCPs). c) Inapproximability for the metric Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP): We show that it is NP-hard to approximate the minimum cost tour within a factor of $111/110$ using AlphaEvolve to discover a new gadget, thus improving the SOTA of $117/116$. Along the way, we provide new modular soundness and completeness arguments that can be of independent interest. A key technical challenge we faced: verifying a candidate construction produced by AlphaEvolve is costly (sometimes requiring time exponential in the size of the construction). We used AlphaEvolve itself to evolve the verification procedure to be faster (sometimes by $10,000\times$ for our gadgets). Our results suggest that gadget based proofs would benefit from a pass through AI-based tools to obtain stronger results.

We investigate the computational complexity of edge-deletion and edge-contraction problems in fuzzy graphs. For any graph property Π that is hereditary under contractions (or deletions) and determined by 3-connected components, the corresponding fuzzy edge-deletion (FPED) and fuzzy edge-contraction (FPEC) problems are NP- hard. Our results hold under both fixed-threshold (α_0) and all-threshold (\forall α) semantics, and apply even to restricted classes of fuzzy graphs such as fuzzy 3-connected or fuzzy bipartite graphs. We further demonstrate that well-known properties, including planarity and series-parallelness, satisfy these conditions, making the fuzzy versions of these classical graph problems computationally intractable. The proofs leverage reductions from classical NP-hard problems and generalize the constructions to the fuzzy setting while preserving key structural properties.

We study egalitarian (acyclic) orientations of undirected graphs under indegree-based objectives, such as minimizing the $\varphi$-sum of indegrees for a strictly convex function $\varphi$, decreasing minimization (dec-min), and increasing maximization (inc-max). In the non-acyclic setting of Frank and Murota (2022), a single orientation simultaneously optimizes these three objectives, however, restricting to acyclic orientations confines us to the corners of the indegree polytope, where these fairness objectives do diverge. We establish strong hardness results across a broad range of settings: minimizing the $\varphi$-sum of indegrees is NP-hard for every discrete strictly convex function $\varphi$; dec-min and inc-max are NP-hard for every indegree bound $k \geq 2$, as well as without a bound; and the complementary inc-min and dec-max problems are NP-hard even on $3$-regular graphs. On the algorithmic side, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for minimizing the maximum weighted indegree via a weighted smallest-last ordering. We also provide an exact exponential-time algorithm for minimizing general separable discrete convex objectives over indegrees, and a polynomial-time algorithm for the non-acyclic case. Finally, for maximizing the sum of the products of indegrees and outdegrees, we prove NP-hardness on graphs of maximum degree $4$, give an algorithm for maximum degree $3$, and provide a $3$-approximation algorithm. Our results delineate the algorithmic frontier of convex integral optimization over indegree (base-)polytopes, and highlight both theoretical consequences and practical implications, notably for scheduling and deadlock-free routing.

We study network robustness under correlated failures modeled by colors, where each color represents a class of edges or vertices that may fail simultaneously. An edge-colored graph is said to be edge-color-avoiding $k$-edge-connected if it remains $k$-edge-connected after the removal of all edges of any single color. We characterize the graphs that admit such a coloring and show that, when $k = 1$, one can determine in polynomial time both the minimum number of colors required and a coloring achieving it; while the problem becomes NP-hard for $k \ge 2$. We also investigate the problem of orienting the edges of a graph so that the resulting digraph remains strongly or rooted connected even after the removal of all arcs of any single color. In addition, we explore generalizations involving vertex-colorings, $k$-vertex-connectivity, simultaneous failures of multiple colors and matroids.

In the Strip Packing problem, we are given a vertical strip of fixed width and unbounded height, along with a set of axis-parallel rectangles. The task is to place all rectangles within the strip, without overlaps, while minimizing the height of the packing. This problem is known to be NP-hard. The Bottom-Left Algorithm is a simple and widely used heuristic for Strip Packing. Given a fixed order of the rectangles, it places them one by one, always choosing the lowest feasible position in the strip and, in case of ties, the leftmost one. Baker, Coffman, and Rivest proved in 1980 that the Bottom-Left Algorithm has approximation ratio 3 if the rectangles are sorted by decreasing width. For the past 45 years, no alternative ordering has been found that improves this bound. We introduce a new rectangle ordering and show that with this ordering the Bottom-Left Algorithm achieves a 13/6 approximation for the Strip Packing problem.

The $k$-Coloring problem on hereditary graph classes has been a deeply researched problem over the last decade. A hereditary graph class is characterized by a (possibly infinite) list of minimal forbidden induced subgraphs. We say that a graph is $(H_1,H_2,\ldots)$-free if it does not contain any of $H_1,H_2,\ldots$ as induced subgraphs. The complexity landscape of the problem remains unclear even when restricting to the case $k=4$ and classes defined by a few forbidden induced subgraphs. While the case of only one forbidden induced subgraph has been completely resolved lately, the complexity when considering two forbidden induced subgraphs still has a couple of unknown cases. In particular, $4$-Coloring on $(P_6,C_3)$-free graphs is polynomial while it is NP-hard on $(P_{22},C_3)$-free graphs. We provide a reduction showing NP-completeness of $4$-Coloring on $(P_t,C_3)$-free graphs for $19\leq t\leq 21$, thus constricting the gap of cases whose complexity remains unknown. Our proof includes a computer search ensuring that the graph family obtained through the reduction is indeed $P_{19}$-free.

A b-chromatic colouring of a graph $G$ is a proper $k$-colouring of the vertices of $G$, for some integer $k$, such that, for each colour $i$ ($1\leq i\leq k$), there exists a vertex $v$ of colour $i$ such that $v$ is adjacent to a vertex of colour $j$, for each $j$ ($1\leq j\leq k$, $j\neq i$). The b-chromatic number of $G$ is the maximum integer $k$ such that $G$ admits a b-chromatic colouring using $k$ colours. In this paper we introduce the concept of a total b-chromatic colouring, which extends the notion of b-chromatic colourings to both vertices and edges in a graph. We show that the problem of computing the total b-chromatic number is NP-hard in general graphs. On the other hand for a subclass of caterpillars we give a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the total b-chromatic number, and indeed a total b-chromatic colouring with the maximum number of colours.

Zero forcing is a binary coloring game on a graph where a set of filled vertices can force non-filled vertices to become filled following a color change rule. In 2008, the zero forcing number of a graph was shown to be an upper bound on its maximum nullity. In addition, the combinatorial optimization problem for the zero forcing number was shown to be NP-hard. Since then, the study of zero forcing and its related parameters has received considerable attention. In 2018, the forts of a graph were defined as non-empty subsets of vertices where no vertex outside the set has exactly one neighbor in the set. Forts have been used to model zero forcing as an integer program and provide lower bounds on the zero forcing number. To date, three integer programming models have been developed for the zero forcing number of a graph: the Infection Model, Time Step Model, and Fort Cover Model. In this article, we present variations of these models for computing the zero forcing number and related graph parameters, such as the minimum and maximum propagation times, throttling number, and fractional zero forcing number. In addition, we present several new models for computing the realized propagation time interval, all minimal forts of a graph, and the fort number of a graph. We conclude with several numerical experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness of our models when applied to small and medium order graphs. Moreover, we provide experimental evidence for several open conjectures regarding the propagation time interval, the number of minimal forts, the fort number, and the fractional zero forcing number of a graph.

We prove that computing the deterministic communication complexity D(f) of a Boolean function is NP-hard in the standard protocol-tree model, answering, independently and concurrently with Hirahara-Llango-Loff (arXiv:2507.10426), a question first posed by Yao (1979). Our reduction builds and expands on a suite of structural "interlacing" lemmas introduced by Mackenzie and Saffidine (arXiv:2411.19003); these lemmas can be reused as black boxes in future lower-bound constructions. The instances produced by our reduction admit optimal protocols for self-similar constructions with strong structural properties, giving a flexible framework for the design of reductions showing NP-hardness of deciding the communication complexity of a Boolean matrix. This complements the work by Hirahara, Ilango, and Loff, which establishes NP-hardness in the same model via a different route; our analysis additionally yields reusable structural guarantees and underpins further consequences concerning inapproximability. Because the gadgets in our construction are self-similar, they can be recursively embedded. We sketch how this yields, under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, an additive inapproximability gap that grows without bound. Furthermore we outline a route toward NP-hardness of approximating D(f) within a fixed constant additive error. Full details of the ETH-based inapproximability results will appear in a future version. Beyond settling the complexity of deterministic communication complexity itself, the modular framework we develop opens the door to a wider class of reductions and, we believe, will prove useful in tackling other long-standing questions in communication complexity.

Graph modification problems, which aim to find a small set of modifications to a graph so that it satisfies a desired property, have been studied for several special graph classes. The literature is rather rich in NP-completeness results and polynomial time solvable cases. However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few exact algorithms have been suggested to address NP-hard cases. In this work, we propose exact solution methods based on integer programming for three perfect graph modification problems: minimum perfect editing, minimum perfect completion and the perfect sandwich problem. The minimum perfect editing problem inquires the smallest number of edge additions and deletions to make a graph perfect, while the completion problem allows only edge additions. In the perfect sandwich problem, only a given subset of non-edges can be changed to edges, and the problem asks whether a perfect graph can be obtained in this way. The proposed methods are based on the Strong Perfect Graph Theorem. We represent odd holes and odd antiholes as linear inequalities, and formulate an integer programming model to solve minimum perfect editing problem. To address the exponential number of constraints, we propose a cutting plane algorithm which relies on finding odd holes and odd antiholes. To enhance the practical efficiency of the cutting plane algorithm, we address the expected number of odd holes and odd antiholes in random graphs. In addition, we propose a heuristic algorithm to make a given graph perfect, which is used to obtain improved upper bounds for the editing and the completion problems. Finally, we demonstrate empirical effectiveness of the proposed methods through computational experiments.

Modularity is a very widely used measure of the level of clustering or community structure in networks. Here we consider a recent generalisation of the definition of modularity to temporal graphs, whose edge-sets change over discrete timesteps; such graphs offer a more realistic model of many real-world networks in which connections between entities (for example, between individuals in a social network) evolve over time. Computing modularity is notoriously difficult: it is NP-hard even to approximate in general, and only admits efficient exact algorithms in very restricted special cases. Our main result is that a multiplicative approximation to temporal modularity can be computed efficiently when the underlying graph has small treewidth. This generalises a similar approximation algorithm for the static case, but requires some substantially new ideas to overcome technical challenges associated with the temporal nature of the problem.

Hypergraph $2$-colorability is one of the classical NP-hard problems. Person and Schacht [SODA'09] designed a deterministic algorithm whose expected running time is polynomial over a uniformly chosen $2$-colorable $3$-uniform hypergraph. Lee, Molla, and Nagle recently extended this to $k$-uniform hypergraphs for all $k\geq 3$. Both papers relied heavily on the regularity lemma, hence their analysis was involved and their running time hid tower-type constants. Our first result in this paper is a new simple and elementary deterministic $2$-coloring algorithm that reproves the theorems of Person-Schacht and Lee-Molla-Nagle while avoiding the use of the regularity lemma. We also show how to turn our new algorithm into a randomized one with average expected running time of only $O(n)$. Our second and main result gives what we consider to be the ultimate evidence of just how easy it is to find a $2$-coloring of an average $2$-colorable hypergraph. We define a coloring oracle to be an algorithm which, given vertex $v$, assigns color red/blue to $v$ while inspecting as few edges as possible, so that the answers to any sequence of queries to the oracle are consistent with a single legal $2$-coloring of the input. Surprisingly, we show that there is a coloring oracle that, on average, can answer every vertex query in time $O(1)$.