arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a flat-foldable origami crease pattern $G=(V,E)$ (a straight-line drawing of a planar graph on a region of the plane) with a mountain-valley (MV) assignment $μ:E\to\{-1,1\}$ indicating which creases in $E$ bend convexly (mountain) or concavely (valley), we may \emph{flip} a face $F$ of $G$ to create a new MV assignment $μ_F$ which equals $μ$ except for all creases $e$ bordering $F$, where we have $μ_F(e)=-μ(e)$. In this paper we explore the configuration space of face flips for a variety of crease patterns $G$ that are tilings of the plane, proving examples where $μ_F$ results in a MV assignment that is either never, sometimes, or always flat-foldable for various choices of $F$. We also consider the problem of finding, given two foldable MV assignments $μ_1$ and $μ_2$ of a given crease pattern $G$, a minimal sequence of face flips to turn $μ_1$ into $μ_2$. We find polynomial-time algorithms for this in the cases where $G$ is either a square grid or the Miura-ori, and show that this problem is NP-hard in the case where $G$ is the triangle lattice.

Circuit-augmentation algorithms are generalizations of the Simplex method, where in each step one is allowed to move along a fixed set of directions, called circuits, that is a superset of the edges of a polytope. We show that in the circuit-augmentation framework the greatest-improvement and Dantzig pivot rules are NP-hard, already for 0/1-LPs. Differently, the steepest-descent pivot rule can be carried out in polynomial time in the 0/1 setting, and the number of circuit augmentations required to reach an optimal solution according to this rule is strongly-polynomial for 0/1-LPs. The number of circuit augmentations has been of interest as a proxy for the number of steps in the Simplex method, and the circuit-diameter of polyhedra has been studied as a lower bound to the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. Extending prior results, we show that for any polyhedron $P$ the circuit-diameter is bounded by a polynomial in the input bit-size of $P$. This is in contrast with the best bounds for the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. Interestingly, we show that the circuit-augmentation framework can be exploited to make novel conclusions about the classical Simplex method itself: In particular, as a byproduct of our circuit results, we prove that (i) computing the shortest (monotone) path to an optimal solution on the 1-skeleton of a polytope is NP-hard, and hard to approximate within a factor better than 2, and (ii) for $0/1$ polytopes, a monotone path of strongly-polynomial length can be constructed using steepest improving edges.

Configuration integer programs (IP) have been key in the design of algorithms for NP-hard high-multiplicity problems since the pioneering work of Gilmore and Gomory [Oper. Res., 1961]. Configuration IPs have a variable for each possible configuration, which describes a placement of items into a location, and whose value corresponds to the number of locations with that placement. In high multiplicity problems items come in types, and are represented succinctly by a vector of multiplicities; solving the configuration IP then amounts to deciding whether the input vector of multiplicities of items of each type can be decomposed into a given number of configurations. We make this implicit notion explicit by observing that the set of all input vectors decomposable into configurations forms a monoid, and solving the configuration IP is the Monoid Decomposition problem. Motivated by applications, we enrich this problem in two ways. First, sometimes each configuration additionally has an objective value, yielding an optimization problem of finding a "best" decomposition under the given objective. Second, there are often different types of configurations for different types of locations. The resulting problem is to optimize over decompositions of the input multiplicity vector into configurations of several types, and we call it Multitype Integer Monoid Optimization, or MIMO. We develop fast exact algorithms for various MIMO with few or many location types and with various objectives. Our algorithms build on a novel proximity theorem connecting the solutions of a certain configuration IP to those of its continuous relaxation. We then cast several fundamental scheduling and bin packing problems as MIMOs, and thereby obtain new or substantially faster algorithms for them. We complement our positive algorithmic results by hardness results.

We study the Maximum Bipartite Subgraph (MBS) problem, which is defined as follows. Given a set $S$ of $n$ geometric objects in the plane, we want to compute a maximum-size subset $S'\subseteq S$ such that the intersection graph of the objects in $S'$ is bipartite. We first give a simple $O(n)$-time algorithm that solves the MBS problem on a set of $n$ intervals. We also give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm that computes a near-optimal solution for the problem on circular-arc graphs. We show that the MBS problem is NP-hard on geometric graphs for which the maximum independent set is NP-hard (hence, it is NP-hard even on unit squares and unit disks). On the other hand, we give a PTAS for the problem on unit squares and unit disks. Moreover, we show fast approximation algorithms with small-constant factors for the problem on unit squares, unit disks and unit-height rectangles. Finally, we study a closely related geometric problem, called Maximum Triangle-free Subgraph (TFS), where the objective is the same as that of MBS except the intersection graph induced by the set $S'$ needs to be triangle-free only (instead of being bipartite).

Let $G$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$, and let $S \subseteq V$. The \emph{open neighborhood} of $v \in V$, $N(v)$, is the set of vertices adjacent to $v$; the \emph{closed neighborhood} is given by $N[v] = N(v) \cup \{v\}$. The \emph{open neighborhood} of $S$, $N(S)$, is the union of the open neighborhoods of vertices in $S$, and the \emph{closed neighborhood} of $S$ is $N[S] = S \cup N(S)$. The sets $ \mathcal{P}^i(S), i \geq 0$, of vertices \emph{monitored} by $S$ at the $i^{\ {th}}$ step are given by $\mathcal{P}^0(S) = N[S]$ and $\mathcal{P}^{i+1}(S) = \mathcal{P}^i(S) \bigcup\left\{ w : \{ w \} = N[v] \backslash \mathcal{P}^i(S) \ { for some } v \in \mathcal{P}^i(S) \right\}$. If there exists $j$ such that $\mathcal{P}^j(S) = V$, then $S$ is called a \emph{power dominating set}, PDS, of $G$. We introduce and discuss the \emph{failed power domination number} of a graph $G$, $\barγ_p(G)$, the largest cardinality of a set that is not a PDS. We prove that $\barγ_p(G)$ is NP-hard to compute, determine graphs in which every vertex is a PDS, and compare $\barγ_p(G)$ to similar parameters.

Graph burning is a simple model for the spread of social influence in networks. The objective is to measure how quickly a fire (e.g., a piece of fake news) can be spread in a network. The burning process takes place in discrete rounds. In each round, a new fire breaks out at a selected vertex and burns it. Meanwhile, the old fires extend to their neighbours and burn them. A burning schedule selects where the new fire breaks out in each round, and the burning problem asks for a schedule that burns all vertices in a minimum number of rounds, termed the burning number of the graph. The burning problem is known to be NP-hard even when the graph is a tree or a disjoint set of paths. For connected graphs, it has been conjectured that burning takes at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ rounds. We approach the algorithmic study of graph burning from two directions. First, we consider graphs with minimum degree $δ$. We present an algorithm that burns any graph of size $n$ in at most $\sqrt{\frac{24n}{δ+1}}$ rounds. In particular, for dense graphs with $δ\in Θ(n)$, all vertices are burned in a constant number of rounds. More interestingly, even when $δ$ is a constant that is independent of the graph size, our algorithm answers the graph-burning conjecture in the affirmative by burning the graph in at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ rounds. Next, we consider burning graphs with bounded path-length or tree-length. These include many graph families including connected interval graphs and connected chordal graphs. We show that any graph with path-length $pl$ and diameter $d$ can be burned in $\lceil \sqrt{d-1} \rceil + pl$ rounds. Our algorithm ensures an approximation ratio of $1+o(1)$ for graphs of bounded path-length. We introduce another algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of $2+o(1)$ for burning graphs of bounded tree-length.

We consider the problem of finding a subgraph of a given graph minimizing the sum of given functions at vertices evaluated at their subgraph degrees. While the problem is NP-hard already for bipartite graphs when the functions are convex on one side and concave on the other, we show that when all functions are convex, the problem can be solved in polynomial time for any graph. We also provide polynomial time solutions for bipartite graphs with one side fixed for arbitrary functions, and for arbitrary graphs when all but a fixed number of functions are either nondecreasing or nonincreasing. We note that the general factor problem and the (l,u)-factor problem over a graph are special cases of our problem, as well as the intriguing exact matching problem. The complexity of the problem remains widely open, particularly for arbitrary functions over complete graphs.

A non-empty subset $S$ of the vertices of a digraph $D$ is called a {\it safe set} if \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$, there exists a strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$ such that there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$; and \item[(ii)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$ and every strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$, we have $|M|\leq |N|$ whenever there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$. \end{itemize} In the case of acyclic digraphs a set $X$ of vertices is a safe set precisely when $X$ is an {\it in-dominating set}, that is, every vertex not in $X$ has at least one arc to $X$. We prove that, even for acyclic digraphs which are traceable (have a hamiltonian path) it is NP-hard to find a minimum cardinality in-dominating set. Then we show that the problem is also NP-hard for tournaments and give, for every positive constant $c$, a polynomial algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set in a tournament on $n$ vertices in which no strong component has size more than $c\log{}(n)$. Under the so called Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) this is close to best possible in the following sense: If ETH holds, then, for every $ε>0$ there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set for the class of tournaments in which the largest strong component has size at most $\log^{1+ε}(n)$. We also discuss bounds on the cardinality of safe sets in tournaments.

We improve the lower bound on the $d$-dimensional rectilinear crossing number of the complete $d$-uniform hypergraph having $2d$ vertices to $Ω\left(\dfrac{(4\sqrt{2}/3^{3/4})^d}{d}\right)$ from $Ω(2^d \sqrt{d})$. We also establish that the $3$-dimensional rectilinear crossing number of a complete $3$-uniform hypergraph having $n \geq 9$ vertices is at least $\dfrac{43}{42}\dbinom{n}{6}$. We prove that the maximum number of crossing pairs of hyperedges in a $4$-dimensional rectilinear drawing of the complete $4$-uniform hypergraph having $n$ vertices is $13\dbinom{n}{8}$. We also prove that among all $4$-dimensional rectilinear drawings of a complete $4$-uniform hypergraph having $n$ vertices, the number of crossing pairs of hyperedges is maximized if all its vertices are placed at the vertices of a $4$-dimensional neighborly polytope. Our result proves the conjecture by Anshu et al. [Anshu, Gangopadhyay, Shannigrahi, and Vusirikala, 2017] for $d=4$. We prove that the maximum $d$-dimensional rectilinear crossing number of a complete $d$-partite $d$-uniform balanced hypergraph is $(2^{d-1}-1){\dbinom{n}{2}}^d$. We then prove that finding the maximum $d$-dimensional rectilinear crossing number of an arbitrary $d$-uniform hypergraph is NP-hard. We give a randomized scheme to create a $d$-dimensional rectilinear drawing of a $d$-uniform hypergraph $H$ such that, in expectation the total number of crossing pairs of hyperedges is a constant fraction of the maximum $d$-dimensional rectilinear crossing number of $H$.

An injective edge-coloring $c$ of a graph $G$ is an edge-coloring such that if $e_1$, $e_2$, and $e_3$ are three consecutive edges in $G$ (they are consecutive if they form a path or a cycle of length three), then $e_1$ and $e_3$ receive different colors. The minimum integer $k$ such that, $G$ has an injective edge-coloring with $k$ colors, is called the injective chromatic index of $G$ ($χ'_{\textrm{inj}}(G)$). This parameter was introduced by Cardoso et \textit{al.} \cite{CCCD} motivated by the Packet Radio Network problem. They proved that computing $χ'_{\textrm{inj}}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is NP-hard. We give new upper bounds for this parameter and we present the relationships of the injective edge-coloring with other colorings of graphs. The obtained general bound gives 8 for the injective chromatic index of a subcubic graph. If the graph is subcubic bipartite we improve this last bound. We prove that a subcubic bipartite graph has an injective chromatic index bounded by $6$. We also prove that if $G$ is a subcubic graph with maximum average degree less than $\frac{7}{3} $ (resp. $\frac{8}{3} $, $3$), then $G$ admits an injective edge-coloring with at most 4 (resp. $6$, $7$) colors. Moreover, we establish a tight upper bound for subcubic outerplanar graphs.

Reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs) are vertex colored graphs whose vertices represent genes and the colors the species where the genes reside. Edges identify pairs of genes that are most closely related with respect to an underlying evolutionary tree. In practical applications this tree is unknown and the edges of the RBMGs are inferred by quantifying sequence similarity. Due to noise in the data, these empirically determined graphs in general violate the condition of being a ``biologically feasible'' RBMG. Therefore, it is of practical interest in computational biology to correct the initial estimate. Here we consider deletion (remove at most $k$ edges) and editing (add or delete at most $k$ edges) problems. We show that the decision version of the deletion and editing problem to obtain RBMGs from vertex colored graphs is NP-hard. Using known results for the so-called bicluster editing, we show that the RBMG editing problem for $2$-colored graphs is fixed-parameter tractable. A restricted class of RBMGs appears in the context of orthology detection. These are cographs with a specific type of vertex coloring known as hierarchical coloring. We show that the decision problem of modifying a vertex-colored graph (either by edge-deletion or editing) into an RBMG with cograph structure or, equivalently, to an hierarchically colored cograph is NP-complete.

The 2-domination number $γ_2(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $ D \subseteq V(G) $ for which every vertex outside $ D $ is adjacent to at least two vertices in $ D $. Clearly, $ γ_2(G) $ cannot be smaller than the domination number $ γ(G) $. We consider a large class of graphs and characterize those members which satisfy $γ_2=γ$. For the general case, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether $γ_2=γ$ holds. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to satisfy the equality hereditarily.

Arboricity is a graph parameter akin to chromatic number, in that it seeks to partition the vertices into the smallest number of sparse subgraphs. Where for the chromatic number we are partitioning the vertices into independent sets, for the arboricity we want to partition the vertices into cycle-free subsets (i.e., forests). Arboricity is NP-hard in general, and our focus is on the arboricity of cographs. For arboricity two, we obtain the complete list of minimal cograph obstructions. These minimal obstructions do generalize to higher arboricities; however, we no longer have a complete list, and in fact, the number of minimal cograph obstructions grows exponentially with arboricity. We obtain bounds on their size and the height of their cotrees. More generally, we consider the following common generalization of colouring and partition into forests: given non-negative integers $p$ and $q$, we ask if a given cograph $G$ admits a vertex partition into $p$ forests and $q$ independent sets. We give a polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm for this problem. In fact, the algorithm solves a more general problem which also includes several other problems such as finding a maximum $q$-colourable subgraph, maximum subgraph of arboricity-$p$, minimum vertex feedback set and minimum $q$ of a $q$-colourable vertex feedback set.

Bottleneck Steiner networks model energy consumption in wireless ad-hoc networks. The task is to design a network spanning a given set of terminals and at most $k$ Steiner points such that the length of the longest edge is minimised. The problem has been extensively studied for the case where an optimal solution is a tree in the Euclidean plane. However, in order to model a wider range of applications, including fault-tolerant networks, it is necessary to consider multi-connectivity constraints for networks embedded in more general metrics. We show that the $2$-connected bottleneck Steiner network problem is NP-hard in any planar $p$-norm and, in fact, if P$\,\neq\,$NP then an optimal solution cannot be approximated to within a ratio of ${2}^\frac{1}{p}-ε$ in polynomial time for any $ε>0$ and $1\leq p< \infty$.

The (Diophantine) Frobenius problem is a well-known NP-hard problem (also called the stamp problem or the chicken nugget problem) whose origins lie in the realm of combinatorial number theory. In this paper we present an adiabatic quantum algorithm which solves it, using the so-called Apéry set of a numerical semigroup, via a translation into a QUBO problem. The algorithm has been specifically designed to run in a D-Wave 2X machine.

Rearrangement operations transform a phylogenetic tree into another one and hence induce a metric on the space of phylogenetic trees. Popular operations for unrooted phylogenetic trees are NNI (nearest neighbour interchange), SPR (subtree prune and regraft), and TBR (tree bisection and reconnection). Recently, these operations have been extended to unrooted phylogenetic networks, which are generalisations of phylogenetic trees that can model reticulated evolutionary relationships. Here, we study global and local properties of spaces of phylogenetic networks under these three operations. In particular, we prove connectedness and asymptotic bounds on the diameters of spaces of different classes of phylogenetic networks, including tree-based and level-k networks. We also examine the behaviour of shortest TBR-sequence between two phylogenetic networks in a class, and whether the TBR-distance changes if intermediate networks from other classes are allowed: for example, the space of phylogenetic trees is an isometric subgraph of the space of phylogenetic networks under TBR. Lastly, we show that computing the TBR-distance and the PR-distance of two phylogenetic networks is NP-hard.

Budget Minimization is a scheduling problem with precedence constraints, i.e., a scheduling problem on a partially ordered set of jobs $(N, \unlhd)$. A job $j \in N$ is available for scheduling, if all jobs $i \in N$ with $i \unlhd j$ are completed. Further, each job $j \in N$ is assigned real valued costs $c_{j}$, which can be negative or positive. A schedule is an ordering $j_{1}, \dots, j_{\vert N \vert}$ of all jobs in $N$. The budget of a schedule is the external investment needed to complete all jobs, i.e., it is $\max_{l \in \{0, \dots, \vert N \vert \} } \sum_{1 \le k \le l} c_{j_{k}}$. The goal is to find a schedule with minimum budget. Rafiey et al. (2015) showed that Budget Minimization is NP-hard following from a reduction from a molecular folding problem. We extend this result and prove that it is NP-hard to $α(N)$-approximate the minimum budget even on bipartite partial orders. We present structural insights that lead to arguably simpler algorithms and extensions of the results by Rafiey et al. (2015). In particular, we show that there always exists an optimal solution that partitions the set of jobs and schedules each subset independently of the other jobs. We use this structural insight to derive polynomial-time algorithms that solve the problem to optimality on series-parallel and convex bipartite partial orders.

Many well-known NP-hard algorithmic problems on directed graphs resist efficient parametrisations with most known width measures for directed graphs, such as directed treewidth, DAG-width, Kelly-width and many others. While these focus on measuring how close a digraph is to an oriented tree resp. a directed acyclic graph, in this paper, we investigate directed modular width as a parameter, which is closer to the concept of clique-width. We investigate applications of modular decompositions of directed graphs to a wide range of algorithmic problems and derive FPT-algorithms for several well-known digraph-specific NP-hard problems, namely minimum (weight) directed feedback vertex set, minimum (weight) directed dominating set, digraph colouring, directed Hamiltonian path/cycle, partitioning into paths, (capacitated) vertex-disjoint directed paths, and the directed subgraph homeomorphism problem. The latter yields a polynomial-time algorithm for detecting topological minors in digraphs of bounded directed modular width. Finally we illustrate that also other structural digraph parameters, such as the directed pathwidth and the cycle-rank can be computed efficiently using directed modular width as a parameter.

Clique-width is a well-studied graph parameter. For graphs of bounded clique-width, many problems that are NP-hard in general can be polynomial-time solvable. The fact motivates several studies to investigate whether the clique-width of graphs in a certain class is bounded or not. We focus on unigraphs, that is, graphs that are uniquely determined by their degree sequences up to isomorphism. We show that every unigraph has clique-width at most 4. It follows that many problems that are NP-hard in general are polynomial-time solvable for unigraphs.

For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a double roman dominating function (DRDF) is a function $f : V \longrightarrow \{0, 1, 2,3\}$ having the property that if $f(v)=0$ for some vertex $v$, then $v$ has at least two neighbors assigned $2$ under $f$ or one neighbor $w$ with $f(w)=3$, and if $f(v)=1$ then $v$ has at least one neighbor $w$ with $f(w) \geq 2$. The weight of a DRDF $f$ is the sum $f (V) =\sum_{u\in V} f (u)$. The minimum weight of a DRDF on a graph $G$ is the double Roman domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{dR}(G)$. The double roman bondage number of $G$, denoted by $b_{dR}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality among all edge subsets $B \subseteq E(G)$ such that $γ_{dR}(G-B) > γ_{dR}(G)$. In this paper we study the double roman bondage number in graphs. We determine the double roman bondage number in several families of graphs, and present several bounds for the double roman bondage number. We also study the complexity issue of the double roman bondage number and prove that the decision problem for the double roman bondage number is NP-hard even when restricted to bipartite graphs.