arXiv++ Combinatorics

The basic goal of survivable network design is to construct low-cost networks which preserve a sufficient level of connectivity despite the failure or removal of a few nodes or edges. One of the most basic problems in this area is the $2$-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem (2-ECSS): given an undirected graph $G$, find a $2$-edge-connected spanning subgraph $H$ of $G$ with the minimum number of edges (in particular, $H$ remains connected after the removal of one arbitrary edge). 2-ECSS is NP-hard and the best-known (polynomial-time) approximation factor for this problem is $4/3$. Interestingly, this factor was achieved with drastically different techniques by [Hunkenschr{ö}der, Vempala and Vetta '00,'19] and [Seb{ö} and Vygen, '14]. In this paper we present an improved $\frac{118}{89}+ε<1.326$ approximation for 2-ECSS. The key ingredient in our approach (which might also be helpful in future work) is a reduction to a special type of structured graphs: our reduction preserves approximation factors up to $6/5$. While reducing to 2-vertex-connected graphs is trivial (and heavily used in prior work), our structured graphs are "almost" 3-vertex-connected: more precisely, given any 2-vertex-cut $\{u,v\}$ of a structured graph $G=(V,E)$, $G[V\setminus \{u,v\}]$ has exactly 2 connected components, one of which contains exactly one node of degree $2$ in $G$.

A way to associate unweighted graphs from weighted ones is presented, such that linear stable equilibria of the Kuramoto homogeneous model associated to both graphs coincide, i.e., equilibria of the system $\dotθ_i = \sum_{j \sim i} \sin(θ_{j}-θ_j)$, where $i\sim j$ means vertices $i$ and $j$ are adjacent in the corresponding graph. As a consequence, the existence of linearly stable equilibrium is proved to be NP-Hard as conjectured by R. Taylor in 2015 and a new lower bound for the minimum degree that ensures synchronization is found.

We show that the eigenpolytopes of graphs are universal in the sense that every polytope, up to affine equivalence, appears as the eigenpolytope of some positively weighted graph. We next extend the theory of graphical designs, which are quadrature rules for graphs, to positively weighted graphs. Through Gale duality for polytopes, we show a bijection between graphical designs and the faces of eigenpolytopes. This bijection proves the existence of graphical designs with positive quadrature weights, and upper bounds the size of a minimal graphical design. Connecting this bijection with the universality of eigenpolytopes, we establish three complexity results: it is strongly NP-complete to determine if there is a graphical design smaller than the mentioned upper bound, it is NP-hard to find a smallest graphical design, and it is #P-complete to count the number of minimal graphical designs.

Quantum annealing is a type of analog computation that aims to use quantum mechanical fluctuations in search of optimal solutions of QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) or, equivalently, Ising problems. Since NP-hard problems can in general be mapped to Ising and QUBO formulations, the quantum annealing paradigm has the potential to help solve various NP-hard problems. Current quantum annealers, such as those manufactured by D-Wave Systems, Inc., have various practical limitations including the size (number of qubits) of the problem that can be solved, the qubit connectivity, and error due to the environment or system calibration, which can reduce the quality of the solutions. Typically, for an arbitrary problem instance, the corresponding QUBO (or Ising) structure will not natively embed onto the available qubit architecture on the quantum chip. Thus, in these cases, a minor embedding of the problem structure onto the device is necessary. However, minor embeddings on these devices do not always make use of the full sparse chip hardware graph, and a large portion of the available qubits stay unused during quantum annealing. In this work, we embed a disjoint random QUBO on the unused parts of the chip alongside the QUBO to be solved, which acts as an indicator of the solution quality of the device over time. Using experiments on three different D-Wave quantum annealers, we demonstrate that (i) long term trends in solution quality exist on the D-Wave device, and (ii) the unused qubits can be used to measure the current level of noise of the quantum system.

A metric basis in a graph $G$ is a smallest possible set $S$ of vertices of $G$, with the property that any two vertices of $G$ are uniquely recognized by using a vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. A strong metric basis is a variant of metric basis that represents a smallest possible set $S'$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices $x,y$ of $G$ are uniquely recognized by a vertex $v\in S'$ by using either a shortest $x-v$ path that contains $y$, or a shortest $y-v$ path that contains $x$. Given a graph $G$, there exist sometimes some vertices of $G$ such that they forcedly belong to every metric basis or to every strong metric basis of $G$. Such vertices are called (resp. strong) basis forced vertices in $G$. It is natural to consider finding them, in order to find a (strong) metric basis in a graph. However, deciding about the existence of these vertices in arbitrary graphs is in general an NP-hard problem, which makes desirable the problem of searching for (strong) basis forced vertices in special graph classes. This article centers the attention in the class of unicyclic graphs. It is known that a unicyclic graph can have at most two basis forced vertices. In this sense, several results aimed to classify the unicyclic graphs according to the number of basis forced vertices they have are given in this work. On the other hand, with respect to the strong metric bases, it is proved in this work that unicyclic graphs can have as many strong basis forced vertices as we would require. Moreover, some characterizations of the unicyclic graphs concerning the existence or not of such vertices are given in the exposition as well.

A jump is a pair of consecutive elements in an extension of a poset which are incomparable in the original poset. The arboreal jump number is an NP-hard problem that aims to find an arboreal extension of a given poset with minimum number of jumps. The contribution of this paper is twofold: (i)~a characterization that reveals a relation between the number of jumps of an arboreal order extension and the size of a partition of its elements that satisfy some structural properties of the covering graph; (ii)~a compact integer programming model and a heuristic to solve the arboreal jump number problem along with computational results comparing both strategies. The exact method provides an optimality certificate for 18 out of 41 instances with execution time limited to two hours. Furthermore, our heuristic was able to find good feasible solutions for all instances in less than three minutes.

Minimum flow decomposition (MFD) -- the problem of finding a minimum set of weighted source-to-sink paths that perfectly decomposes a flow -- is a classical problem in Computer Science, and variants of it are powerful models in different fields such as Bioinformatics and Transportation. Even on acyclic graphs, the problem is NP-hard, and most practical solutions have been via heuristics or approximations. While there is an extensive body of research on acyclic graphs, currently, there is no \emph{exact} solution on graphs with cycles. In this paper, we present the first ILP formulation for three natural variants of the MFD problem in graphs with cycles, asking for a decomposition consisting only of weighted source-to-sink paths or cycles, trails, and walks, respectively. On three datasets of increasing levels of complexity from both Bioinformatics and Transportation, our approaches solve any instance in under 10 minutes. Our implementations are freely available at github.com/algbio/MFD-ILP.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $C$ of unordered pairs of edges regarded as being in conflict, a stable spanning tree in $G$ is a set of edges $T$ inducing a spanning tree in $G$, such that for each $\left\lbrace e_i, e_j \right\rbrace \in C$, at most one of the edges $e_i$ and $e_j$ is in $T$. The existing work on Lagrangean algorithms to the NP-hard problem of finding minimum weight stable spanning trees is limited to relaxations with the integrality property. We exploit a new relaxation of this problem: fixed cardinality stable sets in the underlying conflict graph $H =(E,C)$. We find interesting properties of the corresponding polytope, and determine stronger dual bounds in a Lagrangean decomposition framework, optimizing over the spanning tree polytope of $G$ and the fixed cardinality stable set polytope of $H$ in the subproblems. This is equivalent to dualizing exponentially many subtour elimination constraints, while limiting the number of multipliers in the dual problem to $|E|$. It is also a proof of concept for combining Lagrangean relaxation with the power of MILP solvers over strongly NP-hard subproblems. We present encouraging computational results using a dual method that comprises the Volume Algorithm, initialized with multipliers determined by Lagrangean dual-ascent. In particular, the bound is within 5.5% of the optimum in 146 out of 200 benchmark instances; it actually matches the optimum in 75 cases. All of the implementation is made available in a free, open-source repository.

In this paper, we study the complexity of two types of digraph packing problems: perfect out-forests problem and Steiner cycle packing problem. For the perfect out-forest problem, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a given strong digraph contains a 1-perfect out-forest. However, when restricted to a semicomplete digraph $D$, the problem of deciding whether $D$ contains an $i$-perfect out-forest becomes polynomial-time solvable, where $i\in \{0,1\}$. We also prove that it is NP-hard to find a 0-perfect out-forest of maximum size in a connected acyclic digraph, and it is NP-hard to find a 1-perfect out-forest of maximum size in a connected digraph. For the Steiner cycle packing problem, when both $k\geq 2, \ell\geq 1$ are fixed integers, we show that the problem of deciding whether there are at least $\ell$ internally disjoint directed $S$-Steiner cycles in an Eulerian digraph $D$ is NP-complete, where $S\subseteq V(D)$ and $|S|=k$. However, when we consider the class of symmetric digraphs, the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable. We also show that the problem of deciding whether there are at least $\ell$ arc-disjoint directed $S$-Steiner cycles in a given digraph $D$ is NP-complete, where $S\subseteq V(D)$ and $|S|=k$.

In an Avoider-Enforcer game, we are given a hypergraph. Avoider and Enforcer alternate in claiming an unclaimed vertex, until all the vertices of the hypergraph are claimed. Enforcer wins if Avoider claims all vertices of an edge; Avoider wins otherwise. We show that it is NP-hard to decide if Avoider has a winning strategy.

In the theory of divisors on multigraphs, the $r^{th}$ divisorial gonality of a graph is the minimum degree of a rank $r$ divisor on that graph. It was proved by Gijswijt et al. that the first divisorial gonality of a finite graph is NP-hard to compute. We generalize their argument to prove that it is NP-hard to compute the $r^{th}$ divisorial gonality of a finite graph for all $r$. We use this result to prove that it is NP-hard to compute $r^{th}$ stable divisorial gonality for a finite graph, and to compute $r^{th}$ divisorial gonality for a metric graph. We also prove these problems are APX-hard, and we study the NP-completeness of these problems.

The independence number of a tree decomposition is the maximum of the independence numbers of the subgraphs induced by its bags. The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum independence number of a tree decomposition of it. Several NP-hard graph problems, like maximum weight independent set, can be solved in time n^{O(k)} if the input n-vertex graph is given together with a tree decomposition of independence number k. Yolov, in [SODA 2018], gave an algorithm that, given an n-vertex graph G and an integer k, in time n^{O(k^3)} either constructs a tree decomposition of G whose independence number is O(k^3) or correctly reports that the tree-independence number of G is larger than k. In this paper, we first give an algorithm for computing the tree-independence number with a better approximation ratio and running time and then prove that our algorithm is, in some sense, the best one can hope for. More precisely, our algorithm runs in time 2^{O(k^2)} n^{O(k)} and either outputs a tree decomposition of G with independence number at most $8k$, or determines that the tree-independence number of G is larger than k. This implies 2^{O(k^2)} n^{O(k)}-time algorithms for various problems, like maximum weight independent set, parameterized by the tree-independence number k without needing the decomposition as an input. Assuming Gap-ETH, an n^{Ω(k)} factor in the running time is unavoidable for any approximation algorithm for the tree-independence number. Our second result is that the exact computation of the tree-independence number is para-NP-hard: We show that for every constant k \ge 4 it is NP-hard to decide if a given graph has the tree-independence number at most k.

Since the seminal result of Karger, Motwani, and Sudan, algorithms for approximate 3-coloring have primarily centered around SDP-based rounding. However, it is likely that important combinatorial or algebraic insights are needed in order to break the $n^{o(1)}$ threshold. One way to develop new understanding in graph coloring is to study special subclasses of graphs. For instance, Blum studied the 3-coloring of random graphs, and Arora and Ge studied the 3-coloring of graphs with low threshold-rank. In this work, we study graphs which arise from a tensor product, which appear to be novel instances of the 3-coloring problem. We consider graphs of the form $H = (V,E)$ with $V =V( K_3 \times G)$ and $E = E(K_3 \times G) \setminus E'$, where $E' \subseteq E(K_3 \times G)$ is any edge set such that no vertex has more than an $ε$ fraction of its edges in $E'$. We show that one can construct $\widetilde{H} = K_3 \times \widetilde{G}$ with $V(\widetilde{H}) = V(H)$ that is close to $H$. For arbitrary $G$, $\widetilde{H}$ satisfies $|E(H) ΔE(\widetilde{H})| \leq O(ε|E(H)|)$. Additionally when $G$ is a mild expander, we provide a 3-coloring for $H$ in polynomial time. These results partially generalize an exact tensor factorization algorithm of Imrich. On the other hand, without any assumptions on $G$, we show that it is NP-hard to 3-color $H$.

An obstacle representation of a graph $G$ consists of a set of pairwise disjoint simply-connected closed regions and a one-to-one mapping of the vertices of $G$ to points such that two vertices are adjacent in $G$ if and only if the line segment connecting the two corresponding points does not intersect any obstacle. The obstacle number of a graph is the smallest number of obstacles in an obstacle representation of the graph in the plane such that all obstacles are simple polygons. It is known that the obstacle number of each $n$-vertex graph is $O(n \log n)$ [Balko, Cibulka, and Valtr, 2018] and that there are $n$-vertex graphs whose obstacle number is $Ω(n/(\log\log n)^2)$ [Dujmović and Morin, 2015]. We improve this lower bound to $Ω(n/\log\log n)$ for simple polygons and to $Ω(n)$ for convex polygons. To obtain these stronger bounds, we improve known estimates on the number of $n$-vertex graphs with bounded obstacle number, solving a conjecture by Dujmović and Morin. We also show that if the drawing of some $n$-vertex graph is given as part of the input, then for some drawings $Ω(n^2)$ obstacles are required to turn them into an obstacle representation of the graph. Our bounds are asymptotically tight in several instances. We complement these combinatorial bounds by two complexity results. First, we show that computing the obstacle number of a graph $G$ is fixed-parameter tractable in the vertex cover number of $G$. Second, we show that, given a graph $G$ and a simple polygon $P$, it is NP-hard to decide whether $G$ admits an obstacle representation using $P$ as the only obstacle.

Baker and Norine initiated the study of graph divisors as a graph-theoretic analogue of the Riemann-Roch theory for Riemann surfaces. One of the key concepts of graph divisor theory is the {\it rank} of a divisor on a graph. The importance of the rank is well illustrated by Baker's {\it Specialization lemma}, stating that the dimension of a linear system can only go up under specialization from curves to graphs, leading to a fruitful interaction between divisors on graphs and curves. Due to its decisive role, determining the rank is a central problem in graph divisor theory. Kiss and Tóthméresz reformulated the problem using chip-firing games, and showed that computing the rank of a divisor on a graph is NP-hard via reduction from the Minimum Feedback Arc Set problem. In this paper, we strengthen their result by establishing a connection between chip-firing games and the Minimum Target Set Selection problem. As a corollary, we show that the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon}n})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ unless $P=NP$. Furthermore, assuming the Planted Dense Subgraph Conjecture, the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(n^{1/4-\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$.

We prove new lower and upper bounds on the higher gonalities of finite graphs. These bounds are generalizations of known upper and lower bounds for first gonality to higher gonalities, including upper bounds on gonality involving independence number, and lower bounds on gonality by scramble number. We apply our bounds to study the computational complexity of computing higher gonalities, proving that it is NP-hard to compute the second gonality of a graph when restricting to multiplicity-free divisors.

We describe a kernel of size 9k-8 for the NP-hard problem of computing the Tree Bisection and Reconnect (TBR) distance k between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We achieve this by extending the existing portfolio of reduction rules with three novel new reduction rules. Two of the rules are based on the idea of topologically transforming the trees in a distance-preserving way in order to guarantee execution of earlier reduction rules. The third rule extends the local neighbourhood approach introduced in (Kelk and Linz, Annals of Combinatorics 24(3), 2020) to more global structures, allowing new situations to be identified when deletion of a leaf definitely reduces the TBR distance by one. The bound on the kernel size is tight up to an additive term. Our results also apply to the equivalent problem of computing a Maximum Agreement Forest (MAF) between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We anticipate that our results will be more widely applicable for computing agreement-forest based dissimilarity measures.

Given a finite family of squares in the plane, the packing problem asks for the maximum number $ν$ of pairwise disjoint squares among them, while the hitting problem for the minimum number $τ$ of points hitting all of them. Clearly, $τ\ge ν$. Both problems are known to be NP-hard, even for families of axis-parallel unit squares. The main results of this work provide the first non-trivial bounds for the $τ/ ν$ ratio for not necessarily axis-parallel squares. We establish an upper bound of $6$ for unit squares and $10$ for squares of varying sizes. The worst ratios we can provide with examples are $3$ and $4$, respectively. For comparison, in the axis-parallel case, the supremum of the considered ratio is in the interval $[\frac{3}{2},2]$ for unit squares and $[\frac{3}{2},4]$ for squares of varying sizes. The methods we introduced for the $τ/ν$ ratio can also be used to relate the chromatic number $χ$ and clique number $ω$ of squares by bounding the $χ/ω$ ratio by $6$ for unit squares and $9$ for squares of varying sizes. The $τ/ ν$ and $χ/ω$ ratios have already been bounded before by a constant for "fat" objects, the fattest and simplest of which are disks and squares. However, while disks have received significant attention, specific bounds for squares have remained essentially unexplored. This work intends to fill this gap.

For graphs $G$ and $H$, an $H$-coloring of $G$ is an edge-preserving mapping from $V(G)$ to $V(H)$. In the $H$-Coloring problem the graph $H$ is fixed and we ask whether an instance graph $G$ admits an $H$-coloring. A generalization of this problem is $H$-ColoringExt, where some vertices of $G$ are already mapped to vertices of $H$ and we ask if this partial mapping can be extended to an $H$-coloring. We study the complexity of variants of $H$-Coloring in $F$-free graphs, i.e., graphs excluding a fixed graph $F$ as an induced subgraph. For integers $a,b,c \geq 1$, by $S_{a,b,c}$ we denote the graph obtained by identifying one endvertex of three paths on $a+1$, $b+1$, and $c+1$ vertices, respectively. For odd $k \geq 5$, by $W_k$ we denote the graph obtained from the $k$-cycle by adding a universal vertex. As our main algorithmic result we show that $W_5$-ColoringExt is polynomial-time solvable in $S_{2,1,1}$-free graphs. This result exhibits an interesting non-monotonicity of $H$-ColoringExt with respect to taking induced subgraphs of $H$. Indeed, $W_5$ contains a triangle, and $K_3$-Coloring, i.e., classical 3-coloring, is NP-hard already in claw-free (i.e., $S_{1,1,1}$-free) graphs. Our algorithm is based on two main observations: 1. $W_5$-ColoringExt in $S_{2,1,1}$-free graphs can be in polynomial time reduced to a variant of the problem of finding an independent set intersecting all triangles, and 2. the latter problem can be solved in polynomial time in $S_{2,1,1}$-free graphs. We complement this algorithmic result with several negative ones. In particular, we show that $W_5$-ColoringExt is NP-hard in $S_{3,3,3}$-free graphs. This is again uncommon, as usually problems that are NP-hard in $S_{a,b,c}$-free graphs for some constant $a,b,c$ are already hard in claw-free graphs.

We prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a graph is the square of a 6-apex graph. This shows that the square root problem is not tractable for squares of sparse graphs (or even graphs from proper minor-closed classes).