arXiv++ Combinatorics

A spanning tree with no vertices of degree 2 is called a Homeomorphically irreducible spanning tree\,(HIST). Based on a HIST embedded in the plane, a Halin graph is formed by connecting the leaves of the tree into a cycle following the cyclic order determined by the embedding. Both of the determination problems of whether a graph contains a HIST or whether a graph contains a spanning Halin graph are shown to be NP-complete. It was conjectured by Albertson, Berman, Hutchinson, and Thomassen in 1990 that a {\it every surface triangulation of at least four vertices contains a HIST}\,(confirmed). And it was conjectured by Lovász and Plummer that {\it every 4-connected plane triangulation contains a spanning Halin graph}\,(disproved). Balancing the above two facts, in this paper, we consider generalized Halin graphs, a family of graph structures which are "stronger" than HISTs but "weaker" than Halin graphs in the sense of their construction constraints. To be exact, a generalized Halin graph is formed from a HIST by connecting its leaves into a cycle. Since a generalized Halin graph needs not to be planar, we investigate the minimum degree condition for a graph to contain it as a spanning subgraph. We show that there exists a positive integer $n_0$ such that any 3-connected graph with $n\ge n_0$ vertices and minimum degree at least $(2n+3)/5$ contains a spanning generalized Halin graph. As an application, the result implies that under the same condition, the graph $G$ contains a wheel-minor of order at least $n/2$. The minimum degree condition in the result is best possible.

Given $k$ pairs of vertices $(s_i,t_i)$, $1\le i\le k$, of a digraph $G$, how can we test whether there exist $k$ vertex-disjoint directed paths from $s_i$ to $t_i$ for $1\le i\le k$? This is NP-complete in general digraphs, even for $k = 2$, but for $k=2$ there is a polynomial-time algorithm when $G$ is a tournament (or more generally, a semicomplete digraph), due to Bang-Jensen and Thomassen. Here we prove that for all fixed $k$ there is a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the problem when $G$ is semicomplete.

A subset $D \subseteq V $of a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a $(1, j)$-set if every vertex $v \in V \setminus D$ is adjacent to at least $1$ but not more than $j$ vertices in D. The cardinality of a minimum $(1, j)$-set of $G$, denoted as $γ_{(1,j)} (G)$, is called the $(1, j)$-domination number of $G$. Given a graph $G = (V, E)$ and an integer $k$, the decision version of the $(1, j)$-set problem is to decide whether $G$ has a $(1, j)$-set of cardinality at most $k$. In this paper, we first obtain an upper bound on $γ_{(1,j)} (G)$ using probabilistic methods, for bounded minimum and maximum degree graphs. Our bound is constructive, by the randomized algorithm of Moser and Tardos [MT10], We also show that the $(1, j)$- set problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs. Finally, we design two algorithms for finding $γ_{(1,j)} (G)$ of a tree and a split graph, for any fixed $j$, which answers an open question posed in [CHHM13].

Graph packing and partitioning problems have been studied in many contexts, including from the algorithmic complexity perspective. Consider the packing problem of determining whether a graph contains a spanning tree and a cycle that do not share edges. Bernáth and Király proved that this decision problem is NP-complete and asked if the same result holds when restricting to planar graphs. Similarly, they showed that the packing problem with a spanning tree and a path between two distinguished vertices is NP-complete. They also established the NP-completeness of the partitioning problem of determining whether the edge set of a graph can be partitioned into a spanning tree and a (not-necessarily spanning) tree. We prove that all three problems remain NP-complete even when restricted to planar graphs.

Let $G$ be a graph. A set $S$ of vertices in $G$ dominates the graph if every vertex of $G$ is either in $S$ or a neighbor of a vertex in $S$. Finding a minimal cardinality set which dominates the graph is an NP-complete problem. The graph $G$ is well-dominated if all its minimal dominating sets are of the same cardinality. The complexity status of recognizing well-dominated graphs is not known. We show that recognizing well-dominated graphs can be done polynomially for graphs without cycles of lengths $4$ and $5$, by proving that a graph belonging to this family is well-dominated if and only if it is well-covered. Assume that a weight function $w$ is defined on the vertices of $G$. Then $G$ is $w$-well-dominated} if all its minimal dominating sets are of the same weight. We prove that the set of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-dominated is a vector space, and denote that vector space by $WWD(G)$. We prove that $WWD(G)$ is a subspace of $WCW(G)$, the vector space of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered. We provide a polynomial characterization of $WWD(G)$ for the case that $G$ does not contain cycles of lengths $4$, $5$, and $6$.

A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is locally bijective, surjective, or injective if its restriction to the neighborhood of every vertex of G is bijective, surjective, or injective, respectively. We prove that the problems of testing whether a given graph G allows a homomorphism to a given graph H that is locally bijective, surjective, or injective, respectively, are NP-complete, even when G has pathwidth at most 5, 4, or 2, respectively, or when both G and H have maximum degree 3. We complement these hardness results by showing that the three problems are polynomial-time solvable if G has bounded treewidth and in addition G or H has bounded maximum degree.

We consider the following problem for a fixed graph H: given a graph G and two H-colorings of G, i.e. homomorphisms from G to H, can one be transformed (reconfigured) into the other by changing one color at a time, maintaining an H-coloring throughout. This is the same as finding a path in the Hom(G,H) complex. For H=K_k this is the problem of finding paths between k-colorings, which was shown to be in P for k<=3 and PSPACE-complete otherwise by Cereceda et al. 2011. We generalize the positive side of this dichotomy by providing an algorithm that solves the problem in polynomial time for any H with no C_4 subgraph. This gives a large class of constraints for which finding solutions to the Constraint Satisfaction Problem is NP-complete, but finding paths in the solution space is P. The algorithm uses a characterization of possible reconfiguration sequences (paths in Hom(G,H)), whose main part is a purely topological condition described in algebraic terms of the fundamental groupoid of H seen as a topological space.

Let F be a set of ordered patterns, i.e., graphs whose vertices are linearly ordered. An F-free ordering of the vertices of a graph H is a linear ordering of V(H) such that none of patterns in F occurs as an induced ordered subgraph. We denote by ORD(F) the decision problem asking whether an input graph admits an F-free ordering; we also use ORD(F) to denote the class of graphs that do admit an F-free ordering. It was observed by Damaschke (and others) that many natural graph classes can be described as ORD(F) for sets F of small patterns (with three or four vertices). Damaschke also noted that for many sets F consisting of patterns with three vertices, ORD(F) is polynomial-time solvable by known algorithms or their simple modifications. We complete the picture by proving that all these problems can be solved in polynomial time. In fact, we provide a single master algorithm, i.e., we solve in polynomial time the problem $ORD_3$ in which the input is a set F of patterns with at most three vertices and a graph H, and the problem is to decide whether or not H admits an F-free ordering of the vertices. Our algorithm certifies non-membership by a forbidden substructure, and thus provides a single forbidden structure characterization for all the graph classes described by some ORD(F) with F consisting of patterns with at most three vertices. Many of the problems ORD(F) with F consisting of larger patterns have been shown to be NP-complete by Duffus, Ginn, and Rodl, and we add two simple examples. We also discuss a bipartite version of the problem, BORD(F), in which the input is a bipartite graph H with a fixed bipartition of the vertices, and we are given a set F of bipartite patterns. We also describe some examples of digraph ordering problems and algorithms. We conjecture that for every set F of forbidden patterns, ORD(F) is either polynomial or NP-complete.

We consider several families of combinatorial polytopes associated with the following NP-complete problems: maximum cut, Boolean quadratic programming, quadratic linear ordering, quadratic assignment, set partition, set packing, stable set, 3-assignment. For comparing two families of polytopes we use the following method. We say that a family $P$ is affinely reduced to a family $Q$ if for every polytope $p\in P$ there exists $q\in Q$ such that $p$ is affinely equivalent to $q$ or to a face of $q$, where $\dim q = O((\dim p)^k)$ for some constant $k$. Under this comparison the above-mentioned families are splitted into two equivalence classes. We show also that these two classes are simpler (in the above sence) than the families of poytopes of the following problems: set covering, traveling salesman, 0-1 knapsack problem, 3-satisfiability, cubic subgraph, partial ordering. In particular, Boolean quadratic polytopes appear as faces of polytopes in every of the mentioned families.

The positive zero forcing number of a graph is a graph parameter that arises from a non-traditional type of graph colouring, and is related to a more conventional version of zero forcing. We establish a relation between the zero forcing and the fast-mixed searching, which implies some NP-completeness results for the zero forcing problem. For chordal graphs much is understood regarding the relationships between positive zero forcing and clique coverings. Building upon constructions associated with optimal tree covers and forest covers, we present a linear time algorithm for computing the positive zero forcing number of chordal graphs. We also prove that it is NP-complete to determine if a graph has a positive zero forcing set with an additional property.

In this paper we fix 7 types of undirected graphs: paths, paths with prescribed endvertices, circuits, forests, spanning trees, (not necessarily spanning) trees and cuts. Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and two "object types" $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{B}$ chosen from the alternatives above, we consider the following questions. \textbf{Packing problem:} can we find an object of type $\mathrm{A}$ and one of type $\mathrm{B}$ in the edge set $E$ of $G$, so that they are edge-disjoint? \textbf{Partitioning problem:} can we partition $E$ into an object of type $\mathrm{A}$ and one of type $\mathrm{B}$? \textbf{Covering problem:} can we cover $E$ with an object of type $\mathrm{A}$, and an object of type $\mathrm{B}$? This framework includes 44 natural graph theoretic questions. Some of these problems were well-known before, for example covering the edge-set of a graph with two spanning trees, or finding an $s$-$t$ path $P$ and an $s'$-$t'$ path $P'$ that are edge-disjoint. However, many others were not, for example can we find an $s$-$t$ path $P\subseteq E $ and a spanning tree $T\subseteq E$ that are edge-disjoint? Most of these previously unknown problems turned out to be NP-complete, many of them even in planar graphs. This paper determines the status of these 44 problems. For the NP-complete problems we also investigate the planar version, for the polynomial problems we consider the matroidal generalization (wherever this makes sense).

Mixed-integer quadratic programming is the problem of optimizing a quadratic function over points in a polyhedral set where some of the components are restricted to be integral. In this paper, we prove that the decision version of mixed-integer quadratic programming is in NP, thereby showing that it is NP-complete. This is established by showing that if the decision version of mixed-integer quadratic programming is feasible, then there exists a solution of polynomial size. This result generalizes and unifies classical results that quadratic programming is in NP and integer linear programming is in NP.

We consider (closed neighbourhood) packings and their generalization in graphs called limited packings. A vertex set X in a graph G is a k-limited packing if for any vertex $v\in V(G)$, $\left|N[v] \cap X\right| \le k$, where $N[v]$ is the closed neighbourhood of $v$. The k-limited packing number $L_k(G)$ is the largest size of a k-limited packing in G. Limited packing problems can be considered as secure facility location problems in networks. We develop probabilistic and greedy approaches to limited packings in graphs, providing lower bounds for the k-limited packing number, and randomized and greedy algorithms to find k-limited packings satisfying the bounds. Some upper bounds for $L_k(G)$ are given as well. The problem of finding a maximum size k-limited packing is known to be NP-complete even in split or bipartite graphs.

For a fixed digraph $\mathbb H$, the $\mathbb H$-coloring problem is the problem of deciding whether a given input digraph $\mathbb G$ admits a homomorphism to $\mathbb H$. The CSP dichotomy conjecture of Feder and Vardi is equivalent to proving that, for any $\mathbb H$, the $\mathbb H$-coloring problem is in in P or NP-complete. We confirm this dichotomy for a certain class of oriented trees, which we call special trees (generalizing earlier results on special triads and polyads). Moreover, we prove that every tractable special oriented tree has bounded width, i.e., the corresponding $\mathbb H$-coloring problem is solvable by local consistency checking. Our proof relies on recent algebraic tools, namely characterization of congruence meet-semidistributivity via pointing operations and absorption theory.

We consider the problems of finding optimal identifying codes, (open) locating-dominating sets and resolving sets (denoted IDENTIFYING CODE, (OPEN) LOCATING-DOMINATING SET and METRIC DIMENSION) of an interval or a permutation graph. In these problems, one asks to distinguish all vertices of a graph by a subset of the vertices, using either the neighbourhood within the solution set or the distances to the solution vertices. Using a general reduction for this class of problems, we prove that the decision problems associated to these four notions are NP-complete, even for interval graphs of diameter $2$ and permutation graphs of diameter $2$. While IDENTIFYING CODE and (OPEN) LOCATING-DOMINATING SET are trivially fixed-parameter-tractable when parameterized by solution size, it is known that in the same setting METRIC DIMENSION is $W[2]$-hard. We show that for interval graphs, this parameterization of METRIC DIMENSION is fixed-parameter-tractable.

In evolutionary biology, biologists often face the problem of constructing a phylogenetic tree on a set $X$ of species from a multiset $Π$ of partitions corresponding to various attributes of these species. One approach that is used to solve this problem is to try instead to associate a tree (or even a network) to the multiset $Σ_Π$ consisting of all those bipartitions $\{A,X-A\}$ with $A$ a part of some partition in $Π$. The rational behind this approach is that a phylogenetic tree with leaf set $X$ can be uniquely represented by the set of bipartitions of $X$ induced by its edges. Motivated by these considerations, given a multiset $Σ$ of bipartitions corresponding to a phylogenetic tree on $X$, in this paper we introduce and study the set $P(Σ)$ consisting of those multisets of partitions $Π$ of $X$ with $Σ_Π=Σ$. More specifically, we characterize when $P(Σ)$ is non-empty, and also identify some partitions in $P(Σ)$ that are of maximum and minimum size. We also show that it is NP-complete to decide when $P(Σ)$ is non-empty in case $Σ$ is an arbitrary multiset of bipartitions of $X$. Ultimately, we hope that by gaining a better understanding of the mapping that takes an arbitrary partition system $Π$ to the multiset $Σ_Π$, we will obtain new insights into the use of median networks and, more generally, split-networks to visualize sets of partitions.

Deciding the existence of an $l\times m\times n$ integer threeway table with given line-sums is NP-complete already for fixed $l=3$, but is in P with both $l,m$ fixed. Here we consider {\em huge} tables, where the variable dimension $n$ is encoded in {\em binary}. Combining recent results on integer cones and Graver bases, we show that if the number of {\em layer types} is fixed, then the problem is in P, whereas if it is variable, then the problem is in NP intersect coNP. Our treatment goes through the more general class of $n$-fold integer programming problems.

A rainbow path in an edge coloured graph is a path in which no two edges are coloured the same. A rainbow colouring of a connected graph G is a colouring of the edges of G such that every pair of vertices in G is connected by at least one rainbow path. The minimum number of colours required to rainbow colour G is called its rainbow connection number. Between them, Chakraborty et al. [J. Comb. Optim., 2011] and Ananth et al. [FSTTCS, 2012] have shown that for every integer k, k \geq 2, it is NP-complete to decide whether a given graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours. A split graph is a graph whose vertex set can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. Chandran and Rajendraprasad have shown that the problem of deciding whether a given split graph G can be rainbow coloured using 3 colours is NP-complete and further have described a linear time algorithm to rainbow colour any split graph using at most one colour more than the optimum [COCOON, 2012]. In this article, we settle the computational complexity of the problem on split graphs and thereby discover an interesting dichotomy. Specifically, we show that the problem of deciding whether a given split graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours is NP-complete for k \in {2,3}, but can be solved in polynomial time for all other values of k.

This paper studies constructive heuristics for the minimum labelling spanning tree (MLST) problem. The purpose is to find a spanning tree that uses edges that are as similar as possible. Given an undirected labeled connected graph (i.e., with a label or color for each edge), the minimum labeling spanning tree problem seeks a spanning tree whose edges have the smallest possible number of distinct labels. The model can represent many real-world problems in telecommunication networks, electric networks, and multimodal transportation networks, among others, and the problem has been shown to be NP-complete even for complete graphs. A primary heuristic, named the maximum vertex covering algorithm has been proposed. Several versions of this constructive heuristic have been proposed to improve its efficiency. Here we describe the problem, review the literature and compare some variants of this algorithm.

The regular number of a graph G denoted by reg(G) is the minimum number of subsets into which the edge set of G can be partitioned so that the subgraph induced by each subset is regular. In this work we answer to the problem posed as an open problem in A. Ganesan et al. (2012) [3] about the complexity of determining the regular number of graphs. We show that computation of the regular number for connected bipartite graphs is NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that, determining whether reg(G) = 2 for a given connected 3-colorable graph G is NP-complete. Also, we prove that a new variant of the Monotone Not-All-Equal 3-Sat problem is NP-complete.