arXiv++ Combinatorics

For integer q>1, we derive edge q-colouring models for (i) the Tutte polynomial of a graph G on the hyperbola H_q, (ii) the symmetric weight enumerator of the set of group-valued q-flows of G, and (iii) a more general vertex colouring model partition function that includes these polynomials and the principal specialization order q of Stanley's symmetric monochrome polynomial. In the second half of the paper we exhibit a family of non-symmetric edge q-colouring models defined on k-regular graphs, whose partition functions for q >= k each evaluate the number of proper edge k-colourings of G when G is Pfaffian.

We introduce a new graph invariant Λ(G) that we call maxmaxflow, and put it in the context of some other well-known graph invariants, notably maximum degree and its relatives. We prove the equivalence of two "dual" definitions of maxmaxflow: one in terms of flows, the other in terms of cocycle bases. We then show how to bound the total number (or more generally, total weight) of various classes of subgraphs of G in terms of either maximum degree or maxmaxflow. Our results are motivated by a conjecture that the modulus of the roots of the chromatic polynomial of G can be bounded above by a function of Λ(G).

Let $G$ be a graph without isolated vertices and let $α(G)$ be its stability number and $τ(G)$ its covering number. The {\it $α_{v}$-cover} number of a graph, denoted by $α_{v}(G)$, is the maximum natural number $m$ such that every vertex of $G$ belongs to a maximal independent set with at least $m$ vertices. In the first part of this paper we prove that $α(G)\leq τ(G)[1+α(G)-α_{v}(G)]$. We also discuss some conjectures analogous to this theorem. In the second part we give a lower bound for the number of edges of a graph $G$ as a function of the stability number $α(G)$, the covering number $τ(G)$ and the number of connected components $c(G)$ of $G$. Namely, let $α$ and $τ$ be two natural numbers and let $$ Γ(α,τ)= \min{\sum_{i=1}^α\bin{z_i}{2} | z_1+...+z_α= α+τ{and} z_i \geq 0 \forall i=1,..., α}. $$ Then if $G$ is any graph, we have: $$ |E(G)| \geq α(G)-c(G)+ Γ(α(G), τ(G)). $$

Given a graph G, an incidence matrix N(G) is defined for the set of distinct isomorphism types of induced subgraphs of G. If Ulam's conjecture is true, then every graph invariant must be reconstructible from this matrix, even when the graphs indexing the rows and the columns of N(G) are unspecified. It is proved that the characteristic polynomial, the rank polynomial, and the number of spanning trees of a graph are reconstructible from its N-matrix. These results are stronger than the original results of Tutte in the sense that actual subgraphs are not used. It is also proved that the characteristic polynomial of a graph with minimum degree 1 can be computed from the characteristic polynomials of all its induced proper subgraphs. The ideas in Kocay's lemma play a crucial role in most proofs. Here Kocay's lemma is used to prove Whitney's subgraph expansion theorem in a simple manner. The reconstructibility of the characteristic polynomial is then demonstrated as a direct consequence of Whitney's theorem as formulated here.

We define an algorithm k which takes a connected graph G on a totally ordered vertex set and returns an increasing tree R (which is not necessarily a subtree of G). We characterize the set of graphs G such that k(G)=R. Because this set has a simple structure (it is isomorphic to a product of non-empty power sets), it is easy to evaluate certain graph invariants in terms of increasing trees. In particular, we prove that, up to sign, the coefficient of x^q in the chromatic polynomial of G is the number of increasing forests with q components that satisfy a condition that we call G-connectedness. We also find a bijection between increasing G-connected trees and broken circuit free subtrees of G.

In this paper we are concerned with various graph invariants (girth, diameter, expansion constants, eigenvalues of the Laplacian, tree number) and their analogs for weighted graphs -- weighing the graph changes a combinatorial problem to one in analysis. We study both weighted and unweighted graphs which are extremal for these invariants. In the unweighted case we concentrate on finding extrema among all (usually) regular graphs with the same number of vertices; we also study the relationships between such graphs.