arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the binomial and monomial ideals arising from linear equivalence of divisors on graphs from the point of view of Gröbner theory. We give an explicit description of a minimal Gröbner bases for each higher syzygy module. In each case the given minimal Gröbner bases is also a minimal generating set. The Betti numbers of the binomial ideal and its natural initial ideal coincide and they correspond to the number of 'connected flags' in the graph. In particular the Betti numbers are independent of the characteristic of the base field. For complete graphs the problem was previously studied by Postnikov and Shapiro and by Manjunath and Sturmfels. The case of a general graph was stated as an open problem.

Consider a weighted graph G with n vertices, numbered by the set {1,...,n}. For any path p in G, we call w_G(p) the sum of the weights of the edges of the path and we define the multiset {\cal D}_{i,j} (G) = {w_G(p) | p simple path between i and j} We establish a criterion to say when, given a multisubset of the set of the real numbers there exists a weighted complete graph G such that the multisubset is equal to {\cal D}_{i,j} (G) for some i,j vertices of G. Besides we establish a criterion to say when, given for any i, j in {1,...,n} a multisubset of the set of the real numbers,{\cal D}_{i,j}, there exists a weighted complete graph G with vertices {1,...,n} such that {\cal D}_{i,j} (G)= {\cal D}_{i,j} for any i,j.

Let k be a positive integer and let f be a map from V(G) to the set of all subsets of {1,2,3,...,k}. The function f is called a k-rainbow dominating function of G provided that whenever u is a vertex of G such that f(u) is the empty set, then for each integer r in {1,2,3,...,k} there is a neighbor x of u such that f(x) contains r. The k-rainbow domination number of G is the minimum sum (over all the vertices of G) of the cardinalities of the subsets assigned by a k-rainbow dominating function of G. The k-rainbow domination number of G is the ordinary domination number of the Cartesian product of G and a complete graph of order k. We focus on the 2-rainbow domination number of the lexicographic product of graphs and prove sharp lower and upper bounds for this number. In fact, we prove the exact value of the 2-rainbow domination number of the lexicographic product of G with H in terms of domination invariants of G, except for the case when H has 2-rainbow domination number 3 and there is a minimum 2-rainbow dominating function of H such that some vertex in H is assigned the label {1,2}.

A proper vertex coloring of a graph is equitable if the sizes of color classes differ by at most 1. The equitable chromatic number of a graph $G$, denoted by $χ_=(G)$, is the minimum $k$ such that $G$ is equitably $k$-colorable. The equitable chromatic threshold of a graph $G$, denoted by $χ_=^*(G)$, is the minimum $t$ such that $G$ is equitably $k$-colorable for $k \ge t$. In this paper, we give the exact values of $χ_=(K_{m_1,..., m_r} \times K_n)$ and $χ_=^*(K_{m_1,..., m_r} \times K_n)$ for $\sum_{i = 1}^r m_i \leq n$.

The product dimension of a graph G is defined as the minimum natural number l such that G is an induced subgraph of a direct product of l complete graphs. In this paper we study the product dimension of forests, bounded treewidth graphs and k-degenerate graphs. We show that every forest on n vertices has a product dimension at most 1.441logn+3. This improves the best known upper bound of 3logn for the same due to Poljak and Pultr. The technique used in arriving at the above bound is extended and combined with a result on existence of orthogonal Latin squares to show that every graph on n vertices with a treewidth at most t has a product dimension at most (t+2)(logn+1). We also show that every k-degenerate graph on n vertices has a product dimension at most \ceil{8.317klogn}+1. This improves the upper bound of 32klogn for the same by Eaton and Rodl.

We study the expected value of the length $L_n$ of the minimum spanning tree of the complete graph $K_n$ when each edge $e$ is given an independent uniform $[0,1]$ edge weight. We sharpen the result of Frieze \cite{F1} that $\lim_{n\to\infty}\E(L_n)=\z(3)$ and show that $\E(L_n)=\z(3)+\frac{c_1}{n}+\frac{c_2+o(1)}{n^{4/3}}$ where $c_1,c_2$ are explicitly defined constants.

Cayley's formula states that there are $n^{n-2}$ spanning trees in the complete graph on $n$ vertices; it has been proved in more than a dozen different ways over its 150 year history. The complete graphs are a special case of threshold graphs, and using Merris' Theorem and the Matrix Tree Theorem, there is a strikingly simple formula for counting the number of spanning trees in a threshold graph on $n$ vertices; it is simply the product, over $i=2,3, ...,n-1$, of the number of vertices of degree at least $i$. In this manuscript, we provide a direct combinatorial proof for this formula which does not use the Matrix Tree Theorem; the proof is an extension of Joyal's proof for Cayley's formula. Then we apply this methodology to give a formula for the number of spanning trees in any difference graph.

We study a generalization of strongly regular graphs. We call a graph strongly walk-regular if there is an $\ell >1$ such that the number of walks of length $\ell$ from a vertex to another vertex depends only on whether the two vertices are the same, adjacent, or not adjacent. We will show that a strongly walk-regular graph must be an empty graph, a complete graph, a strongly regular graph, a disjoint union of complete bipartite graphs of the same size and isolated vertices, or a regular graph with four eigenvalues. Graphs from the first three families in this list are indeed strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for all $\ell$, whereas the graphs from the fourth family are $\ell$-walk-regular for every odd $\ell$. The case of regular graphs with four eigenvalues is the most interesting (and complicated) one. Such graphs cannot be strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for even $\ell$. We will characterize the case that regular four-eigenvalue graphs are strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for every odd $\ell$, in terms of the eigenvalues. There are several examples of infinite families of such graphs. We will show that every other regular four-eigenvalue graph can be strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for at most one $\ell$. There are several examples of infinite families of such graphs that are strongly 3-walk-regular. It however remains open whether there are any graphs that are strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for only one particular $\ell$ different from 3.

A "book with k pages" consists of a straight line (the "spine") and k half-planes (the "pages"), such that the boundary of each page is the spine. If a graph is drawn on a book with k pages in such a way that the vertices lie on the spine, and each edge is contained in a page, the result is a k-page book drawing (or simply a k-page drawing). The k-page crossing number nu_k(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of crossings in a k-page drawing of G. In this paper we investigate the k-page crossing numbers of complete graphs K_n. We use semidefinite programming techniques to give improved lower bounds on nu_k(K_n) for various values of k. We also use a maximum satisfiability reformulation to calculate the exact value of nu_k(K_n) for several values of k and n. Finally, we investigate the best construction known for drawing K_n in k pages, calculate the resulting number of crossings, and discuss this upper bound in the light of the new results reported in this paper.

For graphs $G_1, G_2, G_3$, the three-color Ramsey number $R(G_1,$ $G_2, G_3)$ is the smallest integer $n$ such that if we arbitrarily color the edges of the complete graph of order $n$ with 3 colors, then it contains a monochromatic copy of $G_i$ in color $i$, for some $1 \leq i \leq 3$. First, we prove that the conjectured equality $R_3(C_{2n},C_{2n},C_{2n})=4n$, if true, implies that $R_3(P_{2n+1},P_{2n+1},P_{2n+1})=4n+1$ for all $n \ge 3$. We also obtain two new exact values $R(P_8,P_8,P_8)=14$ and $R(P_9,P_9,P_9)=17$, furthermore we do so without help of computer algorithms. Our results agree with a formula $R(P_n,P_n,P_n)=2n-2+(n\bmod 2)$ which was proved for sufficiently large $n$ by Gyárfás, Ruszinkó, Sárközy, and Szemerédi in 2007. This provides more evidence for the conjecture that the latter holds for all $n \ge 1$.

A small oriented cycle double cover (SOCDC)} of a bridgeless graph $G$ on $n$ vertices is a collection of at most $n-1$ directed cycles of the symmetric orientation, $G_s$, of $G$ such that each edge of $G_s$ lies in exactly one of the cycles. It is conjectured that every 2-connected graph except two complete graphs $K_4$ and $K_6$ has an $\rm SOCDC$. In this paper, we study graphs with $\rm SOCDC$ and obtain some properties of the minimal counterexample to this conjecture.

In 1974, Goodman and Hedetniemi proved that every 2-connected $(K_{1,3},K_{1,3}+e)$-free graph is hamiltonian. This result gave rise many other hamiltonicity conditions for various pairs and triples of forbidden connected subgraphs under additional connectivity conditions. In 1997, it was proved that a single forbidden connected subgraph $R$ in 2-connected graphs can create only a trivial class of hamiltonian graphs (complete graphs) with $R=P_3$. In this paper we prove that a single forbidden subgraph $R$ can create a non trivial class of hamiltonian graphs if $R$ is disconnected: $(\ast1)$ every $(K_1\cup P_2)$-free graph either is hamiltonian or belongs to a well defined class of non hamiltonian graphs; $(\ast2)$ every 1-tough $(K_1\cup P_3)$-free graph is hamiltonian. We conjecure that every 1-tough $(K_1\cup P_4)$-free graph is hamiltonian and every 1-tough $P_4$-free graph is hamiltonian

A G-gain graph is a graph whose oriented edges are labeled invertibly from a group G. Zaslavsky proposed two matroids of G-gain graphs, called frame matroids and lift matroids, and investigated linear representations of them. Each matroid has a canonical representation over a field F if G is isomorphic to a subgroup of F^{\times} in the case of frame matroids or G is isomorphic to an additive subgroup of F in the case of lift matroids. The canonical representation of the frame matroid of a complete graph is also known as a Dowling geometry, as it was first introduced by Dowling for finite groups. In this paper, we extend these matroids in two ways. The first one is extending the rank function of each matroid, based on submodular functions over G. The resulting rank function generalizes that of the union of frame matroids or lift matroids. Another one is extending the canonical linear representation of the union of d copies of a frame matroid or a lift matroid, based on linear representations of G on a d-dimensional vector space. We show that linear matroids of the latter extension are indeed special cases of the first extensions, as in the relation between Dowling geometries and frame matroids. We also discuss an attempt to unify the extension of frame matroids and that of lift matroids. This work is motivated from recent research on the combinatorial rigidity of symmetric graphs. As special cases, we give several new results on this topic, including combinatorial characterizations of the symmetry-forced rigidity of generic body-bar frameworks with point group symmetries or crystallographic symmetries and the symmetric parallel redrawability of generic bar-joint frameworks with point group symmetries or crystallographic symmetries.

Let $G_1, G_2, ..., G_t$ be graphs. The multicolor Ramsey number $R(G_1, G_2, ..., G_t)$ is the smallest positive integer $n$ such that if the edges of complete graph $K_n$ are partitioned into $t$ disjoint color classes giving $t$ graphs $H_1,H_2,...,H_t$, then at least one $H_i$ has a subgraph isomorphic to $G_i$. In this paper, we prove that if $(n,m)\neq (3,3), (3,4)$ and $m\geq n$, then $R(P_3,P_n,P_m)=R(P_n,P_m)=m+\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor-1$. Consequently $R(P_3,mK_2,nK_2)=2m+n-1$ for $m\geq n\geq 3$.

An {\sf oriented perfect path double cover} ($\rm OPPDC$) of a graph $G$ is a collection of directed paths in the symmetric orientation $G_s$ of $G$ such that each edge of $G_s$ lies in exactly one of the paths and each vertex of $G$ appears just once as a beginning and just once as an end of a path. Maxov{á} and Ne{š}et{ř}il (Discrete Math. 276 (2004) 287-294) conjectured that every graph except two complete graphs $K_3$ and $K_5$ has an $\rm OPPDC$ and they proved that the minimum degree of the minimal counterexample to this conjecture is at least four. In this paper, among some other results, we prove that the minimal counterexample to this conjecture is 2-connected and 3-edge-connected.

We present an alternative domain concerning mathematics to investigate universal evolution mechanisms by focusing on large cycles theory (LCT) - a simplified version of well-known hamiltonian graph theory. LCT joins together a number of $NP$-complete cycle problems in graph theory. $NP$-completeness is the kay factor insuring (by conjecture of Cook) the generation of endless developments and great diversity around large cycles problems. Originated about 60 years ago, the individuals (claims, propositions, lemmas, conjectures, theorems, and so on) in LCT continually evolve and adapt to their environment by an iterative process from primitive beginnings to best possible theorems based on inductive reasoning. LCT evolves much more rapidly than biosphere and has a few thousand pronounced species (theorems). Recall that life on earth with more than 2 million species was originated about 3.7 billion years ago and evolves extremely slowly. We show that all theorems in LCT have descended from some common primitive propositions such as "every complete graph is hamiltonian" or "every graph contains a cycle of length at least one" via improvements, modifications and three kinds of generalizations - closing, associating and extending. It is reasonable to review Darwinian mechanisms in light of LCT evolution mechanisms (especially inductive reasoning) including the origin and macroevolution disputable phenomena in the biosphere.

We give two combinatorial proofs of an elegant product formula for the number of spanning trees of the $n$-dimensional hypercube. The first proof is based on the assertion that if one chooses a uniformly random rooted spanning tree of the hypercube and orient each edge from parent to child, then the parallel edges of the hypercube get orientations which are independent of one another. This independence property actually holds in a more general context and has intriguing consequences. The second proof uses some "killing involutions" in order to identify the factors in the product formula. It leads to an enumerative formula for the spanning trees of the $n$-dimensional hypercube augmented with diagonals edges, counted according to the number of edges of each type. We also discuss more general formulas, obtained using a matrix-tree approach, for the number of spanning trees of the Cartesian product of complete graphs.

In a properly edge colored graph, a subgraph using every color at most once is called rainbow. In this thesis, we study rainbow cycles and paths in proper edge colorings of complete graphs, and we prove that in every proper edge coloring of K_n, there is a rainbow path on (3/4-o(1))n vertices, improving on the previously best bound of (2n+1)/3 from Gyarfas and Mhalla. Similarly, a k-rainbow path in a proper edge coloring of K_n is a path using no color more than k times. We prove that in every proper edge coloring of K_n, there is a k-rainbow path on (1-2/(k+1)!)n vertices.

For a given finite graph $G$ of minimum degree at least $k$, let $G_{p}$ be a random subgraph of $G$ obtained by taking each edge independently with probability $p$. We prove that (i) if $p \ge ω/k$ for a function $ω=ω(k)$ that tends to infinity as $k$ does, then $G_p$ asymptotically almost surely contains a cycle (and thus a path) of length at least $(1-o(1))k$, and (ii) if $p \ge (1+o(1))\ln k/k$, then $G_p$ asymptotically almost surely contains a path of length at least $k$. Our theorems extend classical results on paths and cycles in the binomial random graph, obtained by taking $G$ to be the complete graph on $k+1$ vertices.

Around 1958, Hill described how to draw the complete graph $K_n$ with [Z(n) :=1/4\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-2}{2}% \rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor] crossings, and conjectured that the crossing number $\crg (K_{n})$ of $K_n$ is exactly Z(n). This is also known as Guy's conjecture as he later popularized it. Towards the end of the century, substantially different drawings of $K_{n}$ with Z(n) crossings were found. These drawings are \emph{2-page book drawings}, that is, drawings where all the vertices are on a line $\ell$ (the spine) and each edge is fully contained in one of the two half-planes (pages) defined by $\ell$. The \emph{2-page crossing number} of $K_{n} $, denoted by $ν_{2}(K_{n})$, is the minimum number of crossings determined by a 2-page book drawing of $K_{n}% $. Since $\crg(K_{n}) \leν_{2}(K_{n})$ and $ν_{2}(K_{n}) \le Z(n)$, a natural step towards Hill's Conjecture is the %(formally) weaker conjecture $ν_{2}(K_{n}) = Z(n)$, popularized by Vrt'o. %As far as we know, this natural %conjecture was first raised by Imrich Vrt'o in 2007. %Prior to this paper, results known for $ν_2(K_n)$ were basically %the same as for $\crg (K_n)$. Here In this paper we develop a novel and innovative technique to investigate crossings in drawings of $K_{n}$, and use it to prove that $ν_{2}(K_{n}) = Z(n) $. To this end, we extend the inherent geometric definition of $k$-edges for finite sets of points in the plane to topological drawings of $K_{n}$. We also introduce the concept of ${\leq}{\leq}k$-edges as a useful generalization of ${\leq}k$-edges and extend a powerful theorem that expresses the number of crossings in a rectilinear drawing of $K_{n}$ in terms of its number of $(\le k)$-edges to the topological setting.