arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Guaranteed Utility Mechanism (GUM) was introduced to implement efficiency in Guaranteed Utility Equilibrium (GUE) in dynamic social choice problems. We show that this mechanism also has a previously unknown connection to risk minimization. Fixing an efficient decision policy, we study variance-minimizing budget-balanced transfer rules in the class of GUE-implementations of truthful reporting. A symmetrized version of GUM (sym-GUM) minimizes the sum of the agents' utility variances under truthful reporting when there is no public state. When a public state is present, a slight modification of this rule yields the minimizer for the same objective. Sym-GUM, however, does not minimize transfer risk. The minimizer for that problem is instead the symmetrized version of a closely related GUM-like transfer rule. In both problems, the minimizing truthful total transfers are unique up to agent-specific constants summing to zero and events of probability zero.

Motivated by problems in Bayesian reusable resource allocation, we introduce the concept of stationary online contention resolution schemes (S-OCRSs). OCRSs are a central tool used to solve non-reusable resource allocation problems. They convert solutions to fluid approximations of problems into feasible online policies while approximately preserving allocation probabilities. S-OCRSs depart from standard OCRSs in that they ensure that the probability of allocating any given set of resources is independent of the arrival order of requests. We show how S-OCRSs can be used to solve reusable resource allocation problems, and discuss a general 'maximum-entropy' approach to construct and analyze S-OCRSs. Our approach, using a unified method for a variety of feasibility constraints, obtains results that match the state-of-the-art for OCRSs, and even improves it for a bipartite matching feasibility constraint. Our results for reusable resource allocation also extend to the assortment optimization setting, and our policies can be implemented using prices.

We study the dimension defect of finitely many subspaces over an arbitrary field. We derive a symmetric, nonrecursive Grassmann-type formula for the dimension of their sum. The formula expresses the total dimension loss through intersections of a distinguished subspace with partial sums of the remaining subspaces, with coefficients determined by the number of subspaces involved. We also show that the formula admits a Shapley-value interpretation for the associated representable polymatroid. Grouping the correction terms by the number of participating subspaces yields a nonnegative dimension-defect profile. We prove that this profile is monotone and identify its successive gaps with the discrete curvatures of the average-rank profile. These gaps give exact remainders in two-sided defect bounds. Equality in either bound holds precisely when the images of the subspaces in the quotient by their common intersection form an internal direct sum. We also give an exact geometric decomposition of the Kinser slack into nonnegative quotient dimensions and characterize equality. Averaging these slacks over permutations and contractions recovers every defect curvature except the final one; additional representability constraints remain in the individual ordered slacks. Weighted and dual formulas accompany the expansion, and entropy analogues express the defect levels and curvatures as averages of mutual and conditional mutual information, respectively.

We introduce and analyze a new model of graph burning, in which two competing fires (coloured yellow and green) ignite vertices of a given signed graph and propagate along its edges. The boolean sign of an edge determines whether a fire spreading along the edge changes colour or not. In each step, a player ignites a new vertex in a colour of their choice, while previously activated fires continue to spread. Given a signed graph $Γ$, the objective is to burn the maximum possible number of vertices in a single colour; the optimal achievable value is called the plurality number of $Γ$. We express the plurality number through Hamming distances to a binary code associated with $Γ$. In particular, the minimum plurality number over the switching class of $Γ$ equals the number of vertices minus the covering radius of this code. Under certain conditions on the signature, we determine exact values of the plurality number of signed paths. By contrast, we prove hardness results for multiple variants of the problem of determining or approximating the plurality number.

Oftentimes, the Shapley value, a measure of the contribution of a player to a game, becomes infeasible for games with many players. However, establishing symmetry allows for polynomial-time computation. To examine this reduction, we identify the spectrum of a homogeneous group game by using an induced representation from a Young subgroup. We prove that the depth of interaction of a two-group game is limited by the size of the minority group. Therefore, the algebraic structure of the game filters out a large space of irrelevant complexities. We then show that this filtration constrains any symmetric linear value to a specific subspace. This recovers the Shapley value uniquely for games consisting of exactly two homogeneous groups under standard axioms. Finally, we explore applications to the UN Security Council and complementary goods markets to illustrate the practical power of this approach.

The number of Nash equilibria of the mixed extension of a generic finite game in normal form is finite and odd. This raises the question how large the number can be, depending on the number of players and the numbers of their pure strategies. Here we present a lower bound for the maximal possible number in the case of m-player games where each player has two pure strategies. It is surprisingly close to a known upper bound.

Bimatrix games may have an exponential number of mixed Nash equilibria if both dimensions of the game are allowed to grow. Bounds on their maximal number give structural insights that have been used to construct hard-to-solve games. We show new sharp or asymptotically sharp bounds on the (polynomial) number of equilibria for generic games where one dimension of the game is fixed and the number of strategies of the other player grows. These results go beyond the hitherto studied square games. Our methods employ combinatorial properties of polytopes, and recent obstructions that relate to the graph of those polytopes. For $n\ge5$, we construct $3\times n$ games that have all $2n+1$ vertices of the best-response polytope as equilibrium strategies, proved using a simple case of the 4-color theorem for planar graphs. Generic $4\times 5$ games are shown to have at most 17 equilibria, using computer calculations with existing datasets for all combinatorial types of the relevant polytopes. For $d\times n$ games, we construct games where all but a fraction of $O(1/n)$ of the maximum number of vertices are equilibrium strategies.

We study the computational complexity of fundamental algorithmic problems -- membership testing, separation, valid-inequality testing, and linear optimization -- over polytopes and cones arising from cooperative games (also known as pseudo-Boolean functions). A central obstacle in the study of such problems is that a general cooperative game on $n$ players requires $2^n$ values, so the input size is $2^n$ for a game with $n$ players, making these computational tasks theoretically trivial. Restricting to $k$-additive games reduces the input size to $O(n^k)$, making such games a natural target for meaningful questions about the existence of efficient algorithms. On the positive side, we give an explicit extended formulation of size $O(n^k)$ for the core of $k$-additive $k$-monotone games, allowing all four problems to be solved by a single polynomial-size linear program -- in particular, circumventing the ellipsoid method that is needed when building from earlier tractability results of Deng and Papadimitriou, or of Edmonds. For the cone of $k$-additive $(k{-}1)$-monotone games, we give a complete characterization of its extreme rays and derive the same $O(n^k)$ bound on extension complexity, yielding a geometry-based proof and generalization of a result of Billionnet and Minoux. On the negative side, we show that for $l \leq k-2$ the cone of $k$-additive $l$-monotone games is computationally intractable: membership testing is not in NP (unless NP\,=\,coNP), valid-inequality testing is NP-complete, and extension complexity is at least $1.5^n$. Our hardness results yield, as a special case, a result of Crama and of Gallo and Simone. Furthermore, our hardness results also explain the lack of any good characterization of the extreme rays of the cone of $k$-additive $(k{-}2)$-monotone games.

The Kemeny rule aggregates multiple strict rankings into a single strict ranking that minimizes the sum of its distances from the input rankings. The resulting optimization problem, called the Kemeny problem (\texttt{KP}), is a special case of the linear ordering problem (\texttt{LOP}). The Kemeny rule satisfies several desirable properties in social choice theory, including the extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{XCC}). Ando et al. strengthened this result by introducing the strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{SCC}) and showing that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOP} instance. Yoo and Escobedo extended the Kemeny rule to rankings with ties and showed that the resulting rule satisfies the non-strict extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NXCC}). This criterion gives a condition under which one candidate must be ranked strictly above another in every optimal solution. In this paper, we introduce the non-strict strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NSCC}), a counterpart of the \texttt{SCC} for rankings with ties, and show that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary instance of the linear ordering problem with ties (\texttt{LOPT}). We also establish a complementary structural property that gives conditions under which two candidates must be tied in every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOPT} instance.

Core stability gives approval-based committee elections a strong form of coalitional proportionality, but deterministic existence is not known for an arbitrary number of seats. We prove that every finite election with nine seats has a deterministic Hare-quota core committee. Starting from an eight-seat committee that is both a global Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) maximizer and core stable, we suppose that all one-candidate extensions are blocked and extract an inclusion-minimal closed response system. Singleton responses are eliminated by exact equality rigidity. For the remaining responses, rational Farkas certificates bound every nonpositive PAV add-marginal drift below by $-n/189$ and force every successor drift above $n/126$. The uniform response chain is irreducible, so stationarity makes these bounds incompatible. The computer-assisted component comprises an exact pointwise check over 7,356 voter types, 36 one-blocker cells, and a symmetry-complete family of 19 two-blocker motifs. Exact certificate archives and standard-library verifiers support these checks. The theorem settles the nine-seat case but does not decide deterministic core existence for arbitrary committee size.

We study graph coloring with color preferences, in which each vertex ranks the available colors. In addition to assigning different colors to adjacent vertices, we require the coloring to be stable: no group of vertices can cyclically exchange their assigned colors so that each strictly prefers its new color to its original one. We define the stable chromatic number $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the minimum integer $k$ such that every preference profile admits a stable $k$-coloring of $G$. We establish several upper and lower bounds. In particular, for any acyclic orientation of the edges of $G$, the largest number of vertices reachable from a vertex by directed paths, including the vertex itself, is an upper bound on $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$. This shows that $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ is well-defined. We also show that $O(t \log (1+n/t))$ colors suffice for an $n$-vertex graph $G$ of treewidth $t$, and complement this with a lower bound in terms of the Grundy number. Turning to the problem of finding a minimum stable coloring for a given profile, we show that stable $2$-colorability is polynomial-time solvable, whereas stable $k$-colorability is NP-complete for every fixed $k\ge 3$. Using the treewidth bound, we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by treewidth.

In this paper, we study fair division problems in which resources are structured as graphs and agents must receive connected bundles. This connectivity requirement fundamentally alters the problem, making it significantly more challenging than its classical counterpart. We focus on the fairness notion of $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$, where envy can be eliminated by removing at most one vertex whose deletion does not disconnect the bundle -- a critical constraint for applications such as land division and network allocation. Our first result extends prior work by establishing the existence of $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ allocations for an infinite family of non-traceable graphs (that is, graphs that do not admit a Hamiltonian path), answering a central open question and generalizing Bilò et al.'s result for traceable graphs. We then make progress on a conjecture concerning the $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ spectrum of trees due to Chen and Zwicker. Finally, we complement our structural results with algorithmic insights, showing that deciding the existence of an $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ allocation is NP-complete even for binary additive valuations, thereby resolving an open complexity question. Taken together, our results deepen the connection between graph theory and fair division, and offer new tools for studying fairness in structured resource environments.

Connectivity can turn separate contributions into a public good that benefits participants and nonparticipants alike. Yet only participants pay for it, and each can avoid her charge by withdrawing while enjoying whatever public output survives. How do network connections constrain who can or must pay, and how large a cost can the group bear? We study a participation game in which public output equals the size of the largest connected group of active players, whose members divide a fixed operating cost. The output a participant destroys by withdrawing is her withdrawal responsibility and bounds her payment. These bounds determine the group's cost-bearing capacity and, whenever the group can be kept active, which participants must pay. We prove that among connected networks with at least five players, the path uniquely maximizes the cost-bearing capacity of a group, yet minimizes the expected surviving output after a uniformly selected participant withdraws. As the group grows, the ratio of maximal capacity to gross social benefit under full participation converges to one quarter. Fragility can therefore strengthen voluntary finance, but even the most financeable network cannot close the gap between the value it creates and what its participants will pay to sustain it.

Condorcet's paradox is a foundational result in social choice theory, showing that no matter which candidate wins an election, a majority of voters may prefer some losing candidate. Worse still, even if the election can choose a committee of $k$ winners, some loser may beat every winner in a majority vote. Recent work showed that this obstruction can be sidestepped by relaxing the majority threshold. For all $\varepsilon > 0$, any election can select a committee of $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ winners such that no loser is preferred to every winner by $\frac12 + \varepsilon$ fraction of voters. We present a simple construction, found by GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, which proves that this result is tight up to a constant factor.

The Kemeny rule aggregates rankings by minimizing their total Kendall-tau distance from an aggregate order. We prove that Kemeny Score is NP-complete for exactly three unweighted rankings, even when every candidate pair is split $2$-to-$1$. On the same profiles, the winner, unique-winner, and possible- and necessary-precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, while recognizing a Kemeny-optimal or uniquely Kemeny-optimal aggregate is coNP-complete. The hard instances induce tournaments of majority dimension exactly $3$. The reduction also determines the exact maximum-cut value from the optimal Kemeny score and recovers a maximum cut from any Kemeny-optimal aggregate. For every fixed $q\geq3$ and $\lceil q/2\rceil\leq s\leq q$, minimum pairwise support $s$ yields a sharp dichotomy: the score problem is NP-complete, the winner and precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, and the recognition problems are coNP-complete when $3s\leq2q$; for $3s>2q$, the majority tournament is transitive and its unique topological order is the unique Kemeny-optimal aggregate. Exact support $s$ suffices in the hard case when $s>q/2$, and supports in ${s,s+1}$ suffice when $s=q/2$. These results give complete fixed-profile-size classifications and transfer to Slater orders, permutation medians, and maximum-likelihood central rankings in the Mallows model. Finally, a six-copy construction proves NP-completeness of both Kemeny Score and Kendall--Tau Center for three pairwise-equidistant rankings that still split every pair $2$-to-$1$. For $N$ output candidates, their common distance is $\frac23\binom N2$, the largest possible for an equidistant triple. The construction gives affine formulas for both optimal values, characterizes all Kemeny-optimal output orders, and shows that the output has a unique Kemeny-optimal order and a unique center exactly when the input has a unique Kemeny-optimal order.

We investigate a remarkable probability distribution on the symmetric group, due to Steck from the early 1970's, arising from a natural process that intertwines continuous and discrete selections for the values and positions, respectively, of a permutation. Steck used a matrix determinant to express his distribution, whereas we contribute new combinatorial formulas for it in terms of "bottom-to-top maxima" (that are simply the left-to-right maxima of the inverse) permutation statistics. These formulas specialize, in the case of the identity permutation, to a result of Pitman--Stanley from the late 1990's. We then use the Steck distribution to define a game of best choice (secretary problem variation) that incorporates a filtering process for the pool of candidates over time. We solve the model for the case where there is a single filtering step. It turns out that the probability of winning the game under optimal play is similar to the classical model ($1/e$, asymptotically), but that the interviewer must employ a different (non-positional) strategy in order to attain it. The optimal strategy depends on the relationship between interview position and the next bottom-to-top maximum value after the filtering step. Among other results, we prove that the optimal strategy always transitions from rejection to acceptance between positions $(1/e)$ and $(1/e) + (1 - 1/e)y$ as a proportion of the total candidates considered, where $y$ is the proportion of unfiltered candidates.

We attach to a finite group $G$ and a structured payoff probe $φ$ an integer \emph{payoff-difference lattice} $M_φ(G)$ and its \emph{conductor} $C_φ(G)$: the primes at which $M_φ(G)$ loses rank modulo $p$. Our main result is an exact computation: for any CA-group the commuting conductor is rad$(b-1)$, where $b$ is the number of maximal abelian subgroups. In particular, conductor primes need not divide $|G|$: the prime $3$ occurs for a $2$-group of order $64$ with $b=7$. The commuting Smith spectrum is an invariant of the isoclinism class and obeys an exact direct-product law, giving ${\rm C_{comm}}(G\times H) = {\rm C_{comm}}(G) \cup {\rm C_{comm}}(H)$ unconditionally. A Galois-orbit-trace character probe reads a complementary layer: an index-$2$ subgroup forces $2\in {\rm C_{char}}(G)$ while no odd prime is forced, and ${\rm C_{comm}}(D_{2q}) = \{q\}$, ${\rm C_{char}}(D_{2q}) = \{2\}$ for all odd primes $q$. Certified exhaustive computation ($|G|\le128$ commuting, $|G|\le64$ character) and a deformation-family analysis support the general program: classify the Smith torsion of the compressed centralizer-type incidence matrix $B_G$.

In the fair allocation problem under conflict constraints, the goal is to partition the vertices of a graph among agents in a fair manner, such that no two adjacent vertices are assigned to the same agent. We study this problem for agents with common preferences through the lens of three fairness criteria: stochastic-dominance envy-freeness up to one item for preference orders (SD-EF1), envy-freeness up to one item for monotone additive valuations (EF1), and envy-freeness up to one item from each side for general additive valuations (EF[1,1]). To do so, we introduce a hierarchy of variants of the strong chromatic number, a graph quantity introduced independently by Alon and Fellows in the early nineties. Our results reveal a close connection between fair allocation under conflict constraints and the first two levels of this hierarchy, providing a unified route to both existential and algorithmic results. For SD-EF1, we fully characterize the number of agents needed to guarantee a fair allocation of a given graph for every common preference order. For EF1 and EF[1,1], we provide analogous sufficient conditions, extending a result on path graphs due to Equbal, Gurjar, Igarashi, Kumar, Manurangsi, Nath, Saxena, Vaish, and Yoneda. We also show that, unlike in the SD-EF1 setting, the sufficient conditions for EF1 and EF[1,1] are not necessary in general. Our framework yields existential and algorithmic consequences in terms of the maximum degree. We obtain that every graph with maximum degree $Δ$ admits SD-EF1, EF1, and EF[1,1] allocations for common preferences whenever the number of agents is at least $3Δ-1$. We further provide, for any $\varepsilon>0$, deterministic polynomial-time algorithms that find such allocations whenever the number of agents is at least $(3+\varepsilon)Δ$. These guarantees strengthen earlier work by Barman and Viswanathan on equitable colorings.

We establish the exact exponential growth rate of the $ρ$-th moment of the constrained guesswork $G_{\mathrm{coset}}$ -- the rank of the true noise vector within its syndrome coset of a random binary linear code under i.i.d.\ Bernoulli$(p)$ noise: \( \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n}\log_2\Eb\!\left[G_{\mathrm{coset}}^ρ\right] = ρ\,h_{\frac{1}{1+ρ}}(p)\;+\;ρ(R-1), \, ρ>0, \) where $h_α(p)$ is the binary Rényi entropy and $R=k/n$ is the code rate. The exponent shifts down by exactly $ρ(1-R)$ relative to the unconstrained Arıkan--Merhav exponent, with each of the $n(1-R)$ parity checks contributing equally. Finite-length simulations confirm convergence from below. We further establish: (i)~a transfer theorem expressing the partition-function exponent in terms of an arbitrary weight-enumerator growth rate $g(δ)$; (ii)~the exact exponent for $L_n$-list (``$k$-th'') constrained guesswork; and (iii)~a sharp second-order refinement of order $ρ\log_2 n$. Beyond the binary i.i.d.\ setting, we prove a universality theorem: for any code ensemble $\mathcal{E}$ whose weight enumerator concentrates at rate $g_{\mathcal{E}}(δ)$, the guesswork exponent equals $(1+ρ)ψ_{1/(1+ρ)}(g_{\mathcal{E}})-ρ\,ψ_1(g_{\mathcal{E}})$, where $ψ_α(g)=\sup_δ[g(δ)+α\ell(δ)]$. As concrete applications, we instantiate this theorem for the $q$-ary extension, $Λ_q(ρ)=ρ\,h^{(q)}_{1/(1+ρ)}(P)+ρ(R-1)\log_2 q$, and for Gallager's regular LDPC ensemble, obtaining a closed-form guesswork exponent via an exact finite-length identity for the ensemble-average weight enumerator.

The classical existence result of Nash guarantees that every finite noncooperative game admits an equilibrium in mixed strategies, but it leaves open the question of when pure strategy equilibria exist. This paper develops a structural approach to that question by exploiting properties of the best-response correspondence on finite strategy sets. Building on recent work, we derive new sufficient conditions for the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria in finite games. We introduce several broad classes of finite games for which pure equilibria are guaranteed, including a class that generalizes unilaterally competitive games and a class characterized by the existence of an aggregate-payoff maximizer over an ordered set. Our results clarify the role of acyclicity, and aggregation in producing pure equilibria and connect disparate sufficient-condition results in the literature into a unified framework.