arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a finite group $G$, we say that a Cayley graph $Γ$ on $G$ is a most rigid representation (MRR) of $G$ if its full automorphism group has the smallest possible order among all Cayley graphs on $G$, and say that $Γ$ is stable if every automorphism of $Γ\times K_2$ comes from $\mathrm{Aut}(Γ)\times\Aut(K_2)$. Although the study of stability has attracted significant attention, particularly regarding Cayley graphs on abelian groups, a complete classification is currently out of reach even for Cayley graphs on cyclic groups. In this paper, we prove that almost all Cayley graphs on finite abelian groups are stable MRRs. This strengthens the main result of Dobson, Spiga and Verret [Combinatorica, 36 (2016), no.~4, 371--393], which states that almost all Cayley graphs on finite abelian groups are MRRs.

A perfect code in a graph $Γ=(V, E)$ is a subset $C$ of $V$ such that no two vertices in $C$ are adjacent and every vertex in $V \setminus C$ is adjacent to exactly one vertex in $C$. A subgroup $H$ of a group $G$ is called a subgroup perfect code of $G$ if it is a perfect code in some Cayley graph of $G$. In this paper, we undertake a systematic study of which maximal subgroups of a group can be perfect codes. Our approach highlights a characterization of subgroup perfect codes in terms of their ``local'' complements.

We say that a group is a $4$-HAT-stabilizer if it is the vertex stabilizer of some connected $4$-valent half-arc-transitive graph. In 2001, Marušič and Nedela proved that every $4$-HAT-stabilizer must be a concentric group. However, over the past two decades, only a very small proportion of concentric groups have been shown to be $4$-HAT-stabilizers. This paper develops a theory that provides a general framework for determining whether a concentric group is a $4$-HAT-stabilizer. With this approach, we significantly extend the known list of $4$-HAT-stabilizers. As a corollary, we confirm that $\mathcal{H}_7\times C_2^{m-7}$ are $4$-HAT-stabilizers for $m\geq 7$, achieving the goal of a conjecture posed by Spiga and Xia.

A subset $C$ of the vertex set $V$ of a graph $Γ$ is called a perfect code in $Γ$ if every vertex in $V\setminus C$ is adjacent to exactly one vertex in $C$. Given a group $G$ and a subgroup $H$ of $G$, a subgroup $A$ of $G$ containing $H$ is called a perfect code of the pair $(G,H)$ if there exists a coset graph $\mathrm{Cos}(G,H,U)$ such that the set of left cosets of $H$ in $A$ is a perfect code in $\mathrm{Cos}(G,H,U)$. In particular, $A$ is called a perfect code of $G$ if $A$ is a perfect code of the pair $(G,1)$. In this paper, we give a characterization of $A$ to be a perfect code of the pair $(G,H)$ under the assumption that $H$ is a perfect code of $G$. As a corollary, we derive an additional sufficient and necessary condition for $A$ to be a perfect code of $G$. Moreover, we establish conditions under which $A$ is not a perfect code of $(G,H)$, which is applied to construct infinitely many counterexamples to a question posed by Wang and Zhang [\emph{J.~Combin.~Theory~Ser.~A}, 196 (2023) 105737]. Furthermore, we initiate the study of determining which maximal subgroups of $S_n$ are perfect codes.

Let $G$ be a finite group and $S$ be a subset of $G$. The bi-Cayley graph $\mathrm{BCay}(G,S)$ is the graph with vertex set $G\times \{0,1\}$ and edge set $\{\{(x,0),(sx,1)\}\mid x\in G,s\in S\}$. A bi-Cayley graph $\mathrm{BCay}(G,S)$ is called a BCI-graph if for every $T\subseteq G$, the isomorphism $\mathrm{BCay}(G,S)\cong \mathrm{BCay}(G,T)$ implies that $T=gS^α$ for some $g\in G$ and $α\in \mathrm{Aut}(G)$. We say a group $G$ an $m$-BCI-group if every bi-Cayley graphs of $G$ with valency at most $m$ is a BCI-graph. In this paper, we show that for $m\in\{2,3\}$, the generalized quaternion group of order $4n$ with $n\geq 2$ is an $m$-BCI-group if and only if it is an $m$-DCI-group if and only if it is an $m$-CI-group if and only if $n$ is odd or $n=2$.

For positive integers $k$ and $n$, the shuffle group $G_{k,kn}$ is generated by the $k!$ permutations of a deck of $kn$ cards performed by cutting the deck into $k$ piles with $n$ cards in each pile, and then perfectly interleaving these cards following a certain permutation of the $k$ piles. For $k=2$, the shuffle group $G_{2,2n}$ was determined by Diaconis, Graham and Kantor in 1983. The Shuffle Group Conjecture states that, for general $k$, the shuffle group $G_{k,kn}$ contains $\mathrm{A}_{kn}$ whenever $k\notin\{2,4\}$ and $n$ is not a power of $k$. In particular, the conjecture in the case $k=3$ was posed by Medvedoff and Morrison in 1987. The only values of $k$ for which the Shuffle Group Conjecture has been confirmed so far are powers of $2$, due to recent work of Amarra, Morgan and Praeger based on Classification of Finite Simple Groups. In this paper, we confirm the Shuffle Group Conjecture for all cases using results on $2$-transitive groups and elements of large fixed point ratio in primitive groups.