arXiv++ Combinatorics

A proper conflict-free coloring of a graph is a proper vertex coloring in which every non-isolated vertex has a color appearing exactly once in its neighborhood. A graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $(\mathrm{degree}+2)$-choosable if every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)|\ge d_G(v)+2$ for each $v\in V(G)$ admits such a coloring from the lists. We prove that every graph with girth at least $7$ and maximum average degree less than $8/3$ is proper conflict-free $(\mathrm{degree}+2)$-choosable. Consequently, every planar graph of girth at least $8$ has this property, improving the previously established sufficient girth bound of $9$.

Signed graphs have been introduced to enrich graph structures expressing relationships between persons or general social entities, introducing edge signs to reflect the nature of the relationship, e.g., friendship or enmity. Independently, offensive alliances have been defined and studied for undirected, unsigned graphs. We join both lines of research and define offensive alliances in signed graphs, hence considering the nature of relationships. Apart from some combinatorial results, mainly on k-balanced and k-anti-balanced signed graphs (where the latter is a newly introduced family of signed graphs), we focus on the algorithmic complexity of finding smallest offensive alliances, looking at a number of parameterizations. While the parameter solution size leads to an FPT result for unsigned graphs, we obtain W[2]-completeness for the signed setting. We introduce new parameters for signed graphs, e.g., distance to weakly balanced signed graphs, that could be of independent interest. We show that these parameters yield FPT results. Here, we make use of the recently introduced parameter neighborhood diversity for signed graphs.