arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Thijs Laarhoven

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-10-01 v2
A lattice family with kissing numbers $τ(\mathcal{L}_n) \ge e^{2 \sqrt{n}}$
For all prime powers $q\geq5$, we construct lattices $\mathcal{L}_q\subseteq\mathbb{Z}^q$ with kissing numbers \[ τ(\mathcal{L}_q)\geq \left(\frac{1}{2πe^2}+o(1)\right)\sqrt{q}\,e^{2\sqrt{q}}. \] The same asymptotic bound holds on a set of integer dimensions of natural density $1$, and in every sufficiently large integer dimension $n$ with an additional factor $e^{-\tfrac{1}{2}n^{1/40}}$. The construction is an extension of a previous construction by Bennett-Peikert based on Reed-Solomon codes.
2026-09-08
A Note on Sphere Packing Bounds for Tuple Lattice Sieving
A finite set of unit vectors is $k$-irreducible if every signed sum of between two and $k$ distinct elements has norm greater than one. Let $\mathcal{R}_k$ be the maximal asymptotic rate of such sets, and let $κ(α)$ be the maximal asymptotic rate of spherical codes with pairwise inner products at most $α$. For $k \ge 2$ we show: \begin{align} \mathcal{R}_k \le \min_{1 \le r \le \lfloor k/2 \rfloor} \frac{1}{r} \, κ\!\left(1 - \frac{1}{2r}\right) \, . \end{align} Combining this with standard sphere packing bounds, for large $k$ we obtain an almost-tight asymptotic comparison with the known lower bounds: \begin{align} \left(\tfrac{1}{2}-o(1)\right) \, \frac{\log_2 k}{k} \le \mathcal{R}_k \le (1 + o(1)) \, \frac{\log_2 k}{k} \, . \end{align}