arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Melanie Gerling

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-10-06 v3
The Multiorbital Bivariate Chromatic Polynomial: A Subgroup-Lattice Refinement
We introduce the multiorbital bivariate chromatic polynomial F_Γ(G;x,y) = \sum_{H\leq G}\frac{1}{|H|}\sum_{h\in H}P_{Γ/h}(x,y), which aggregates the orbital bivariate chromatic polynomials associated with all subgroups of a finite group acting on a graph. We derive the equivalent element-wise representation F_Γ(G;x,y) = \sum_{g\in G}c_G(g)P_{Γ/g}(x,y), where c_G(g) = \sum_{\langle g\rangle\leq H\leq G}\frac{1}{|H|}. The coefficient function depends only on the cyclic subgroup generated by the element and is constant on conjugacy classes. This yields decompositions by cyclic subgroups and conjugacy classes and an interpretation in terms of the incidence algebra of the subgroup lattice. After normalization, the coefficients define a probability distribution obtained by choosing a subgroup uniformly and then an element uniformly from that subgroup. We also establish diagonal multiplicativity for disjoint unions and a weighted cycle-index expression for edgeless graphs. A further contribution concerns the distinguishing power of the orbital bivariate chromatic polynomial. We answer a question of Dohmen and Lange-Geisler affirmatively by exhibiting two non-isomorphic graphs, P_3 and K_2 \mathbin{\dot\cup} K_1 under C_2-actions, with identical orbital bivariate chromatic polynomials. The two actions nevertheless have different multiorbital bivariate chromatic polynomials. Thus the multiorbital polynomial is not determined by the orbital bivariate polynomial, whereas the converse question remains open.
2017-02-21 v2
On distinguishing special trees by their chromatic symmetric functions
In 1995, Stanley introduced the well-known chromatic symmetric function $X_{G}(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots)$ of a graph $G$. It is a sum of monomial symmetric functions such that for each vertex coloring of $G$ there is exactly one of these summands. The question, whether $X_{G}(x_1,x_{2},\ldots)$ distinguishes nonisomorphic trees with the same number of vertices, is still open in general. For special trees it has already been shown. In 2008, Martin, Morin and Wagner proved it for spiders and some caterpillars. We decompose a tree by separating the leafs and their neighbors and do the same to the remaining forest until there remains a forest with vertices of degree not greater than $1$. For nonisomorphic trees $G$ and $H$ with the same number of vertices and special properties concerning their number of leafs and leaf neighbors for each subgraph in their leaf decomposition we prove that the chromatic symmetric function distinguishes the graphs. Our idea is to find independent partitions of $G$ and $H$ with respectively a block of maximal cardinality for $G$ as well as for $H$. These cardinalities are different for graphs $G$ and $H$ with special properties of their leaf decompositions. Additionally, we give explicit formulas for the cardinality of such a maximal block of an independent partition of star connections and spiders.