arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Leandro Aurichi

7 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Linear arboricity conjecture for infinite graphs
The linear arboricity $\la(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the least cardinality of linear forests, that is, forests of maximum degree at most $2$, into which its edge set $E(G)$ can be decomposed. The Linear Arboricity Conjecture asserts that $\la(G)\leq\lceil(Δ(G)+1)/2\rceil$ for every finite graph $G$, where $Δ(G)$ denotes the maximum degree of $G$. We extend this conjecture to infinite graphs of finite maximum degree and prove that its finite and infinite versions are equivalent. We introduce topological linear arboricity $\latop (G)$ by requiring the linear forests to contain no topological circle, and show that it differs from linear arboricity by at most one. Finally, we prove that every $2k$-regular graph of girth at least $2k$ has topological linear arboricity at most $k+1$.
Kriesell's conjecture for infinite graphs
Let $G$ be a graph and $S\subseteq V(G)$ be a subset of vertices. An $S$-Steiner tree $T$ of $G$ is a tree of $G$ which contains $S$ in its vertex set $V(T)$. Kriesell conjectured that for every $2k$-edge-connected subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ in a finite connected graph $G$, there exist $k$ pairwise edge-disjoint $S$-Steiner trees. This conjecture is false for infinite graphs. We present a version of Kriesell's conjecture with topological $S$-Steiner trees for countable finitely edge-separable graphs and a version with $F$-limits of trees for rayless graphs. We show that if Kriesell's conjecture holds for finite graphs, then it holds for every connected, rayless and finitely edge-separable graph. We also show that every $2k$-edge-connected rayless and finitely edge-separable graph contains $k$ pairwise edge-disjoint spanning trees.
A topological characterization of end space of infinite graphs via games, subspaces and products
In 1992, Diestel asked which topological spaces could be represented as the end space of some graph. In 2023, Pitz provided a solution to this question by giving a topological characterization of end spaces using a hereditarily complete special subbase. In this paper, we present an alternative topological characterization of end spaces, in which we employ a special subbase and a topological game. Furthermore, we provide several applications of this characterization: we show that every end space is hereditarily Baire, that $G_δ$ subspaces of end spaces are also end spaces, and that the product of end spaces is not always an end space.
Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs
Diestel and Kühn proved that the topological ends of an infinite graph are precisely its undominated graph ends, yielding a canonical embedding of the space of topological ends into the space of graph ends. For edge-ends, introduced by Hahn, Laviolette and Širáň, such an embedding does not exist in general. In this note, we characterize the class of infinite graphs for which the topological ends admit a natural injective map into the space of edge-ends that is compatible with the canonical maps between end spaces. Our characterization is purely combinatorial and is expressed in terms of edge-equivalence classes of vertices. Moreover, when such an embedding exists, we identify precisely which edge-ends arise from topological ends, showing that they are exactly the edge-ends containing a non-dominated ray. This establishes a parallel result to the theorem of Diestel and Kühn for edge-end spaces.
On orientations preserving edge-connectivity in infinite graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
We prove that every 2k-edge-connected graph with countably many edge-ends admits a k-arc-connected orientation, extending the previous result by Assem, Koloschin and Pitz that also assumed the hypothesis of the graph being locally finite. We prove that, if every locally finite graph has a well-balanced orientation, so does every graph. Lastly, we explore an alternative to the Nash-Williams Orientation Conjecture via topological paths, and prove that it is true for every finitely separated graph.
On cycle covers of infinite bipartite graphs
Given a graph $G$ and a subset $X$ of vertices of $G$ with size at least two, we denote by $N^2_G(X)$ the set of vertices of $G$ that have at least two neighbors in $X$. We say that a bipartite graph $G$ with sides $A$ and $B$ satisfies the double Hall property if for every subset $X$ of vertices of $A$ with size at least 2, $\vert N^2_G(X)\vert \geq \vert X\vert$. Salia conjectured that if $G$ is a bipartite graph that satisfies the double Hall property, then there exists a cycle in $G$ that covers all vertices of $A$. In this work, we study this conjecture restricted to infinite graphs. For this, we use the definition of ends and infinite cycles. It is simple to see that Salia's conjecture is false for infinite graphs in general. Consequently, all our results are partial. Under certain hypothesis it is possible to obtain a collection of pairwise disjoint 2-regular subgraphs that covers $A$. We show that if side $B$ is locally finite and side $A$ is countable, then the conjecture is true. Furthermore, assuming the conjecture holds for finite graphs, we show that it holds for infinite graphs with a restriction on the degree of the vertices of $B$. This result is inspired by the result obtained by Barát, Grzesik, Jung, Nagy and Pálvölgyi for finite graphs. Finally, we also show that if Salia's conjecture holds for some cases of infinite graphs, then the conjecture about finite graphs presented by Lavrov and Vandenbussche is true.
On ends of degree $ω_1$
We prove that if $ T $ is a semi-special tree that is not special, then there exists a graph $ G $, formed as an inflation of a sparse $ T $-graph, such that for any special tree $ S $, $ G $ is not a subdivision of an inflation of an sparse $ S $-graph. Furthermore $G$ has an end of uncountable degree that has no ray graph. This result provides a consistent negative answer to a problem posed by Stefan Geschke et al. in 2023. Additionally, we introduce and explore a property that generalizes Halin's grid theorem, extending it to ends of degree $ \aleph_1 $, which was originally established for ends of countable degree.