Papers by Haroldo Costa Silva Filho
2 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
The crossing number and the unit-distance crossing number of the Hamming graphs H(d,3)=K_3^{box d}, and their realizations over many coordinate fields
The Hamming graph H(d,3)=K_3^{box d} (n=3^d vertices) is the graph of single-symbol errors of ternary codes, yet we ask a geometric question of it: can it be drawn in the plane with every edge exactly one unit long and no two non-adjacent vertices a unit apart? It can, for every d, joining two problems into one.
Where does it live? As a Minkowski sum of unit triangles, each H(d,3) has a hidden flexibility carrying its coordinates up the constructibility ladder (compass, origami, and beyond), so one graph is realizable over many number fields at once, in the plane and in R^3 (edim(H(d,q))=q-1). Yet almost every faithful realization is transcendental: the Galois picture is a measure-zero shadow of a vast transcendental continuum, matching the exists-R hardness of unit-distance recognition.
How crowded must a unit drawing be? We separate the ordinary crossing number from a unit-distance crossing number (absent from Schaefer's survey), and one recursion H(d,3)=H(d-1,3) box K_3 controls both. We prove cr(H)=Theta(n^2), with sharp one-page constant 7/6; and Omega(n^2) <= udcr(H) <= O(n^2 log n) by concentration, plus a closed-form majorant (3/2)n^2(L^2-L+1), L=log_3 n. The least-crossing drawing we find is constructible (origami): field and crossings are two readings of one geometry. All claims are verified computationally; the lower bound udcr=Omega(n^2 log n) is the central open problem.
Exact certification of the coordinate fields of the triangle-free Exoo-Ismailescu unit-distance graphs EI17 and EI19 (HoG 51375, 51376): a solvable-non-solvable dichotomy (origami vs. S20) and the Laman-number conjecture
We certify, exactly, the coordinate fields of a faithful planar realization of two neighbouring triangle-free Exoo-Ismailescu unit-distance graphs (UDGs), and show they realize the two opposite extremes of the constructibility hierarchy. The 17-vertex graph EI17 (House of Graphs 51375) is the smallest triangle-free UDG with chromatic number 4; the 19-vertex graph EI19 (HoG 51376) is its state-of-the-art origami neighbour. In both, fixing a rational base edge, the remaining vertices are intersections of unit circles -- each on the radical axis of its two neighbours, a tower of square roots over the free angles -- and a small closure system locks the realization. For EI19 the base lies in Q(sqrt 2, sqrt 5, sqrt 7) and a single free angle has an irreducible degree 12 = 2^2*3 minimal polynomial with Galois group the solvable transitive group 12T236 (order 2304 = 2^8*3^2): not ruler-and-compass, but origami-constructible (the cubic Beloch fold O6 necessary, in casus irreducibilis). For EI17 two free angles are locked by two closures, whose resultant is irreducible of degree 20 = 2^2*5 with Galois group the full symmetric group S20 (a Frobenius census exhibits a 17-cycle, forcing A20 by Jordan, and an odd 20-cycle, raising it to S20): non-solvable, so the coordinates are not expressible by radicals -- neither compass nor origami of any fold order. Thus the smallest triangle-free 4-chromatic UDG is the generic, maximally exotic case, the exact opposite of its origami neighbour. We give the full certification pipeline as explicit algorithms, record two methodological pitfalls, and read the pair through a conjectural bridge between the Laman number and the Galois group.