arXiv++ Combinatorics

We determine the maximum population size for which exactly two defective items can always be identified using at most $k$ adaptive quantitative tests, for every $0\le k\le10$. Each test reports the number of defectives in a chosen subset. The exact maxima for eight, nine and ten tests are 65, 112 and 192, respectively. We also classify all pairs of sizes of two disjoint sets, each containing exactly one defective, that can be resolved within each test budget through eight. These exact results are supported by explicit strategies and maximality certificates checked by programs separate from the search implementation. Additional results include partial nine-test boundaries and an eleven-test strategy for 328 items; maximality of the latter remains open.

In adaptive quantitative group testing with exactly two defective items, each test reports how many defectives lie in a chosen subset. We study configurations in which the possible defective pairs form the edges of a star forest. Aigner proved a necessary majorization condition on the ordered star sizes for identifying the defective pair within a prescribed number of tests, and conjectured that this condition was sufficient. We disprove the conjecture by an explicit six-test counterexample and give an analytic family of counterexamples for every test budget $k\ge6$. The obstruction uses two tight prefix sums to force incompatible demands on the outcomes of the first test. We also prove, by exhaustive computation combined with analytic reductions, that the converse holds for $0\le k\le5$. Thus six is the first test budget at which majorization alone fails. The counterexamples and their infinite extension do not depend on the exhaustive computation.