arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Dongxiu Cai

4 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-10-02
A finite threshold for the double-comet conjecture
For a tree $T$, let $g(T)=λ_1(T)-λ_2(T)$ be the difference between its two largest adjacency eigenvalues. A balanced double comet is obtained by attaching equally many leaves to the two endpoints of a path. Jovović, Koledin and Stanić conjectured that such a tree attains the minimum adjacency spectral gap among trees of any fixed order. We prove that every minimizing tree of order $n\ge200$ is a balanced double comet. We also show that, for any finite irreducible reversible continuous-time Markov chain, the inverse spectral gap differs from the effective resistance between two states times the stationary variance of their hitting probability by at most the inverse Dirichlet gap for killing at those states. For Perron chains, we give an exact two-vertex Schur-complement formula for this resistance--variance quantity.
Polynomial positivity cones for Coxeter roots and walks in trees
For a finite simple graph $G$ and an integer $k\ge0$, let $w_k(G)$ denote the number of walks of length $k$. We prove the conjecture of Täubig, Weihmann, Kosub, Hemmecke, and Mayr for every finite tree and determine all equality cases. If $T$ has $n\ge1$ vertices, then $n w_{k+1}(T)-2(n-1)w_k(T)\ge0$ for every $k\ge1$; for $n\ge3$, equality holds if and only if $T$ is a star and $k$ is even, whereas for $n=1$ or $n=2$, equality holds for every $k\ge1$. For non-Dynkin trees and even indices, the proof is based on a polynomial positivity cone associated with the adjacency operator of a finite graph and a positive real root of its simply-laced Coxeter system. For finite connected bipartite non-Dynkin graphs, we establish sufficient positivity conditions in terms of Coxeter orbits and inversion sets, and verify these conditions for indicator roots supported on connected induced subtrees. For non-Dynkin trees, this yields the rooted even-index inequality and, after summation, the corresponding global inequality. We also prove that if $G$ is a finite connected bipartite non-Dynkin simple graph, $\varnothing\ne U\subseteq V(G)$, and the subgraph of $G$ induced by $U$ is a tree, then $|U|w_{k+1}(G,U)-2(|U|-1)w_k(G,U)\ge0$ for every $k\ge0$, where $w_k(G,U)$ counts the length-$k$ walks in $G$ whose initial and terminal vertices lie in $U$; the intermediate vertices are unrestricted. The remaining even-index cases for finite Dynkin trees are handled by generating-function recurrences, while the odd-index cases follow from a spectral covariance identity.
The Equality Cases for the Grone-Merris-Bai Theorem
The Grone--Merris inequality, conjectured by Grone and Merris~(1994) and first proved by Bai~(2011), states that for every graph $G$ of order $n$ and every $1\le k\le n$, $\sum_{i=1}^kλ_i(G)\le\sum_{i=1}^k d_i^*(G)$, where $λ_1\ge\cdots\geλ_n$ are the Laplacian eigenvalues and $d_1^*\ge\cdots\ge d_n^*$ is the conjugate degree sequence. In this paper we determine exactly when equality holds. Using the split-graph trace inequality developed by Kothari and Tudose~(2026) in their proof of Brouwer's Laplacian conjecture---which relies on Bai's theorem and also establishes the equivalence between the two conjectures---together with the recent characterization of the Brouwer equality cases by Cai, Chen, Yang and Zhang~(2027), we prove that equality holds in the Grone--Merris inequality if and only if the graph $G$ belongs to one of two explicitly described families. Both families are obtained from a threshold graph by a surgical operation at one terminal block: in the first family, edges are removed from the initial dominating block; in the second, edges are added inside the initial isolated block. Our analysis yields a complete combinatorial description of all pairs $(G,k)$ for which the Grone--Merris bound is tight.
2026-06-08
Sharp Bounds for Guiduli-Type Hereditary Spectral Problems
Guiduli asked in 1996 the following problem concerning the maximum spectral radius of a graph under hereditary density constraints. If an $n$-vertex graph $G$ satisfies $e(H)\le c|V(H)|^2$ for every subgraph $H$ of $G$, must one have $λ(G)\le 2cn$? More generally, what remains true when the exponent $2$ is replaced by a constant less than $2$? We study the natural power-law version of this question for all $1<p\le2$. For $1<p\le 2$, define \[ d_p(G)=\max_{\varnothing\ne S\subseteq V(G)}\frac{e(G[S])}{|S|^p}. \] We determine the sharp asymptotic upper bound for $λ(G)$ in terms of $d_p(G)$ and $n$. More precisely, every $n$-vertex graph $G$ with at least one edge satisfies \[ λ(G)\le \begin{cases} \left(\left(\max_{t\in\mathbb N_{\ge1}}\dfrac{t}{(t+1)^p}\right)^{-1}+o(1)\right)d_p(G)\sqrt n,&1<p<3/2,\\[0.4em] \left(\dfrac{3\sqrt3}{4}+o(1)\right)d_p(G)\sqrt{n\log n},&p=3/2,\\[0.4em] (\mathfrak C_p+o(1))d_p(G)n^{p-1},&3/2<p<2, \end{cases} \] and each constant here is best possible. Here $\mathfrak C_p$ is characterized by an exact variational problem over finite kernels. We apply a sparse graphon operator estimate to convert hereditary $p$-density bounds into sharp spectral bounds, and this estimate also explains the transition at the critical exponent $p=3/2$. For the endpoint $p=2$, Wilf's theorem gives the exact finite-$n$ bound $λ(G)\le 2d_2(G)n$, with equality for $K_n$. Thus Guiduli's power-law problem is resolved in its sharp asymptotic form for every $1<p\leq2$, including exact leading constants.