arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a finite preorder $τ$, we study how its order relation determines the $h^*$-polynomial of the associated polar preorder polytope. Let $\mathcal R_τ^{\vee}$ be the convex hull of the negative standard basis vectors and the indicator vectors of nonempty order ideals, and write $h_τ^*(t)=h^*(\mathcal R_τ^{\vee},t)$. Athanasiadis and Chapoton conjectured that this enumerative invariant takes ordinal sums to products: $$h_{τ_1\oplusτ_2}^*(t)=h_{τ_1}^*(t)\,h_{τ_2}^*(t).$$ We prove the conjecture for arbitrary finite preorders, including those with nontrivial equivalence classes. More precisely, we construct a positively homogeneous piecewise unimodular shear from the free sum $\mathcal R_{τ_1}^{\vee}\oplus\mathcal R_{τ_2}^{\vee}$ onto $\mathcal R_{τ_1\oplusτ_2}^{\vee}$, giving lattice-point bijections at every nonnegative real dilation scale. The key is a formula for the Minkowski functional in terms of the least nonnegative order-reversing majorant: after the shear, the functional becomes the sum of the two factor functionals. Together with the Ehrhart product formula for free sums, this proves the conjecture and the corresponding product formula for normalized volume.

Let a random permutation $W\in S_n$ represent the order of $n$ distinct cards. After each guess, the player learns the actual card, and the objective is to maximize the expected total number of correct guesses. Diaconis, Fulman, and Holmes conjectured that, after a single uniform, unbiased shelf shuffle, the direction-tracking strategy is optimal: first guess the smallest card, and thereafter choose the nearest remaining card in the direction of the most recent rise or fall. We prove a more general theorem: if \[ \mathbb P(W=w)=\frac{f(v(w))}{\sum_{σ\in S_n}f(v(σ))}, \] where $v(w)$ is the number of interior valleys of the permutation, $f$ is nonnegative and nonincreasing, and the denominator is positive, then direction tracking maximizes the conditional probability of correctly guessing the next card after every history of positive probability. It therefore maximizes the expected total number of correct guesses among all complete-feedback strategies. Here an interior valley is a position $2\le i\le n-1$ satisfying $w_{i-1}>w_i<w_{i+1}$. Combined with the known shelf-shuffling probability formula, this theorem proves the conjecture for every deck size and number of shelves. The key to the proof is a swap of adjacent remaining values that preserves the revealed prefix: starting from the preferred candidate, the swap leaves the valley count unchanged or increases it by one, thereby turning monotonicity of the weights into a conditional probability ordering after every history.

We study the minimum and maximum expected scores over all adaptive strategies in sequential card guessing with yes/no feedback. A deck contains $n$ labels, each appearing $m$ times, and is shuffled uniformly. The cards are guessed one at a time, and after each guess the player is told only whether it was correct. Always guessing the same label gives exactly $m$ points. How far can the expected score depart from $m$ if all previous feedback is used either to seek or to avoid correct guesses? Diaconis, Graham, and Spiro conjectured that the minimum expectation is $m-o(m)$ as $m\to\infty$ with $n$ sufficiently large in terms of $m$, and that, for each fixed $m$, the limit superior of the maximum expectation as $n\to\infty$ is at most $(e-1)m$. Writing these extrema as $P^-_{m,n}$ and $P^+_{m,n}$, we prove \[ 0\le m-P^-_{m,n}\le3m^{3/4} \qquad(n\ge m\ge1), \] and the finite-parameter bound \[ \frac{P^+_{m,n}}m\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac1{k!}<e-1 \] for all positive integers $m,n$. The first bound gives a first-order asymptotic uniform in $n\ge m$; the universal constant $e-1$ in the second cannot be reduced. Thus both conjectures follow. The lower bound combines a switching comparison for restricted permutations with martingale second-moment estimates. For the upper bound, we represent the repeated cards as a random interleaving of independent decks of distinct cards and prove that the optimal expectation is additive when the component-deck labels are revealed.