arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

spanning tree

1037 papers tagged with this keyword
Completely Independent Spanning Trees in Some Regular Graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
Let $k\ge 2$ be an integer and $T_1,\ldots, T_k$ be spanning trees of a graph $G$. If for any pair of vertices $(u,v)$ of $V(G)$, the paths from $u$ to $v$ in each $T_i$, $1\le i\le k$, do not contain common edges and common vertices, except the vertices $u$ and $v$, then $T_1,\ldots, T_k$ are completely independent spanning trees in $G$. For $2k$-regular graphs which are $2k$-connected, such as the Cartesian product of a complete graph of order $2k-1$ and a cycle and some Cartesian products of three cycles (for $k=3$), the maximum number of completely independent spanning trees contained in these graphs is determined and it turns out that this maximum is not always $k$.
Spanning trees with nonseparating paths
Published • View Publication • BIB
We consider questions related to the existence of spanning trees in graphs with the property that after the removal of any path in the tree the graph remains connected. We show that, for planar graphs, the existence of trees with this property is closely related to the Hamiltonicity of the graph. For graphs with a 1- or 2-vertex cut, the Hamiltonicity also plays a central role. We also deal with spanning trees satisfying this property restricted to paths arising from fundamental cycles. The cycle space of a graph can be generated by the fundamental cycles of any spanning tree, and Tutte showed, that for a 3-connected graph, it can be generated by nonseparating cycles. We are also interested in the existence of a fundamental basis consisting of nonseparating cycles.
2014-09-08
Some NP-complete edge packing and partitioning problems in planar graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
Graph packing and partitioning problems have been studied in many contexts, including from the algorithmic complexity perspective. Consider the packing problem of determining whether a graph contains a spanning tree and a cycle that do not share edges. Bernáth and Király proved that this decision problem is NP-complete and asked if the same result holds when restricting to planar graphs. Similarly, they showed that the packing problem with a spanning tree and a path between two distinguished vertices is NP-complete. They also established the NP-completeness of the partitioning problem of determining whether the edge set of a graph can be partitioned into a spanning tree and a (not-necessarily spanning) tree. We prove that all three problems remain NP-complete even when restricted to planar graphs.
2014-09-08
On $k$-ended spanning and dominating trees
A tree with at most $k$ leaves is called a $k$-ended tree. A spanning 2-ended tree is a Hamilton path. A Hamilton cycle can be considered as a spanning 1-ended tree. The earliest result concerning spanning trees with few leaves states that if $k$ is a positive integer and $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$ with $d(x)+d(y)\ge n-k+1$ for each pair of nonadjacent vertices $x,y$, then $G$ has a spanning $k$-ended tree. In this paper, we improve this result in two ways, and an analogous result is proved for dominating $k$-ended trees based on the generalized parameter $t_k$ - the order of a largest $k$-ended tree. In particular, $t_1$ is the circumference (the length of a longest cycle), and $t_2$ is the order of a longest path.
Vertex-Colored Graphs, Bicycle Spaces and Mahler Measure
Published • View Publication • BIB
The space C of conservative vertex colorings (over a field F) of a countable, locally finite graph G is introduced. The subspace of based colorings is shown to be isomorphic to the bicycle space of the graph. For graphs G with a free Z^d-action by automorphisms, C is a finitely generated module over the polynomial ring F[Z^d], and for this a polynomial invariant, the Laplacian polynomial, is defined. Properties of this polynomial are discussed. The logarithmic Mahler measure of the Laplacian polynomial is characterized in terms of the growth of spanning trees of G.
2014-08-13
No Laplacian Perfect State Transfer in Trees
Published • View Publication • BIB
We consider a system of qubits coupled via nearest-neighbour interaction governed by the Heisenberg Hamiltonian. We further suppose that all coupling constants are equal to $1$. We are interested in determining which graphs allow for a transfer of quantum state with fidelity equal to $1$. To answer this question, it is enough to consider the action of the Laplacian matrix of the graph in a vector space of suitable dimension. Our main result is that if the underlying graph is a tree with more than two vertices, then perfect state transfer does not happen. We also explore related questions, such as what happens in bipartite graphs and graphs with an odd number of spanning trees. Finally, we consider the model based on the $XY$-Hamiltonian, whose action is equivalent to the action of the adjacency matrix of the graph. In this case, we conjecture that perfect state transfer does not happen in trees with more than three vertices.
2014-08-05 v2
Graph-induced operators: Hamiltonian cycle enumeration via fermion-zeon convolution
Published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 56 (2017), 3923-3934 • View Publication • BIB
Operators are induced on fermion and zeon algebras by the action of adjacency matrices and combinatorial Laplacians on the vector spaces spanned by the graph's vertices. Properties of the algebras automatically give information about the graph's spanning trees and vertex coverings by cycles \& matchings. Combining the properties of operators induced on fermions and zeons gives a fermion-zeon convolution that recovers the number of Hamiltonian cycles in an arbitrary graph. The mathematics underlying the graph-theoretic interpretation of these operators is provided by Kirchhoff's theorem and by the seminal works of Goulden and Jackson and Liu, who established formulas for enumeration of Hamiltonian cycles and paths using determinants and permanents of adjacency matrices.
2014-08-01
Trees with Large Neighborhood Total Domination Number
Published • View Publication • BIB
In this paper, we continue the study of neighborhood total domination in graphs first studied by Arumugam and Sivagnanam [Opuscula Math. 31 (2011), 519--531]. A neighborhood total dominating set, abbreviated NTD-set, in a graph $G$ is a dominating set $S$ in $G$ with the property that the subgraph induced by the open neighborhood of the set $S$ has no isolated vertex. The neighborhood total domination number, denoted by $\gnt(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a NTD-set of $G$. Every total dominating set is a NTD-set, implying that $γ(G) \le \gnt(G) \le \gt(G)$, where $γ(G)$ and $\gt(G)$ denote the domination and total domination numbers of $G$, respectively. Arumugam and Sivagnanam posed the problem of characterizing the connected graphs $G$ of order $n \ge 3$ achieving the largest possible neighborhood total domination number, namely $\gnt(G) = \lceil n/2 \rceil$. A partial solution to this problem was presented by Henning and Rad [Discrete Applied Mathematics 161 (2013), 2460--2466] who showed that $5$-cycles and subdivided stars are the only such graphs achieving equality in the bound when $n$ is odd. In this paper, we characterize the extremal trees achieving equality in the bound when $n$ is even. As a consequence of this tree characterization, a characterization of the connected graphs achieving equality in the bound when $n$ is even can be obtained noting that every spanning tree of such a graph belongs to our family of extremal trees.
2014-07-30 v2
On Chromatic Number and Minimum Cut
Published • View Publication • BIB
For a graph $G$, the tree graph ${\cal T}_{G,t}$ has all tree subgraphs of $G$ with $t$ vertices as vertex set and two tree subgraphs are neighbors if they are edge-disjoint. Also, the $r^{th}$ cut number of $G$ is the minimum number of edges between parts of a partition of vertex set of $G$ into two parts such that each part has size at least $r$. We show that if $t=(1-o(1))n$ and $n$ is large enough, then for any dense graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, the chromatic number of the tree graph ${\cal T}_{G,t}$ is equal to the $(n-t+1)^{th}$ cut number of $G$. In particular, as a consequence, we prove that if $n$ is large enough and $G$ is a dense graph, then the chromatic number of the spanning tree graph ${\cal T}_{G,n}$ is equal to the size of the minimum cut of $G$. The proof method is based on alternating Turán number inspired by Tucker's lemma, an equivalent combinatorial version of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.
2014-07-24
On the distance preserving trees in graphs
For a vertex $v$ of a graph $G$, a spanning tree $T$ of $G$ is distance-preserving from $v$ if, for any vertex $w$, the distance from $v$ to $w$ on $T$ is the same as the distance from $v$ to $w$ on $G$. If two vertices $u$ and $v$ are distinct, then two distance-preserving spanning trees $T_{u}$ from $u$ and $T_{v}$ from $v$ are distinct in general. A purpose of this paper is to give a characterization for a given weighted graph $G$ to have a spanning tree $T$ such that $T$ is a distance-preserving spanning tree from distinct two vertices.
2014-07-18
On the tractability of some natural packing, covering and partitioning problems
In this paper we fix 7 types of undirected graphs: paths, paths with prescribed endvertices, circuits, forests, spanning trees, (not necessarily spanning) trees and cuts. Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and two "object types" $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{B}$ chosen from the alternatives above, we consider the following questions. \textbf{Packing problem:} can we find an object of type $\mathrm{A}$ and one of type $\mathrm{B}$ in the edge set $E$ of $G$, so that they are edge-disjoint? \textbf{Partitioning problem:} can we partition $E$ into an object of type $\mathrm{A}$ and one of type $\mathrm{B}$? \textbf{Covering problem:} can we cover $E$ with an object of type $\mathrm{A}$, and an object of type $\mathrm{B}$? This framework includes 44 natural graph theoretic questions. Some of these problems were well-known before, for example covering the edge-set of a graph with two spanning trees, or finding an $s$-$t$ path $P$ and an $s'$-$t'$ path $P'$ that are edge-disjoint. However, many others were not, for example can we find an $s$-$t$ path $P\subseteq E $ and a spanning tree $T\subseteq E$ that are edge-disjoint? Most of these previously unknown problems turned out to be NP-complete, many of them even in planar graphs. This paper determines the status of these 44 problems. For the NP-complete problems we also investigate the planar version, for the polynomial problems we consider the matroidal generalization (wherever this makes sense).
2014-07-14
Pfaffian formulas for spanning tree probabilities
Published • View Publication • BIB
We show that certain topologically defined uniform spanning tree probabilities for graphs embedded in an annulus can be computed as linear combinations of Pfaffians of matrices involving the line-bundle Green's function, where the coefficients count cover-inclusive Dyck tilings of skew Young diagrams.
2014-07-08 v6
From G-parking functions to B-parking functions
Published in Fengming Dong, From G-parking functions to B-parking functions. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 160 (2018 Nov), 84-110 • View Publication • BIB
A matching $M$ in a multigraph $G=(V,E)$ is said to be uniquely restricted if $M$ is the only perfect matching in the subgraph of $G$ induced by $V(M)$ (i.e., the set of vertices saturated by $M$). For any fixed vertex $x_0$ in $G$, there is a bijection from the set of spanning trees of $G$ to the set of uniquely restricted matchings of size $|V|-1$ in $S(G)-x_0$, where $S(G)$ is the bipartite graph obtained from $G$ by subdividing each edge in $G$. Thus the notion "uniquely restricted matchings of a bipartite graph $H$ saturating all vertices in a partite set $X$" can be viewed as an extension of "spanning trees in a connected graph". Motivated by this observation, we extend the notion "G-parking functions" of a connected multigraph to "B-parking functions" $f:X\rightarrow \{-1,0,1,2,\cdots \}$ of a bipartite graph $H$ with a bipartition $(X,Y)$ and find a bijection $ψ$ from the set of uniquely restricted matchings of $H$ to the set of B-parking functions of $H$. We also show that for any uniquely restricted matching $M$ in $H$ with $|M|=|X|$, if $f=ψ(M)$, then $\sum_{x\in X}f(x)$ is exactly the number of elements $y\in Y-V(M)$ which are not externally B-active with respect to $M$ in $H$, where the new notion "externally B-active members with respect to $M$ in $H$" is an extension of "externally active edges with respect to a spanning tree in a connected multigraph".
2014-06-19 v3
The Bernardi process and torsor structures on spanning trees
Published • View Publication • BIB
Let G be a ribbon graph, i.e., a connected finite graph G together with a cyclic ordering of the edges around each vertex. By adapting a construction due to O. Bernardi, we associate to any pair (v,e) consisting of a vertex v and an edge e adjacent to v a bijection between spanning trees of G and elements of the set Pic^g(G) of degree g divisor classes on G, where g is the genus of G. Using the natural action of the Picard group Pic^0(G) on Pic^g(G), we show that the Bernardi bijection gives rise to a simply transitive action β_v of Pic^0(G) on the set of spanning trees which does not depend on the choice of e. A plane graph has a natural ribbon structure (coming from the counterclockwise orientation of the plane), and in this case we show that β_v is independent of v as well. Thus for plane graphs, the set of spanning trees is naturally a torsor for the Picard group. Conversely, we show that if β_v is independent of v then G together with its ribbon structure is planar. We also show that the natural action of Pic^0(G) on spanning trees of a plane graph is compatible with planar duality. These findings are formally quite similar to results of Holroyd et al. and Chan-Church-Grochow, who used rotor-routing to construct an action r_v of Pic^0(G) on the spanning trees of a ribbon graph G, which they show is independent of v if and only if G is planar. It is therefore natural to ask how the two constructions are related. We prove that β_v = r_v for all vertices v of G when G is a planar ribbon graph, i.e. the two torsor structures (Bernardi and rotor-routing) on the set of spanning trees coincide. In particular, it follows that the rotor-routing torsor is compatible with planar duality. We conjecture that for every non-planar ribbon graph G, there exists a vertex v with β_v \neq r_v.
Sandpiles, spanning trees, and plane duality
Published • View Publication • BIB
Let G be a connected, loopless multigraph. The sandpile group of G is a finite abelian group associated to G whose order is equal to the number of spanning trees in G. Holroyd et al. used a dynamical process on graphs called rotor-routing to define a simply transitive action of the sandpile group of G on its set of spanning trees. Their definition depends on two pieces of auxiliary data: a choice of a ribbon graph structure on G, and a choice of a root vertex. Chan, Church, and Grochow showed that if G is a planar ribbon graph, it has a canonical rotor-routing action associated to it, i.e., the rotor-routing action is actually independent of the choice of root vertex. It is well-known that the spanning trees of a planar graph G are in canonical bijection with those of its planar dual G*, and furthermore that the sandpile groups of G and G* are isomorphic. Thus, one can ask: are the two rotor-routing actions, of the sandpile group of G on its spanning trees, and of the sandpile group of G* on its spanning trees, compatible under plane duality? In this paper, we give an affirmative answer to this question, which had been conjectured by Baker.
2014-05-26 v2
Embedding bounded degree spanning trees in random graphs
We prove that if a tree $T$ has $n$ vertices and maximum degree at most $Δ$, then a copy of $T$ can almost surely be found in the random graph $\mathcal{G}(n,Δ\log^5 n/n)$.
2014-05-26
Sharp threshold for embedding combs and other spanning trees in random graphs
When $k|n$, the tree $\mathrm{Comb}_{n,k}$ consists of a path containing $n/k$ vertices, each of whose vertices has a disjoint path length $k-1$ beginning at it. We show that, for any $k=k(n)$ and $ε>0$, the binomial random graph $\mathcal{G}(n,(1+ε)\log n/ n)$ almost surely contains $\mathrm{Comb}_{n,k}$ as a subgraph. This improves a recent result of Kahn, Lubetzky and Wormald. We prove a similar statement for a more general class of trees containing both these combs and all bounded degree spanning trees which have at least $εn/ \log^9n$ disjoint bare paths length $\lceil\log^9 n\rceil$. We also give an efficient method for finding large expander subgraphs in a binomial random graph. This allows us to improve a result on almost spanning trees by Balogh, Csaba, Pei and Samotij.
2014-05-19 v2
The constant objective value property for combinatorial optimization problems
Given a combinatorial optimization problem, we aim at characterizing the set of all instances for which every feasible solution has the same objective value. Our central result deals with multi-dimensional assignment problems. We show that for the axial and for the planar $d$-dimensional assignment problem instances with constant objective value property are characterized by sum-decomposable arrays. We provide a counterexample to show that the result does not carry over to general $d$-dimensional assignment problems. Our result for the axial $d$-dimensional assignment problem can be shown to carry over to the axial $d$-dimensional transportation problem. Moreover, we obtain characterizations when the constant objective value property holds for the minimum spanning tree problem, the shortest path problem and the minimum weight maximum cardinality matching problem.
2014-05-05 v2
Cycle/cocycle oblique projections on oriented graphs
Published in Lett. Math. Phys. 105 , 89-107 (2015) • View Publication • BIB
It is well known that the edge vector space of an oriented graph can be decomposed in terms of cycles and cocycles (alias cuts, or bonds), and that a basis for the cycle and the cocycle spaces can be generated by adding and removing edges to an arbitrarily chosen spanning tree. In this paper we show that the edge vector space can also be decomposed in terms of cycles and the generating edges of cocycles (called cochords), or of cocycles and the generating edges of cycles (called chords). From this observation follows a construction in terms of oblique complementary projection operators. We employ this algebraic construction to prove several properties of unweighted Kirchhoff-Symanzik matrices, encoding the mutual superposition between cycles and cocycles. In particular, we prove that dual matrices of planar graphs have the same spectrum (up to multiplicities). We briefly comment on how this construction provides a refined formalization of Kirchhoff's mesh analysis of electrical circuits, which has lately been applied to generic thermodynamic networks.
Sandpile groups of generalized de Bruijn and Kautz graphs and circulant matrices over finite fields
Published in Journal of Algebra (2015), pp. 268-295 • View Publication • BIB
A maximal minor $M$ of the Laplacian of an $n$-vertex Eulerian digraph $Γ$ gives rise to a finite group $\mathbb{Z}^{n-1}/\mathbb{Z}^{n-1}M$ known as the sandpile (or critical) group $S(Γ)$ of $Γ$. We determine $S(Γ)$ of the generalized de Bruijn graphs $Γ=\mathrm{DB}(n,d)$ with vertices $0,\dots,n-1$ and arcs $(i,di+k)$ for $0\leq i\leq n-1$ and $0\leq k\leq d-1$, and closely related generalized Kautz graphs, extending and completing earlier results for the classical de Bruijn and Kautz graphs. Moreover, for a prime $p$ and an $n$-cycle permutation matrix $X\in\mathrm{GL}_n(p)$ we show that $S(\mathrm{DB}(n,p))$ is isomorphic to the quotient by $\langle X\rangle$ of the centralizer of $X$ in $\mathrm{PGL}_n(p)$. This offers an explanation for the coincidence of numerical data in sequences A027362 and A003473 of the OEIS, and allows one to speculate upon a possibility to construct normal bases in the finite field $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ from spanning trees in $\mathrm{DB}(n,p)$.