arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the critical beta-splitting model of a random $n$-leaf rooted tree, clades are recursively (from the root) split into sub-clades, and a clade of $m$ leaves is split into sub-clades containing $i$ and $m-i$ leaves with probabilities $\propto 1/(i(m-i))$. Study of structure theory and explicit quantitative aspects of this model (in discrete or continuous versions) is an active research topic. For many results there are different proofs, probabilistic or analytic, so the model provides a testbed for a ``compare and contrast" discussion of techniques. This article provides an overview of results proved in the sequence of similarly-titled articles I, III, IV and related articles. We mostly do not repeat proofs given elsewhere: instead we seek to paint a ``Big Picture" via graphics and heuristics, and emphasize open problems. Our discussion is centered around three categories of results. (i) There is a CLT for leaf heights, and the analytic proofs can be extended to provide surprisingly precise analysis of other height-related aspects. (ii) There is an explicit description of the limit {\em fringe distribution} relative to a random leaf, whose graphical representation is essentially the format of the cladogram representation of biological phylogenies. (iii) There is a canonical embedding of the discrete model into a continuous-time model, that is a random tree CTCS(n) on $n$ leaves with real-valued edge lengths, and this model turns out more convenient to study. The family (CTCS(n), n \ge 2) is consistent under a ``delete random leaf and prune" operation. That leads to an explicit inductive construction of (CTCS(n), n \ge 2) as $n$ increases, and then to a limit structure CTCS($\infty$) formalized via exchangeable partitions. Many open problems remain, in particular to elucidate a relation between CTCS($\infty$) and the $β(2,1)$ coalescent.

Diagrammatic notation has become a ubiquitous computational tool; early examples include Penrose's graphical notation for tensor calculus, Feynman's diagrams for perturbative quantum field theory, and Cvitanovic's birdtracks for Lie algebras. Category theory provides a robust framework in which to understand the nature of such diagrams, and Joyal and Street formalized this framework by introducing string diagrams, governed by the syntax of monoidal 1-categories. The notion of "manifold diagrams" generalizes string diagrams to higher dimensions, and can be interpreted in higher-categorical terms by a process of geometric dualization. The closely related notion of "tame tangles" describes a well-behaved class of embedded manifolds that can likewise be interpreted categorically. In this paper we formally introduce the notions of manifold diagrams and of tame tangles, and show that they admit a combinatorial classification, by using results from the toolbox of framed combinatorial topology. We then study the stability of tame tangles under perturbation; the local forms of perturbation stable tame tangles provide combinatorial models of differential singularities. As an illustration we describe various such combinatorial singularities in low dimensions. We conclude by observing that all smooth 4-manifolds can be presented as tame tangles, and conjecture that the same is true for smooth manifolds of any dimension.

Although there is a somewhat standard formalization of computability on countable sets given by Turing machines, the same cannot be said about uncountable sets. Among the approaches to define computability in these sets, order-theoretic structures have proven to be useful. Here, we discuss the mathematical structure needed to define computability using order-theoretic concepts. In particular, we introduce a more general framework and discuss its limitations compared to the previous one in domain theory. We expose four features in which the stronger requirements in the domain-theoretic structure allow to improve upon the more general framework: computable elements, computable functions, model dependence of computability and complexity theory. Crucially, we show computability of elements in uncountable spaces can be defined in this new setup, and argue why this is not the case for computable functions. Moreover, we show the stronger setup diminishes the dependence of computability on the chosen order-theoretic structure and that, although a suitable complexity theory can be defined in the stronger framework and the more general one posesses a notion of computable elements, there appears to be no proper notion of element complexity in the latter.

The \emph{$ p$-processor cup game} is a classic and widely studied scheduling problem that captures the setting in which a $p$-processor machine must assign tasks to processors over time in order to ensure that no individual task ever falls too far behind. The problem is formalized as a multi-round game in which two players, a filler (who assigns work to tasks) and an emptier (who schedules tasks) compete. The emptier's goal is to minimize backlog, which is the maximum amount of outstanding work for any task. Recently, Kuszmaul and Westover (ITCS, 2021) proposed the \emph{variable-processor cup game}, which considers the same problem, except that the amount of resources available to the players (i.e., the number $p$ of processors) fluctuates between rounds of the game. They showed that this seemingly small modification fundamentally changes the dynamics of the game: whereas the optimal backlog in the fixed $p$-processor game is $Θ(\log n)$, independent of $p$, the optimal backlog in the variable-processor game is $Θ(n)$. The latter result was only known to apply to games with \emph{exponentially many} rounds, however, and it has remained an open question what the optimal tradeoff between time and backlog is for shorter games. This paper establishes a tight trade-off curve between time and backlog in the variable-processor cup game. Importantly, we prove that for a game consisting of $t$ rounds, the optimal backlog is $Θ(n)$ if and only if $t \ge Ω(n^3)$. Our techniques also allow for us to resolve several other open questions concerning how the variable-processor cup game behaves in beyond-worst-case-analysis settings.

We prove new lower bounds for suitable competitive ratio measures of two relaxed online packing problems: online removable multiple knapsack, and a recently introduced online minimum peak appointment scheduling problem. The high level objective in both problems is to pack arriving items of sizes at most 1 into bins of capacity 1 as efficiently as possible, but the exact formalizations differ. In the appointment scheduling problem, every item has to be assigned to a position, which can be seen as a time interval during a workday of length 1. That is, items are not assigned to bins, but only once all the items are processed, the optimal number of bins subject to chosen positions is determined, and this is the cost of the online algorithm. On the other hand, in the removable knapsack problem there is a fixed number of bins, and the goal of packing items, which consists in choosing a particular bin for every packed item (and nothing else), is to pack as valuable a subset as possible. In this last problem it is possible to reject items, that is, deliberately not pack them, as well as to remove packed items at any later point in time, which adds flexibility to the problem.

Let $H$ be an HD0L-system. We show that there are only finitely many primitive words $v$ with the property that $v^k$, for all integers $k$, is an element of the factorial language of $H$. In particular, this result applies to the set of all factors of a morphic word. We provide a formalized proof in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL as part of the Combinatorics on Words Formalized project.

There are many concepts of signed graph coloring which are defined by assigning colors to the vertices of the graphs. These concepts usually differ in the number of self-inverse colors used. We introduce a unifying concept for this kind of coloring by assigning elements from symmetric sets to the vertices of the signed graphs. In the first part of the paper, we study colorings with elements from symmetric sets where the number of self-inverse elements is fixed. We prove a Brooks'-type theorem and upper bounds for the corresponding chromatic numbers in terms of the chromatic number of the underlying graph. These results are used in the second part where we introduce the symset-chromatic number $χ_{sym}(G,σ)$ of a signed graph $(G,σ)$. We show that the symset-chromatic number gives the minimum partition of a signed graph into independent sets and non-bipartite antibalanced subgraphs. In particular, $χ_{sym}(G,σ) \leq χ(G)$. In the final section we show that these colorings can also be formalized as $DP$-colorings.

We investigate algebraic and compositional properties of abstract multiway rewriting systems, which are archetypical structures underlying the formalism of the Wolfram model. We demonstrate the existence of higher homotopies in this class of rewriting systems, where homotopical maps are induced by the inclusion of appropriate rewriting rules taken from an abstract rulial space of all possible such rules. Furthermore, we show that a multiway rewriting system with homotopies up to order $n$ may naturally be formalized as an $n$-fold category, such that (upon inclusion of appropriate inverse morphisms via invertible rewriting relations) the infinite limit of this structure yields an ${\infty}$-groupoid. Via Grothendieck's homotopy hypothesis, this ${\infty}$-groupoid thus inherits the structure of a formal homotopy space. We conclude with some comments on how this computational framework of homotopical multiway systems may potentially be used for making formal connections to homotopy spaces upon which models relevant to physics may be instantiated.

Faces play a central role in the combinatorial and computational aspects of polyhedra. In this paper, we present the first formalization of faces of polyhedra in the proof assistant Coq. This builds on the formalization of a library providing the basic constructions and operations over polyhedra, including projections, convex hulls and images under linear maps. Moreover, we design a special mechanism which automatically introduces an appropriate representation of a polyhedron or a face, depending on the context of the proof. We demonstrate the usability of this approach by establishing some of the most important combinatorial properties of faces, namely that they constitute a family of graded atomistic and coatomistic lattices closed under interval sublattices. We also prove a theorem due to Balinski on the $d$-connectedness of the adjacency graph of polytopes of dimension $d$.

We introduce the notion of multi-patterns, a combinatorial abstraction of polyphonic musical phrases. The interest of this approach in encoding musical phrases lies in the fact that it becomes possible to compose multi-patterns in order to produce new ones. This composition is parameterized by a monoid structure on the scale degrees. This embeds the set of the musical phrases into an algebraic framework since the set of the multi-patterns is endowed with the structure of an operad. Operads are algebraic structures offering a formalization and an abstraction of the notion of operators and their compositions. Seeing musical phrases as operators allows us to perform computations on phrases and admits applications in generative music. Indeed, given a set of initial multi-patterns, we propose various algorithms to randomly generate a new and longer phrase emulating the style suggested by the inputted multi-patterns. The designed algorithms use types of grammars working with operads and colored operads, known as bud generating systems.

Operads are algebraic devices offering a formalization of the concept of operations with several inputs and one output. Such operations can be naturally composed to form bigger and more complex ones. Coming historically from algebraic topology, operads intervene now as important objects in computer science and in combinatorics. The theory of operads, together with the algebraic setting and the tools accompanying it, promises advances in these two areas. On the one hand, operads provide a useful abstraction of formal expressions, and also, provide connections with the theory of rewrite systems. On the other hand, a lot of operads involving combinatorial objects highlight some of their properties and allow to discover new ones. This book presents the theory of nonsymmetric operads under a combinatorial point of view. It portrays the main elements of this theory and the links it maintains with several areas of computer science and combinatorics. A lot of examples of operads appearing in combinatorics are studied and some constructions relating operads with known algebraic structures are presented. The modern treatment of operads consisting in considering the space of formal power series associated with an operad is developed. Enrichments of nonsymmetric operads as colored, cyclic, and symmetric operads are reviewed. This text is addressed to any computer scientist or combinatorist who looks a complete and a modern description of the theory of nonsymmetric operads. Evenly, this book is intended to an audience of algebraists who are looking for an original point of view fitting in the context of combinatorics.

We introduce the notion of multi-pattern, a combinatorial abstraction of polyphonic musical phrases. The interest of this approach lies in the fact that this offers a way to compose two multi-patterns in order to produce a longer one. This dives musical phrases into an algebraic context since the set of multi-patterns has the structure of an operad; operads being structures offering a formalization of the notion of operators and their compositions. Seeing musical phrases as operators allows us to perform computations on phrases and admits applications in generative music: given a set of short patterns, we propose various algorithms to randomly generate a new and longer phrase inspired by the inputted patterns.

A sweep of a point configuration is any ordered partition induced by a linear functional. Posets of sweeps of planar point configurations were formalized and abstracted by Goodman and Pollack under the theory of allowable sequences of permutations. We introduce two generalizations that model posets of sweeps of higher dimensional configurations. Mimicking the fact that sweep polytopes of point configurations (the monotone path polytopes of the associated zonotopes) are projections of permutahedra, we define sweep oriented matroids as strong maps of the braid oriented matroid. Allowable sequences are then the sweep oriented matroids of rank 2, and many of their properties extend to higher rank. We show strong ties between sweep oriented matroids and both modular hyperplanes and Dilworth truncations from (unoriented) matroid theory. We also explore their connection with the generalized Baues problem for cellular strings, where sweep oriented matroids can play the role of monotone path polytopes, even for non-realizable oriented matroids. In particular, we show that for oriented matroids that admit a sweep oriented matroid, their poset of pseudo-sweeps deformation retracts to a sphere of the appropriate dimension. A second generalization are allowable graphs of permutations: symmetric sets of permutations pairwise connected by allowable sequences. They have the structure of acycloids and include sweep oriented matroids.

We formalize Hall's Marriage Theorem in the Lean theorem prover for inclusion in mathlib, which is a community-driven effort to build a unified mathematics library for Lean. One goal of the mathlib project is to contain all of the topics of a complete undergraduate mathematics education. We provide three presentations of the main theorem statement: in terms of indexed families of finite sets, of relations on types, and of matchings in bipartite graphs. We also formalize a version of Kőnig's lemma (in terms of inverse limits) to boost the theorem to the case of countably infinite index sets. We give a description of the design of the recent mathlib library for simple graphs, and we also give a necessary and sufficient condition for a simple graph to carry a function.

We study the problem of detecting the edge correlation between two random graphs with $n$ unlabeled nodes. This is formalized as a hypothesis testing problem, where under the null hypothesis, the two graphs are independently generated; under the alternative, the two graphs are edge-correlated under some latent node correspondence, but have the same marginal distributions as the null. For both Gaussian-weighted complete graphs and dense Erdős-Rényi graphs (with edge probability $n^{-o(1)}$), we determine the sharp threshold at which the optimal testing error probability exhibits a phase transition from zero to one as $n\to \infty$. For sparse Erdős-Rényi graphs with edge probability $n^{-Ω(1)}$, we determine the threshold within a constant factor. The proof of the impossibility results is an application of the conditional second-moment method, where we bound the truncated second moment of the likelihood ratio by carefully conditioning on the typical behavior of the intersection graph (consisting of edges in both observed graphs) and taking into account the cycle structure of the induced random permutation on the edges. Notably, in the sparse regime, this is accomplished by leveraging the pseudoforest structure of subcritical Erdős-Rényi graphs and a careful enumeration of subpseudoforests that can be assembled from short orbits of the edge permutation.

We study a new version of the Traveling Salesperson Problem, called \VectorTSP, where the traveler is subject to discrete acceleration constraints, as defined in the paper-and-pencil game Racetrack (also known as Vector Racer). In this model, the degrees of freedom at a certain point in time depends on the current velocity, and the speed is not limited. The paper introduces this problem and initiates its study, discussing also the main differences with existing versions of TSP. Not surprisingly, the problem turns out to be NP-hard. A key feature of \VectorTSP is that it deals with acceleration in a discrete, combinatorial way, making the problem more amenable to algorithmic investigation. The problem involves two layers of trajectory planning: (1) the order in which cities are visited, and (2) the physical trajectory realizing such a visit, both interacting with each other. This interaction is formalized as an interactive protocol between a high-level tour algorithm and a trajectory oracle, the former calling the latter repeatedly. We present an exact implementation of the trajectory oracle, adapting the A* algorithm for paths over multiple checkpoints whose ordering is \emph{given} (this algorithm being possibly of independent interest). To motivate the problem further, we perform experiments showing that the naive approach consisting of solving the instance as an \EuclideanTSP first, then optimizing the trajectory of the resulting tour, is typically suboptimal and outperformed by simple (but dedicated) heuristics.

An oriented hypergraph is an oriented incidence structure that allows for the generalization of graph theoretic concepts to integer matrices through its locally signed graphic substructure. The locally graphic behaviors are formalized in the subobject classifier of incidence hypergraphs. Moreover, the injective envelope is calculated and shown to contain the class of uniform hypergraphs -- providing a combinatorial framework for the entries of incidence matrices. A multivariable all-minors characteristic polynomial is obtained for both the determinant and permanent of the oriented hypergraphic Laplacian and adjacency matrices arising from any integer incidence matrix. The coefficients of each polynomial are shown to be submonic maps from the same family into the injective envelope limited by the subobject classifier. These results provide a unifying theorem for oriented hypergraphic matrix-tree-type and Sachs-coefficient-type theorems. Finally, by specializing to bidirected graphs, the trivial subclasses for the degree-$k$ monomials of the Laplacian are shown to be in one-to-one correspondence with $k$-arborescences.

The topic of this paper is "gerrymandering", namely the curse of deliberate creations of district maps with highly asymmetric electoral outcomes to disenfranchise voters, and it has a long legal history. Measuring and eliminating gerrymandering has enormous implications to sustain the backbone of democratic principles of a society. Although there is no dearth of legal briefs involving gerrymandering over many years, it is only more recently that mathematicians and applied computational researchers have started to investigate this topic. However, it has received relatively little attention so far from the computational complexity researchers dealing with theoretical analysis of computational complexity issues, such as computational hardness, approximability issues, etc. There could be many reasons for this, such as descriptions of these problem non-CS non-math (often legal or political) journals that theoretical CS (TCS) people usually do not follow, or the lack of coverage of these topics in TCS publication venues. One of our modest goals in writing this article is to improve upon this situation by stimulating further interactions between the gerrymandering and TCS researchers. To this effect, our main contributions are twofold: (1) we provide formalization of several models, related concepts, and corresponding problem statements using TCS frameworks from the descriptions of these problems as available in existing non-TCS (perhaps legal) venues, and (2) we also provide computational complexity analysis of some versions of these problems, leaving other versions for future research. The goal of writing this article is not to have the final word on gerrymandering, but to introduce a series of concepts, models and problems to the TCS community and to show that science of gerrymandering involves an intriguing set of partitioning problems involving geometric and combinatorial optimization.

Over the last few decades, many distinct lines of research aimed at automating mathematics have been developed, including computer algebra systems (CASs) for mathematical modelling, automated theorem provers for first-order logic, SAT/SMT solvers aimed at program verification, and higher-order proof assistants for checking mathematical proofs. More recently, some of these lines of research have started to converge in complementary ways. One success story is the combination of SAT solvers and CASs (SAT+CAS) aimed at resolving mathematical conjectures. Many conjectures in pure and applied mathematics are not amenable to traditional proof methods. Instead, they are best addressed via computational methods that involve very large combinatorial search spaces. SAT solvers are powerful methods to search through such large combinatorial spaces---consequently, many problems from a variety of mathematical domains have been reduced to SAT in an attempt to resolve them. However, solvers traditionally lack deep repositories of mathematical domain knowledge that can be crucial to pruning such large search spaces. By contrast, CASs are deep repositories of mathematical knowledge but lack efficient general search capabilities. By combining the search power of SAT with the deep mathematical knowledge in CASs we can solve many problems in mathematics that no other known methods seem capable of solving. We demonstrate the success of the SAT+CAS paradigm by highlighting many conjectures that have been disproven, verified, or partially verified using our tool MathCheck. These successes indicate that the paradigm is positioned to become a standard method for solving problems requiring both a significant amount of search and deep mathematical reasoning. For example, the SAT+CAS paradigm has recently been used by Heule, Kauers, and Seidl to find many new algorithms for $3\times3$ matrix multiplication.

In 2016, Ellenberg and Gijswijt established a new upper bound on the size of subsets of $\mathbb{F}^n_q$ with no three-term arithmetic progression. This problem has received much mathematical attention, particularly in the case $q = 3$, where it is commonly known as the \emph{cap set problem}. Ellenberg and Gijswijt's proof was published in the \emph{Annals of Mathematics} and is noteworthy for its clever use of elementary methods. This paper describes a formalization of this proof in the Lean proof assistant, including both the general result in $\mathbb{F}^n_q$ and concrete values for the case $q = 3$. We faithfully follow the pen and paper argument to construct the bound. Our work shows that (some) modern mathematics is within the range of proof assistants.