arXiv++ Combinatorics

We report on our ongoing project to develop a computational pipeline, AutoGraphForge, for an automated graph-theoretic conjecturing-refuting-formalizing-proving system. Conjecture generation is counterexample-guided and runs in rounds: a Graffiti3 generator proposes conjectures over a small, evolving snapshot table $T$ (initially a few hundred graphs with their computed invariants) that grows only by counterexamples to its own conjectures. A novelty filter of $559$ classical and folklore relations, closed under transitive composition and linear identity substitution, decides via a linear program whether a candidate is already implied by known results. Surviving candidates are tested against a dataset of about $348,000$ graphs, unioning the complete House of Graphs invariant export, the exhaustive census of all connected graphs on at most nine vertices, several extremal families (strongly regular, minimal Ramsey, Cayley, cages, barbells, lollipops, spiders), and random models. Counterexample-search algorithms then attack the remainder. Run for several rounds on an HPC cluster, the loop yields $6,522$ conjectures that survived the refutation dataset, the novelty filter and every active-search run -- among them nontrivial relations between the annihilation number and the edge-cover number for bipartite and regular graphs, which we prove by hand. A subsequent formalization and proving stage deterministically translates each surviving conjecture into a Lean 4 statement skeleton; every candidate proof is kernel-verified against a pinned mathlib4 and our custom invariant preamble. This stage integrates two neural provers -- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (served with vLLM) and the Lean-specialised OProver-32B -- behind the independent kernel check. It is implemented end-to-end and passes initial sanity checks, with the full pipeline currently running on the cluster.

A $p$-ary bent partition of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ is a partition into $K$ nonempty cells such that every balanced assignment of its cells to $\mathbb{F}_p$ produces a bent function. It was asked whether every possible depth $K$ is a power of $p$; for general $p$, previous affirmative results required regularity or cell-symmetry hypotheses. We prove the stronger unconditional statement that, for every nonzero $h$, exactly $p^n/K$ points remain in the same fine cell under translation by $h$. Thus the fine cells form a partitioned difference family and the fine label map is zero-difference balanced. Consequently $K\mid p^n$, so $K=p^t$; nonempty cells further give $1\le t<n$. In even dimension, the classical cell-size theorem yields $K\mid p^{n/2}$. Together with the known odd-dimensional ternary three-fibre parameter restriction, this gives the global bound $t\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor$. The proof is an exact finite average over balanced coarsenings. The main counting identity and selected consequences are formalized and kernel-checked in Lean 4.

The Rogers--Ramanujan identities equate a $q$-series whose exponents are governed by a quadratic form with an infinite product supported on two residue classes modulo~$5$. Identities of this shape are scarce, and a central problem is to identify the structures that produce them in families. Huang, Jiang, and Oblomkov have proposed a source of a new kind: to each pair of coprime integers $a,b>1$ they attach an infinite-rank $q$-series $Z_{a,b}(q)$, assembled from counts of commuting nilpotent matrix pairs $(A,B)$ with $A^a=B^b$ over finite fields, and they conjecture that it equals an explicit product of $(a-1)(b-1)/2$ modular units of level $a+b$. The $a=2$ cases are the Andrews--Gordon identities; no case with $a>2$ was known. We prove the conjecture for $(a,b)=(3,4)$, $(3,5)$, $(3,7)$, and $(3,8)$. Our proofs pass through a finer sum-to-sum identity, which we conjecture for all $b$ coprime to $3$ and establish for all $b$ when $q=1$. Lau and Ono have since proved that identity in general, and with it the full $a=3$ case. These identities have been formalized and verified in Lean by AxiomProver.

In the transversal achievement game on the $n\times n$ board, two players alternately claim cells, and the first to own a transversal---a set of $n$ cells of which no two share a row or column---wins. Ranđelović showed that the first player wins for every $n\ge4$, while the game is a draw for $n=2,3$. We give an independent proof that the first player wins for $n\ge4$ that additionally establishes a bound on the length of the win: the given strategy forces a win by ply $2n+3$, i.e.\ on the first player's $(n+2)$-nd move, for every $n\ge4$. The proof yields a strategy that is fully determined by a fixed rule on the current position and can thus be implemented directly. We isolate the use of the hypothesis $n\ge4$ to two steps in the analysis, explaining why the argument fails at $n=3$. An exhaustive computational search implementing the strategy verifies it against every legal defense for $n=4,5,6$, confirming both the strategy's validity and that the $2n+3$ bound is attained in these cases. The main theorem has also been formalized and machine-checked in Lean 4.

In 2016, Berkovich and Uncu proved that, for all nonnegative integers $i$, $j$, and $n$, the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ odd-indexed odd parts and $j$ even-indexed odd parts equals the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ parts congruent to $1$ modulo $4$ and $j$ parts congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. Their proof used generating functions, and they asked for a combinatorial proof. We answer their question with an explicit bijection, assembled from three classical ingredients: $2$-modular diagrams, an insertion algorithm of Chen, Gao, Ji, and Li, and Glaisher's bijection. AxiomProver autonomously formalized and verified the proof of the main theorem in Lean.

Razborov's flag algebra method is a powerful tool for proving asymptotic inequalities in extremal graph theory, often reducing the task to finding a finite certificate by semidefinite programming. We present a machine-checked formalization of the method for finite simple graphs, together with a certificate-to-proof compiler that turns externally generated certificate data into algebraic proofs checked by Lean. The formalization covers the foundations of the method: partially labeled graphs, their densities in large graphs, the quotient algebra of density expressions, graph-limit semantics through positive homomorphisms, and the downward operators used to average out labels. The compiler treats the external semidefinite programming output as candidate data rather than trusted input: Lean independently computes the required density and multiplication facts, verifies positive semidefiniteness exactly over $\mathbb{Q}$, and carries out the algebraic normalization steps of flag-algebra proofs. Our case studies yield formal proofs of seven Turán-type upper bounds, including Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, a $C_4$-density bound for triangle-free graphs, and edge-density bounds for $K_4$-free, $K_5$-free, and $C_5$-free graphs. Independently of the compiler, we formalize the matching constructions that complete the exact Turán densities of Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, and prove two inequalities of Goodman. Our constrained semantics also prompted a meta-theoretic comparison of two ways of imposing graph constraints: building a hereditary constraint into the flag algebra from the start, or testing inequalities afterward on constrained graph limits with labels chosen at random. We state the resulting root-plantability criterion characterizing when the two approaches agree; a forthcoming paper will present the complete account.

We prove a conjecture of Monical, Tokcan, and Yong that every fixed positive power of the Vandermonde determinant is non-SNP in all sufficiently many variables, where a polynomial is non-SNP if there is a lattice point in its Newton polytope that does not appear with nonzero coefficient. This means our result proves that for every even power $k\geq4$, there is always such a missing lattice monomial in large enough dimensions. The odd case follows from alternation, and the quadratic case was previously known. For every even power $k\geq4$, we exhibit an explicit lattice point in the Newton polytope of $a_{δ_k}^k$ whose coefficient vanishes. The vanishing is obtained from a Dyson constant-term identity, proved using the finite-variable Jack scalar product and Macdonald's specialization formula. The key even-power construction and proof strategy arose from prompting with OpenAI Codex (GPT Sol 5.6 Extra High), a large language model; the complete transcript appears in the appendix. The authors subsequently checked and organized the argument. The accompanying Lean formalization is available at https://github.com/steven-le-thien/vandermonde-snp.

When $m = 1$, the Dyson rank generating function is a classical bridge between partition theory, Ramanujan's mock theta functions, and the theory of harmonic Maass forms and nonholomorphic Jacobi forms. The rank is a statistic on partitions, and the higher Dyson systems, for $m \geq 2$, are a natural multivariable refinement of it, combining $m$ graded rank contributions. Unlike the classical case, these higher systems are not expected to fit the mock-modular framework, which raises the question of what analytic structure governs them. We show that their root-of-unity specializations carry a hidden elliptic structure. A finite $q$-difference recurrence produces an explicit polynomial obstruction to the expected index $m$ elliptic transformation law, and because the obstruction is finite, its partial fractions canonically determine finitely many Appell--Lerch correction terms that remove it. The corrected functions satisfy a twisted index $m$ elliptic law; a natural translation removes the twist, and their holomorphic finite parts admit finite theta decompositions. Thus, the natural analogue of Dyson's mock-modular phenomenon at higher $m$ is not mock modularity but a finite theta decomposition governed by an index $m$ elliptic transformation law. These results grew out of a human--AI collaboration, and the key new formulas were formalized and machine-verified in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver.

For integer vectors R,S let A(R,S) denote the class of (0,1)-matrices with row sum vector R and column sum vector S. Its interchange graph G(R,S) has A(R,S) as its vertex set, two matrices being adjacent when they differ by a single 2 x 2 interchange. Brualdi conjectured that G(R,S) is Hamiltonian for every R,S. We prove the stronger statement that G(R,S) is maximally Hamiltonian: Hamilton-laceable when bipartite, and Hamilton-connected when not. The proof is a structural induction on the number of matrices in the class, organized by the structure theory of interchange graphs. Deleting inactive lines and splitting invariant positions expresses any class as a Cartesian product, reducing the argument to the prime factors. The bipartite classes are products of complete transposition graphs; we settle them together, without induction, by proving they are paired 2-disjoint-path-coverable and hence Hamilton-laceable, using a recent theorem of Coleman, Fischberg, Gong, Harrington and Wong on paired disjoint path covers. The non-bipartite classes divide into three cases: products assembled from smaller factors, a base of Johnson graphs and small classes, and the large prime classes, treated by a pivot-and-fiber construction whose line quotients are matroid base-exchange graphs. The complete argument has been machine-checked in the Lean 4 proof assistant from first principles together with seven cited results of the literature; the disjoint-path-cover results it imports are themselves proved within the formalization.

Let $p$ be a prime number. We introduce a sparseness condition on the supports of $p$-adic Hahn series, and prove that this condition implies transcendence over $\breve{\mathbf Q}_p$, the completed maximal unramified extension of $\mathbf{Q}_p$. As an application, we prove the order-type conjecture of $\mathbf{Q}_p$-algebraic $p$-adic Hahn series with bounded support under the condition that the support has only finitely many accumulation points. All results in this paper have been fully formalized in the Lean theorem prover (v 4.31.0), building over Mathlib.

For $n\ge1$, we let $$x_n:=\tan\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\arctan k\bigr).$$ In 2008, Amdeberhan, Medina, and Moll conjectured that $x_n\not \in \mathbb{Z}$ for every $n\ge5$. This was known for a set of positive integers of density $\tfrac{120}{817}\approx0.1469$. We prove that an integer value $x_n=m$ satisfies $|m|\ge e^{(1/2+o(1))\,n\log n}$, which we use to deduce that $$\#\{\,1\leq n\le N:x_n\in\mathbb{Z}\,\}=O(\log N). $$ In particular, the conjecture holds for a density-one set of $n$. The results in this note were formalized in Lean/Mathlib and produced autonomously by AxiomProver from natural-language statements.

The theory of $q$-series and basic hypergeometric series plays a crucial role at the intersection of combinatorics, number theory, and representation theory. From the classical partition identities of Euler and Jacobi to modern developments in class field theory, vertex operator algebras, and the Monstrous Moonshine conjecture, $q$-series provide the analytic framework for a wide range of profound applications. In this paper, we discuss the formalization of this theory in the Lean proof assistant, a process that requires careful design of scalable and versatile structures to reconcile formal algebraic identities with analytic convergence properties. We address these foundational challenges by focusing on the construction of $q$-Pochhammer symbols, $q$-binomial coefficients, Bailey's Lemma and similar primitives. To demonstrate the utility of this work, we provide fully verified proofs of the Jacobi Triple Product formula and the celebrated Rogers-Ramanujan identities, which serve as both historical and technical benchmarks for the field. This work establishes a rigorous computational foundation for the future formalization of mock theta functions, modular forms, and the diverse algebraic structures that underpin their applications across mathematics and physics.

Let $f_3(N)$ be the least integer such that every set $A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,N\}$ of size at least $f_3(N)$ contains distinct elements $a,b,c\in A$ such that $a+b\in A$, $a+c\in A$, and $b+c\in A$. We prove that $f_3(N)\le 5N/8+O(1)$. Together with the standard construction $[N/8,N/4]\cup[N/2,N]$, this gives $f_3(N)=5N/8+O(1)$, resolving Erdős Problem 865. The proof is self-contained. An earlier conditional version of the reduction has also been formalized in Lean 4/Mathlib with no sorries and no added axioms.

Start with four digits, arrange them in both descending and ascending order, subtract, and repeat. This simple process is known as the Kaprekar routine, famous in base ten for sending every nonconstant four-digit string to $6174$. We show that in every odd base $B>3$, the four-digit Kaprekar map has an unexpectedly rigid structure. After at most three iterations, every nonconstant orbit enters an explicit triangular region $\mathcal{T}_B$, and on this region the map is conjugate to projective doubling: \[ \{[r],[s]\}\longmapsto \{[2r],[2s]\}. \] This gives a complete finite description of all nonconstant terminal cycles, including an explicit formula for their lengths and counts. In particular, the longest terminal cycle has length at most $(B-1)/2$, and equality can occur only when $B$ is prime. For primes $p>5$, equality occurs precisely when the least positive $m$ with $2^m\equiv\pm1\pmod p$ is $m=(p-1)/2$. The results proved here were first formulated by Schwartz and Thakur. As a test case for AI-assisted formal mathematics, AxiomProver produced Lean/mathlib formalizations of these results.

In his 2009 paper, Thakur posed three conjectural hypotheses for the degrees of the power sums \[ S_d(k)=\sum_{\substack{a\in \mathbb F_q[t] \text{ monic}\\ °a=d}} a^{-k} \qquad\text{and}\qquad s_d(k)=-°_t S_d(k). \] For prime fields $q=p$, we prove Hypotheses H1 and H2, giving a unique greedy description of the extremal term in Carlitz's formula and establishing the recursion \[ s_d(k)=s_{d-1}(s_1(k))+s_1(k). \] As consequences, the prime-field recursion gives the strict Newton-polygon convexity used in the prime-field Carlitz-Goss Riemann-hypothesis theorem, and it recovers Thakur's nonvanishing theorem for positive multizeta values over $\mathbb F_p[t]$. We also prove Hypothesis H3 for all finite fields $q=p^f$, establishing the monotonicity \[ s_d(k)<s_d(k+1)\qquad (p\nmid k). \] We provide Lean formalizations of the arguments in this paper, generated by AxiomProver.

The Riemann--Roch theorem for graphs, due to Baker and Norine, is a foundational result establishing a powerful analogy between finite graphs and algebraic curves. We describe a complete formal proof of this theorem implemented in the Lean 4 theorem prover. Our formalization includes the existence and uniqueness of q-reduced divisors, a modified form of Dhar's burning algorithm, the bijection between acyclic orientations with unique source and maximal superstable configurations, and Clifford's theorem. We also include several challenges for future formalization.

We present Trellis: an autoformalization system that leverages LLM agents in a deterministically constrained workflow to enforce incremental progress in Lean autoformalization tasks through iterative refinement of natural language proofs. Our approach is motivated by the common mathematician's notion of what it means to have a rigorous proof in the first place: namely, that it would be routine to elaborate any part of the proof in further detail. The result is a system which aims to achieve reliable autoformalization on a modest budget and with generalist agents, with specialization to autoformalization coming not from any task-specific agent training but instead from a meaning-of-rigor inspired workflow enforced by process semantics. We link to an end-to-end Lean formalization of a recent Ramsey theory breakthrough produced by the process.

We present a short proof that the book Ramsey number $R(B_8,B_{10})$ equals 37. The lower bound $R(B_8,B_{10}) \ge 37$ is already available in the literature, so it is enough to rule out a 37-vertex graph containing neither a copy of $B_8$ nor a copy of $B_{10}$ in its complement. The problem as well as the proof were found with AutoMath, an AI-assisted mathematical discovery workflow developed by the first author. A Lean formalization of the upper-bound argument is available in the accompanying repository.

Complementarity is the case in which a human--AI interaction (HAI) outperforms the best prediction benchmark available among its members. Although this idea is central in HAI research, formal work on complementarity remains limited. Existing frameworks do not model how agents' predictions compose into workflow-sensitive multi-agent protocols. We close this gap by introducing a tree-based formalization of complementarity in multi-agent HAI. An HAI protocol is represented by an ordered agent-role configuration together with a rooted planar binary tree whose leaves are decorated by prediction vectors. A local binary composition rule is evaluated recursively along the tree, yielding a tree-relative complementarity functional relative to a pointwise-min oracle benchmark. We prove four results. First, selector-based HAIs, including self- or AI-reliance, cannot achieve complementarity regardless of task, loss, or prediction quality. Second, in regression under squared loss, complementarity is equivalent to Euclidean distance minimization from the ground-truth vector; for $N=2$, the optimal linear-pooling weight has a closed form and a residual-correction interpretation. Third, under linear local composition, every protocol tree defines a barycentric coordinate chart on the simplex of leaf weights; Tamari-cover reparameterizations of protocol trees preserve complementarity, and for $N=4$, they satisfy the pentagon identity. Fourth, in binary classification, no internal local composition can achieve complementarity under endpoint-monotone losses, including standard Bregman and many finite Bernoulli $f$-divergence losses; an analogous obstruction holds for multiclass aggregation under cross-entropy. In summary, our framework shows that complementarity is attainable in multi-agent regression, but obstructed in classification under natural conditions on local aggregation and loss functions.

Graph coloring with preferences offers a powerful framework for constraint satisfaction problems in which fulfilling every request is impossible but satisfying a guaranteed positive fraction is highly desirable. A \emph{request} on a graph $G$ equipped with a list assignment $L$ assigns to each vertex of some subset $dom(r)\subseteq V(G)$ a preferred color from its list. Following Dvořák, Norin, and Postle (2019), $G$ is \emph{$\varepsilon$-flexibly $k$-choosable} if, for every $k$-list assignment $L$ and every request $r$, there is an $L$-coloring of $G$ that agrees with $r$ on at least $\varepsilon|dom(r)|$ vertices. The corresponding notion for DP-coloring (correspondence coloring) was formalized by Bradshaw, Choi, and Kostochka (2025). Choi, Clemen, Ferrara, Horn, Ma, and Masařík (2022) proved that every planar graph without $4$-cycles and with $3$-cycle distance at least $2$ is $\varepsilon$-flexibly $4$-choosable. We improve the result in two respects: weakening the hypothesis from $3$-cycle distance $\geq 2$ to vertex-disjoint triangles, and strengthening the conclusion from list flexibility to weighted DP-flexibility: \emph{Every simple planar graph without $4$-cycles and without intersecting triangles is weighted $\varepsilon$-flexibly DP-$4$-colorable.} The list size $4$ is sharp: Montassier, Raspaud, and Wang constructed a planar graph without $4$-cycles, $5$-cycles, and intersecting triangles that is not $3$-choosable.