arXiv++ Combinatorics

DomiRank is a node-importance algorithm for unweighted networks, defined by a dynamical-system model whose steady state is governed by a competition-strength parameter, a dominance threshold, and a natural decay rate. We study its intrinsic relations with graph automorphism: vertices mapped to each other by an automorphism share the same DomiRank value, and a graph whose DomiRank values are pairwise distinct must be asymmetric; we derive DomiRank properties of regular and vertex-transitive graphs and bound the number of orbits by that of distinct DomiRank values. For DomiRank entropy, the maximum over connected graphs is attained only by regular graphs, and under sufficient conditions (rigorously in the low-competition regime) the entropy decreases monotonically with the competition parameter, a behavior observed on all tested networks and conjectured to hold generally; tuning sigma shifts the identification from important to dominant key nodes. We also study how graph transformations (vertex similarity, vertex partitions, edge swaps, m-products) affect the DomiRank vector, and characterize analytically the sensitivity and limiting behavior of sigma: the normalized DomiRank distribution is sigma-invariant iff the degree vector is an eigenvector of the adjacency matrix, and sigma interpolates continuously between degree and least-eigenvector centrality; experiments on four real networks confirm these results. These results position DomiRank as a tunable complement to principal-eigenvector centrality, with distinctive behavior under strong competition and new tools for node-importance evaluation. Because the parameterization by sigma is a structural property of the measure, not a guarantee of advantage on a downstream task, we also relate these results to the companion null-model study of how much of DomiRank's task-level edge over a degree baseline survives an explicit degree correction.

Detecting structure in complex networks, especially those arising from physical systems, is a central problem across the sciences. One approach is via rich club analysis, which identifies important vertices using a centrality metric and measures whether those vertices are more tightly interconnected than expected by chance. While informative, this approach captures only pairwise interactions, missing out on higher-order ones known to shape the structure and function of many complex systems. We propose a hyper-rich club pipeline that asks whether central vertices are more tightly interconnected than expected by chance through hyperedges encoding higher-order interactions, which also enables the inclusion of important, often omitted, directional information. We work in a broad class of hypergraphs, which we call general directed hypergraphs, that includes as special cases undirected hypergraphs, head-and-tail directed hypergraphs, and totally ordered hypergraphs (a hypergraph related to directed simplicial complexes from topological data analysis). This unifies several non-equivalent notions of directed hypergraph under one definition. On these hypergraphs we define a hyper-rich club framework whose concrete construction depends on explicit choices the domain scientist fixes according to their research goals. Particular choices recover the existing rich club notions for graphs and undirected hypergraphs, and yield the first such notion for each version of directed hypergraphs. We demonstrate that the pipeline recovers meaningful structure in data by studying networks of very different origins: connectomes, temporal networks of infectious spread, networks of poems, and the XGI hypergraph database, in each case detecting structure the standard graph rich club misses.

The Interconnectedness Coefficient (IC) is a bounded semi-local graph-theoretic node measure designed to identify connector vertices between cohesive network regions. Such connector vertices, also referred to as bridging nodes, may mediate between locally cohesive regions even when they are neither hubs nor themselves highly clustered. The IC preferentially assigns high values to weakly clustered focal vertices whose adjacent vertices remain strongly clustered after exclusion of the focal connection. Candidate vertices are required to have degree at least two. The construction is partition-free, uses information within radius two, and requires no predefined community or module partition. The range and extremal properties of the score are derived analytically. Exact graph families isolate its maximal response to fully cohesive branches, its controlled response to a single cohesion defect, its invariance under a cohesion-free hub extension, and a sharp fragmentation threshold. A separate application to a Human Interactome Map reveals pronounced degree-dependent stabilization of IC values near the network's mean clustering level. This behavior follows directly from the multiplicative definition. If focal clustering tends to zero while mean leave-one-out cohesion in the neighborhood stabilizes, the IC converges to that neighborhood-cohesion level. Among the highly ranked IC vertices are proteins with established interface, scaffold, and adaptor roles in molecular complexes. The IC is therefore positioned as a semi-local connector measure for cohesive network regions.

We present the first rigorous analysis of decentralized geometric routing in Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs (GIRGs), a weight-agnostic variant of the greedy routing protocol. While greedy routing in GIRGs is known to explain the algorithmic small-world phenomenon by finding ultra-short paths of length $Θ(\log \log n)$, it assumes additional knowledge of vertex weights beyond geometry, an assumption that is often restrictive or unavailable. We investigate whether the underlying geometry alone is sufficient for efficient navigation. We prove that for power-law weight exponent $τ\in (2,3)$ and geometric decay parameter $α> τ- 1$, geometric routing succeeds with constant probability and finds ultra-short paths of length $Θ(\log \log n)$, matching the optimal asymptotic guarantees for greedy routing. Our analysis further reveals that, upon success, both protocols follow a similar two-phase trajectory, consisting of a rapid ascent to the heavy vertices, followed by efficient navigation to the target. These results demonstrate that, in the appropriate regime, the network's geometry alone implicitly guides the path to the target through its high-weight core.

The shortest path multiplicity is an important metric of complex networks. The shortest path multiplicity of real networks is high and it correlates with their community structure. Since local network evolution induces network communities, it is possible that a high shortest path multiplicity is the natural expectation of local evolution rules. Here I demonstrate, by means of numerical simulations, that this is indeed the case.

A hypergraph is called uniform when every hyperedge contains the same number of vertices, otherwise, it is called non-uniform. In the real world, many systems give rise to non-uniform hypergraphs, such as email networks and co-authorship networks. A uniform hypergraph has a natural one-to-one correspondence with its adjacency tensor. In 2019, Benson proposed the eigenvector centrality of uniform hypergraphs via its adjacency tensor. In this paper, we define an adjacency tensor for hypergraphs and propose the eigenvector centrality for hypergraphs. When the hypergraph is uniform, our proposed eigenvector centrality reduces to Benson's. When each edge of the uniform hypergraph contains exactly two vertices, our proposed centrality reduces to the eigenvector centrality of graphs. We conducted experiments on several real-world hypergraph datasets. The results show that, compared to traditional centrality measures, the proposed centrality measure provides a unique perspective for identifying important vertices and can also effectively identify them.

We analyze greedy routing in a random graph G_n constructed on the vertex set V = {1, 2, ..., n} embedded in Z. Vertices are inserted according to a uniform random permutation pi, and each newly inserted vertex connects to its nearest already-inserted neighbors on the left and right (if they exist). This work addresses a conjecture originating from empirical studies (Ponomarenko et al., 2011; Malkov et al., 2012), which observed through simulations that greedy search in sequentially grown graphs exhibits logarithmic routing complexity across various dimensions. While the original claim was based on experiments and geometric intuition, a rigorous mathematical foundation remained open. Here, we formalize and resolve this conjecture for the one-dimensional case. For a greedy walk GW starting at vertex 1 targeting vertex n -- which at each step moves to the neighbor closest to n -- we prove that the number of steps S_n required to reach n satisfies S_n = Theta(log n) with high probability. Precisely, S_n = L_n + R_n - 2, where L_n and R_n are the numbers of left-to-right and right-to-left minima in the insertion-time permutation. Consequently, E[S_n] = 2H_n - 2 ~ 2 log n and P(S_n >= (2+c) log n) <= n^(-h(c/2) + o(1)) for any constant c > 0, with an analogous lower tail bound for 0 < c < 2, where h(u) = (1+u) ln(1+u) - u is the Bennett rate function. Furthermore, we establish that this logarithmic scaling is robust: for arbitrary or uniformly random start-target pairs, the expected routing complexity remains E[S_{s,t}] = 2 log n + O(1), closely mirroring decentralized routing scenarios in real-world networks where endpoints are chosen dynamically rather than fixed a priori.

Hypergraphs have been a powerful tool to represent higher-order interactions, where hyperedges can connect an arbitrary number of nodes. Quantifying the relative importance of nodes and hyperedges in hypergraphs is a fundamental problem in network analysis. In this paper, we propose a new tensor-based centrality measure for general hypergraphs. We use a third-order tensor to represent the relationship between nodes and hyperedges. The tensor's positive Perron vector is defined as the centrality vector of the hypergraph. The existence and uniqueness of this centrality vector are guaranteed by the Perron-Frobenius theorem for tensors. This new centrality measure captures a higher-order mutual reinforcement mechanism: a node's importance is determined by the importance of its incident hyperedges and the other nodes within these hyperedges; symmetrically, a hyperedge's importance is determined by the importance of its constituent nodes and the other hyperedges containing these nodes. We further provide a combinatorial interpretation by proving that the centrality vector represents the limit geometric capacity of two-steps expansion trees. We illustrate the centrality measure on real-world hypergraph datasets.

The Artificial Benchmark for Community Detection (ABCD) graph is a random graph model with community structure and power-law distribution for both degrees and community sizes. The model generates graphs similar to the well-known LFR model but it is faster, more interpretable, and can be investigated analytically. In this paper, we use the underlying ingredients of the ABCD model, and its generalization to include outliers (ABCD+$o$), and introduce another variant that allows for overlapping communities, ABCD+$o^2$.