arXiv++ Combinatorics

How much information can a single neuron remember? How many memories can neural networks retrieve without creating false memories? These questions are related to a basic question: how many Boolean threshold functions $f(x)=\operatorname{sgn}(a_0+\langle a,x\rangle)$, $x\in\{-1,1\}^n$, are there? In this paper, we show that the number $T_n$ of distinct Boolean threshold functions is \[ T_n=2\binom{2^n-1}{n}\bigl(1+O(n^{-99})\bigr). \] Equivalently, the capacity of a single threshold neuron is $n^2-\log_2(n!)+1+O(n^{-99})$ bits, improving the $O(n)$ error term in the result of Kahn--Komlós--Szemerédi to $O(n^{-99})$. To prove this, we show that, for $1\le r\le n-1$, and $v_1,\ldots,v_r$ are chosen at random from $\{-1,1\}^n$, \[ \mathbb P\!\left\{ \langle v_1,\ldots,v_r\rangle\cap\{-1,1\}^n =\{\pm v_1,\ldots,\pm v_r\} \right\} =1-O(n^{-99}). \] In the context of the Kanter--Sompolinsky Hamiltonian for memory retrieval, this identifies $r=n-1$ as a sharp threshold, at which, for almost every collection of $r$ memories, the only ground states are these memories and their negatives, confirming a weaker form of the Kalai--Linial--Odlyzko conjecture. It also settles a recent open problem posed by M. Anthony on the specification number of Boolean threshold functions. In addition, we show that, for every $1\le r\le n-1$, \[ \mathbb P\{v_1,\ldots,v_r\text{ are linearly dependent}\} =2\binom r2\,2^{-n}+O\!\left(2^{-n}e^{-cn}\right), \] confirming a conjecture of Kahn--Komlós--Szemerédi.

The 2026 disproof of Erdős's unit-distance conjecture and Sawin's subsequent explicit quantitative refinement show that the maximum number $u(n)$ of unit distances among $n$ planar points can exceed $n^{1+\varepsilon}$ for a fixed positive $\varepsilon$. Sawin's explicit bound gives more than $n^{1.014}$ unit distances for arbitrarily large $n$ and exposes integer parameters whose choice is not fully optimized. This report starts from Sawin's nonlinear integer optimization problem and develops an open-source Python verification pipeline. The pipeline is first validated by reproducing Sawin's published parameter choice and is then applied to computationally improved certificates. We optimize and verify certificates involving sets of primes $T$ and $S_Q$, integer multiplicities $k(p)$, and a rationally encoded real parameter $R$. The implementation is deliberately lean, so that all results can be replicated on standard hardware and the procedures can be extended. We compare a deterministic greedy heuristic, a tailored integer evolution strategy with two-sided geometric, or discrete-Laplace, integer mutation and repair operators for number-theoretic feasibility, and a two-parent discrete-recombination variant. Four certificate levels are reported: Sawin's published example with $δ=0.0141144286784982\ldots$, a greedy certificate with $δ=0.0151718056372133\ldots$, a tailored integer evolution strategy certificate with $R=6672416/100000$ and $δ=0.0152616610684193\ldots$, and a recombination variant with the same $R$ and $δ=0.0152628688170072\ldots$. Consequently, the best current certificate supports the cautious statement $u(n)>n^{1.0152}$ for arbitrarily large $n$. Beyond this unit-distance application, the work illustrates how randomized optimization heuristics can improve explicit certificates in pure mathematics and combinatorial geometry.