arXiv++ Combinatorics

Two graphs $G$ and $H$ are homomorphism indistinguishable over a graph class $\mathcal{F}$ if, for every graph $F \in \mathcal{F}$, the number of homomorphisms from $F$ to $G$ is equal to the number of homomorphisms from $F$ to $H$. Lovász (Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica, 1967) showed that two graphs are isomorphic if, and only if, they are homomorphism indistinguishable over all graphs. Subsequently, homomorphism indistinguishability relations of a long list of natural graph classes have been equated with natural graph isomorphism relaxations. Given the wealth of such results, Atserias, Kolaitis, & Wu (LICS 2021) asked for an axiomatic characterisation of homomorphism indistinguishability relations. By exhibiting topological and geometric structure associated with homomorphism indistinguishability, we derive such an axiomatic characterisation. Here, a central ingredient is a novel characterisation of graph parameters of the form $\hom(F, \star)$ for some graph $F$ alternative to a previous result of Lovász & Schrijver (JCTA 2010). Moreover, we investigate the topology of homomorphism indistinguishability and discuss repercussions for the Ulam--Kelly Reconstruction Conjecture.

We prove several negative results about first-order transducibility for classes of sparse graphs: - for every $t \in \mathbb{N}$, the class of graphs of treewidth at most $t+1$ is not transducible from the class of graphs of treewidth at most $t$; - for every $t \in \mathbb{N}$, the class of graphs with Hadwiger number at most $t+2$ is not transducible from the class of graphs with Hadwiger number at most $t$; and - the class of graphs of treewidth at most $4$ is not transducible from the class of planar graphs. These results are obtained by combining the known upper and lower bounds on the weak coloring numbers of the considered graph classes with the following two new observations: - If a weakly sparse graph class $\mathscr D$ is transducible from a class $\mathscr C$ of bounded expansion, then for some $k \in \mathbb{N}$, every graph $G \in \mathscr D$ is a $k$-congested depth-$k$ minor of a graph $H^\circ$ obtained from some $H\in \mathscr C$ by adding a universal vertex. - The operations of adding a universal vertex and of taking $k$-congested depth-$k$ minors, for a fixed $k$, preserve the degree of the distance-$d$ weak coloring number of a graph class, understood as a polynomial in $d$.

We refute the Strong Roberson Conjecture, which asserts that adding any graph outside a class closed under minors and disjoint unions strictly increases the distinguishing power of homomorphism counts from that class. More precisely, we construct connected graphs $H$ for which counts from graphs excluding $H$ as a minor determine the number of homomorphisms from $H$ to any target graph. We also refute the analogous conjecture with immersions in place of minors. We give explicit infinite families of excluded graphs, including cubic bipartite graphs that yield counterexamples for both relations. The proof introduces a method for deriving exact homomorphism count dependence from modular equivalences. We obtain these equivalences for infinitely many primes using prime-order automorphisms of graphs that exclude their orbit quotients as minors or immersions.

In 1965, D. H. Lehmer conjectured that the permutations of every multiset admit an imperfect Hamiltonian traversal by adjacent swaps: a walk in the neighbor-swap graph that visits every word, with some words visited twice in order to reach a neighbor and return. The question is posed as an unsolved research problem in Knuth's Art of Computer Programming. Verhoeff (2017) chose the stutter words, in which every domino is a double, as the words to be reached this way, and reformulated the conjecture as the Hamiltonicity of the graph $N(S)$ on the non-stutter words, with two exceptional families --- binary signatures with an odd multiplicity, and the permutations of $(2k,1,1)$ --- that admit a Hamiltonian path but no cycle. This article proves the reformulated conjecture, and with it Lehmer's conjecture. The key structure is a partition of the words into hypercubes: the swaps inside dominoes turn each class of words with the same domino contents into a hypercube, and the stutters are exactly the $0$-dimensional classes. When every multiplicity is even, Hamiltonian cycles of the hypercubes are glued along a spanning tree, with no finite check. The case of exactly one odd multiplicity reduces to the all-even case and to a theorem of Stachowiak (1992), the one inherited Hamiltonicity input, which also settles two or more odd multiplicities. The only finite ingredients are two explicit cycles, of 28 and 84 words. Every construction is implemented in Python and checked against brute-force graphs, and the proof is formalized in Lean 4 over Mathlib.

We give an algorithm counting the permutations that avoid a fixed pattern of the following form: the direct sum of an increasing pattern and 231. The first members of the family are 1342 and 12453. For each member the algorithm uses polynomially many operations and stored integers, with degrees that grow linearly in the length of the pattern. It comes from a recurrence that reads a permutation from left to right and records the constraints that the letters read so far impose on those still unread. This recurrence has exponentially many states, but part of each state is protected: later steps carry it along unchanged and do not depend on it, and factoring the protected part out leaves a dynamic program of polynomial size. For 12453 a translation symmetry sharpens the bounds to degree seven for the operations and degree four for the storage. We also compute the number of 12453-avoiding permutations of every length up to 150. The previously published series, due to Biers-Ariel (2019), reached length 38. We also give a sampler of uniformly random avoiders. A floating-point implementation of it, proved to be within total variation distance $3.5\cdot10^{-5}$ of uniform for ideal random bits, draws the one million 12453-avoiding permutations of length 300 shown in a heatmap. The literal and kernel recurrences for 1342 and 12453 are verified in the Lean 4 proof assistant.

A class of graphs is monadically dependent if one cannot encode all graphs in coloured graphs from the class using a fixed first-order formula, and monadically stable if one cannot even encode arbitrarily long linear orders. Bonnet et al. (ICALP 2025) characterised monadic dependence by flip-separability: for every vertex weighting, boundedly many flips - complementations of the adjacency relation within a vertex subset - make every ball of radius $r$ carry at most an $\varepsilon$-fraction of the weight, so that every set carrying an $\varepsilon$-fraction has two elements pulled apart. We introduce flip-packability: boundedly many graphs, each obtained from the input by boundedly many flips and all determined by the weighting before any set is presented, such that every set carrying an $\varepsilon$-fraction of the weight has $m$ elements pairwise far apart in one of them. The number of flips producing each graph depends on the radius alone; only the number of graphs depends on $\varepsilon$ and $m$. We prove that a class of graphs is flip-packable if and only if it is monadically stable, and $2$-flip-packable, that is, flip-packable with $m=2$, if and only if it is monadically dependent. The passage from two scattered elements to $m$ is thus exactly what separates the two notions. For monadically stable classes we show that the flipped graphs can be computed from the weighting in cubic time. Varying the three parameters of the definition - the sparsifying operation, the radius, and the number $m$ of elements scattered - produces eight known characterisations of sparse and dense graph classes from the same template. In each case $m$ separates a depth-like notion from its width-like relaxation: treedepth from treewidth, shrubdepth from cliquewidth, and monadic stability from monadic dependence.

In the field of constraint satisfaction problems (CSP), a clause is called redundant if its satisfaction is implied by satisfying all other clauses. An instance of CSP$(P)$ is called non-redundant if it does not contain any redundant clause. The non-redundancy (NRD) of a predicate $P$ is the maximum number of clauses in a non-redundant instance of CSP$(P)$, as a function of the number of variables $n$. Recent progress has shown that non-redundancy is crucially linked to many other important questions in computer science and mathematics including sparsification, kernelization, query complexity, universal algebra, and extremal combinatorics. Given that non-redundancy is a nexus for many of these important problems, the central goal of this paper is to more deeply understand non-redundancy. Our first main result shows that for every rational number $r \ge 1$, there exists a finite CSP predicate $P$ such that the non-redundancy of $P$ is $Θ(n^r)$. Our second main result explores the concept of conditional non-redundancy first coined by Brakensiek and Guruswami [STOC 2025]. We completely classify the conditional non-redundancy of all binary predicates (i.e., constraints on two variables) by connecting these non-redundancy problems to the structure of high-girth graphs in extremal combinatorics. Inspired by these concrete results, we build off the work of Carbonnel [CP 2022] to develop an algebraic theory of conditional non-redundancy. As an application of this algebraic theory, we revisit the notion of Mal'tsev embeddings, which is the most general technique known to date for establishing that a predicate has linear non-redundancy. For example, we provide the first example of predicate with a Mal'tsev embedding that cannot be attributed to the structure of an Abelian group, but rather to the structure of the quantum Pauli group.

A graph is biplanar if it is the union of two planar graphs on the same vertex set. The largest chromatic number of a biplanar graph is known to lie between 9 and 12. The lower bound comes from Sulanke's graph, which has independence number 2, and a biplanar graph on 19 vertices with independence number 2 would have chromatic number at least 10. Gethner and Sulanke asked in 2009 whether such a graph exists. We show that it does not, and more generally that every biplanar graph with independence number at most 2 is 9-colorable. The proof embeds a hypothetical counterexample in the union of two sphere triangulations, enumerates with SAT modulo symmetries the 3271 graphs that pass a necessary filter for the complement of such a union, and shows with a SAT solver that none of them is such a complement; a matching argument reduces the general statement to this computation and one further case on 18 vertices. The computational part of the proof, including the completeness of the enumeration and every refutation, is checked in Lean 4, assuming three classical facts about planar graphs. The Lean development, the SAT instances, and the enumeration certificates are available on Zenodo.

We say that an instance of a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is non-redundant if the satisfaction of each clause cannot be implied by the satisfaction of the other clauses in the instance. The non-redundancy (NRD) of a CSP is the maximal number of clauses a non-redundant instance can have for a given number of variables. NRD is closely tied to the behavior of CSPs in various computational models including their sparsification, kernelization, and streaming complexity. A primary open question in the study of non-redundancy is the identification of which CSP predicates have near-linear NRD. Recent works by Carbonnel [CP 2022], Khanna, Putterman and Sudan [STOC 2025], Brakensiek and Guruswami [STOC 2025] and Brakensiek, Guruswami, Jansen, Lagerkvist, and Wahlström [2025] have introduced various forms of gadget reductions between CSPs to relate their non-redundancy. The primary contribution of this work is to recontextualize many of these gadget reductions in a framework which we call hypergraph projections. By studying a quantity we call the shrinking factor of these hypergraph projections, we can more precisely predict when a gadget reduction between predicates can yield a super-linear NRD lower bound, greatly improving on the analysis of previous works. To illustrate the power of our framework, we identify some concrete CSP predicates whose non-redundancy is at the cusp of our understanding and show how our methods give lower bounds that could not have been achieved with previous methods. We also demonstrate how these gadget reductions can be automatically deduced using SAT solvers, thereby opening up novel computational avenues for discovering further relationships between the non-redundancy of various CSPs.

Let $D_d(m)$ be the Cartesian product of $d$ positively oriented directed cycles of length $m$. We prove that $D_d(m)$ decomposes into $d$ directed Hamilton cycles for every $m\ge3$ and $d\ge2$. The construction proceeds by splitting coordinate directions in directed multitori. An integer selection theorem supplies unit voltages compatible with the prescribed arc multiplicities; at even modulus, the decisive condition is the parity of each incidence component. For even $m$ and odd $d\ge7$, we satisfy this condition with a factorization having one additional cycle. A relative lifting theorem preserves the first-return data of a three-colour recolouring through successive coordinate splits, after which the recolouring removes the additional cycle on a set whose size is independent of the dimension. Explicit constructions complete the low-dimensional cases. The theorem yields Hamilton decompositions of Cartesian products of equal-order, equal-degree Hamilton-decomposable digraphs, of abelian Cayley digraphs whose generators partition into module bases, and of a family of height-stretched directed tori.

We prove that the quantum monad in dimension $2n$ admits no natural transformation to the polymorphism clone of linear equations modulo $n$. Consequently, for every $n\geq 2$, there exists an unsatisfiable system of linear equations over $\mathbb{Z}_n$ whose constraint system game admits a perfect finite-dimensional quantum strategy. As a corollary, we completely characterise pseudo-telepathic constraint languages in finite dimension. The proof combines a result of Harding, Jager, and Smith on group-valued measures on subspaces of Hilbert spaces with the polymorphism-minion characterisation of quantum pseudo-telepathy.

Kolokolnikov conjectured that, among all simple graphs on \(n\) vertices with exactly \(2(n-2)\) edges, the complete bipartite graph maximizes algebraic connectivity. This paper proves the conjecture. The underlying Lean~4 formalization was generated with MerLean and checked by the Lean kernel.

For a finite set $S$ with $\lvert S\rvert = N$, the number of families $\mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{P}(S)$ that are topological bases is $\#(N) = \sum_{\mathcal{T} \in \operatorname{Top}(S)} 2^{\lvert\mathcal{T}\rvert - \lvert\mathcal{M}_{\mathcal{T}}\rvert}$, where $\mathcal{M}_{\mathcal{T}}$ is the canonical minimal basis of minimal open neighborhoods. The identity is proved in Lean 4 / Mathlib (`CARDB.lean`): bases generating $\mathcal{T}$ are exactly the sets with $\mathcal{M}_{\mathcal{T}} \subseteq \mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{T}$. The small-$N$ table and the discrete-dominance sandwich are proved in `CARDB/SmallN.lean` and `CARDB/Asymptotics.lean`.

We present a method for partitioning the solution space of statements in extremal set theory. Compared with domain-agnostic partitioning methods like look-ahead, we perform case analysis on the strategies by which a candidate solution can be constructed. We demonstrate that our approach can decompose problems in extremal set theory more effectively than look-ahead. Combining this new partitioning strategy with an exact proof-producing MILP solver, we are able to verify larger finite cases of Chvátal's Conjecture---a long-standing open question in extremal combinatorics---compared to previous work.

We prove that, on finite graphs of rank-width at most two, VR-recognizability and counting monadic second-order definability coincide. This advances the recognizability-versus-definability problem from bounded linear clique-width to the first nontrivial bounded rank-width level beyond the rank-width-one split-decomposition case. The proof first treats split-prime graphs. The maximal partial-tree theory of Clark and Whittle organizes the non-sequential cut-rank-two separations, while a single strong separation orients all strong equivalence classes and yields a CMSO-definable laminar family of canonical cores. Although the auxiliary partial tree is not itself transduced, it proves that every canonical local piece has a port-contiguous layout of uniformly bounded linear rank-width. The width argument uses partition atoms and the branch-width-three display theorem of Hall, Oxley, Semple, and Whittle and does not assume that graph torsos remain prime. Coherent ordered rank-two frames then permit a finite-state bottom-up evaluation whose local transitions are definable by the bounded-linear-clique-width theorem of Bojańczyk, Grohe, and Pilipczuk. Finally, the CMSO-transducible canonical split decomposition lifts the result from prime graphs to arbitrary graphs of rank-width at most two.

We introduce, for every surface $Σ$, a two-way connection between definability of a graph class $\mathcal C$ by FO transductions (first-order logical transformations) of the graphs embeddable in $Σ$ and a certain variant of fan-crossing drawings of the graphs from $\mathcal C$ in $Σ$. If $\mathcal C$ is additionally of bounded maximum degree, then the restriction on drawings of the graphs from $\mathcal C$ in $Σ$ is simply to have a bounded number of crossings per edge (such as being $k$-planar for fixed~$k$ if $Σ$ is the plane). For graph classes, this connection allows us to derive non-transducibility results from the nonexistence of the said drawings and, conversely, from the nonexistence of a transduction to derive nonexistence of the said drawings. One example of such reasoning is as follows; since the class of 3D-grids is not transducible from the class of planar graphs, we can conclude that the class of 3D-grids is not $k$-planar for any fixed~$k$. On the other hand, the fact that the class of 3D-grids is not $k$-planar for any fixed~$k$ is known also via other means, and this conversely implies that the class of 3D-grids is not transducible from the class of planar graphs. We hope that this connection will help to draw a path to a possible proof that not all toroidal graphs are transducible from planar graphs. The result is based on a recent characterization of weakly sparse FO transductions of classes of bounded expansion by [Gajarský, Gładkowski, Jedelský, Pilipczuk and Toruńczyk, arXiv:2505.15655].

Lovász (1967) showed that two graphs $G$ and $H$ are isomorphic if, and only if, they are homomorphism indistinguishable over all graphs, i.e., $G$ and $H$ admit the same number of number of homomorphisms from every graph $F$. Subsequently, a substantial line of work studied homomorphism indistinguishability over restricted graph classes. For example, homomorphism indistinguishability over minor-closed graph classes $\mathcal{F}$ such as the class of planar graphs, the class of graphs of treewidth $\leq k$, pathwidth $\leq k$, or treedepth $\leq k$, was shown to be equivalent to quantum isomorphism and equivalences with respect to counting logic fragments, respectively. Via such characterisations, the distinguishing power of e.g. logical or quantum graph isomorphism relaxations can be studied with graph-theoretic means. In this vein, Roberson (2022) conjectured that homomorphism indistinguishability over every graph class excluding some minor is not the same as isomorphism. We prove this conjecture for all vortex-free graph classes. In particular, homomorphism indistinguishability over graphs of bounded Euler genus is not the same as isomorphism. As a negative result, we show that Roberson's conjecture fails when generalised to graph classes excluding a topological minor. Furthermore, we show homomorphism distinguishing closedness for several graph classes including all topological-minor-closed and union-closed classes of forests, and show that homomorphism indistinguishability over graphs of genus $\leq g$ (and other parameters) forms a strict hierarchy.

Algebraic combinatorics often seeks bijections that explain identities between distributions object by object. Encoding combinatorial objects as words lets automata theory study such a bijection as a word-to-word computation and measure its memory, input access, and control of output order. This refines existence questions by asking which computational mechanisms a bijection requires. We develop this viewpoint for Dyck paths. Our motivating example is the $q,t$-Catalan polynomial. Let $D_n$ be the set of Dyck paths of semilength $n$, let $D=\bigcup_{n\ge 0}D_n$, and let $area, dinv, bounce \colon D\to\mathbb{N}$ be the standard statistics. Then, \[ C_n(q,t)=\sum_{P\in D_n}q^{area(P)}t^{bounce(P)} =\sum_{P\in D_n}q^{dinv(P)}t^{area(P)}. \] Haglund's zeta map $ζ\colon D\to D$ gives a bijective proof: it preserves semilength and sends $(dinv,area)$ to $(area,bounce)$. By contrast, the full symmetry $C_n(q,t)=C_n(t,q)$ still lacks a direct explanation: no explicit, uniform, semilength-preserving bijection is known that swaps area and dinv on every Dyck path. Polyregular maps from automata theory provide a natural computational starting point, but we prove that neither $ζ$ nor the classical height-sweep bijection witnessing Narayana symmetry is polyregular. The missing mechanism is global ordering by numerical levels whose range grows with the input. We call this a \emph{rank sort} and introduce \emph{weighted-rank polyregular maps} (WRP), extending polyregular maps by one such sort and containing both bijections. Nevertheless, WRP is a proper subclass of deterministic logspace. We prove that $ζ^{-1}$ lies outside WRP and that no WRP map can realise a semilength-preserving area-dinv swap. Thus the rank-sorting strategy behind $ζ$ cannot be extended within WRP to exchange the two statistics.

We report on our ongoing project to develop a computational pipeline, AutoGraphForge, for an automated graph-theoretic conjecturing-refuting-formalizing-proving system. Conjecture generation is counterexample-guided and runs in rounds: a Graffiti3 generator proposes conjectures over a small, evolving snapshot table $T$ (initially a few hundred graphs with their computed invariants) that grows only by counterexamples to its own conjectures. A novelty filter of $559$ classical and folklore relations, closed under transitive composition and linear identity substitution, decides via a linear program whether a candidate is already implied by known results. Surviving candidates are tested against a dataset of about $348,000$ graphs, unioning the complete House of Graphs invariant export, the exhaustive census of all connected graphs on at most nine vertices, several extremal families (strongly regular, minimal Ramsey, Cayley, cages, barbells, lollipops, spiders), and random models. Counterexample-search algorithms then attack the remainder. Run for several rounds on an HPC cluster, the loop yields $6,522$ conjectures that survived the refutation dataset, the novelty filter and every active-search run -- among them nontrivial relations between the annihilation number and the edge-cover number for bipartite and regular graphs, which we prove by hand. A subsequent formalization and proving stage deterministically translates each surviving conjecture into a Lean 4 statement skeleton; every candidate proof is kernel-verified against a pinned mathlib4 and our custom invariant preamble. This stage integrates two neural provers -- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (served with vLLM) and the Lean-specialised OProver-32B -- behind the independent kernel check. It is implemented end-to-end and passes initial sanity checks, with the full pipeline currently running on the cluster.

The two-dimensional bandwidth minimization problem (2DBMP) seeks an injective embedding of a guest graph into a square grid that minimizes the maximum Manhattan distance over its edges. Heuristic methods can provide strong upper bounds, but these bounds do not by themselves certify optimality. We present an efficient exact SAT-based approach for 2DBMP that incrementally searches for the minimum feasible bandwidth and certifies optimality through satisfiability and unsatisfiability results. On the standard $\lceil\sqrt n\rceil \times \lceil\sqrt n\rceil$ host grid, under a 3600 s time limit, the proposed SAT approach certifies optimal bandwidths for 41 of 43 Regular instances and 42 of 93 Harwell--Boeing instances, achieving substantially broader optimality certification within the 3600 s time limit than a previous exact approach evaluated with a 72-hour time limit. In addition, it certifies three bandwidth values that improve all previously published comparison values considered in this study and establishes all three as optimal. We further evaluate the approach on alternative host geometries, namely $2\times\lceil n/2\rceil$ and $n\times n$ grids, to assess its effectiveness beyond the standard host. Overall, the results demonstrate that the proposed SAT approach provides an effective exact method for the small- and medium-sized benchmark instances considered in this study, with fewer than 400 vertices, while heuristic methods remain important for larger and more challenging instances.